Cited by 119Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Errors in MET Estimates of Physical Activities Using 3.5 ml·kg−1·min−1 as the Baseline Oxygen Consumption

Kozey, Sarah, Lyden, Kate, Staudenmayer, John, Freedson, Patty·2010·Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Abstract

Purpose: To compare intensity misclassification and activity MET values using measured RMR (measMET) compared with 3.5 ml·kg−1·min−1 (standMET) and corrected METs [corrMET = mean standMET × (3.5 ÷ Harris-Benedict RMR)] in subgroups. Methods: RMR was measured for 252 subjects following a 4-hr fast and before completion of 11 activities. VO 2 was measured during activity using indirect calorimetry (n = 2555 activities). Subjects were classified by BMI category (normal-weight or overweight/obese), sex, age (decade 20, 30, 40, or 50 y), and fitness quintiles (low to high). Activities were classified into low, moderate, and vigorous intensity categories. Results: The (mean ± SD) measMET was 6.1 ± 2.64 METs. StandMET [mean (95% CI)] was (0.51(0.42, 0.59) METs) less than measMET. CorrMET was not statistically different from measMET (−0.02 (−0.11, 0.06) METs). 12.2% of the activities were misclassified using standMETs compared with an 8.6% misclassification rate for METs based on predicted RMR (P < .0001). StandMET differences and misclassification rates were highest for low fit, overweight, and older individuals while there were no differences when corrMETs were used. Conclusion: Using 3.5 ml·kg−1·min−1 to calculate activity METs causes higher misclassification of activities and inaccurate point estimates of METs than a corrected baseline which considers individual height, weight, and age. These errors disproportionally impact subgroups of the population with the lowest activity levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jpah.7.4.508

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kozey, S., Lyden, K., Staudenmayer, J., & Freedson, P.
Venue
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Published
2010-07
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
508-516
ISSN
  • 1543-3080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5474
OpenAlex
W2162050088
Cited by
119
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Physical Activity and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA121005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
resting metabolic rate, Harris-Benedict equation, physical activity energy expenditure, indirect calorimetry, body mass index, fitness level, older adults, overweight and obesity
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Fitness, Reference Values, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review