Cited by 440Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sleep Preferentially Enhances Memory for Emotional Components of Scenes

Open access

Abstract

Central aspects of emotional experiences are often well remembered at the expense of background details. Previous studies of such memory trade-offs have focused on memory after brief delays, but little is known about how these components of emotional memories change over time. We investigated the evolution of memory for negative scenes across 30 min, 12 daytime hours spent awake, and 12 nighttime hours including sleep. After 30 min, negative objects were well remembered at the expense of information about their backgrounds. Time spent awake led to forgetting of the entire negative scene, with memories of objects and their backgrounds decaying at similar rates. Sleep, in contrast, led to a preservation of memories of negative objects, but not their backgrounds, a result suggesting that the two components undergo differential processing during sleep. Memory for a negative scene develops differentially across time delays containing sleep and wake, with sleep selectively consolidating those aspects of memory that are of greatest value to the organism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02157.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
Payne, J. D., Stickgold, R., Swanberg, K., & Kensinger, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Payne, Jessica D.
  • Kensinger, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2008-08
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
781-788
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2163520994
Cited by
440
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 26
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH048832)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
sleep-dependent memory consolidation, emotional memory, scene memory, memory decay, forgetting, time delay effects
MeSH terms
Arousal, Attention, Circadian Rhythm, Emotions, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Retention, Psychology, Sleep, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review