Cited by 31Bartonella species infections researchVector-borne infectious diseasesBacillus and Francisella bacterial research

Molecular Evidence for Bartonella spp. in Cat and Dog Fleas from Germany and France

Open access
Just, F. T., Gilles, J., Pradel, I., Pfalzer, S., Lengauer, H., Hellmann, K., Pfister, K.·2008·Zoonoses and Public Health

Abstract

Summary: Nine hundred and fifty‐two fleas were collected from 148 cats and 133 dogs at 18 widely distributed geographic locations in Germany and France and examined for the presence of six different Bartonella spp. (Bartonella bacilliformis, Bartonella clarridgeiae, Bartonella elizabethae, Bartonella henselae, Bartonella quintana, Bartonella vinsonii subsp.berkhoffii) by PCR. Thirty‐five specimens (3.7%) tested positive for either B. henselae(14 positive fleas) or B. clarridgeiae(21 positive fleas). DNA of other Bartonella spp. were not detected.Bartonella clarridgeiae was the dominating species in samples from France (19 out of 22 positive fleas), whereas B. henselae was more frequent in Germany (11 out of 13 positive fleas). With 3.5% (22 out of 632 fleas) in France and 4.1% (13 out of 320 fleas) in Germany, the overall prevalences of pathogen did not vary significantly between the flea populations of both countries. 5.4% of cats in France versus 16.1% of cats from Germany were infested by fleas carrying Bartonella, whereas 9.5% of dogs in France but none of the examined dogs from Germany were infested by Bartonella positive fleas. The molecular evidence of Bartonella infections reveals that agents of zoonotic potential are established in flea populations in Germany and France and that the spectrum of species can vary significantly from country to country.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01131.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both B. henselae and B. clarridgeiae have been found in fleas collected from dogs and cats in France and Germany, Albania, Spain, the Netherlands, Hungary, UK, and in the USA.

    “As key examples, both B. henselae and B. clarridgeiae have been found in fleas collected from dogs and cats in France and Germany [161], Albania [162], Spain [90], the Netherlands [98], Hungary [163], UK [159], and in the USA as well [164].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Just, F. T., Gilles, J., Pradel, I., Pfalzer, S., Lengauer, H., Hellmann, K., & Pfister, K.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Just, F. T.
Venue
Zoonoses and Public Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-03
Volume
55
Issue
8-10
Pages
514-520
ISSN
  • 1863-1959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2378
OpenAlex
W2157711709
Cited by
31
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zoonoses and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bartonella species infections research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Keywords
Bartonella, Ctenocephalides felis, dog flea, Bartonella henselae, Bartonella clarridgeiae, zoonotic pathogens, prevalence, regional variation, cats, dogs, Germany, France
MeSH terms
Animals, Bartonella, Bartonella Infections, Cat Diseases, Cats, Disease Reservoirs, DNA, Bacterial, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Siphonaptera, France, Gene Amplification, Germany, Humans, Insect Vectors, Species Specificity, Zoonoses, Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review