The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reduced Aβ secretion by human neurons under conditions of strongly increased BACE activity
Abstract
The initial step in the amyloidogenic cascade of amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing is catalyzed by beta‐site APP‐cleaving enzyme (BACE), and this protease has increased activities in affected areas of Alzheimer's disease brains. We hypothesized that altered APP processing, because of augmented BACE activity, would affect the actions of direct and indirect BACE inhibitors. We therefore compared post‐mitotic human neurons (LUHMES) with their BACE‐overexpressing counterparts (B LUHMES). Although β‐cleavage of APP was strongly increased in BLUHMES, they produced less full‐length and truncated amyloid beta (Aβ) than LUHMES. Moreover, low concentrations of BACE inhibitors decreased cellular BACE activity as expected, but increased Aβ 1‐40 levels. Several other approaches to modulate BACE activity led to a similar, apparently paradoxical, behavior. For instance, reduction in intracellular acidification by bepridil increased Aβ production in parallel with decreased BACE activity. In contrast to BLUHMES, the respective control cells (LUHMES or BLUHMES with catalytically inactive BACE) showed conventional pharmacological responses. Other non‐canonical neurochemical responses (so‐called ‘rebound effects’) are well‐documented for the Aβ pathway, especially for γ‐secretase: a partial block of its activity leads to an increased Aβ secretion by some cell types. We therefore compared LUHMES and BLUHMES regarding rebound effects of γ‐secretase inhibitors and found an Aβ rise in LUHMES but not in BLUHMES. Thus, different cellular factors are responsible for the γ‐secretase‐ versus BACE‐related Aβ rebound. We conclude that increased BACE activity, possibly accompanied by an altered cellular localization pattern, can dramatically influence Aβ generation in human neurons and affect pharmacological responses to secretase inhibitors. Open Practices: Open Science: This manuscript was awarded with the Open Materials Badge. For more information see: https://cos.io/our-services/open-science-badges/ image
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As examples, constitutive CMV-based promoters drastically change activity during differentiation of LUHMES cells (Scholz et al., 2018; Schildknecht et al., 2013)”
From Guidance document on Good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0) (2021) · cites this paper as Scholz et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The prolyl isomerase Pin1 regulates amyloid precursor protein processing and amyloid-β production
Pastorino, L., Sun, A., Lu, P.-J., Zhou, X. Z., Balastik, M., Finn, G., Wulf, G., Lim, J., Li, S.-H., Li, X., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04543 · Cited by 487
The Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein (LRP) Is a Novel β-Secretase (BACE1) Substrate
von Arnim, C. A. F., Kinoshita, A., Peltan, I. D., Tangredi, M. M., Herl, L., Lee, B. M., Spoelgen, R., Hshieh, T. T., Ranganathan, S., Battey, F. D., et al. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m414248200 · Cited by 258
Schildknecht, S., Gerding, H. R., Karreman, C., Drescher, M., Lashuel, H. A., Outeiro, T. F., Di Monte, D. A., & Leist, M. (2013) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.12226 · Cited by 148
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 77
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.130 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04421.1999 · DOI
- 10.1021/jm0705408 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M009899200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M005339200 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0022-3042.2002.00770.x · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M804175200 · DOI
- 10.1038/85064 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.01.011 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M003202200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M409680200 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M409272200 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104117 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.218 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/tp.2013.59 · DOI
- 10.2174/1567205012666141218125042 · DOI
- 10.2174/156720508783954695 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00401-007-0312-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M211485200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archneur.59.9.1381 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jnc.12937 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja000300g · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71051920.x · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600061 · DOI
- 10.1038/357500a0 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003040 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M002095200 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng0106-11 · DOI
- 10.1096/fj.08-106666 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M004175200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M111141200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0751085.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.01.064 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.200201123 · DOI
- 10.1159/000095267 · DOI
- 10.1038/mp.2015.97 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.275.5.3173 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32449-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/jcs.109.5.991 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3872-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1124/jpet.106.110700 · DOI
- 10.1385/MB:29:1:47 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M210105200 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.200301115 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.200407070 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07560.x · DOI
- 10.1021/bi015800g · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1746-05.2005 · DOI
- 10.1038/85059 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0031084 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchembio.1508 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1199-10.2010 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-291X(92)90269-Q · DOI
- 10.1007/s00204-017-1966-1 · DOI
- 10.3233/JAD-2004-6107 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.27.18851 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.22308 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2513-11.2011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M507016200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.taap.2009.07.027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07255.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.03.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(96)00002-9 · DOI
- 10.1021/jm049379g · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/toxsci/kfr034 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.R800019200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nsmb.1743 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.286.5440.735 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3657-09.2009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.028 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2009.01.008 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M011116200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90177-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07501.x · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M104350200 · DOI
- 10.1038/nm0103-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt0997-871 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidance document on Good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0)
Pamies, D. (2021) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.2111011 · Cited by 100
OECD (2023) · OECD Series on Testing and Assessment · doi:10.1787/91964ef3-en · Cited by 44
Spänle, J. V., Haiber, L. M., & Seeger, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Toxicology · doi:10.3389/ftox.2026.1800157 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Scholz, D., Chernyshova, Y., Ückert, A., & Leist, M.
- Affiliations
- Chair for in vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine University of Konstanz Konstanz Germany
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-26
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 256-274
- ISSN
- 0022-3042
- 1471-4159
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1120/3‐1; RTG1331)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review