Cited by 775Psychology of Development and EducationEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Urie Bronfenbrenner's Theory of Human Development: Its Evolution From Ecology to Bioecology

Open access
Rosa, Edinete Maria, Tudge, Jonathan·2013·Journal of Family Theory & Review

Abstract

We describe the evolution, over three phases, of Bronfenbrenner's theory from an ecological to a bioecological theory. Phase 1 (1973–1979) culminated in the publication of The Ecology of Human Development (1979). Phase 2 (1980–1993) saw almost immediate modifications to the theory, with more attention paid to the role of the individual and greater concern with developmental processes. In Phase 3 (1993–2006), proximal processes were defined and placed at the heart of bioecological theory, and from 1998, the Process‐Person‐Context‐Time ( PPCT ) model was described as the theory's appropriate research design. Given the extent of these changes, and to avoid theoretical incoherence, scholars should be cautious about stating that their research is based on Bronfenbrenner's theory without specifying which version they are using .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jftr.12022

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bronfenbrenner's theorizing developed in three phases: 1973-1979, 1983-1993, and 1993-2006.

    “These iterations were developed across three distinct phases: (a) 1973-1979, (b) 1983-1993, and (c) 1993-2006 (Rosa & Tudge, 2013).”

    From Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory. (2023) · cites this paper as Rosa & Tudge, 2013

    The Abstract and phase headings identify three phases, with Phase 1 spanning 1973–1979 and Phase 3 spanning 1993–2006. But they date Phase 2 to 1980–1993, not 1983–1993. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bronfenbrenner's theory was fully developed by the turn of the century and did not take account of development in the digital age.

    “Bronfenbrenner’s theory, being fully developed by the turn of the century (Rosa & Tudge, 2013), did not consider the impact of developing in the digital age.”

    From Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory. (2023) · cites this paper as Rosa & Tudge, 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [5]5. Hyattsville, MD: National Education Press.
  2. [7]7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1975). Reality and research in the ecology of human development. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 119, 439-469.
  3. [12]12. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1978). The social role of the child in ecological perspective. Zeitschrift fur Soziologie, 7(1), 4-20.
  4. [28]28. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568-586.
  5. [29]29. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Crouter, A. C. (1983). The evolution of environmental models in developmental research. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & W. Kessen (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1:History, theory and methods (4th ed., pp. 357-414). New York, NY: Wiley.
  6. [33]33. Ceci, S. J. (1990). On intelligence . . . more or less: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  7. [35]35. Lüscher, K., & Jones, G. (1995). The published writings of Urie Bronfenbrenner. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 649-678). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
243-258
ISSN
  • 1756-2570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-2589
OpenAlex
W1675192189
Cited by
775
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 127 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
39.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Family Theory & Review (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
Bronfenbrenner, bioecological model, ecological systems theory, human development theory, proximal processes, Process-Person-Context-Time model, developmental processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review