Cited by 113Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

The Effect of Metformin on Fat Distribution and the Metabolic Syndrome in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome–A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Lord, J, Thomas, R, Fox, B, Acharya, U, Wilkin, T·2006·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether metformin has a significant action in reducing visceral fat and improving other metabolic parameters in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Reproductive medicine clinic. POPULATION: Forty women with anovulatory PCOS. METHODS: Participants were randomised into receiving metformin 500 mg three times a day or placebo for 3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fat distribution was measured by computed tomography scan. Secondary outcome measures included serum indices of the metabolic syndrome and evidence of ovulation. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in any of the measures of fat distribution between the placebo and metformin groups. The metformin group had significantly lower total cholesterol (P= 0.02), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P= 0.02) and cholesterol:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (P= 0.05), but there was no statistically significant treatment effect on androgens, insulin, insulin resistance, triglycerides, ovulation or pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin has no clinically significant effect in reducing visceral fat mass, although it does have a beneficial effect on lipids. This trial lends support to the growing evidence that metformin is not a weight loss drug. Metformin might therefore be used as an adjunct to lifestyle modification in women with PCOS, but not as a substitute for it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00966.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lord, J., Thomas, R., Fox, B., Acharya, U., & Wilkin, T.
Affiliations
  • Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust (GB)
  • Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Derriford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Lord, J
ORCID
Lord, J
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-22
Volume
113
Issue
7
Pages
817-824
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2076863250
Cited by
113
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
metformin, polycystic ovary syndrome, metabolic syndrome, visceral fat, body fat distribution, lipid profile, cholesterol, insulin resistance, ovulation, anovulation, weight loss, lifestyle modification
MeSH terms
Adult, Anovulation, Cholesterol, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Metformin, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Observer Variation, Subcutaneous Fat, Intra-Abdominal Fat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review