Cited by 114Cardiovascular Disease and AdiposityAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesAdipose Tissue and Metabolism

Comparison of reducing epicardial fat by exercise, diet or bariatric surgery weight loss strategies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rabkin, S. W., Campbell, H.·2015·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

The objectives were to determine whether epicardial fat (EAT) is subject to modification, and whether various strategies accomplish this end point and the relationship between weight loss and EAT. A systematic review of the literature following meta-analysis guidelines was conducted using the search strategy 'epicardial fat' OR 'epicardial adipose tissue' AND 'diet' OR 'exercise' OR 'bariatric surgery (BS)' OR 'change in body weight' limited to humans. Eleven articles were identified with 12 intervention approaches of which eight studies showed a statistically significant reduction in EAT. A random-effects meta-analysis suggests an overall significant reduction of 1.12 standardized units (95% CI = [-1.71, -0.54], P value < 0.01). While there is a large amount of heterogeneity across study groups, a substantial amount of this variability can be accounted for by considering intervention type and change in body mass index (BMI). These variables were incorporated into a random-effects meta-regression model. Using this analysis, significant EAT reduction occurred with diet and BS but not with exercise. BMI reductions correlated significantly with EAT reductions for diet-based interventions, i.e. for some but not all interventions. In conclusion, EAT, a factor that is significantly associated with coronary artery disease, can be modified. The type of intervention, in addition to the amount of weight loss achieved, is predictive of the amount of EAT reduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obr.12270

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rabkin, S. W., & Campbell, H.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • EMMES Canada Burnaby BC Canada
Corresponding author
Rabkin, S. W.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-05
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
406-415
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W1518443297
Cited by
114
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
Keywords
epicardial adipose tissue, visceral fat reduction, weight loss interventions, diet, physical activity, bariatric surgery, body mass index, coronary artery disease
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Diet, Reducing, Humans, Obesity, Pericardium, Risk Factors, Weight Loss, Exercise, Treatment Outcome, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review