Cited by 914Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Glucose Deprivation Contributes to the Development of KRAS Pathway Mutations in Tumor Cells

Open access
Yun, Jihye, Rago, Carlo, Cheong, Ian, Pagliarini, Ray, Angenendt, Philipp, Rajagopalan, Harith, Schmidt, Kerstin, Willson, James K. V. +8 more·2009·Science

Abstract

Desperately Seeking Glucose: Mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes allow cancer cells to outgrow their neighboring healthy cells. What microenvironmental conditions provide a selective growth advantage to these cells? Yun et al. (p. 1555 , published online 6 August) identify low glucose availability as a microenvironmental factor driving the acquisition of KRAS oncogenic mutations that allow cancer cells to survive and grow. In genetically matched colorectal cancer cells that differed only in the mutational status of the KRAS oncogene, mutant cells selectively overexpressed glucose transporter-1 and exhibited enhanced glucose uptake and glycolysis. When cells with wild-type KRAS were placed in a low-glucose environment, very few cells survived but most of the survivors expressed high levels of glucose transporter-1, and a small percentage of the survivors had acquired new KRAS mutations. Thus, glucose deprivation may help to drive the acquisition of cell growth–promoting oncogenic mutations during tumor development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1174229

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mutant KRAS upregulates GLUT1 to increase glucose uptake and induces HK1 and HK2 to increase glycolytic activity.

    “Gene expression and metabolic flux analyses have shown that it upregulates the expression of the GLUT1 glucose transporter to promote glucose uptake by cells, as well as inducing expression of hexokinase 1 and 2 (HK1 and HK2) rate-limiting enzymes of glycolysis, to increase glycolytic activity27–30 (Fig. 2a).”
  • Mutant KRAS or BRAF helps drive the Warburg effect partly by increasing GLUT1.

    “Oncogenic KRAS or BRAF mutations contribute to the Warburg effect, in part by upregulating GLUT1 (REF46).”

    From Targeting cancer vulnerabilities with high-dose vitamin C (2019) · cites this paper as [46]

  • Most cancers have highly effective upregulated, insulin-independent glucose uptake mechanisms and therefore may not derive a further growth advantage from hyperglycemia.

    “Direct data concerning dose-response characteristics of cancers to glucose are sparse, but it is relevant that most cancers have highly effective upregulated, insulin-independent glucose uptake mechanisms (67) and therefore may not derive a further growth advantage from hyperglycemia.”

    From Diabetes and Cancer (2010) · cites this paper as [67]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]Bos JL Cancer Res 49 4682 1989 2547513
  2. [31]Airley R Clin Cancer Res 7 928 2001 11309343
  3. [34]Yasuda S J Nucl Med 42 989 2001 11438616
  4. [37]Delbeke D J Nucl Med 38 1196 1997 9255148

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yun, J., Rago, C., Cheong, I., Pagliarini, R., Angenendt, P., Rajagopalan, H., Schmidt, K., Willson, J. K. V., Markowitz, S., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A., Velculescu, V. E., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., & Papadopoulos, N.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • The Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics and The Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
  • Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rajagopalan, Harith
  • Vogelstein, Bert
Venue
Science
Published
2009-09-18
Volume
325
Issue
5947
Pages
1555-1559
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1970766774
Cited by
914
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 61
FWCI
15.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA43460, R37CA043460, P50CA062924, CA 62924)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
glucose deprivation, KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, GLUT1, glucose transporter 1, colorectal cancer cell lines, tumor progression, glycolysis, glucose uptake, 3-bromopyruvate, transcriptome
MeSH terms
Animals, Glucose, Glycolysis, Humans, Mice, Nude, Mutation, Neoplasm Transplantation, Pyruvates, Genes, ras, Transplantation, Heterologous, Colorectal Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Gene Targeting, Lactic Acid, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Cell Line, Tumor, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Cell Proliferation, Glucose Transporter Type 1, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review