Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,117

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans

Open access
Oude Munnink, Bas B., Sikkema, Reina S., Nieuwenhuijse, David F., Molenaar, Robert Jan, Munger, Emmanuelle, Molenkamp, Richard, van der Spek, Arco, Tolsma, Paulien, Rietveld, Ariene, Brouwer, Miranda, Bouwmeester-Vincken, Noortje, Harders, Frank, Hakze-van der Honing, Renate, Wegdam-Blans, Marjolein C. A., Bouwstra, Ruth J., GeurtsvanKessel, Corine, van der Eijk, Annemiek A., Velkers, Francisca C., Smit, Lidwien A. M., Stegeman, Arjan, van der Poel, Wim H. M., Koopmans, Marion P. G.·2021·Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Two-way transmission on mink farms: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a zoonotic virus—one that spilled over from another species to infect and transmit among humans. We know that humans can infect other animals with SARS-CoV-2, such as domestic cats and even tigers in zoos. Oude Munnink et al. used whole-genome sequencing to show that SARS-CoV-2 infections were rife among mink farms in the southeastern Netherlands, all of which are destined to be closed by March 2021 (see the Perspective by Zhou and Shi). Toward the end of June 2020, 68% of mink farm workers tested positive for the virus or had antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. These large clusters of infection were initiated by human COVID-19 cases with viruses that bear the D614G mutation. Sequencing has subsequently shown that mink-to-human transmission also occurred. More work must be done to understand whether there is a risk that mustelids may become a reservoir for SARS-CoV-2. Science , this issue p. 172 ; see also p. 120

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abe5901

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.3201/eid2612.202989 · doi:10.3201/eid2612.202989
  2. 10.12834/VetIt.2246.12523.1 · doi:10.12834/vetit.2246.12523.1
  3. Q. Zhang H. Zhang K. Huang Y. Yang X. Hui J. Gao X. He C. Li W. Gong Y. Zhang C. Peng X. Gao H. Chen Z. Zou Z. Shi M. Jin SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing serum antibodies in cats: A serological investigation. bioRxiv 2020.04.01.021196 [Preprint]. 3 April 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.01.021196.10.1101/2020.04.01.021196 · doi:10.1101/2020.04.01.021196
  4. 10.1126/science.abe3870 · doi:10.1126/science.abe3870

Cited by

See all 1,117

Metadata

Authors
Oude Munnink, B. B., Sikkema, R. S., Nieuwenhuijse, D. F., Molenaar, R. J., Munger, E., Molenkamp, R., van der Spek, A., Tolsma, P., Rietveld, A., Brouwer, M., Bouwmeester-Vincken, N., Harders, F., Hakze-van der Honing, R., Wegdam-Blans, M. C. A., Bouwstra, R. J., GeurtsvanKessel, C., van der Eijk, A. A., Velkers, F. C., Smit, L. A. M., Stegeman, A., van der Poel, W. H. M., & Koopmans, M. P. G.
Venue
Science
Published
2021-01-08
Volume
371
Issue
6525
Pages
172-177
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3102258632
Cited by
1,117
References
54
FWCI
27.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Funders
  • ZonMW (10150062010005)
  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (848096, 101003589)
  • The European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (874735)
  • the Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Foods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.