Cited by 23Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Abilities and TestingChild and Animal Learning Development

Developmental changes in the engagement of episodic retrieval processes and their relationship with working memory during the period of middle childhood

Open access
Rhodes, Sinéad M., Murphy, Derek, Hancock, Peter J. B.·2011·British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Abstract

We examined the development of children's engagement of the episodic retrieval processes of recollection and familiarity and their relationship with working memory (WM). Ninety‐six children (24 in four groups aged 8, 9, 10, and 11 years) and 24 adults performed an episodic memory (EM) task involving old/new, remember/know (R/K), and source memory judgements and numerous WM tasks that assessed verbal and spatial components of WM and delayed short‐term memory (STM). Developmental changes were observed in EM with younger children (8‐, 9‐, 10‐year‐olds) making fewer remember responses than 11‐year‐olds and adults while 11‐year‐olds did not differ from adults. Only children aged 10 years plus showed a relationship between EM and WM. EM was related to verbal executive WM in 10‐ and 11‐year‐old children suggesting that children at this stage use verbal strategies to aid EM. In contrast, EM was related to spatial executive WM in adults. The engagement of episodic retrieval processes appears to be selectively related to executive components of verbal and spatial WM, the pattern of which differs in children and adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-835x.2010.02014.x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children at the age of 10-12 appear to have recall abilities compared to adults.

    “Children at the age of 10–12 appear to have recall abilities compared to adults [31–33].”

    From Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects (2017) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Discussion reports that 11-year-olds engaged recollection to the same degree as adults. It also says 10-year-olds differed from adults, while the study did not test 12-year-olds. The source therefore supports an adult comparison at age 11, not across the stated 10–12 age range. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Atkinson, R. C., & Joula, J. F. (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Fourth international symposium on attention and performance (pp. 583-611). New York: Academic Press.
  2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  3. Halliday, M. S., & Hitch, G. J. (1988). Developmental applications of working memory. In G. Claxton (Ed.), New directions in cognition (pp. 193-222). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhodes, S. M., Murphy, D., & Hancock, P. J. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
Corresponding author
Rhodes, Sinéad M.
Venue
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-06
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
865-882
ISSN
  • 0261-510X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-835X
OpenAlex
W2168350673
Cited by
23
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • British Journal of Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/F030401/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
episodic memory, episodic memory retrieval, recollection, familiarity, working memory, middle childhood, developmental changes, executive function, verbal working memory, spatial working memory, source memory, remember-know judgments, old/new recognition, short-term memory, children
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Child, Child Development, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Task Performance and Analysis, Verbal Learning, Recognition, Psychology, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review