Cited by 251Cardiovascular Disease and AdiposityDiabetes Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Liraglutide causes large and rapid epicardial fat reduction

Open access
Iacobellis, Gianluca, Mohseni, Mahshid, Bianco, Suzy D., Banga, Pritisheel K.·2017·Obesity

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), the visceral fat depot of the heart, is a modifiable cardiovascular risk factor and emerging therapeutic target. Liraglutide, an analog of glucagon-like peptide-1, is indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Liraglutide has recently been shown to reduce cardiovascular risk. Nevertheless, whether liraglutide could reduce EAT is unknown. METHODS: and hemoglobinA1c ≤8% on metformin monotherapy. Individuals were randomized in two groups to receive additional liraglutide up to 1.8 mg s.c. once daily (n = 54) or to remain on metformin up to 1,000 mg twice daily (n = 41). Ultrasound-measured EAT thickness was measured at baseline and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. RESULTS: In the liraglutide group, EAT decreased from 9.6 ± 2 to 6.8 ± 1.5 and 6.2 ± 1.5 mm (P < 0.001), accounting for a -29% and -36% of reduction at 3 and 6 months, respectively, whereas there was no EAT reduction in the metformin group; BMI and hemoglobinA1c improved only in the liraglutide group after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Liraglutide causes a substantial and rapid EAT reduction. Liraglutide cardiometabolic effects may be EAT-mediated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.21718

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Iacobellis G, Lonn E, Lamy A, Singh N, Sharma AM. Epicardial fat thickness and CAD correlate independently of obesity. Int J Cardiol 2011;146:452-454.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iacobellis, G., Mohseni, M., Bianco, S. D., & Banga, P. K.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Iacobellis, Gianluca
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-26
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
311-316
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2580189755
Cited by
251
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8
FWCI
16.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
liraglutide, epicardial adipose tissue, visceral fat, GLP-1 receptor agonists, type 2 diabetes, metformin, cardiovascular risk, cardiometabolic effects, EAT thickness
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Adipose Tissue, Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Pericardium, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Intra-Abdominal Fat, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review