CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 147Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Response perseveration and delayed responding in childhood behavior disorders

Daugherty, Timothy K., Quay, Herbert C.·1991·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00323.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Students (N = 814) in grades 3 through 6 at a public school were screened for behavior problems using the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Fifty-three selected students, representing Conduct Disorder, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Conduct Disorder plus Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Anxiety-Withdrawal Disorder, and normal controls were administered a response perseveration task and delayed responding task (DRL). It was predicted that performance on the two tasks would vary as a function of group membership. While DRL performance did not vary between groups, findings on the response perseveration task provided support for the hypothesis of the perseverative responding for reward in Conduct Disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00323.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In two of three DOT studies, children with ADHD and comorbid ODD/CD played the task longer and ran more risks than NCs (Cohen's d = 0.97 and 1.32).

    “Two out of the three studies reported that children with ADHD and comorbid ODD/CD played the task longer and therefore ran more risks than the NCs [35], [53] (Cohen’s d respectively = 0.97 and 1.32).”

    From Risky behavior in gambling tasks in individuals with ADHD–a systematic literature review (2013) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Ten studies used an implicit gambling task, of which five (50%) found clear evidence that children/adolescents with ADHD displayed more risky behavior than NCs.

    “Ten studies used an implicit gambling task, of which five studies (5/10 = 50%) found clear evidence that children/adolescents with ADHD displayed more risky behavior than NCs [35], [47], [49], [53], [55].”

    From Risky behavior in gambling tasks in individuals with ADHD–a systematic literature review (2013) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Of the 13 studies using tangible rewards, 6 (46%) found a group effect.

    “of which six studies found a group effect [35], [40], [47], [49], [53], [55] and seven studies had null findings [41], [50], [52], [59], [61], [65], [68] (6/13 = 46% of the studies using tangible rewards had positive findings)”

    From Risky behavior in gambling tasks in individuals with ADHD–a systematic literature review (2013) · cites this paper as [35]

  • The two remaining studies with positive findings did not specify whether participants were on medication at the time of assessment.

    “The two remaining studies with positive findings unfortunately did not specify whether participants were on medication at the time of assessment [35], [47].”

    From Risky behavior in gambling tasks in individuals with ADHD–a systematic literature review (2013) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Three studies found that individuals with ADHD-C had performed in a more risky fashion than the NCs.

    “Furthermore, three studies found that individuals with ADHD-C had performed in a more risky fashion than the NCs [35], [47], [63] (3/10 = 30% of studies with positive findings).”

    From Risky behavior in gambling tasks in individuals with ADHD–a systematic literature review (2013) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Daugherty, T. K., & Quay, H. C.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Quay, Herbert C.
ORCID
Daugherty, Timothy K.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-03
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
453-461
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
DOI
10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00323.x
OpenAlex
W2061115325
Cited by
147
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 5760 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BearWorks (Missouri State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
response perseveration, conduct disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children with behavioral disorders, executive function, elementary school students
MeSH terms
Achievement, Anxiety Disorders, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Extinction, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review