Cited by 151Historical and Modern Theater StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurology and Historical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imitation and utilisation behaviour

Open access
De Renzi, E, Cavalleri, F, Facchini, S·1996·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence, anatomical correlates, and clinical features of imitation and utilisation behaviour, which are thought by Lhermitte and coworkers to represent a reliable and frequent index of frontal lobe disease. METHODS: 78 patients with hemispheric local lesions were tested in two separate sessions, in which their reactions to a series of gestures performed by the examiner and to the presentation of a set of objects were recorded. The patients were stratified into a frontal (n = 52) and a non-frontal group (n = 26) on the basis of their CT data. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Imitation behaviour was present in 39% of the frontal patients and was mainly associated with medial and lateral lesions, at odds with the claim of Lhermitte et al that it is a constant accompaniment of lower, mediobasal lesions. In the non-frontal group it was found in three patients, all with damage to the deep nuclei region. Utilisation behaviour was a much rarer phenomenon, present in only two patients, both of whom had frontal damage. Neither imitation behaviour nor utilisation behaviour were found in patients with retrorolandic cortical lesions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.61.4.396

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with brain damage who imitate uncontrollably imply that an active inhibitory mechanism normally controls automatic imitation.

    “and the existence of patients who imitate uncontrollably after brain damage (Lhermitte et al., 1986; De Renzi et al., 1996) suggests that some active inhibitory mechanism is required to control automatic imitation.”
  • Imitative tendencies must be inhibited to prevent overt imitation.

    “More specifically, imitative tendencies have to be inhibited to prevent overt imitation (Brass, Derrfuss, Cramon, Matthes-von Cramon, & von Cramon, 2003;De Renzi, Cavalleri, & Facchini, 1996;Lhermitte, Pillon, & Serdaru, 1986).”

    From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as De Renzi, Cavalleri, & Facchini, 1996

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Assal G. Un aspet du comportement d'utilization: la dependance vis-a-vis du langage ecrit. Rev Neurol 1985; 141:493-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
De Renzi, E., Cavalleri, F., & Facchini, S.
Affiliations
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1996-10-01
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
396-400
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038173051
Cited by
151
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
Keywords
frontal lobe lesions, gesture imitation, anatomical correlates
MeSH terms
Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review