Cited by 150Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of adults with ADHD: A meta-review

Open access
De Crescenzo, Franco, Cortese, Samuele, Adamo, Nicoletta, Janiri, Luigi·2017·Evidence Based Mental Health

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterised by a persistent and impairing pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity and it is one of the most common neuropsychiatric conditions. Evidence about interventions of adults with ADHD is growing rapidly and clinicians need a reliable summary of all the best available information in order to better inform their daily practice. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO and Cochrane databases until 31 May 2016 for systematic reviews about pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments in adults with ADHD and carried out a meta-review to address clinically relevant questions. We identified a total of 40 papers. Psychostimulants-such as methylphenidate, dexamphetamine, mixed amphetamine salts and lisdexamfetamine-and non-psychostimulants-such as atomoxetine-were the most studied agents. Overall, pharmacological treatments were significantly more efficacious than placebo (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.45, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.52), albeit less well accepted (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36) and tolerated (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.97 to 2.66). The effects of pharmacological treatment for individuals with co-occurring ADHD and substance use disorder are still uncertain. The evidence for the efficacy and effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments of ADHD in adults, as well as the combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, is only preliminary. In conclusion, while available evidence addressed mainly the efficacy and tolerability of psychostimulants and non-psychostimulants for ADHD core symptoms in the short term, we still need further empirical support for the non-pharmacological and multimodal treatments. A comprehensive evidence-informed hierarchy of ADHD drugs based on their efficacy and tolerability is not yet available but it should be the next research priority in the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/eb-2016-102415

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crescenzo et al. note modest improvements in adults with ADHD from omega-3 but emphasize the need for more rigorous trials.

    “Crescenzo et al. [181] also note modest improvements in adults with ADHD but emphasize the need for more rigorous trials.”

    From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [181]

    The Results discuss improvements with medications and some psychological treatments, and the Abstract calls for further evidence on non-pharmacological treatments. Neither passage addresses omega-3 or trials of omega-3 in adults with ADHD; searches for omega, fish oil, and polyunsaturated fatty acids found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Crescenzo, F., Cortese, S., Adamo, N., & Janiri, L.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Psychiatry and Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
  • Solent NHS Trust (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Venue
Evidence Based Mental Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-12-19
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
4-11
ISSN
  • 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-960X
OpenAlex
W2565831906
Cited by
150
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
adult ADHD, pharmacotherapy, non-pharmacological treatment, psychostimulants, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, mixed amphetamine salts, lisdexamfetamine, atomoxetine, treatment efficacy, tolerability, substance use comorbidity, multimodal therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review