Cited by 817

Knockout Rats via Embryo Microinjection of Zinc-Finger Nucleases

Geurts, Aron M., Cost, Gregory J., Freyvert, Yevgeniy, Zeitler, Bryan, Miller, Jeffrey C., Choi, Vivian M., Jenkins, Shirin S., Wood, Adam +18 more·2009·Science

Abstract

Targeted gene disruption in rats paves the way for new human disease models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1172447

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some countries discouraged or prohibited germline modification research a decade before the technical feasibility of germline modification was confirmed in rats in 2009.

    “Because of such concerns - as well as for serious ethical reasons - some countries discouraged or prohibited this type of research a decade before the technical feasibility of germline modification was confirmed in rats in 2009 (ref. 9).”

    From Don’t edit the human germ line (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]Aitman TJ Nat Genet 40 516 May 2008 18443588
  2. [2]Carroll D Gene Ther 15 1463 Nov 2008 18784746 PMC2747807
  3. [3]Doyon Y Nat Biotech 26 702 Jun 2008 PMC2674762 18500334
  4. [4]Michalkiewicz M Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293 H881 Jul 2007 17322424
  5. [5]Pabo CO Peisach E Grant RA Annu Rev Biochem 70 313 2001 11395410

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geurts, A. M., Cost, G. J., Freyvert, Y., Zeitler, B., Miller, J. C., Choi, V. M., Jenkins, S. S., Wood, A., Cui, X., Meng, X., Vincent, A., Lam, S., Michalkiewicz, M., Schilling, R., Foeckler, J., Kalloway, S., Weiler, H., Ménoret, S., Anegon, I., Davis, G. D., Zhang, L., Rebar, E. J., Gregory, P. D., Urnov, F. D., Jacob, H. J., & Buelow, R.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-07-24
Volume
325
Issue
5939
Pages
433-433
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
817
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review