Cited by 288Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchCancer Risks and Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International Cancer Microbiome Consortium consensus statement on the role of the human microbiome in carcinogenesis

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this consensus statement, an international panel of experts deliver their opinions on key questions regarding the contribution of the human microbiome to carcinogenesis. DESIGN: International experts in oncology and/or microbiome research were approached by personal communication to form a panel. A structured, iterative, methodology based around a 1-day roundtable discussion was employed to derive expert consensus on key questions in microbiome-oncology research. RESULTS: Some 18 experts convened for the roundtable discussion and five key questions were identified regarding: (1) the relevance of dysbiosis/an altered gut microbiome to carcinogenesis; (2) potential mechanisms of microbiota-induced carcinogenesis; (3) conceptual frameworks describing how the human microbiome may drive carcinogenesis; (4) causation versus association; and (5) future directions for research in the field.The panel considered that, despite mechanistic and supporting evidence from animal and human studies, there is currently no direct evidence that the human commensal microbiome is a key determinant in the aetiopathogenesis of cancer. The panel cited the lack of large longitudinal, cohort studies as a principal deciding factor and agreed that this should be a future research priority. However, while acknowledging gaps in the evidence, expert opinion was that the microbiome, alongside environmental factors and an epigenetically/genetically vulnerable host, represents one apex of a tripartite, multidirectional interactome that drives carcinogenesis. CONCLUSION: Data from longitudinal cohort studies are needed to confirm the role of the human microbiome as a key driver in the aetiopathogenesis of cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318556

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Key terms in the microbiome literature.
Figure 1 Key terms in the microbiome literature.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2 A multistage, structured, iterative methodology was employed. ICMC, International Cancer Microbiome Consortium.
Figure 2 A multistage, structured, iterative methodology was employed. ICMC, International Cancer Microbiome Consortium.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Select quotes on dysbiosis and the microbiome.
Figure 3 Select quotes on dysbiosis and the microbiome.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Select quotes on mechanisms of microbiome-induced carcinogenesis. HPV, human papilloma virus.
Figure 4 Select quotes on mechanisms of microbiome-induced carcinogenesis. HPV, human papilloma virus.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Select quotes on conceptual frameworks describing microbiome-induced carcinogenesis.
Figure 5 Select quotes on conceptual frameworks describing microbiome-induced carcinogenesis.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Select quotes on the potential causal relationship between the human microbiome and carcinogenesis.
Figure 6 Select quotes on the potential causal relationship between the human microbiome and carcinogenesis.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Select quotes regarding future directions in the field.
Figure 7 Select quotes regarding future directions in the field.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Scott, A. J., Alexander, J. L., Merrifield, C. A., Cunningham, D., Jobin, C., Brown, R., Alverdy, J., O’Keefe, S. J., Gaskins, H. R., Teare, J., Yu, J., Hughes, D. J., Verstraelen, H., Burton, J., O’Toole, P. W., Rosenberg, D. W., Marchesi, J. R., & Kinross, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Royal Marsden Hospital (GB)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Lawson Health Research Institute (CA)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
Corresponding author
Marchesi, Julian R
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-05-15
Volume
68
Issue
9
Pages
1624-1632
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2945346908
Cited by
288
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 8
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Cancer Research UK
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
human microbiome, carcinogenesis, gut dysbiosis, association versus causation, longitudinal cohort
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, DNA Damage, Humans, Inflammation, Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Biomedical Research, Carcinogenesis, Microbiota, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review