Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The present and future use of functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience

Open access
Pinti, Paola, Tachtsidis, Ilias, Hamilton, Antonia, Hirsch, Joy, Aichelburg, Clarisse, Gilbert, Sam, Burgess, Paul W.·2020·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1111/nyas.13948
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The past few decades have seen a rapid increase in the use of functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in cognitive neuroscience. This fast growth is due to the several advances that fNIRS offers over the other neuroimaging modalities such as functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography/magnetoencephalography. In particular, fNIRS is harmless, tolerant to bodily movements, and highly portable, being suitable for all possible participant populations, from newborns to the elderly and experimental settings, both inside and outside the laboratory. In this review we aim to provide a comprehensive and state‐of‐the‐art review of fNIRS basics, technical developments, and applications. In particular, we discuss some of the open challenges and the potential of fNIRS for cognitive neuroscience research, with a particular focus on neuroimaging in naturalistic environments and social cognitive neuroscience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.13948

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 134

  1. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.009 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.044 · DOI
  4. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00444 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.10.002 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.067 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.02.002 · DOI
  8. Einalou Z., 2014, Functional near infrared spectroscopy to investigation of functional connectivity in schizophrenia using partial correlation, Univers. J. Biomed. Eng., 2, 5, 10.13189/ujbe.2014.020102 · DOI
  9. 10.1186/s12868-016-0244-0 · DOI
  10. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00216 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.269 · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.269
  12. 10.1161/01.STR.0000100166.81077.8A · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1186/s40814-016-0099-2 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s40520-013-0119-5 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1177/1545968316650426 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00003 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1126/science.929199 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1117/1.429952 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cobme.2017.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90094-2 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1007/978-1-4615-2468-7_74 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/jcbfm.1993.66 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1098/rspb.1995.0158 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3770 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1203/00006450-199806000-00019 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/S0166-2236(97)01132-6 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1152/jappl.1993.75.4.1842 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1118/1.597496 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1097/00001756-199608120-00024 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)00122-4 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.008 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.045 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.033 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1098/rstb.1997.0046 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1017/CBO9780511605505 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1177/1073858417703033 · DOI
  39. 10.1364/BOE.2.001478 · DOI
  40. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066319 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1179/174313209X383286 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.0611266104 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1002/mrm.1910390109 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.065 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/j.mri.2005.12.034 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.069 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.124 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00419 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.016 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1007/978-1-4419-7756-4_7 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.036 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.044 · DOI
  53. 10.1371/journal.pone.0172500 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.001 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.014 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.011 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.022 · DOI
  59. 10.1364/BOE.1.000324 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.075 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.080 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.035 · DOI
  63. 10.1177/1094428116658959 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1117/1.NPh.4.4.041403 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.036 · DOI
  66. Noah J.A., 2015, fMRI validation of fNIRS measurements during a naturalistic task, J. Vis. Exp., 100, e52116
  67. 10.1088/0967-3334/31/5/004 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.082 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.002 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.058 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1203/00006450-200102000-00014 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.001 · DOI
  73. 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3180cc1fbc · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.03.010 · DOI
  75. 10.3390/a11050067 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.069 · DOI
  77. 10.1117/1.NPh.5.1.011012 · doi:10.1117/1.nph.5.1.011012
  78. 10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.091310 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1364/BOE.5.003450 · doi:10.1364/boe.5.003450
  80. 10.1109/JSTQE.2018.2833205 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.018 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Kvavilashvili L., 2004, Ecological validity and the real‐life/laboratory controversy in memory research: a critical (and historical) review, Hist. Philos. Psychol., 6, 59
  84. Moscovitch M., 1990, Modular Deficits in Alzheimer‐Type Dementia, 1
  85. Burgess P.W., 2009, Mesulam's frontal lobe mystery re‐examined, Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 27, 493
  86. 10.1117/1.3462996 · DOI
  87. 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00258 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1177/1545968316650426 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00216 · DOI
  90. 10.1177/0018720816675053 · DOI
  91. 10.1186/1743-0003-11-85 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.005 · DOI
  93. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  94. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00274 · DOI
  95. 10.1093/brain/120.10.1805 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0633 · DOI · Paper page
  97. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00882 · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00882
  98. 10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  99. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00464 · DOI
  100. 10.1038/nature04766 · DOI · Paper page
  101. 10.1098/rstb.1996.0124 · DOI · Paper page
  102. 10.1007/BF00412364 · DOI · Paper page
  103. 10.1037/0096-1523.14.4.682 · DOI · Paper page
  104. 10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.331 · DOI · Paper page
  105. 10.1038/nn.2112 · DOI · Paper page
  106. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
  107. 10.1093/brain/119.4.1377 · DOI · Paper page
  108. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00278 · DOI
  109. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.051 · DOI
  110. 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  111. 10.1002/hbm.22953 · DOI
  112. 10.1093/cercor/bhn081 · DOI · Paper page
  113. 10.1093/scan/nst008 · DOI
  114. 10.1080/17470919.2017.1285812 · DOI
  115. 10.3389/fncom.2016.00070 · DOI
  116. 10.1080/17470919.2012.696077 · DOI
  117. 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.02.005 · DOI
  118. 10.1007/s10548-014-0414-2 · DOI
  119. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
  120. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.009 · DOI
  121. 10.1098/rspb.2012.3026 · DOI · Paper page
  122. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.12.008 · DOI
  123. 10.1371/journal.pone.0158804 · DOI
  124. 10.1038/srep04740 · DOI
  125. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00813 · DOI
  126. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01811 · DOI · Paper page
  127. 10.1364/BOE.6.001074 · DOI
  128. 10.1038/s41598-017-06764-1 · DOI
  129. 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00571 · DOI
  130. 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00431 · DOI
  131. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.028 · DOI · Paper page
  132. 10.1073/pnas.1422930112 · DOI · Paper page
  133. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.059 · DOI · Paper page
  134. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00163 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,336

Metadata

Authors
Pinti, P., Tachtsidis, I., Hamilton, A., Hirsch, J., Aichelburg, C., Gilbert, S., & Burgess, P. W.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-07
Volume
1464
Issue
1
Pages
5-29
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
DOI
10.1111/nyas.13948
OpenAlex
W2886301707
Cited by
1,336
References
19
FWCI
31.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (104580/Z/14/Z)
  • European Research Council (313398‐INTERACT)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The present and future use of functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nyas.13948
The paper
Pinti, P., Tachtsidis, I., Hamilton, A., Hirsch, J., Aichelburg, C., Gilbert, S., & Burgess, P. W. (2020). The present and future use of functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13948

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.