Cited by 500Physical Activity and HealthHealth disparities and outcomesWorkplace Health and Well-being

Sedentary behaviour and the risk of depression: a meta-analysis

Zhai, Long, Zhang, Yi, Zhang, Dongfeng·2015·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: Sedentary behaviour is associated with risk of depression. We review and quantitatively summarise the evidence from observational studies in a meta-analysis. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases for observational studies related to the association of sedentary behaviour and depression risk up to 15 January 2014. Summary relative risks (RRs) were estimated by the use of a random effects model. Results: Thirteen cross-sectional studies with 110 152 participants and 11 longitudinal studies with 83 014 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The summary RR of depression for the highest versus non-occasional/occasional sedentary behaviour was 1.25 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.35, I 2=50.7%) for all included studies. The pooled RRs of depression for sedentary behaviour were 1.31 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.48) in cross-sectional studies and 1.14 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.21) in longitudinal studies. In subgroup analysis by different types of sedentary behaviour, the pooled RRs of depression were 1.13 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.21) for long-time TV viewing and 1.22 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.34) for prolonged computer or internet use. Conclusions: This meta-analysis of observational studies indicates that sedentary behaviour is associated with increased risk of depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093613

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhai, L., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, D.
Affiliations
Qingdao University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Dongfeng
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-09-02
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
705-709
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2156295306
Cited by
500
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
sedentary behavior, depression, depression risk, television viewing, computer and internet use, prolonged screen time, physical inactivity
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Publication Bias, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review