Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,792

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test

Viswanath Venkatesh, Fred D. Davis·1996·Decision Sciences

Abstract

The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been widely used to predict user acceptance and use based on perceived ease of use and usefulness. However, in order to design effective training interventions to improve user acceptance, it is necessary to better understand the antecedents and determinants of key acceptance constructs. In this research, we focus on understanding the determinants of perceived ease of use. Data from three experiments spanning 108 subjects and six different systems supported our hypothesis that an individual's perception of a particular system's ease of use is anchored to her or his general computer self-efficacy at all times, and objective usability has an impact on ease of use perceptions about a specific system only after direct experience with the system. In addition to being an important research issue in user acceptance research, understanding antecedents of perceived ease of use is also important from a practical standpoint since several systems in which millions of dollars are invested are rejected because of poor user interfaces. Moreover, the actual underlying problem might be low computer self-efficacy of the target user group. In such cases, training interventions aimed at improving computer self-efficacy of users may be more effective than improved interface design for increasing user acceptance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.2307/249577 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior
  3. 10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191 · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191 · Paper page
  4. 10.1037//0003-066X.37.2.122 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1145/5666.5669 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1086/209102 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1037//0022-0167.28.5.399 · doi:10.1037//0022-0167.28.5.399 · Paper page
  8. 10.1037//0022-006X.49.6.886 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/0005-7967(80)90033-9 · DOI
  10. Card S.K., 1983, The psychology of human-computer interaction
  11. 10.1037//0022-3514.50.3.492 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 14W.W. Chin, and A. Gopal, An examination of the relative importance of four belief constructs on the GSS adoption decision: A comparison of four methods . Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1993 : 548 -557 . · DOI
  13. 10.2307/249688 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 16F.D. Davis, A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results . Doctoral dissertation , Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1986 .
  15. 10.1006/imms.1993.1022 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Davis F.D., 1989, Management Science, 35, 982, 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 20F.D. Davis, and V. Venkatesh, Measuring user acceptance of emerging information technologies: An assessment of possible method biases . Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1995 : 729 -736 .
  18. 21F.D. Davis, and V. Venkatesh, A critical assessment of possible measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments . International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, forthcoming.
  19. DeSanctis G., 1983, Psychological Reports, 52, 247, 10.2466/pr0.1983.52.1.247 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fazio R.H., 1981, Advances in Experimental Psychology, 14, 161, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60372-X · DOI · Paper page
  21. Fishbein M., 1975, Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research
  22. Ginzberg M.J., 1981, Management Science, 27, 459, 10.1287/mnsc.27.4.459 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.2307/258514 · doi:10.2307/258514 · Paper page
  24. 10.2307/258770 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1037//0021-9010.74.6.884 · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.74.6.884 · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.2307/249803 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Hill T., 1986, Advances in consumer research, 419
  29. 10.1037//0021-9010.72.2.307 · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.72.2.307 · Paper page
  30. 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Olfman L., 1991, Journal of Information Systems, 1, 249, 10.1111/j.1365-2575.1991.tb00061.x · DOI
  32. Panko J.W., 1988, End-user computing: Management, applications, and technology
  33. 10.1145/2163.2164 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Rogers E.M., 1962, Diffusion of innovations
  35. 10.2307/249590 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.2307/249621 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.2307/3151829 · doi:10.2307/3151829 · Paper page
  38. 10.2307/248951 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Swanson B.E., 1987, Decision Sciences, 18, 131, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1987.tb01508.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. Tornatzky L.G., 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29, 28, 10.1109/TEM.1982.6447463 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1177/009365092019005001 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 48V. Venkatesh, and F.D. Davis Modeling the determinants of perceived ease of use. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems , Vancouver, Canada, 1994 : 213 -227 .
  43. Ward J.R., 1985, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 5, 24, 10.1109/MCG.1985.276522 · DOI
  44. Weinberg R.S., 1980, Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 340, 10.1123/jsp.2.4.340 · DOI

Cited by

See all 3,792

Metadata

Authors
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D.
Venue
Decision Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-09
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
451-481
ISSN
  • 0011-7315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5915
OpenAlex
W2075647120
Cited by
3,792
References
9
FWCI
21.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 6939 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x
The paper
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.