Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protracted continental collision — evidence from the Grenville OrogenThis article is one of a series of papers published in this Special Issue on the theme Lithoprobe — parameters, processes, and the evolution of a continent.

Hynes, Andrew, Rivers, Toby·2010·Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

Abstract

The Grenville Orogen in North America is interpreted to have resulted from collision between Laurentia and another continent, probably Amazonia, at ca. 1100 Ma. The exposed segment of the orogen was derived largely from reworked Archean to Paleoproterozoic Laurentian crust, products of a long-lived Mesoproterozoic continental-margin arc and associated back arc, and remnants of one or more accreted mid-Mesoproterozoic island-arc terranes. A potential suture, preserved in Grenvillian inliers of the southeastern USA, may separate rocks of Laurentian and Amazonian affinities. The Grenvillian Orogeny lasted more than 100 million years. Much of the interior Grenville Province, with peak metamorphism at ca. 1090–1020 Ma, consists of uppermost amphibolite- to granulite-facies rocks metamorphosed at depths of ca. 30 km, but areas of lower crustal, eclogite-facies nappes metamorphosed at 50–60 km depth also occur and an orogenic lid that largely escaped Grenvillian metamorphism is preserved locally. Overall, deformation and regional metamorphism migrated sequentially to the northwest into the Laurentian craton, with the youngest contractional structures in the northwestern part of the orogen at ca. 1000–980 Ma. The North American lithospheric root extends across part of the Grenville Orogen, where it may have been produced by depletion of sub-continental lithospheric mantle beneath the long-lived Laurentian-margin Mesoproterozoic subduction zone. Both the Grenville Orogen and the Himalaya–Tibet Orogen have northern margins characterized by long-lived subduction before continental collision and protracted convergence following collision. Both exhibit cratonward-propagating thrusting. In the Himalaya–Tibet Orogen, however, the pre-collisional Eurasian-margin arc is high in the structural stack, whereas in the Grenville Orogen, the pre-collisional continental-margin arc is low in the structural stack. We interpret this difference as due to subduction reversal in the Grenville case shortly before collision, so that the continental-margin arc became the lower plate during the ensuing orogeny. The structurally low position of the warm, extended Laurentian crust probably contributed significantly to the ductility of lower and mid-crustal Grenvillian rocks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/e10-003

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on size, duration and overall configuration, the Grenville orogen is commonly compared to the modern-day Himalaya-Tibet.

    “Based on size, duration and overall configuration, the Grenville orogen is commonly compared to the modern-day Himalaya-Tibet (Hynes and Rivers 2010).”
  • It is generally accepted that subduction was beneath Laurentia throughout the development of the Great Proterozoic Accretionary Orogen but traditional interpretations consider Laurentia to have transitioned to a lower plate setting in the Grenvillian orogeny.

    “It is generally accepted that subduction was beneath Laurentia throughout the development of the Great Proterozoic Accretionary Orogen but traditional interpretations consider Laurentia to have transitioned to a lower plate setting in the Grenvillian orogeny (Hynes and Rivers 2010).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 139

  1. 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.01.020 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/307017a0 · DOI
  3. Ashwal, L.D. 1993. Anorthosites. Springer, Berlin, Germany. · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90079-5 · DOI
  5. 10.1029/2003JB002809 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0301-9268(96)00052-6 · DOI
  7. Bethune K.M., 1997, Canadian Mineralogist, 35, 1191
  8. 10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00112-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0012-821X(84)90017-7 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00147-3 · DOI
  11. 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0507:SAERIT>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  12. 10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022<0155:COTMRA>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  13. 10.1139/cjes-37-2-3-193 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00113-4 · DOI
  15. Carswell, D.A. 1990. Eclogites and eclogite facies: definition and classification. In Eclogite facies rocks. Edited by D. A. Carswell. Chapman and Hall, New York, N.Y., pp. 1–13.
  16. 10.1029/94TC02018 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0061:AARGIT>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  18. Corrigan D., 1997, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 34, 299, 10.1139/e17-027 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1130/0091-7613(1990)018<0614:PSATAI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1139/e05-086 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/BF00283233 · DOI
  22. 10.1139/cjes-37-2-3-235 · DOI
  23. 10.1139/cjes-37-2-3-253 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1130/0091-7613(1990)018<0646:ATOTSC>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1139/e05-078 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0301-9268(97)00036-3 · DOI
  27. 10.1139/e94-013 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1139/e17-081 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0598:PMOLAE>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.023 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0012-821X(94)00237-S · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0012-821X(90)90098-I · DOI
  33. 10.1130/0016-7606(1985)96<1572:UAFTNP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  34. 10.1029/2001TC001322 · DOI
  35. 10.1086/627920 · DOI
  36. Dewey J.F., 1989, Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 82, 717
  37. 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.04.031 · DOI
  38. 10.1046/j.1365-3121.1999.00232.x · DOI
  39. Easton, R.M. 1992. The Grenville Province and the Proterozoic history of central and southern Ontario. In The Geology of Ontario. Vol. 4. Ontario Geological Survey, pp. 715–904.
  40. Forsyth D.A., 1994, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 31, 229, 10.1139/e94-023 · DOI
  41. 10.1139/cjes-38-10-1463 · DOI
  42. 10.1029/JB087iB03p01786 · DOI
  43. 10.1130/0091-7613(1981)9<225:CCSLUT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  44. Gobeil, A., Brisebois, D., Clark, T., Verpaelst, P., Madore, L., Wodicka, N., and Chevé, S. 2003. Géologie de la moyenne Côte-Nord. In Géologie et ressources minerales de la partie est de la Province de Grenville. Ministère de la Richesses naturelles Québec, Qué., DV2002-2003, pp. 59–117.
  45. 10.1139/e01-090 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022<0827:DOPMCI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/0301-9268(91)90106-K · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.08.004 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.06.007 · DOI
  50. 10.1139/E06-072 · DOI
  51. 10.1029/94JB00042 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/0040-1951(96)00074-1 · DOI
  53. 10.1029/2000JB900039 · DOI
  54. 10.1139/E06-117 · DOI
  55. 10.1139/cjes-38-8-1129 · DOI
  56. 10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<324:TOTHAS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  57. 10.1126/science.258.5087.1466 · DOI
  58. Hoffman, P.F. 1989. Precambrian geology and tectonic history of North America. In The Geology of North America: an Overview. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo., The Geology of North America, Vol. A., pp. 447–512.
  59. 10.1126/science.252.5011.1409 · DOI
  60. 10.1029/1998TC900032 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1139/cjes-37-2-3-341 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1995.tb00235.x · DOI
  63. Indares A., 1995, European Journal of Mineralogy, 7, 43, 10.1127/ejm/7/1/0043 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1139/cjes-37-2-3-325 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2008.00788.x · DOI · Paper page
  66. Indares A., 2009, EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 90, Abstract GA71C–
  67. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1995.tb00213.x · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1029/2003JB002811 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Jamieson R.A., 2007, Tectonics, 26, 23 p, 10.1029/2006TC002036 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1139/E06-038 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1016/S0301-9268(01)00154-1 · DOI
  72. 10.1180/minmag.1998.62A.2.76 · DOI
  73. 10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022<0215:GGITSG>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/S0301-9268(97)00079-X · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1139/e01-099 · DOI
  76. 10.1126/science.1078115 · DOI
  77. 10.1029/94TC00801 · DOI · Paper page
  78. La Tour T.E., 1981, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 18, 884, 10.1139/e81-085 · DOI
  79. 10.1130/B25974.1 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.021 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/S0040-1951(03)00338-X · DOI
  82. 10.1139/cjes-37-2-3-459 · DOI · Paper page
  83. MacLean W.H., 1982, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 19, 633, 10.1139/e82-052 · DOI
  84. Magloughlin J.F., 1997, Geological Association of Canada, Program with Abstracts, 22, A97
  85. 10.1029/95TC03748 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.precamres.2005.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1139/cjes-37-2-3-291 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00144-8 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.1126/science.189.4201.419 · DOI
  90. Moore J.M., 1980, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 17, 1685, 10.1139/e80-178 · DOI
  91. 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0425:SUSEAS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1130/0016-7606(1998)110<1357:TEOTSL>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  93. Nadeau L., 1994, Geological Association of Canada, Program with Abstracts, 19, A81
  94. 10.1126/science.274.5293.1684 · DOI
  95. 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0435:CIHEAI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1029/2005GL025605 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90074-I · DOI
  98. Piper J.D.A., 1976, Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 280, 469, 10.1098/rsta.1976.0007 · DOI
  99. 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0205:DEOCAI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  100. Rankin, D.W., Chiarenzelli, J.R., Drake, A.A., Goldsmith, R., Hall, L.M., Isachsen, Y.W., et al. 1993. Proterozoic rocks east and southeast of the Grenville Front. In Precambrian: Conterminous U.S.A. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo., The Geology of North America, Vol. C-2, pp. 335–461.
  101. 10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00070-6 · DOI
  102. 10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00174-3 · DOI · Paper page
  103. 10.1016/S0301-9268(97)00038-7 · DOI · Paper page
  104. 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
  105. Rivers T., 2008, Geological Association of Canada, Program with Abstracts, 33, 144
  106. 10.1139/cjes-37-2-3-359 · DOI · Paper page
  107. 10.1029/TC008i001p00063 · DOI · Paper page
  108. 10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<1127:CTSITN>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  109. 10.1139/e02-025 · DOI · Paper page
  110. Rivers, T., Culshaw, N., Hynes, A., Indares, A., Jamieson, R., and Martignole, J. In press. The Grenville Orogen. In Variations in tectonic styles revisited: a Lithoprobe perspective.
  111. 10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00145-X · DOI
  112. 10.1139/e93-034 · DOI
  113. Scott D.J., 1994, Lithoprobe Report (Abitibi–Grenville Transect), 41, 109
  114. 10.1130/0091-7613(1976)4<779:COICMI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  115. 10.1130/G19814.1 · DOI
  116. Sims P.K., 1989, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 26, 2145, 10.1139/e89-180 · DOI
  117. Sinha, A.K., Hogan, J.P., and Parks, J.K. 1996. Lead isotope mapping of crustal reservoirs within the Grenville Superterrane: I. Central and Southern Appalachians. In Earth processes: reading the isotopic code. Edited by A. Basu and S.R. Hart. American Geophysical Union, Monograph 95, pp. 295–305.
  118. 10.1029/2005TC001907 · DOI
  119. 10.1016/0012-821X(75)90088-6 · DOI
  120. 10.1038/256392a0 · DOI
  121. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00561-7 · DOI
  122. 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.09.029 · DOI
  123. 10.1130/G22534.1 · DOI
  124. 10.1086/629648 · DOI
  125. Valley, J.M. 1985. Polymetamorphism in the Adirondacks. In The deep Proterozoic crust in the North Atlantic provinces. Edited by A.C. Tobi and J. Touret. NATO Advanced Study Institute, Special Paper C138, pp. 217–236.
  126. 10.1038/300497a0 · DOI
  127. 10.1139/e05-079 · DOI
  128. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00846-4 · DOI
  129. van der Lee, S., and Frederiksen, A.W. 2005. Surface wave tomography applied to the North America upper mantle. In Seismic earth array analysis of broadband seismograms. Edited by G. Noland and A.R. Levander. American Geophysical Union, Monograph 157, pp. 67–80.
  130. Van Schmus, W.R., and Bickford, M.E. 1981. Proterozoic chronology and evolution of the mid-continent region, North America. In Precambrian plate tectonics. Edited by A. Kröner. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 261–296.
  131. Van Schmus, W.R., Bickford, M.E., Sims, P.K., Anderson, R.R., Shearer, C.K., and Treaves, S.B. 1993. Proterozoic geology of the western midcontinent basement. In Precambrian: Conterminous U.S.A. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colo., Geology of North America, Vol. C-2, pp. 239–258.
  132. 10.1139/cjes-36-6-967 · DOI
  133. 10.1126/science.1010580 · DOI
  134. 10.1139/cjes-37-2-3-183 · DOI · Paper page
  135. 10.1038/211676a0 · DOI
  136. Winardhi S., 1997, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 34, 1167, 10.1139/e17-094 · DOI
  137. Wodicka N., 1996, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33, 1087, 10.1139/e96-083 · DOI · Paper page
  138. 10.2113/gscanmin.38.2.471 · DOI · Paper page
  139. 10.1130/B25388.1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hynes, A., & Rivers, T.
Affiliations
Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University St, Montreal, QC H3A 2A7, Canada.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Published
2010-05
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
591-620
ISSN
  • 0008-4077
  • 1480-3313
Cited by
170
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review