CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 79

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A map for lineage restriction of progenitors during hematopoiesis: the essence of the myeloid‐based model

Kawamoto, Hiroshi, Ikawa, Tomokatsu, Masuda, Kyoko, Wada, Haruka, Katsura, Yoshimoto·2010·Immunological Reviews
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-065x.2010.00959.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Summary: Most hematology and immunology textbooks describe that the first branch point from the hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) produces two progenitors, one for myelo‐erythroid cells and the other for lymphoid cells including T and B cells. This model is based on the concept that the blood cell family can be subdivided into two major lineages, a myelo‐erythroid lineage and a lymphoid lineage. Several alternative models have been proposed during the last three decades. We proposed the myeloid‐based model in 2001, in which myeloid potential is retained in an early stage of branches toward erythroid, T‐, and B‐cell lineages. In this review, we focus on the point that cell differentiation models have two different facets: as a map of developmental potential and a cell fate map. These two are expressed in other words as a map for lineage restriction and a map for physiological production routes. We argue that a map of potential is first and foremost essential for the study of molecular mechanisms of lineage commitment, which is the least clarified aspect of cell differentiation. The validity of the myeloid‐based model of hematopoiesis will be discussed in reference to these two issues, developmental potential and cell fate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-065x.2010.00959.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1084/jem.145.6.1567 · DOI
  2. 10.1152/physrev.1924.4.4.533 · DOI
  3. Maximow A, 1935, A Text Book of Histology
  4. Ogawa M, 1983, Renewal and commitment to differentiation of hemopoietic stem cells (an interpretive review), Blood, 61, 823, 10.1182/blood.V61.5.823.823 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/bjc.1985.243 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.it.2007.07.007 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nri2525 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0952-7915(96)80053-7 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.8079170 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90407-3 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.4049/jimmunol.163.5.2681 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80269-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/intimm/9.7.1011 · DOI
  14. Kawamoto H, 1998, Presence of progenitors restricted to T, B, or myeloid lineage, but absence of multipotent stem cells, in the murine fetal thymus, J Immunol, 161, 3799, 10.4049/jimmunol.161.8.3799 · DOI
  15. 10.4049/jimmunol.162.5.2725 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80196-X · DOI
  17. 10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3519 · DOI
  18. 10.3109/08830180109056720 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80453-5 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/ni965 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00366-7 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.013 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/nri721 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.it.2006.02.004 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.it.2009.03.001 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/intimm/dxp125 · DOI
  27. 10.1182/blood-2008-08-173682 · DOI
  28. 10.1101/gad.1836009 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.03.005 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/ni.1889 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.5848 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1038/nature06840 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/nri2232 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/44076 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00049-4 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/ni1555 · DOI
  38. 10.1101/gad.1378206 · DOI
  39. 10.1182/blood-2005-07-2740 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/384474a0 · DOI
  41. 10.1084/jem.191.7.1085 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.91.20.9402 · DOI
  43. 10.1084/jem.20090934 · DOI
  44. 10.1126/science.1188995 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1126/science.1188989 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/eji.200526318 · DOI
  47. 10.1084/jem.20052444 · DOI
  48. 10.1084/jem.20031800 · DOI
  49. 10.1182/blood-2009-08-236398 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/83210 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/ni1314 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.01.014 · DOI
  53. 10.1084/jem.20030929 · DOI
  54. 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2529 · DOI
  55. 10.1182/blood-2008-04-151506 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/ni.1869 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.047 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/0167-5699(96)20031-B · DOI
  59. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00419-2 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Matutes E, 1997, Definition of acute biphenotypic leukemia, Haematologica, 82, 64
  62. 10.1038/sj.leu.2404848 · DOI
  63. 10.1182/blood-2008-10-187351 · DOI
  64. 10.3324/haematol.2009.007799 · DOI
  65. 10.1182/blood-2005-09-009977 · DOI
  66. 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2438 · DOI
  67. 10.1080/096876899294661 · DOI
  68. 10.1002/jez.1124 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/29457 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.1998.tb01261.x · DOI
  71. 10.1038/nature02740 · DOI
  72. 10.1038/ni1389 · DOI
  73. 10.1002/eji.200323461 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kawamoto, H., Ikawa, T., Masuda, K., Wada, H., & Katsura, Y.
Venue
Immunological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-25
Volume
238
Issue
1
Pages
23-36
ISSN
  • 0105-2896
  • 1600-065X
DOI
10.1111/j.1600-065x.2010.00959.x
Cited by
79
References
10
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review