Cited by 211Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenomics and Rare Diseases

Identification of a recurrent breakpoint within the SHANK3 gene in the 22q13.3 deletion syndrome

Open access
Bonaglia, M C, Giorda, R, Mani, E, Aceti, G, Anderlid, B-M, Baroncini, A, Pramparo, T, Zuffardi, O·2006·Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

Introduction: The 22q13.3 deletion syndrome (MIM 606232) is characterised by neonatal hypotonia, normal to accelerated growth, absent to severely delayed speech, global developmental delay, and minor dysmorphic facial features. We report the molecular characterisation of the deletion breakpoint in two unrelated chromosome 22q13.3 deletion cases. Methods: The deletions were characterised by FISH, checked for other abnormalities by array-CGH, and confirmed by Real-Time PCR, and finally the breakpoints were cloned, sequenced, and compared. Results: Both cases show the cardinal features of the 22q13.3 deletion syndrome associated with a deletion involving the last 100 kb of chromosome 22q13.3. The cases show a breakpoint within the same 15 bp repeat unit, overlapping the results obtained by Wong and colleagues in 1997 and suggesting that a recurrent deletion breakpoint exists within the SHANK3 gene. The direct repeat involved in these 22q13 deletion cases is presumably able to form slipped (hairpin) structures, but it also has a strong potential for forming tetraplex structures. Discussion: Three cases with a common breakpoint within SHANK3 share a number of common phenotypic features, such as mental retardation and developmental delay with severely delayed or absent expressive speech. The two cases presented here, having a deletion partially overlapping the commercial subtelomeric probe, highlight the difficulties in interpreting FISH results and suggest that many similar cases may be overlooked.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jmg.2005.038604

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss of a functional copy of the SHANK3 gene leads to the neurobehavioral manifestations of 22q13 deletion syndrome and/or to autism spectrum disorders.

    “Loss of a functional copy of the SHANK3 gene leads to the neurobehavioral manifestations of 22q13 deletion syndrome and/or to autism spectrum disorders.”
  • Features of Angelman, Phelan McDermid, and Smith-Magenis syndromes can be recapitulated by point mutations in UBE3A, SHANK3, and RAI1 respectively.

    “For example, clinical features of Angelman, Phelan McDermid and Smith-Magenis Syndromes, which are caused by large deletions of multiple genes, can be recapitulated by point mutations in UBE3A (Fang et al., 1999) and SHANK3 (Bonaglia et al., 2006) and RAI1 (Slager et al., 2003) respectively.”

    From Getting to the cores of autism (2019) · cites this paper as Bonaglia et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Phelan MC, Rogers RC, Saul RA, Stapleton GA, Sweet K, McDermid H, Shaw SR, Claytor J, Willis J, Kelly DP. 22q13 deletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2001;101:91-9.
  2. Goizet C, Excoffier E, Taine L, Taupiac E, El Moneim AA, Arveiler B, Bouvard M, Lacombe D. Case with autistic syndrome and chromosome 22q13.3 deletion detected by FISH. Am J Med Genet 2000;96:839-44.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonaglia, M. C., Giorda, R., Mani, E., Aceti, G., Anderlid, B.-M., Baroncini, A., Pramparo, T., & Zuffardi, O.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Eugenio Medea (IT)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
Corresponding author
Bonaglia, M C
Venue
Journal of Medical Genetics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-11-11
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
822-828
ISSN
  • 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-6244
OpenAlex
W2135686500
Cited by
211
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondazione Cariplo
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (FIRB_2001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
SHANK3, direct repeats, developmental delay, intellectual disability, fish
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Multiple, Adolescent, Base Sequence, Carrier Proteins, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22, Female, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Molecular Sequence Data, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Recurrence, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Syndrome, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Chromosome Breakage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review