Cited by 34Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Understanding and effectively addressing disparities in obesity: A systematic review of the psychological determinants of emotional eating behaviours among Black women

Pickett, Stephanie, Burchenal, Clare A., Haber, Leora, Batten, Kendra, Phillips, Erica·2020·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Emotional eating may be a particularly important contributor to differences in body weight and weight loss response to behavioural interventions among non-Hispanic Black women. We performed a systematic review on the impact of psychological factors (stress, anxiety, depression, and discrimination) upon emotional eating and weight among non-Hispanic Black women, applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis for relevant studies. The initial search yielded 4593 articles with 15 accepted for review. Based on this review, there is a suggestion that negative emotions, in particular, perceived stress, may be predictive of emotional eating among non-Hispanic Black women. Results from the only two longitudinal studies identified by the review indicate that stress influences emotional eating, and emotional eating predicts weight gain over time. Findings from this review highlight the need for more studies that examine various negative emotions that may lead to emotional eating and weight gain among non-Hispanic Black women. Findings from this review also highlight the need for more rigorous studies to differentiate the effects of emotional eating from that of the physiologic (ie, activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis) responses to stress and its impact on high-risk groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obr.13010

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pickett, S., Burchenal, C. A., Haber, L., Batten, K., & Phillips, E.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Erica
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-17
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
e13010-e13010
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W3008511442
Cited by
34
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
The Health Resources and Services Administration (D34HP318790100)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
emotional eating, obesity disparities, non-Hispanic Black women, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, discrimination, weight gain, hypothalamic-pituitary axis, weight loss response
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Black or African American, Depression, Emotions, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Stress, Psychological, Health Status Disparities, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review