Cited by 808Evolution and Genetic DynamicsPhilosophy and History of ScienceGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Principles for the buffering of genetic variation

Hartman, John L., Garvik, Barbara, Hartwell, Lee·2001·Science

Abstract

Most genetic research has used inbred organisms and has not explored the complexity of natural genetic variation present in outbred populations. The translation of genotype to phenotype is complicated by gene interactions observed as epistasis, canalization, robustness, or buffering. Analysis of double mutations in inbred experimental organisms suggests some principles for gene interaction that may apply to natural variation as well. The buffering of variation in one gene is most often due to a small number of other genes that function in the same biochemical process. However, buffering can also result from genes functioning in processes extrinsic to that of the primary gene.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1056072

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large part of phenotype variability across patients with the same ABCD1 genotype may be due to stochasticity.

    “Beyond identifiable causes, a large part of phenotype variability across patients with the same ABCD1 genotype may “simply” be due to stochasticity, a factor hitherto considered “noise” by Cartesian researchers.”

    From Revisiting the Pathogenesis of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (2025) · cites this paper as [133]

  • Stochasticity rules all living cells through fluctuations in gene expression, molecular interactions, and metabolic fluxes, even systems governed by deterministic laws.

    “Actually, stochasticity rules all living cells through fluctuations in gene expression, molecular interactions, and metabolic fluxes, even systems governed by deterministic laws, such as monogenic genetics [131,132,133,134].”

    From Revisiting the Pathogenesis of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (2025) · cites this paper as [133]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hartman, J. L., Garvik, B., & Hartwell, L.
Affiliations
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • Houston Methodist (US)
Corresponding author
Hartwell, Lee
Venue
Science
Published
2001-02-09
Volume
291
Issue
5506
Pages
1001-1004
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1975931018
Cited by
808
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 53
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM17709)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
epistasis, canalization, robustness, genetic interactions, double mutations, natural genetic variation, genotype-phenotype correlation, outbred populations
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Epistasis, Genetic, Biological Evolution, Genes, Genotype, Humans, Mutation, Phenotype, Genetic Variation, Yeasts, Quantitative Trait, Heritable

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review