Cited by 118Action Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Selective attention modulates inferior frontal gyrus activity during action observation

Chong, Trevor T.-J., Williams, Mark A., Cunnington, Ross, Mattingley, Jason B.·2008·NeuroImage

Abstract

Our ability to recognize the actions of others is subserved by a complex network of brain areas, including the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), inferior parietal lobe (IPL) and superior temporal sulcus (STS). An unresolved issue is whether the activity within these regions requires top-down control or whether it arises relatively automatically during passive action observation. Here we used fMRI to determine whether cortical activity associated with action observation is modulated by the strategic allocation of selective attention. Participants observed moving and stationary images of reach-to-grasp hand actions, while they performed an attentionally demanding task at the fovea. We first defined regions-of-interest (ROIs) in the IFG, IPL and STS which responded to the perception of these actions. We then probed these ROIs while participants observed the identical, but now task-irrelevant, actions and instead performed an easy (low attentional load) or difficult (high attentional load) visual discrimination task. Our data indicate that the activity of the left IFG was consistently attenuated under conditions of high attentional load, while the remaining action observation areas remained relatively unaffected by attentional manipulations. The suppression of the left IFG was unique to the observation of hand actions, and did not occur during the observation of non-biological control stimuli, in the form of coherent dot motion. We propose that the left IFG is the site at which descending inhibitory processes affect the processing of observed actions, and that the attentional modulation of this region is responsible for filtering task-irrelevant actions during ongoing behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.030

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mirror neuron system activity and imitative compatibility effects can be modulated by attention and contextual factors.

    “While there is accumulating evidence that both mirror neuron system activity (Newman Norlund 2007; Catmur 2007; Chong 2008; Molenberghs 2012) and imitative compatibility effects (Van Baaren 2003; Likowski 2008; Chong 2009; Liepelt 2009; Leighton 2010) can be modulated by attention and contextual factors”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chong, T. T.-J., Williams, M. A., Cunnington, R., & Mattingley, J. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Chong, Trevor T.-J.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
298-307
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978623467
Cited by
118
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Melbourne
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
action observation, inferior frontal gyrus, selective attention, attentional load, top-down control, inferior parietal lobule, superior temporal sulcus, descending inhibition, visual discrimination task
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Female, Frontal Lobe, Hand, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Hand Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review