Cited by 903Gut microbiota and healthGenetic factors in colorectal cancerOral microbiology and periodontitis research

A bacterial driver–passenger model for colorectal cancer: beyond the usual suspects

Tjalsma, Harold, Boleij, Annemarie, Marchesi, Julian R., Dutilh, Bas E.·2012·Nature Reviews Microbiology

Abstract

Cancer has long been considered a genetic disease. However, accumulating evidence supports the involvement of infectious agents in the development of cancer, especially in those organs that are continuously exposed to microorganisms, such as the large intestine. Recent next-generation sequencing studies of the intestinal microbiota now offer an unprecedented view of the aetiology of sporadic colorectal cancer and have revealed that the microbiota associated with colorectal cancer contains bacterial species that differ in their temporal associations with developing tumours. Here, we propose a bacterial driver-passenger model for microbial involvement in the development of colorectal cancer and suggest that this model be incorporated into the genetic paradigm of cancer progression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrmicro2819

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The driver-passenger model for colorectal cancer proposes that a first hit by indigenous intestinal bacteria ('bacterial drivers') drives DNA damage that contributes to CRC initiation, and that tumorigenesis then induces intestinal niche alterations favouring proliferation of opportunistic bacteria ('bacterial passengers').

    “Tjalsma et al90 have also proposed the ‘driver-passenger’ model for CRC: a first hit by indigenous intestinal bacteria (‘bacterial drivers’), which drive the DNA damage that contributes to CRC initiation. Second, tumorigenesis induces intestinal niche alterations that favour the proliferation of opportunistic bacteria (‘bacterial passengers’).”

    From The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier (2016) · cites this paper as [90]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tjalsma, H., Boleij, A., Marchesi, J. R., & Dutilh, B. E.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Tjalsma, Harold
  • Marchesi, Julian R.
Venue
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Published
2012-06-25
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
575-582
ISSN
  • 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1534
OpenAlex
W2101565190
Cited by
903
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
KWF Kankerbestrijding
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
colorectal cancer, gut microbiota, cancer etiology, tumor progression
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Bacterial Infections, Humans, Models, Biological, Colorectal Neoplasms, Biota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review