Cited by 241Vitamin D Research StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionNutrition and Health Studies

Vitamin D and the occurrence of depression: causal association or circumstantial evidence?

Open access
Bertone-Johnson, Elizabeth R·2009·Nutrition Reviews

Abstract

While recent laboratory-based studies have substantially advanced our understanding of the action of vitamin D in the brain, much is still unknown concerning how vitamin D relates to mood. The few epidemiological studies of vitamin D and depression have produced inconsistent results and generally have had substantial methodological limitations. Recent findings from a randomized trial suggest that high doses of supplemental vitamin D may improve mild depressive symptoms, but important questions persist concerning how vitamin D may affect monoamine function and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response to stress, whether vitamin D supplementation can improve mood in individuals with moderate-to-severe depression, and whether vitamin D sufficiency is protective against incident depression and recurrence. At this time, it is premature to conclude that vitamin D status is related to the occurrence of depression. Additional prospective studies of this relationship are essential.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00220.x

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertone-Johnson, E. R.
Venue
Nutrition Reviews
Published
2009-08
Volume
67
Issue
8
Pages
481-492
ISSN
  • 0029-6643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-4887
OpenAlex
W2164305641
Cited by
240
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH076274, MH076274)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
vitamin D, depression, vitamin D supplementation, mood, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, depression recurrence, vitamin D sufficiency, causal relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Animals, Brain, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Premenstrual Syndrome, Stress, Psychological, Vitamin D, Vitamin D Deficiency, Biogenic Monoamines, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Seasonal Affective Disorder, Receptors, Calcitriol, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review