Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individual Differences: Interplay of Learner Characteristics and Learning Environment

Dörnyei, Zoltán·2009·Language Learning
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00542.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The notion of language as a complex adaptive system has been conceived within an agent‐based framework, which highlights the significance of individual‐level variation in the characteristics and contextual circumstances of the learner/speaker. Yet, in spite of this emphasis, currently we know relatively little about the interplay among language, agent, and environment in the language acquisition process, which highlights the need for further research in this area. This article is intended to pursue this agenda by discussing four key issues in this respect: (a) conceptualizing the agent, (b) conceptualizing the environment and its relationship to the agent, (c) operationalizing the dynamic relationship among language, agent, and environment, and (d) researching dynamic systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00542.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Abrams D., 1999, Social identity and social cognition
  2. Allport G. W., 1937, Personality: A psychological interpretation
  3. 10.1002/neu.10160 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1017/S0140525X05250045 · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05250045
  5. 10.4135/9781849209311 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0263276405057194 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00712.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1017/S1366728906002732 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dörnyei Z., 2003, Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning, 3
  10. Dörnyei Z., 2005, The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition
  11. Dörnyei Z., 2007, Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies
  12. Dörnyei Z., 2009, The psychology of second language acquisition
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511667138 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dörnyei Z., 2009, Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass, 117
  15. Ehrman M. E., 1998, Interpersonal dynamics in second language education: The visible and in‐visible classroom
  16. 10.1017/S1366728906002744 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/applin/aml028 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gass S. M., 2007, Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction, 175
  20. Harklau L., 2005, Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 179
  21. 10.1016/j.dr.2005.09.002 · DOI
  22. Lafford B. A., 2007, Second language acquisition reconceptualized? The impact of Firth and Wagner (1997) [Focus issue, Modern Language Journal, 91, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00666.x · DOI
  23. Lantolf J. P., 2006, Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development
  24. 10.1017/S136672890600277X · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00668.x · DOI
  26. Larsen‐Freeman D., 2008, Complex systems and applied linguistics
  27. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00714.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. Lewin K., 1951, Field theory in social science
  29. 10.4324/9780203880852 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80119-7 · DOI
  31. 10.4135/9781412984867 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.7551/mitpress/3666.001.0001 · DOI
  33. 10.1075/lllt.2 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1075/lllt.2.08rob · DOI
  35. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.015 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Scherer K. R., 1995, Plato's legacy: Relationships between cognition, emotion, and motivation, Geneva Studies in Emotion and Communication, 9, 1
  37. Schieffelin B., 1986, Language socialization across cultures
  38. Skehan P., 1989, Individual differences in second language learning
  39. Thelen E., 1994, A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action, 10.7551/mitpress/2524.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Toohey K., 2008, Encyclopedia of language and education:Vol. 10. Research methods, 177
  41. 10.1207/S15326985EP3502_2 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00713.x · DOI
  43. Van Gelder T., 1995, Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition, 1
  44. 10.1007/978-94-011-4535-0_13 · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4535-0_13
  45. 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00233.x · DOI · Paper page
  46. Zuengler J., 2005, Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 301
  47. 10.2307/40264510 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1093/applin/23.3.283 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dörnyei, Z.
Venue
Language Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-24
Volume
59
Issue
s1
Pages
230-248
ISSN
  • 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9922
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00542.x
OpenAlex
W1957440361
Cited by
373
References
6
FWCI
80.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.