The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries
Open accessAbstract
Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions’ effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior—several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people’s initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/466029a · Cited by 3,441
Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3
Salvatier, J., Wiecki, T. V., & Fonnesbeck, C. (2016) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.55 · Cited by 2,544
Sheeran, P., & Webb, T. L. (2016) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12265 · Cited by 2,185
Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2943 · Cited by 1,616 · cited 1×
“Given that belief is a key antecedent of proenvironmental intentions, behavior, and policy support ( 26 ), we examined how the interventions would affect these outcomes for different people along the belief continuum ranging from skeptics to true believers.”
IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report
Bernstein, L., Bösch, P. M., Canziani, O. F., Chen, Z., Christ, R., & Riahi, K. (2008) · IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) · Cited by 1,582
Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618923114 · Cited by 1,580 · cited 1×
“To target more ecologically valid behavior and climate activism ( 34 ), the third outcome was willingness to share climate mitigation information on social media (i.e., “Did you know that removing meat and dairy for only two out of three meals per day could decrease food-related carbon emissions by…”
Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation.
Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778 · Cited by 1,459
The Generalizability of Survey Experiments
Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2015.19 · Cited by 1,228
Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050
Otto, I. M., Donges, J. F., Cremades, R., Bhowmik, A., Hewitt, R. J., Lucht, W., Rockström, J., Allerberger, F., McCaffrey, M., Doe, S. S. P., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900577117 · Cited by 958
Berinsky, A. J., Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12081 · Cited by 951 · cited 1×
“Although removing participants who failed these preregistered attention checks risks contributing to a selection bias in the sample ( 54 ), we a priori determined we would screen participants according to these criteria to ensure data quality.”
Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?
Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Sunstein, C. R., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., Tucker-Ray, W., Congdon, W. J., & Galing, S. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617702501 · Cited by 861
Allcott, H., & Mullainathan, S. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1180775 · Cited by 851
The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review
Kormos, C., & Gifford, R. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003 · Cited by 806
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209351435 · Cited by 720
Chater, N., & Loewenstein, G. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x22002023 · Cited by 710
The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence
van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489 · Cited by 661
Dynamic Norms Promote Sustainable Behavior, Even if It Is Counternormative
Sparkman, G., & Walton, G. M. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617719950 · Cited by 639
Self-citationQuantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options
Ivanova, D., Barrett, J., Wiedenhofer, D., Macura, B., Callaghan, M., & Creutzig, F. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab8589 · Cited by 639
Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019
Chancel, L. (2022) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-022-00955-z · Cited by 610
Weinberg, J., Freese, J., & McElhattan, D. (2014) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v1.a19 · Cited by 582
Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of well-being
Creutzig, F., Niamir, L., Bai, X., Callaghan, M., Cullen, J., Díaz-José, J., Figueroa, M., Grubler, A., Lamb, W. F., Leip, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01219-y · Cited by 579
Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Doran, P. T., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2009) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/2009eo030002 · Cited by 528
The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American?
Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C., & Arnett, J. J. (2021) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000622 · Cited by 521
The Future is Now: Reducing Psychological Distance to Increase Public Engagement with Climate Change
Jones, C., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. G. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12601 · Cited by 507
Self-citationRelationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conservatism and climate scepticism across nations
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., & Fielding, K. S. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0157-2 · Cited by 501
Goal-directed conservation behavior: the specific composition of a general performance
Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003 · Cited by 496
Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005 · Cited by 470
Generalizability of heterogeneous treatment effect estimates across samples
Coppock, A., Leeper, T. J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1808083115 · Cited by 445
Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature
Lynas, M., Houlton, B. Z., & Perry, S. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966 · Cited by 423
Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions
Gifford, R., Kormos, C., & McIntyre, A. (2011) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.143 · Cited by 408
Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion
Geiger, N., & Swim, J. K. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.002 · Cited by 397
Understanding and interpreting confidence and credible intervals around effect estimates
Hespanhol, L., Vallio, C. S., Costa, L. M., & Saragiotto, B. T. (2019) · Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.12.006 · Cited by 390
Nisa, C. F., Bélanger, J. J., Schumpe, B. M., & Faller, D. G. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12457-2 · Cited by 349
Self-citationHow to win public support for a global carbon tax
Carattini, S., Kallbekken, S., & Orlov, A. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00124-x · Cited by 341
Negativity drives online news consumption
Robertson, C. E., Pröllochs, N., Schwarzenegger, K., Pärnamets, P., Van Bavel, J. J., & Feuerriegel, S. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01538-4 · Cited by 333 · cited 1×
“For instance, recent work found that online news consumption is largely driven by the negative content of the news ( 43 ).”
Self-citationvan Valkengoed, A. M., Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01473-w · Cited by 316
National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic
Van Bavel, J. J., Cichocka, A., Capraro, V., Sjåstad, H., Nezlek, J. B., Pavlović, T., Alfano, M., Gelfand, M. J., Azevedo, F., Birtel, M. D., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27668-9 · Cited by 311
Self-citationA Theory of System Justification
Jost, J. T. (2020) · doi:10.4159/9780674247192 · Cited by 308
Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2019) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12501 · Cited by 302
Reassessing emotion in climate change communication
Chapman, D. A., Lickel, B., & Markowitz, E. M. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0021-9 · Cited by 298
Self-citationHershfield, H. E., Cohen, T. R., & Thompson, L. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.002 · Cited by 268
Self-citationToward a principled Bayesian workflow in cognitive science.
Schad, D. J., Betancourt, M., & Vasishth, S. (2021) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000275 · Cited by 252
Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science
Milkman, K. L., Gromet, D., Ho, H., Kay, J. S., Lee, T. W., Pandiloski, P., Park, Y., Rai, A., Bazerman, M., Beshears, J., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04128-4 · Cited by 249
Field interventions for climate change mitigation behaviors: A second-order meta-analysis
Bergquist, M., Thiel, M., Goldberg, M. H., & van der Linden, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2214851120 · Cited by 209
Self-citationPublic opinion about climate policies: A review and call for more studies of what people want
Fairbrother, M. (2022) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000030 · Cited by 185
Behavioral paradigms for studying pro-environmental behavior: A systematic review
Lange, F. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01825-4 · Cited by 177
Self-citationScientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science
Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619850561 · Cited by 174
Myers, K. F., Doran, P. T., Cook, J., Kotcher, J., & Myers, T. A. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2774 · Cited by 160
Social Identity and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas
Simpson, B. (2006) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463106066381 · Cited by 150
Experiences of collaborative research
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.723 · Cited by 149
The case for impact-focused environmental psychology
Nielsen, K., Cologna, V., Lange, F., Brick, C., & Stern, P. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101559 · Cited by 146
Self-citationvan der Linden, S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.005 · Cited by 139
Lange, F., & Dewitte, S. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01617-2 · Cited by 132
Self-citationFrom future self to current action: An identity-based motivation perspective
Nurra, C., & Oyserman, D. (2018) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2017.1375003 · Cited by 123
Climate change helplessness and the (de)moralization of individual energy behavior.
Salomon, E., Preston, J. L., & Tannenbaum, M. B. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000105 · Cited by 117
Determinants of climate change policy adoption: A meta-analysis
Yeganeh, A. J., McCoy, A. P., & Schenk, T. (2019) · Urban Climate · doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100547 · Cited by 114
Adelman, R. M., Herrmann, S. D., Bodford, J. E., Barbour, J. E., Graudejus, O., Okun, M. A., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2016) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12248 · Cited by 96
Shuman, E., Saguy, T., van Zomeren, M., & Halperin, E. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000333 · Cited by 96
Self-citationSo Useful as a Good Theory? The Practicality Crisis in (Social) Psychological Theory
Berkman, E. T., & Wilson, S. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620969650 · Cited by 92
Persuasion in Parallel: How Information Changes Minds about Politics
Coppock, A. (2022) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226821832.001.0001 · Cited by 91
Lizzio‐Wilson, M., Thomas, E. F., Louis, W. R., Wilcockson, B., Amiot, C. E., Moghaddam, F. M., & McGarty, C. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620970562 · Cited by 77
Understanding the effects of partisan identity on climate change
Doell, K. C., Pärnamets, P., Harris, E., Hackel, L. M., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.013 · Cited by 74
Self-citationShrum, T. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03002-6 · Cited by 72
Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to reduce household energy demand: a scoping review
Composto, J. W., & Weber, E. U. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b8 · Cited by 70
Goldenberg, A., Cohen‐Chen, S., Goyer, J. P., Dweck, C. S., Gross, J. J., & Halperin, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1706800115 · Cited by 65
Self-citationCrowdsourcing research questions in science
Beck, S., Brasseur, T.-M., Poetz, M. K., & Sauermann, H. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104491 · Cited by 55
Keep your enemies close: Adversarial collaborations will improve behavioral science.
Clark, C. J., Costello, T., Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2022) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/mac0000004 · Cited by 47
The impact of place and legacy framing on climate action: A lifespan approach
Wickersham, R. H., Zaval, L., Pachana, N. A., & Smyer, M. A. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228963 · Cited by 46
Doell, K. C., Conte, B., & Brosch, T. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99438-y · Cited by 42
Self-citationDuckworth, A. L., & Milkman, K. L. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac214 · Cited by 36
Using a News Article to Convey Climate Science Consensus Information
Rode, J. B., Iqbal, S., Butler, B. J., & Ditto, P. H. (2021) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470211027235 · Cited by 17
Cited by
A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science
Ghai, S., Thériault, R., Forscher, P., Shoda, Y., Syed, M., Puthillam, A., Peng, H. C., Basnight-Brown, D., Majid, A., Azevedo, F., et al. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00179-1 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Todorova, B., Berkebile-Weinberg, M. M., Grayson, S. J., Patel, Y., Goldwert, D., Pei, Y., Chakroff, A., Pronizius, E., van den Broek, K. L., Vlasceanu, D., Constantino, S., Morais, M. J., Schumann, P., Rathje, S., Fang, K., Aglioti, S. M., Alfano, M., Alvarado-Yepez, A. J., Andersen, A., Anseel, F., Apps, M. A. J., Asadli, C., Awuor, F. J., Azevedo, F., Basaglia, P., Bélanger, J. J., Berger, S., Bertin, P., Białek, M., Bialobrzeska, O., Blaya-Burgo, M., Bleize, D. N. M., Bø, S., Boecker, L., Boggio, P. S., Borau, S., Bos, B., Bouguettaya, A., Brauer, M., Brick, C., Brik, T., Briker, R., Brosch, T., Buchel, O., Buonauro, D., Butalia, R., Carvacho, H., Chamberlain, S. A. E., Chan, H.-Y., Chow, D., Chung, D., Cian, L., Cohen-Eick, N., Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Contu, D., Cristea, V., Cutler, J., D'Ottone, S., De Keersmaecker, J., Delcourt, S., Delouvée, S., Diel, K., Douglas, B. D., Drupp, M. A., Dubey, S., Ekmanis, J., Elbaek, C. T., Elsherif, M., Engelhard, I. M., Escher, Y. A., Etienne, T. W., Farage, L., Farias, A. R., Feuerriegel, S., Findor, A., Freira, L., Friese, M., Gains, N. P., Gallyamova, A., Geiger, S. J., Genschow, O., Gjoneska, B., Gkinopoulos, T., Goldberg, B., Goldenberg, A., Gradidge, S., Grassini, S., Gray, K., Grelle, S., Griffin, S. M., Grigoryan, L., Grigoryan, A., Grigoryev, D., Gruber, J., Guilaran, J., Hadar, B., Hahnel, U. J. J., Halperin, E., Harvey, A. J., Haugestad, C. A. P., Herman, A. M., Hershfield, H. E., Himichi, T., Hine, D. W., Hofmann, W., Howe, L., Huaman-Chulluncuy, E. T., Huang, G., Ishii, T., Ito, A., Jia, F., Jost, J. T., Jovanović, V., Jurgiel, D., Kácha, O., Kankaanpää, R., Kantorowicz, J., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Kaplan Mintz, K., Kaya, I., Kaya, O., Khachatryan, N., Klas, A., Klein, C., Klöckner, C. A., Koppel, L., Kosachenko, A. I., Kothe, E. J., Krebs, R., Krosch, A. R., Krouwel, A. P. M., Kyrychenko, Y., Lagomarsino, M., Lamm, C., Lange, F., Lee Cunningham, J., Lees, J., Leung, T. Y., Levy, N., Lockwood, P. L., Longoni, C., López Ortega, A., Loschelder, D. D., Lu, J. G., Luo, Y., Luomba, J., Lutz, A. E., Majer, J. M., Markowitz, E., Marsh, A. A., Mascarenhas, K. L., Mbilingi, B., Mbungu, W., McHugh, C., Meijers, M. H. C., Mercier, H., Mhagama, F. L., Michalakis, K., Mikus, N., Milliron, S., Mitkidis, P., Monge-Rodríguez, F. S., Mora, Y. L., Moreau, D., Motoki, K., Moyano, M., Mus, M., Navajas, J., Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, D. M., Nguyen, T., Niemi, L., Nijssen, S. R. R., Nilsonne, G., Nitschke, J. P., Nockur, L., Okura, R., Öner, S., Özdoğru, A. A., Palumbo, H., Panagopoulos, C., Panasiti, M. S., Pärnamets, P., Paruzel-Czachura, M., Pavlov, Y. G., Payán-Gómez, C., Pearson, A. R., Pereira da Costa, L., Petrowsky, H. M., Pfattheicher, S., Pham, N. T., Ponizovskiy, V., Pretus, C., Rêgo, G. G., Reimann, R., Rhoads, S. A., Riano-Moreno, J., Richter, I., Röer, J. P., Rosa-Sullivan, J., Ross, R. M., Sabherwal, A., Saito, T., Sarrasin, O., Say, N., Schmid, K., Schmitt, M. T., Schoenegger, P., Scholz, C., Schug, M. G., Schulreich, S., Shreedhar, G., Shuman, E., Sivan, S., Sjåstad, H., Soliman, M., Soud, K., Spampatti, T., Sparkman, G., Spasovski, O., Stanley, S. K., Stern, J. A., Strahm, N., Suko, Y., Sul, S., Syropoulos, S., Taylor, N. C., Tedaldi, E., Tinghög, G., Huynh, L. D. T., Travaglino, G. A., Tsakiris, M., Tüter, İ., Tyrala, M., Uluğ, Ö. M., Urbanek, A., Valko, D., van der Linden, S., van Schie, K., van Stekelenburg, A., Vanags, E., Västfjäll, D., Vesely, S., Vintr, J., Vranka, M., Wanguche, P. O., Willer, R., Wojcik, A. D., Xu, R., Yadav, A., Zawisza, M., Zhao, X., Zhao, J., Żuk, D., & Van Bavel, J. J.
- Venue
- Science Advances
- Published
- 2024-02-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- eadj5778-eadj5778
- ISSN
- 2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391629219
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 196.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.