Cited by 109Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 40 of the 53 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

APOE3 -Jacksonville (V236E) variant reduces self-aggregation and risk of dementia

Open access

Abstract

A rare APOE variant APOE3 -Jac reduces self-aggregation and promotes healthy brain aging.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The APOE3-Jacksonville (V236E) variant is associated with reduced risk of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies and promotes healthy brain aging. Mechanistically, V236E reduces apoE self-aggregation, increases apoE lipidation, and lowers amyloid pathology and plaque-associated toxicity in human tissue and mouse models.

Key findings

  • APOE3-Jac carriers had reduced AD risk (OR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.03–0.45), comparable to or better than APOE2 (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.38–0.54); the variant was found at 0.12% frequency on the APOE3 backbone and at an overall 2.0% carrier frequency in exceptional-aging subjects.
  • In human brains, APOE3-Jac carriers showed reduced insoluble apoE, increased soluble/insoluble apoE ratios, lower soluble Aβ42 and insoluble Aβ40/Aβ42, and fewer cored Aβ plaques.
  • Biochemically, WT apoE3 eluted primarily as 4–6 molecule aggregates, whereas apoE3-Jac eluted as monomers; apoE3-Jac also promoted greater cholesterol efflux. The V236E substitution reduced apoE4 aggregation, with apoE4 existing primarily as tetramers at 30 μM while apoE4-Jac consisted mostly of dimers.
  • In 5xFAD mice, astrocytic AAV-apoE3-Jac expression reduced amyloid deposition, insoluble Aβ40/Aβ42, fibrillar plaques, plaque-associated apoE, microglial clustering, dystrophic neurites, and reactive astrocyte markers compared with apoE3; behavioral improvement was a trend.

Methods

  • Human genetic and pathological analyses included exome sequencing in exceptional-aging brains (n=46/108 test; n=62/108 validation), an antemortem PET exceptional-aging series (n=45), DLB clinical cases (n=441), pathologically defined DLB cases (n=622), clinical controls (n=975), and an AD pathological cohort (n=469). Biochemical comparisons used APOE3 (n=8) and APOE3-Jac (n=3) postmortem frontal cortex samples (average age 90.13 ± 2.8 years).
  • Cellular and biochemical assays used site-directed mutagenesis, HEK293 expression, size exclusion chromatography/FPLC, chemical cross-linking, heparin binding, cholesterol efflux with BODIPY-cholesterol, immunoprecipitation, lipidomics, and analytical ultracentrifugation.
  • Mouse experiments used AAV8-GFAP-apoE3 or AAV8-GFAP-apoE3-Jac delivered intracerebroventricularly at postnatal day 2 into 5xFAD amyloid model mice, followed by amyloid, plaque, glial, neuritic dystrophy, and behavioral analyses.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the APOE3-Jac variant is rare (MAF 0.12%), so human brain analyses had small sample sizes and require replication in much larger cohorts; the DLB finding was not statistically significant (P=0.11).
  • The paper notes that it is difficult to distinguish whether apoE self-aggregation alone, apoE-Aβ aggregation, or both drive AD progression, and that end-stage amyloid assessments may not fully recapitulate early apoE effects on Aβ seeding.
  • The paper states that the cognitive benefit in amyloid model mice was only a trend and not apparent at 4 months of age, warranting further aging studies; human microglial analysis was limited because amyloid deposition was undetectable in 2 of 3 APOE3/3-Jac brains.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc9375

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

40 of 53 cited sources checked · 21 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 65 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 41
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
55 of 55
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanism by which APOE3-Jac protects against Alzheimer’s disease risk remains unclear.

    “The variant was found to be associated with markedly reduced risk of AD; however, the mechanism by which this variant protects against AD risk remains unclear.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The functional effects of apoE3-Jac observed in cellular and mouse models explain its protective association against Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies in humans.

    “Our study demonstrates that apoE3-Jac protects against AD and related dementia, and promotes healthy brain aging by reducing its self-aggregation, leading to decreased amyloid plaques and related toxicity, as well as enhanced lipidation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reducing apoE self-aggregation is a viable therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies.

    “These findings have major implications on how apoE aggregation contributes to disease pathogenesis and nominate a drug targeting strategy by reducing apoE aggregation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 5xFAD mouse model’s amyloid pathology and plaque-associated toxicity are relevant to human Alzheimer’s disease.

    “To investigate whether apoE3-Jac variant affects amyloid pathogenesis in vivo, we also established 5xFAD amyloid model mice expressing apoE3 or apoE3-Jac via AAV-mediated gene delivery.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Exceptional aging (≥85 years, cognitively normal, minimal AD pathology) is enriched for protective genetic variants such as APOE3-Jac.

    “Neuropathologically-defined exceptional-aging brains (≥ 85 years) were obtained from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank. Individuals who did not have neurodegenerative disease diagnosis (e.g. AD, DLB, frontotemporal lobar degeneration), were cognitively normal prior to autopsy, and had available frozen tissue, were selected.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 5xFAD amyloid mouse model with apoE3-Jac expression recapitulates key aspects of human AD amyloid pathology and apoE biology relevant to dementia.

    “Our in vivo study demonstrates that expression of apoE3-Jac in an amyloid mouse model decreases the association of apoE with amyloid plaques, which may in turn reduce amyloid deposition as well as plaque-associated microgliosis and resultant neuronal toxicity.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 70 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–109 of 109

Metadata

Authors
Liu, C.-C., Murray, M. E., Li, X., Zhao, N., Wang, N., Heckman, M. G., Shue, F., Martens, Y., Li, Y., Raulin, A.-C., Rosenberg, C. L., Doss, S. V., Zhao, J., Wren, M. C., Jia, L., Ren, Y., Ikezu, T. C., Lu, W., Fu, Y., Caulfield, T., Trottier, Z. A., Knight, J., Chen, Y., Linares, C., Wang, X., Kurti, A., Asmann, Y. W., Wszolek, Z. K., Smith, G. E., Vemuri, P., Kantarci, K., Knopman, D. S., Lowe, V. J., Jack, C. R., Parisi, J. E., Ferman, T. J., Boeve, B. F., Graff-Radford, N. R., Petersen, R. C., Younkin, S. G., Fryer, J. D., Wang, H., Han, X., Frieden, C., Dickson, D. W., Ross, O. A., & Bu, G.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
  • Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
  • Barshop Institute for Longevity and Aging Studies, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Chia-Chen
  • Murray, Melissa E.
  • Li, Xia
  • Zhao, Na
  • Bu, Guojun
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2021-09-29
Volume
13
Issue
613
Pages
eabc9375-eabc9375
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W3204399059
Cited by
108
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 1
FWCI
10.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1rf1ag062110-01, 1rf1ag061872-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG015866, R01AG027924, R37AG027924, RF1-AG061872, U01AG052409, U01AG006786, RF1AG057181, R01AG054449, R01AG021010, R01AG011378, RF1 AG062110, RF1AG046205, R01AG041851, P30AG062677, U19AG069701, P30AG066546)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS076471, R01NS078086, U54NS110435, P50NS072187, U01NS100620, P01NS074969)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, APOE ε4, amyloid plaques, astrocytes, brain lipids, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, sulfatide, synaptic function, neuritic dystrophy, amyloid pathology, brain aging
MeSH terms
Apolipoproteins E, Dementia, Humans, Apolipoprotein E3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-31, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-31 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review