Cited by 24Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Latent class analysis of indicators of intolerance of uncertainty

Open access
Boelen, Paul A., Lenferink, Lonneke I.M.·2018·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) is a transdiagnostic vulnerability factor involved in depression and anxiety symptoms and disorders. IU encompasses Prospective IU (“Unforeseen events upset me greatly”) and Inhibitory IU (“The smallest doubt can stop me from acting”). Research has yet to explore whether subgroups or classes of people exist characterized by different profiles of IU. This study used latent class analysis to identify such subgroups and examined if different classes of IU were distinct in terms of several cognitive vulnerabilities and psychological symptoms. Data were obtained from 519 students completing a 12‐item measure of IU. Four subgroups were identified, characterized by low IU, predominantly Prospective IU, predominantly Inhibitory IU, and high IU, respectively. People in the high IU class reported cognitive vulnerabilities and depression and anxiety more than people in the low IU class. Inhibitory IU was more strongly associated with poor outcomes than was Prospective IU.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sjop.12440

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Barlow, D. H., Ellard, K. K., Fairholme, C., Farchione, T. J., Boisseau, C., Allen, L. & Ehrenreich-May, J. (2011). Unified protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment ofemotional disorders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  2. Connor, K. M., Davidson, J. R. T., Churchill, L. E., Sherwood, A., Foa, E. & Weisler, R. H. (2000). Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379-386.
  3. Van der Does, A. J. W. (2002). BDI-II-NL. Handleiding. De Nederlandse versie vande Beck Depression Inventory-2nd edition [BDI-II-NL. Instructions. The Dutch version of the Beck Depression Inventory-2nd edition]. Lisse: Harcourt Test Publishers.
  4. Note: IU = intolerance of uncertainty; CI = confidence interval. © 2018 Scandinavian Psychological Associations and John Wiley & Sons

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boelen, P. A., & Lenferink, L. I. M.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Boelen, Paul A.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-26
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
243-251
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W2788985172
Cited by
24
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, inhibitory intolerance of uncertainty, depression, anxiety, cognitive vulnerability, students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Uncertainty, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review