Cited by 41Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthSports Performance and Training

Resting oxygen uptake value of 1 metabolic equivalent of task in older adults: A systematic review and descriptive analysis

Open access
Leal-Martín, Javier, Muñoz-Muñoz, Miguel, Keadle, Sarah Kozey, Amaro-Gahete, Francisco, Alegre, Luis M., Mañas, Asier, Ara, Ignacio·2022·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background It is important for sport scientists and health professionals to have estimative methods for energy demand during different physical activities. The metabolic equivalent of task (MET) provides a feasible approach for classifying activity intensity as a multiple of the resting metabolic rate (RMR). RMR is generally assumed to be 3.5 mL of oxygen per kilogram of body mass per minute (mL O 2 kg-1 min-1), a value that has been criticized and considered to be overestimated in the older adult population. However, there has been no comprehensive effort to review available RMR estimations, equivalent to 1 MET, obtained in the older adult population.Objective The aim of this review was to examine the existing evidence reporting measured RMR values in the older adult population and to provide descriptive estimates of 1 MET.Methods A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library, from database inception to July 2021. To this end, original research studies assessing RMR in adults ≥ 60 years old using indirect calorimetry and reporting results in mL O 2 kg-1 min-1 were sought.Results Twenty-three eligible studies were identified, including a total of 1091 participants (426 men). All but two studies reported RMR values lower than the conventional 3.5 mL O 2 kg-1 min-1. The overall weighted average 1 MET value obtained from all included studies was 2.7 ± 0.6 mL O 2 kg-1 min-1; however, when considering best practice studies, this value was 11% lower (2.4 ± 0.3 mL O 2 kg-1 min-1).Conclusion Based on the results of this systematic review, we would advise against the application of the standard value of 1 MET (3.5 mL O 2 kg-1 min-1) in people ≥ 60 years of age and encourage the direct assessment of RMR using indirect calorimetry while adhering to evidence-based best practice recommendations. When this is not possible, assuming an overall value of 2.7 mL O 2 kg-1 min-1 might be reasonable. Systematic review registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on 30 September 2020, with registration number CRD42020206440.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-021-01539-1

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leal-Martín, J., Muñoz-Muñoz, M., Keadle, S. K., Amaro-Gahete, F., Alegre, L. M., Mañas, A., & Ara, I.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES)
  • California Polytechnic State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ara, Ignacio
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2021-08-21
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
331-348
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W3193947076
Cited by
41
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUIdeRA - Institutional University Repository (University of Castilla-La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable
  • Ministerio de Ciencia Tecnología y Telecomunicaciones (DEP2005-00046, FPU19/01276)
  • Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (SBPLY/19/180501/000312)
  • European Regional Development Fund (CB16/10/00477, CB16/10/00456)
  • Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (2019-PREDUCLM-11385)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
resting metabolic rate, metabolic equivalent of task, older adults, oxygen consumption, energy expenditure estimation, indirect calorimetry, activity intensity classification
MeSH terms
Aged, Basal Metabolism, Calorimetry, Indirect, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Metabolic Equivalent

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review