Cited by 30Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Long-term effectiveness and outcome predictors of therapist-guided internet-based cognitive–behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder in routine psychiatric care

Open access
El Alaoui, Samir, Hedman, Erik, Ljótsson, Brjánn, Lindefors, Nils·2015·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: Although the short-term outcome of therapist-guided internet-based cognitive–behavioural therapy (ICBT) for treating social anxiety disorder (SAD) has been well studied, little research has been undertaken on the sustainability of treatment gains, especially under clinically representative conditions. Further, there is some debate whether delivering psychological treatment via the internet may be suitable for more severely ill patients. Design: Longitudinal multilevel growth-modelling of long-term (1–4 years) follow-up cohort data. Setting: An outpatient psychiatric clinic specialised in internet interventions. Participants: 446 adults having been treated for SAD. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary outcomes were estimated improvement rate and Cohen's d effect size on the self-rated Liebowitz Social Anxiety Disorder Scale. Secondary outcome measures were change in comorbid depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life. Results: A large treatment effect was observed on the primary outcome measure after treatment (d=0.8 (95% CI 0.7 to 0.9)), with continued long-term improvements (d=1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)). However, the rate of change varied significantly between individuals over time. A faster rate of improvement was observed among patients with higher illness severity, whereas having a family history of social anxiety was related to worse response. Long-term improvements were also observed in comorbid depressive symptoms (d=0.7 (95% CI 0.5 to 0.8)) and health-related quality of life (d=−0.3 (95% CI −0.4 to −0.1)). Conclusions: These findings provide evidence for the long-term effectiveness of ICBT for SAD in routine clinical practice, even for more severe cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007902

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment credibility was high and similar to credibility ratings in similar ICBT studies.

    “Treatment credibility was high and similar to credibility ratings in similar ICBT studies (Carlbring et al., 2003;El Alaoui et al., 2015).”

    From Internet delivered cognitive behavior therapy for antenatal depression: A randomised controlled trial (2017) · cites this paper as El Alaoui et al., 2015

    The Results (Sample description, Table 1; page unavailable) report a mean treatment-credibility score of 36.24 out of 50, supporting the description of credibility as high. The paper does not compare that score with credibility ratings in similar ICBT studies, so the similarity claim is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Even in settings providing ICBT in regular care, the main part of the patients can come from self-referral.

    “However, even in settings providing ICBT in regular care, the main part of the patients can come from self-referral (El Alaoui et al., 2015;Hedman et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [2]Reich J, Goldenberg I, Vasile R A prospective follow-along study of the course of social phobia. Psychiatry Res 1994; 54: 249– 58. 10.1016/0165-1781(94)90019-1 7792329 · DOI
  2. [3]Stein MB, Roy-Byrne PP, Craske MG Functional impact and health utility of anxiety disorders in primary care outpatients. Med Care 2005; 43: 1164– 70. 10.1097/01.mlr.0000185750.18119.fd 16299426 · DOI
  3. [8]Boettcher J, Carlbring P, Renneberg B Internet-based interventions for social anxiety disorder—an overview. Verhaltenstherapie 2013; 23: 160– 8. 10.1159/000354747 · DOI
  4. [9]Carlbring P, Nordgren LB, Furmark T Long-term outcome of Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy for social phobia: a 30-month follow-up. Behav Res Ther 2009; 47: 848– 50. 10.1016/j.brat.2009.06.012 19631312 · DOI
  5. [10]Hedman E, Furmark T, Carlbring P A 5-Year follow-up of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e39 10.2196/jmir.1776 21676694 PMC3221374 · DOI
  6. [11]Hedman E, El Alaoui S, Lindefors N Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Internet- vs. group-based cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder: 4-Year follow-up of a randomized trial. Behav Res Ther 2014; 59C: 20– 9. 10.1016/j.brat.2014.05.010 24949908 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [15]Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ Empirical-evidence of bias—dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408– 12. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030 7823387 · DOI
  8. [18]Scholing A, Emmelkamp PM Prediction of treatment outcome in social phobia: a cross-validation. Behav Res Ther 1999; 37: 659– 70. 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00175-2 10402691 · DOI
  9. [21]Clark DM, Wells A A cognitive model of social phobia. In: Heimberg RG, Leibowitz M, Hope DA, eds Social phobia: diagnosis, assessment and treatment. New York: Guilford press, 1995: 63– 93.
  10. [25]Mattick RP, Clarke JC Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behav Res Ther 1998; 36: 455– 70. 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6 9670605 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [29]Svanborg P, Ekselius L Self-assessment of DSM-IV criteria for major depression in psychiatric out- and inpatients. Nord J Psychiatry 2003; 57: 291– 6. 10.1080/08039480307281 12888397 · DOI
  12. [30]Svanborg P, Asberg M A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). J Affect Disord 2001; 64: 203– 16. 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00242-1 11313087 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [31]EuroQol-Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199– 208. 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 10109801 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [32]Stark RG, Reitmeir P, Leidl R Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in inflammatory bowel disease in Germany. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010; 16: 42– 51. 10.1002/ibd.20989 19475674 · DOI
  15. [36]Hox JJ Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. 2nd edn New York: Routledge, 2010.
  16. [38]Mululo SC, Menezes GB, Vigne P A review on predictors of treatment outcome in social anxiety disorder. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2012; 34: 92– 100. 10.1590/S1516-44462012000100016 22392395 · DOI
  17. [39]Slaap BR, van Vliet IM, Westenberg HG Responders and non-responders to drug treatment in social phobia: differences at baseline and prediction of response. J Affect Disord 1996; 39: 13– 19. 10.1016/0165-0327(96)00013-4 8835649 · DOI
  18. [40]Tillfors M, Furmark T, Ekselius L Social phobia and avoidant personality disorder as related to parental history of social anxiety: a general population study. Behav Res Ther 2001; 39: 289– 98. 10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00003-6 11227810 · DOI
  19. [41]Yonkers KA, Dyck IR, Keller MB An eight-year longitudinal comparison of clinical course and characteristics of social phobia among men and women. Psychiatr Serv 2001; 52: 637– 43. 10.1176/appi.ps.52.5.637 11331798 · DOI
  20. [44]Titov N, Andrews G, Schwencke G Shyness 1: distance treatment of social phobia over the Internet. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2008; 42: 585– 94. 10.1080/00048670802119762 18612862 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [45]Carlbring P, Gunnarsdottir M, Hedensjo L Treatment of social phobia: randomised trial of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy with telephone support. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190: 123– 8. 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.020107 17267928 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El Alaoui, S., Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., & Lindefors, N.
Affiliations
  • Division of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-06
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
e007902
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1940766854
Cited by
30
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Stockholms Läns Landsting (ALF 20130413)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, long-term treatment effectiveness, predictors of treatment response, disease severity, comorbid depression, health-related quality of life, psychiatric outpatient clinic
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Prognosis, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Sweden, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review