Cited by 47Cardiovascular Disease and AdiposityPhysical Activity and HealthCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

Physical exercise and epicardial adipose tissue: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Saco‐Ledo, Gonzalo, Valenzuela, Pedro L., Castillo‐García, Adrián, Arenas, Joaquín, León‐Sanz, Miguel, Ruilope, Luis M., Lucia, Alejandro·2021·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

We performed a meta-analysis of the effects of exercise on epicardial adipose tissue (EAT). A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus (since inception to 1 February 2020) of randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of exercise interventions alone (with no concomitant weight loss intervention) on EAT. The standardized mean difference (Hedges' g) and 95% confidence interval between interventions were computed using a random effects model. Ten studies (including 521 participants who had, on average, overweight/obesity) met all inclusion criteria. Interventions were supervised and lasted 2 to 16 weeks (≥3 sessions·per week). Exercise significantly reduced EAT (g = 0.82 [0.57-1.07]) irrespective of the duration of the intervention or the EAT imaging assessment method. Exercise benefits were separately confirmed for endurance (six studies, n = 287; g = 0.83 [0.52-1.15]) but not for resistance exercise training (due to insufficient data for quantitative synthesis). It was not possible to compare the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (two studies, one reporting higher benefits with HIIT and the other no differences). Physical exercise interventions-particularly endurance training, with further evidence needed for other exercise modalities-appear as an effective strategy for reducing EAT in individuals with overweight/obesity, which supports their implementation for cardiovascular risk reduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obr.13103

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saco‐Ledo, G., Valenzuela, P. L., Castillo‐García, A., Arenas, J., León‐Sanz, M., Ruilope, L. M., & Lucia, A.
Affiliations
  • Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (ES)
  • Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
  • Physiology, Health and Physical Activity Fissac Madrid Spain
  • Research Institute of the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (‘imas12’) Madrid Spain
  • Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (ES)
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-21
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
e13103-e13103
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W3044898345
Cited by
47
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica (Universidad Europea) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI18/00139)
  • Universidad de Alcalá (FPI2016)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
physical activity, epicardial adipose tissue, endurance training, resistance training, high-intensity interval training, moderate-intensity continuous training, obesity, overweight, cardiovascular risk reduction, exercise intervention
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Humans, Obesity, Pericardium, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Overweight, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review