Cited by 133Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Shyness 2: Treating Social Phobia Online: Replication and Extension

Titov, Nickolai, Andrews, Gavin, Schwencke, Genevieve·2008·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: In a randomized controlled trial Titov et al. (2008) demonstrated significant benefit from an Internet- and email-based treatment programme for social phobia. The present study (Shyness 2) seeks to replicate that finding and compares results with benchmark data. Method: Eighty-eight individuals with social phobia were randomly assigned to a clinician-assisted computerized cognitive behavioural treatment programme or to a waitlist control group. Participants completed the same treatment programme used in Shyness 1, consisting of six online lessons, cognitive behavioural homework assignments, email contact with a therapist, and participation in an online discussion forum. An intention-to-treat model was used for data analyses. Results: A total of 80% of treatment group participants completed all lessons, and post-treatment data were obtained from 78/81 participants. Treatment group participants each had an average of 127 min of therapist contact over the 10 week programme, including an average of 22 email contacts plus therapist responses to forum postings. Pre- to post-treatment differences were seen between treatment and waitlist participants across two measures of symptoms of social phobia, and across a measure of disability. Mean within- and between-group effect sizes (Cohen's d) across the two primary outcome measures were 1.18, and 1.20, respectively. Quantitative and qualitative data indicate that the procedure is very acceptable to participants. Conclusions: These results closely replicate those obtained in Shyness 1, indicating that the treatment procedure is reliable. These results compare favourably with outcomes reported in benchmarking studies from high-quality face-to-face treatment programmes for social phobia. These results provide further positive data about the utility of Internet-based guided self-help programmes for people with social phobia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00048670802119820

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies categorized participants into adherent or not, or usage categories such as low, medium, and high, while others used continuous variables or a combination of these.

    “Several studies categorized participants into adherent or not [49,54,57,75], or usage categories such as low, medium, and high [60], while others used continuous variables [23,24,33-36,38-41,43-45,50-52,55,56,58,59,61,76] or a combination of these [42,46,53,64-66,77].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Titov, N., Andrews, G., & Schwencke, G.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Titov, Nickolai
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
595-605
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W1995762476
Cited by
133
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
24.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, online therapy, online forums, guided self-help, replication study, treatment acceptability, treatment outcome comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Demography, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Shyness, Waiting Lists, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review