Cited by 211Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function

Evaluating the negative or valuing the positive? Neural mechanisms supporting feedback-based learning across development

Open access
van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C. K., Zanolie, Kiki, Rombouts, Serge A. R. B., Raijmakers, Maartje E. J., Crone, Eveline A.·2008·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

How children learn from positive and negative performance feedback lies at the foundation of successful learning and is therefore of great importance for educational practice. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the neural developmental changes related to feedback-based learning when performing a rule search and application task. Behavioral results from three age groups (8-9, 11-13, and 18-25 years of age) demonstrated that, compared with adults, 8- to 9-year-old children performed disproportionally more inaccurately after receiving negative feedback relative to positive feedback. Additionally, imaging data pointed toward a qualitative difference in how children and adults use performance feedback. That is, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and superior parietal cortex were more active after negative feedback for adults, but after positive feedback for children (8-9 years of age). For 11- to 13-year-olds, these regions did not show differential feedback sensitivity, suggesting that the transition occurs around this age. Pre-supplementary motor area/anterior cingulate cortex, in contrast, was more active after negative feedback in both 11- to 13-year-olds and adults, but not 8- to 9-year-olds. Together, the current data show that cognitive control areas are differentially engaged during feedback-based learning across development. Adults engage these regions after signals of response adjustment (i.e., negative feedback). Young children engage these regions after signals of response continuation (i.e., positive feedback). The neural activation patterns found in 11- to 13-year-olds indicate a transition around this age toward an increased influence of negative feedback on performance adjustment. This is the first developmental fMRI study to compare qualitative changes in brain activation during feedback learning across distinct stages of development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1485-08.2008

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A qualitative shift in neural recruitment during feedback-based learning is seen in early adolescence, possibly reflecting the increasing influence of negative feedback on behavioral adjustment.

    “A qualitative shift in neural recruitment during feedback-based learning is seen in early adolescence, possibly reflecting the increasing influence of negative feedback on behavioral adjustment (van Duijvenvoorde et al. 2008).”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as van Duijvenvoorde et al. 2008

  • Activation to negative feedback or aversive consequences increases with age in various cognitive control regions.

    “gradual age-related increases in activation to negative feedback/aversive consequences in a variety of cognitive control regions”
  • Neural responses to positive feedback mature earlier than neural responses to negative feedback.

    “other fMRI evidence for earlier maturation of neural responses to positive than negative feedback”
  • Children in the eight to nine year old age group demonstrated greater brain activation during positive feedback compared to negative feedback, particularly in dlPFC and parietal regions, whereas adults showed the reverse trend.

    “At the neural level, children in the eight to nine year old age group demonstrated greater brain activation during positive feedback compared to negative feedback, particularly in dlPFC and parietal regions, whereas adults showed the reverse trend, activating similar regions more than the other age groups when receiving negative compared to positive feedback.”
  • All age groups performed better on a rule learning task when they received positive feedback compared to negative feedback, and this trend was largest for eight to nine year olds.

    “A study by Duijvenvoorde et al. comparing responses to positive and negative feedback across age found that all age groups performed better on a rule learning task when they received positive feedback compared to negative feedback, and this trend was the largest for eight to nine year olds [42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Zanolie, K., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Raijmakers, M. E. J., & Crone, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-09-17
Volume
28
Issue
38
Pages
9495-9503
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2070258707
Cited by
211
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (516542)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Keywords
performance feedback, feedback learning, negative feedback, positive feedback, cognitive control, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, superior parietal cortex, pre-supplementary motor area, anterior cingulate cortex, children and adolescents, age differences in learning
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Cognition, Feedback, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Judgment, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Processes, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review