The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extended Practice and Aerobic Exercise Interventions Benefit Untrained Cognitive Outcomes in Older Adults: A Meta‐Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To examine whether therapeutic interventions of extended practice of cognitive tasks or aerobic exercise have led to significant improvement in untrained cognitive tasks. Design: The PSYCINFO, MEDLINE, and Abstracts in Social Gerontology databases were searched for English‐language studies of cognitive interventions of exercise or extended cognitive practice between 1966 and 2010. The final search was in January 2011. Studies included were experimental interventions hypothesizing improvement on untrained cognitive outcomes with pre‐ and posttests. Studies of varying quality were included and compared. Setting: Interventions generally took place in laboratories, in gymnasium facilities, in the home, and outdoors. Experimenters administered testing. Participants: Forty‐two studies with 3,781 healthy older adults aged 55 and older were analyzed. Measurements: Between‐group effect sizes ( ES s), which account for practice effects on outcome measures, and within‐experimental group ES s were computed from untrained cognitive outcome domains, including choice reaction time, memory, and executive function, and compared. ES s were also coded for training type and study quality. Multilevel mixed‐effect analyses accommodated multiple outcomes from individual studies. Results: Extended practice (estimated ES = 0.33, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) = 0.13–0.52) and aerobic fitness (estimated ES = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.10–0.55) training produced significant between‐group ES s, but they did not differ in magnitude. Better study quality was associated with larger ES s. Conclusion: Findings indicate that aerobic and extended cognitive practice training interventions for healthy older adults improve performance on untrained cognitive tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aerobic Exercise Training Increases Brain Volume in Aging Humans
Colcombe, S. J., Erickson, K. I., Scalf, P. E., Kim, J. S., Prakash, R., McAuley, E., Elavsky, S., Marquez, D. X., Hu, L., & Kramer, A. F. (2006) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/61.11.1166 · Cited by 2,134
Effects of Cognitive Training Interventions With Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ball, K., Berch, D. B., Helmers, K. F., Jobe, J. B., Leveck, M. D., Marsiske, M., Morris, J. N., Rebok, G. W., Smith, D. M., Tennstedt, S. L., et al. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.18.2271 · Cited by 2,049
Smith, P. J., Blumenthal, J. A., Hoffman, B. M., Cooper, H., Strauman, T. A., Welsh-Bohmer, K., Browndyke, J. N., & Sherwood, A. (2010) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3181d14633 · Cited by 1,714
An in vivo correlate of exercise-induced neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus
Pereira, A. C., Huddleston, D. E., Brickman, A. M., Sosunov, A. A., Hen, R., McKhann, G. M., Sloan, R., Gage, F. H., Brown, T. R., & Small, S. A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611721104 · Cited by 1,353
A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity
Lövdén, M., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., & Schmiedek, F. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0020080 · Cited by 731
Working memory plasticity in old age: practice gain, transfer, and maintenance
Li, S.-C., Schmiedek, F., Huxhold, O., Röcke, C., Smith, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0014343 · Cited by 369
A five-phase model for clinical-outcome research
Robey, R. R. (2004) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.04.003 · Cited by 288
Experience-dependent plasticity of white-matter microstructure extends into old age
Lövdén, M., Bodammer, N. C., Kühn, S., Kaufmann, J., Schütze, H., Tempelmann, C., Heinze, H.-J., Düzel, E., Schmiedek, F., & Lindenberger, U. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.026 · Cited by 222
Cited by
Diamond, A., & Ling, D. S. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005 · Cited by 1,177
Karbach, J., & Verhaeghen, P. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614548725 · Cited by 589
Mikulska, J., Juszczyk, G., Gawrońska-Grzywacz, M., & Herbet, M. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11101298 · Cited by 450
Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies
Soveri, A., Antfolk, J., Karlsson, L., Salo, B., & Laine, M. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1217-0 · Cited by 371
“…2016; Melby-Lervåg et al., 2016; Schwaighofer, Fischer, & Bühner, 2015; Weicker, Villringer, & Thöne-Otto, 2016; for meta-analyses investigating not only WM training, see Hindin & Zelinski, 2012; Karbach, & Verhaeghen, 2014; Karr, Areshenkoff, Rast, & GarciaBarrera, 2014; Kelly et al., 2014).”
Ueda, T., Suzukamo, Y., Sato, M., & Izumi, S.-I. (2013) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2013.02.003 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Hindin, S. B., & Zelinski, E. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-08
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 136-141
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2014877105
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extended Practice and Aerobic Exercise Interventions Benefit Untrained Cognitive Outcomes in Older Adults: A Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03761.x
- The paper
- Hindin, S. B., & Zelinski, E. M. (2012). Extended Practice and Aerobic Exercise Interventions Benefit Untrained Cognitive Outcomes in Older Adults: A Meta‐Analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03761.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
