Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 400

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon cycling in peatlands — A review of processes and controls

Blodau, C·2002·Environmental Reviews

Abstract

Covering only 3% of the land area, northern peatlands store about 30% of the global soil carbon and account for 5 to 10% of the global methane burden to the atmosphere. A review of the literature on net ecosystem exchange, net primary productivity, carbon mineralization, methane emissions, and dissolved organic carbon dynamics indicates that peatlands can be both C sources and sinks. The temporal and spatial variability of fluxes is large, but a substantial portion of this variation can be explained by environmental and ecological variables. Uncertainty in predictions about carbon dynamics under changing environmental conditions arises from a number of knowledge gaps: (i) the understanding of how organic matter is mineralized and partitioned into carbon dioxide, methane, and dissolved organic carbon is insufficient; (ii) little is known about the consequences of long-term and short-term disturbances, such as elevated carbon dioxide concentrations, nitrogen and sulfur deposition, fire, and droughts, on the individual components of the carbon cycle; (iii) models that capture the dynamic interaction of the processes and their controls have not been developed yet, with the notable exception of methane dynamics. Key words: peatlands, carbon cycle, organic matter, carbon dioxide, methane, climate change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/a02-004

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 400

Metadata

Authors
Blodau, C.
Venue
Environmental Reviews
Published
2002-05-14
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
111-134
ISSN
  • 1181-8700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1208-6053
OpenAlex
W1983239894
Cited by
400
References
115
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.