Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extended Practice and Aerobic Exercise Interventions Benefit Untrained Cognitive Outcomes in Older Adults: A Meta‐Analysis

Open access
Hindin, Shoshana B., Zelinski, Elizabeth M.·2012·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To examine whether therapeutic interventions of extended practice of cognitive tasks or aerobic exercise have led to significant improvement in untrained cognitive tasks. Design: The PSYCINFO, MEDLINE, and Abstracts in Social Gerontology databases were searched for English‐language studies of cognitive interventions of exercise or extended cognitive practice between 1966 and 2010. The final search was in January 2011. Studies included were experimental interventions hypothesizing improvement on untrained cognitive outcomes with pre‐ and posttests. Studies of varying quality were included and compared. Setting: Interventions generally took place in laboratories, in gymnasium facilities, in the home, and outdoors. Experimenters administered testing. Participants: Forty‐two studies with 3,781 healthy older adults aged 55 and older were analyzed. Measurements: Between‐group effect sizes ( ES s), which account for practice effects on outcome measures, and within‐experimental group ES s were computed from untrained cognitive outcome domains, including choice reaction time, memory, and executive function, and compared. ES s were also coded for training type and study quality. Multilevel mixed‐effect analyses accommodated multiple outcomes from individual studies. Results: Extended practice (estimated ES = 0.33, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) = 0.13–0.52) and aerobic fitness (estimated ES = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.10–0.55) training produced significant between‐group ES s, but they did not differ in magnitude. Better study quality was associated with larger ES s. Conclusion: Findings indicate that aerobic and extended cognitive practice training interventions for healthy older adults improve performance on untrained cognitive tasks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03761.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hindin, S. B., & Zelinski, E. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-08
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
136-141
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2014877105
Cited by
164
References
8
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.