Beyond Intrinsic Motivation: The Role of Autonomous Motivation in User Experience
Open accessAbstract
Motivation and autonomy are fundamental concepts in Human–Computer Interaction (HCI), yet in User Experience (UX) research they have remained surprisingly peripheral. We draw on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to analyse autonomous and non-autonomous patterns of motivation in 497 interaction experiences. Using latent profile analysis, we identify five distinct patterns of motivation in technology use—‘motivational profiles’—associated with significant differences in need satisfaction, affect, and perceived usability. Users’ descriptions of these experiences also reveal qualitative differences between profiles: from intentional, purposive engagement, to compulsive use which users themselves consider unhealthy. Our results complicate exclusively positive notions of intrinsic motivation and clarify how extrinsic motivation can contribute to positive UX. Based on these findings, we identify open questions for UX and SDT: addressing ‘hedonic amotivation’—negative experiences in activities which are intrinsically motivated but not otherwise valued—and ‘design for internalisation’—scaffolding healthy and sustainable patterns of engagement over time.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Using Self-Determination Theory’s Organismic Integration Theory and latent profile analysis on 497 interaction experiences, the paper identifies five motivational profiles in technology use that differ significantly in need satisfaction, affect, and perceived usability. It argues that autonomous extrinsic motivation can support positive UX, while intrinsic motivation can coexist with compulsive, low-intentionality use—termed “hedonic amotivation.”
Key findings
- Five motivational profiles emerged: High Quality (165, 33.2%), Medium (146, 29.4%), External (58, 11.7%), Amotivated-Intrinsic (71, 14.3%), and Amotivated (57, 11.5%). A likelihood ratio test indicated UX variables differed significantly between profiles, χ²(24) = 1400.1, p < 0.0001; after Holm-Bonferroni correction, 48 pairwise comparisons were significant at p < 0.05, 33 at p < 0.001.
- More autonomous profiles generally showed higher need satisfaction and affect. For example, High Quality had autonomy M = 5.47, competence M = 5.07, relatedness M = 4.09, and PANAS M = 2.35; Amotivated had autonomy M = 2.34, competence M = 2.79, relatedness M = 1.84. High Quality and Medium had similar intrinsic motivation scores, but differed substantially on integrated regulation and outcomes.
- The Amotivated-Intrinsic profile combined relatively high intrinsic motivation (equivalent to ∼5 out of 7 on the scale) with high amotivation, very low need satisfaction, and descriptions of compulsion, bad habits, and diminished mood. The authors call this “hedonic amotivation.”
- Extrinsic motivation was not uniformly negative: integrated and identified regulation were associated with positive affect and need satisfaction, and the External profile scored higher than amotivated profiles on relatedness, competence, and security, though still low on autonomy and affect.
Methods
- Online survey via Prolific; 573 full responses collected, 76 excluded, leaving n = 497. Participants were randomly assigned to describe a technology they “felt good” about (n = 254) or “did not feel good” about (n = 243), focusing on frequent use over the past 2 months.
- Measures included the User Motivation Inventory (UMI) for OIT’s six regulations, Sheldon’s need satisfaction scale, UMUX perceived usability, PANAS affect, self-attribution, and open-ended questions about why they started, continue, and what the technology means to them.
- Analysis used confirmatory factor analysis on UMI scores, latent profile analysis on factor scores (selecting a 5-profile, equal variance, equal covariance model), BCH method with likelihood ratio and Wald tests for outcomes, and inductive thematic analysis of open-text responses.
Limitations
- The paper states the profiles should not be treated as a definitive typology; free choice of technologies meant some technology types had few participants, and larger samples might support more profiles. It also notes the negative condition captured “not feel good” rather than actively bad experiences, interpersonal factors and age differences were not analyzed in depth, and results do not establish causal relationships.
- Evident from the text: the study is cross-sectional and self-report, the sample is from Prolific with mostly social media technologies, and the qualitative coding was completed by the first author with periodic review by the second author; profile-to-theme percentages are described as a heuristic rather than precise quantities.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 142 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Users' descriptions of these experiences reveal qualitative differences between profiles: from intentional, purposive engagement, to compulsive use which users themselves consider unhealthy.
“Users' descriptions of these experiences also reveal qualitative differences between profiles: from intentional, purposive engagement, to compulsive use which users themselves consider unhealthy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The open-ended responses reflect actual experiences rather than constructed narratives.
- Findingown data
A pilot analysis of a prior UMI dataset containing 460 participants observed that the data best supported a 4-class structure with unequal class sizes.
“We conducted a pilot analysis of a prior UMI dataset containing 460 participants [16], observing that the data best supported a 4-class structure with unequal class sizes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
The paper identifies 'hedonic amotivation': intrinsically motivated, yet low-intentionality, experiences which are marked by compulsion and which users themselves consider unhealthy.
“We identify what we call hedonic amotivation: intrinsically motivated, yet low-intentionality, experiences which are marked by compulsion and which users themselves consider unhealthy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The open-ended responses reflect actual experiences rather than constructed narratives.
- Findingown data
Using latent profile analysis, the study identifies five distinct patterns of motivation in technology use-'motivational profiles'-associated with significant differences in need satisfaction, affect, and perceived usability.
“Using latent profile analysis, we identify five distinct patterns of motivation in technology use-'motivational profiles'-associated with significant differences in need satisfaction, affect, and perceived usability.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“We identify five distinct 'motivational profiles' in technology use and find that they are associated with significant differences in basic need satisfaction, affect and perceived usability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Participants' self-reports of their experiences and motivations are sincere and accurate.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
- Findingown data
Comparing adjacent profiles, the largest difference is found between the Medium and High Quality profiles.
“Comparing adjacent profiles, the largest difference is found between the Medium and High Quality profiles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
A likelihood ratio test indicated that the UX variables differed significantly between profiles, χ2(24)=1400.1, p<0.0001.
“First, a likelihood ratio test indicated that the UX variables differed significantly between profiles 2 (24) = 1400.1,< 0.0001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In External profile, negative impacts focused less on compulsion and more on personal insecurities.
“In the External profile, however, negative impacts were a little different in character, focusing less on compulsion and more on personal insecurities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Users in Amotivated-Intrinsic were least likely to ascribe qualities to technology, both positive and negative (30%).
“Meanwhile, users in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile were least likely to ascribe qualities to the technology, both positive and negative (in 30% of responses).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
External (55%) and Amotivated (30%) profiles were most likely to emphasise they did not engage with the technology by choice.
“Finally, the External (55%) and Amotivated (30%) profiles were most likely to emphasise they did not engage with the technology by choice, e.g., 'I have to continue using it cause everyone else does' (ID672).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Negative qualities were more commonly mentioned in External and Amotivated profiles (66% and 75%, respectively).
“Meanwhile, negative qualities were more commonly mentioned in the External and Amotivated profiles (66% and 75%, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Users in Amotivated-Intrinsic were more likely to discuss personal value conflicts than other profiles (17% vs <5%).
“Users in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile were also more likely to discuss personal value conflicts than other profiles (17% vs. <5% in other profiles): for example, 'Its a weird hate/love relationship.Instagram can be very inspiring and motivating at times […].Silmultanesly it will hold me back from achieving my dreams because I wastes my time'.(ID284)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Need satisfaction and positive affect in the sample are not more strongly associated with intrinsic motivation than with extrinsic motivation.
“Counter to assumptions in previous HCI research [e.g., 36, 59, 105, 118], need satisfaction and positive affect in our sample are not more strongly associated with intrinsic motivation than with extrinsic motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the Amotivated and Amotivated-Intrinsic profiles, mean scores for all needs are comfortably below the respective mean scores for both the complete sample and the negative condition.
“For the two least autonomous profiles-Amotivated and Amotivated-Intrinsic-mean scores for all needs are comfortably below the respective mean scores for both the complete sample, and the negative condition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In general, a higher proportion of participants in more autonomously motivated profiles indicated they felt good about the technologies they described.
“In general, a higher proportion of the participants in the more autonomously motivated profiles indicated that they felt good about the technologies they described (see Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Overall, participants displayed relatively autonomous patterns of motivation.
“Overall, participants displayed relatively autonomous patterns of motivation (see Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Users in High Quality were most likely to describe ways technology was good for them (27%), e.g., supporting self-care, personal growth or health and fitness.
“Users in the High Quality profile were most likely to describe ways in which the technology was good for them (in 27% of accounts): for example, by supporting self-care, personal growth or health and fitness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, relatively high intrinsic motivation coexisted with negative outcomes: low need satisfaction and compulsive engagement.
“Meanwhile, in our Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, relatively high intrinsic motivation coexisted with negative outcomes: low need satisfaction and compulsive engagement, raising questions around exclusively positive interpretations of intrinsic motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Connecting with others was most commonly mentioned in the External profile (40%).
“Connecting with others was most commonly mentioned in the External profile (40%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the negative condition, amotivation scored highest.
“In the negative condition amotivation scored highest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The paper identified five motivational profiles that captured how users were intrinsically and extrinsically motivated to engage with particular technologies.
“Specifically, we identified five motivational profiles that captured how users were intrinsically and extrinsically motivated to engage with particular technologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, intrinsic motivation was almost as high as in the Medium profile.
“At the same time, intrinsic motivation was almost as high as in the Medium profile, indicating that motivation to engage with the technology was dominated by immediate interest and enjoyment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
While participants in Medium (18%) and External (14%) profiles also discussed lack of meaning, their comments tended to be less explicitly negative.
“While participants in the Medium (18%) and External (14%) profiles also discussed lack of meaning, their comments tended to be less explicitly negative: often suggesting the technology had pragmatic or escapist value but no deeper personal meaning: e.g., ' they don't mean anything really, i just like them'.(ID147).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the External profile, workplace technologies (22%) and messaging and e-mail (17%) were relatively prominent.
“The next most homogenous sample was the External profile where workplace technologies (22%), and messaging and e-mail (17%) were relatively prominent, within an otherwise diverse sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Optimal values of LL and saBIC were found in the 5-profile model estimated with equal variance and equal covariance.
“Optimal values of LL and saBIC were found in the 5-profile model estimated with equal variance and equal covariance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
It was fairly common in the two amotivated profiles (~30%) to find the technology meaningless (~12%).
“Finally, it was fairly common in the two amotivated profiles (∼ 30%) to find the technology meaningless (∼ 12%): e.g., 'it means nothing except a technology I have to stop using' (ID521).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants in Amotivated-Intrinsic were more likely to describe passive consumption and lurking behaviour on social and streaming media (32% vs <20% other).
“Participants in this profile were also more likely to describe passive consumption and lurking behaviour on social and streaming media (32% vs. <20% in other profiles).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PANAS, UMUX and Self-Attribution received higher scores in the positive condition than the negative condition.
“Similarly, PANAS, UMUX and Self-Attribution received higher scores in the positive condition than the negative condition (see Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the two amotivated groups, positive qualities were often framed as being in conflict with wider problems.
“Notably, in the two amotivated groups, positive qualities were often framed as being in conflict with wider problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Autonomy need satisfaction scores for adjacent profiles were often separated by more than one scale point.
“In particular, autonomy need satisfaction scores for adjacent profiles were often separated by more than one scale point-noteworthy since autonomy satisfaction has often been excluded from analysis in previous UX research [e.g., 37,38,61,102].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Larger differences in UX outcomes were observed between motivational profiles than between the positive and negative conditions.
“Notably, however, we observed larger differences in UX outcomes between motivational profiles than between the positive and negative conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The two least autonomously regulated profiles were both dominated by amotivation.
“The two least autonomously regulated profiles were both dominated by amotivation-indicating a lack of intentionality and conscious valuing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The High Quality profile reflects highly autonomous regulation.
“Our High Quality profile reflects highly autonomous regulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Minimum classification probability was acceptable (0.82).
“Minimum classification probability (i.e., of a user in a profile) was acceptable (0.82).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The six-factor measurement model of the UMI was supported by the data.
“Results of CFA indicated that the six factor model was supported by the data [ 2 = 290.23,< 0.01, 2 / = 2.41, = 0.965, = 0.059, = 0.053, = 0.144].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Such concerns also featured in Amotivated (35%) and External (24%) profiles.
“Such concerns also featured in the Amotivated (35%) and External (24%) profiles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants in High Quality and Medium were most likely to ascribe positive qualities to their chosen technologies (~60% vs 30% or less in other profiles).
“Participants in the High Quality and Medium profiles were most likely to ascribe positive qualities to their chosen technologies (∼ 60% vs. 30% or less in other profiles).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A few participants in High Quality (6%) and Medium (7%) described ways technologies aligned with ethical values or promoted fairness, sustainability and other positive values.
“A few participants in the High Quality (6%) and Medium (7%) profiles described ways in which the technologies aligned with ethical values, or promoted fairness, sustainability and other positive values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Active and self-driven engagement was particularly common in High Quality (48%) and Medium (38%) profiles.
“Active and self-driven engagement was particularly common in the autonomous High Quality (48%) and Medium profiles (38%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All pairwise comparisons of profiles indicated significant differences in the UX measures.
“Furthermore, all pairwise comparisons of profiles also indicated significant differences in the UX measures (see Table A6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
More often than other profiles, High Quality and Medium described using technology to pursue passions and interests (~27%) or for self-growth and health (~40%).
“More often than other profiles, these profiles described using the technology to pursue passions and interests (∼ 27%) or for self-growth and health (∼ 40%): e.g., 'i have learned painting through ticktok and it has now became my new hobby.I also use it to get more insights on spiritual teachings so i can advance in my spiritual journey'.(ID390).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Autonomous forms of extrinsic motivation were strongly associated with positive affect and need satisfaction.
“In particular, autonomous forms of extrinsic motivation were strongly associated with positive affect and need satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In pilot analysis, the data had best supported a 4-profile model.
“In our pilot analysis, data had best supported a 4-profile model [aligning with results in 15], and larger profile counts had resulted in high numbers of parameters per participant, risking overfitting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
In High Quality, some participants (19%) prefaced positive evaluations with identity statements or connected technology to professional and enthusiast identities.
“In the High Quality profile in particular some participants (19%) prefaced positive evaluations of the technology with identity statements such as 'as a DJ' (ID152), 'as a woman and as a mom' (ID134), or connected the technology to professional and enthusiast identities such as 'content creator' (ID523), 'marketing manager' (ID233).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The paper's own results suggest that autonomous regulations can happily coexist.
“Our own results suggest that autonomous regulations can happily coexist, and longitudinal studies have shown that less autonomous regulations need not decline as more autonomous forms of motivation increase [115].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participants in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile often described the use of entertainment and social media apps, technologies generally designed to be enjoyable and presenting little barrier to engagement.
“Participants in that profile often described the use of entertainment and social media apps: technologies which are generally designed to be enjoyable and present little barrier to engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The High Quality profile is dominated by integrated regulation-the goal of Gerstenberg et al.'s design strategies.
“Our High Quality profile, for example, is dominated by integrated regulation-the goal of Gerstenberg et al.'s design strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The External profile scores far more highly for competence, relatedness and security satisfactions than the two amotivated profiles.
“the External profile (reflecting external control) scores far more highly for competence, relatedness and security satisfactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The External profile has high scores for external regulation-the regulation associated with the pursuit of rewards and the avoidance of sanctions.
“This profile has high scores for external regulation-the regulation associated with the pursuit of rewards (e.g., money, status) and the avoidance of sanctions (e.g., social censure, punishment).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The two kinds of low-autonomy engagement have distinct experiential outcomes in the paper's results.
“While previous work in UX has not distinguished between these kinds of low-autonomy engagement, they have distinct experiential outcomes in our results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Previous work in UX has not distinguished between these kinds of low-autonomy engagement.
- Findingreasoning
The External profile reflects low autonomy due to external control.
“First, the External profile reflects low autonomy due to external control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The Amotivated-Intrinsic profile has a very high score for amotivation.
“At the same time, the profile has a very high score for amotivation, a construct associated with the absence of need satisfaction [80, p. 190], and the lack of conscious volition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The High Quality profile has high scores for integrated regulation, indicating strong internalisation.
“It has high scores for integrated regulation, indicating strong internalisation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The External profile has high scores for introjected regulation, indicating partial and rigid internalisation related to phenomena like guilt and conditional regard.
“Scores for introjected regulation are also high, indicating partial and rigid internalisation of the activity, related to phenomena like guilt and conditional regard.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants in the High Quality profile often connected their technologies with personal goals, vocations and social roles.
“Participants in this group often connected their technologies with personal goals, vocations and social roles: describing how they appreciated the technology 'as a mom', 'as a gamer', and so on.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The High Quality and Medium profiles also had high scores for identified regulation.
“The High Quality and Medium profiles also had high scores for another form of autonomous regulation: identified regulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In our study, 'lurking' behaviour on social media was associated with amotivation.
“Our analysis of participants' descriptions offers some clues as to candidates for these behavioural markers, e.g., 'lurking' behaviour on social media (in our study this was associated with amotivation) and a focus of interest and active searching in media consumption (more autonomous motivation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Online gaming was less well represented in our sample.
“Online gaming was less well represented in our sample yet, as discussed in Section 6.3, there is value in clarifying the role played by different motivational factors in cases where players persist in disempowering and often negative play experiences [see, e.g., 15,111].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We combined OIT with LPA to identify five distinct profiles of motivation across a wide range of technology types.
“We combined OIT with LPA to identify five distinct profiles of motivation across a wide range of technology types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mostly controlled, External, profile showed quite high scores for relatedness and popularity, despite low need satisfaction in other respects.
“It is also interesting that the mostly controlled, External, profile nonetheless showed quite high scores for relatedness and popularity, despite low need satisfaction in other respects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In our study, a focus of interest and active searching in media consumption was associated with more autonomous motivation.
“Our analysis of participants' descriptions offers some clues as to candidates for these behavioural markers, e.g., 'lurking' behaviour on social media (in our study this was associated with amotivation) and a focus of interest and active searching in media consumption (more autonomous motivation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The five motivational profiles were associated with significant and often large differences across key UX outcomes, including need satisfaction, affect and usability.
“These motivational profiles-capturing intrinsic and extrinsic motivations and amotivation-were associated with significant and often large differences across key UX outcomes, including need satisfaction, affect and usability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The paper's own results point to similar conclusions: even in the most integrated, High Quality, profile relatively high introjection was observed.
“Our own results point to similar conclusions: even in the most integrated, High Quality, profile we observed relatively high introjection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Cronbach's for the UMUX (0.76) indicated good reliability.
“Cronbach's for the UMUX (0.76) indicated good reliability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Motivation influences a range of outcomes which HCI research has considered important, including emotion, depth of engagement, effort and achievement.
“Motivation influences a range of outcomes which Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research has considered important, including emotion [55], depth of engagement [28], effort and achievement [113].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [113]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
Cronbach's scores indicated all UMI sub-scales were reliable: = 0.91, = 0.88, = 0.79, = 0.80, = 0.86, = 0.91.
“Cronbach's scores indicated all sub-scales were reliable: = 0.91, = 0.88, = 0.79, = 0.80, = 0.86, = 0.91.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The sample size was guided by prior literature and a pilot analysis.
“Our sample size was guided by prior literature and a pilot analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The UMI was chosen because it addresses all six motivational regulations, where other relevant scales do not.
“This was chosen because it addresses all six motivational regulations, where other relevant scales [e.g., 70] do not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [70]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
SDT holds that behaviour in adult life is at least as strongly influenced by extrinsic motivations as by intrinsic motivation.
“However, while SDT grants an important role to intrinsic motivation, it holds that behaviour in adult life is at least as strongly influenced by extrinsic motivations, motivations which arise not from the activity itself but from its outcomes and wider ramifications [80, pp. 196-197].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80, pp. 196-197]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Extrinsic motivation can be strongly supportive of engagement, achievement and other positive outcomes.
“It can also be strongly supportive of engagement [28], achievement [113] and other positive outcomes [28, 33, 55, 80, p. 198].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [113]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [28, 33, 55, 80, p. 198]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Extrinsic motivation can in many cases be highly autonomous.
“Like intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation can in many cases be highly autonomous [80, p. 198].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80, p. 198]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Previous work in HCI and UX has commonly addressed autonomy via autonomy need satisfaction, which concerns episodic and spontaneous aspects of autonomy experience.
“Previous work in HCI and UX has commonly addressed autonomy via autonomy need satisfaction.This concerns episodic and 'spontaneous' [e.g., 25, p. 3932] aspects of autonomy experience, grounded in the user's immediate inclinations and anticipations [3,25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [e.g., 25, p. 3932]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The BCH method takes into account classification uncertainty by linking profiles to outcomes via weighted estimation of a linear regression model.
“This approach takes into account classification uncertainty by linking profiles to outcomes via weighted estimation of a linear regression model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Applying LPA to factor scores derived from CFA helps correct for measurement error.
“We applied LPA to the factor scores derived from the CFA, as this helps correct for measurement error [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The naive approach of assigning participants to profiles and comparing mean outcomes using ANOVA is misleading because LPA assigns probabilities, which ANOVA does not take into account.
“This approach is misleading as LPA does not directly assign data points to profiles, but rather assigns probabilities, which ANOVA does not take into account [2,5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The 5-profile, equal variance, equal covariance model was deemed optimal.
“On the basis of these results, we deemed the 5-profile, equal variance, equal covariance model to be optimal.5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
HCI and UX research has often treated intrinsic motivation as the gold standard of motivation.
“In line with this, HCI and UX research has often treated intrinsic motivation as the gold standard of motivation [see, e.g., 1, 57, 94, 104].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [94]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [104]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Insofar as UX research has addressed motivation, it has commonly focused on the motivating role of immediate satisfactions that arise during interaction.
“Insofar as UX research has addressed the issue of motivation, it has commonly focused on the motivating role of immediate satisfactions that arise during interaction [e.g., 37,38,61,102].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [61]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [102]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
As illustrated in Figure 7, the paper's results suggest that improved need satisfaction may often be supported by any internalisation of motivation: that is, by any rightward shift in the motivational profile towards more autonomous regulation.
“As illustrated in Figure 7, our results suggest that improved need satisfaction may often be supported by any internalisation of motivation: that is, by any rightward shift in the motivational profile towards more autonomous regulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Mills and Allen found almost no correlation between levels of intrinsic motivation and lower problematic gaming behaviour.
“and Mills and Allen found almost no correlation between levels of intrinsic motivation and lower problematic gaming behaviour [63].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
As the paper's results illustrate, extrinsic motivation and amotivation provide a useful context for interpreting the intrinsic motivation score.
“As our results illustrate, extrinsic motivation and amotivation provide a useful context for interpreting the intrinsic motivation score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This is consistent with Gerstenberg et al.'s strategy of helping users see the fit between the activity and their identity.
“This is consistent with the strategy of Gerstenberg et al. of helping users see the fit between the activity and their identity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The paper's empirical results provide an evidential basis for design strategies to support more autonomous forms of motivation, such as those proposed by Gerstenberg et al.
“First, our empirical results provide an evidential basis for design strategies to support more autonomous forms of motivation-such as those proposed by Gerstenberg et al. [29].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The results illustrate two qualitatively different kinds of low autonomy regulation, where activities are not coherently related to the user's values and goals.
“Our results also illustrate two qualitatively different kinds of low autonomy regulation, where activities are not coherently related to the user's values and goals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The need density account is grounded in Rigby and Ryan's observation that, for some players, an activity which gave them a lot of happiness moment to moment was at the same time creating a dull ache in their soul.
“The account is grounded in Rigby and Ryan's observation that, for some players, an activity which gave them 'a lot of happiness moment to moment was at the same time creating a dull ache in [their] soul' [74, p. 99, our emphasis].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Longitudinal studies have shown that less autonomous regulations need not decline as more autonomous forms of motivation increase.
“Our own results suggest that autonomous regulations can happily coexist, and longitudinal studies have shown that less autonomous regulations need not decline as more autonomous forms of motivation increase [115].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Games and other digital technologies often combine high levels of need satisfaction with very low barriers to engagement, particularly compared to need-satisfying activities not mediated by digital technology.
“Specifically, they often combine high levels of need satisfaction with very low barriers to engagement [74, pp.100-105]-particularly in comparison to need-satisfying activities which are not mediated by digital technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductnone given
The mix of technologies addressed by participants differed across the Amotivated, Amotivated-Intrinsic and External profiles.
“In making this comparison, it is important to note that the mix of technologies addressed by participants differed across the Amotivated, Amotivated-Intrinsic and External profiles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Amotivation is not related to the presence of external control, but rather to the lack of intentionality and internalisation.
“Amotivation is not related to the presence of external control, but rather to the lack of intentionality and internalisation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
It is inherently difficult to support integrated regulation through design.
“While integrated regulation is considered the most autonomous and well-being supportive form of extrinsic motivation [79], it is inherently difficult to support this through design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Results in a number of SDT-informed studies of technology challenge SDT's unified view of intrinsic motivation.
“Alongside these theoretical concerns, results in a number of SDT-informed studies of technology challenge SDT's unified view of intrinsic motivation (albeit the challenge to SDT is rarely articulated explicitly).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The External profile form of low autonomy motivation contrasts with the two amotivated profiles.
“This form of low autonomy motivation contrasts with our two amotivated profiles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Our results do not provide evidence of causal relationships between motivational profiles, basic needs and other outcome measures.
“Finally, it is important to note that our results do not provide evidence of causal relationships between motivational profiles, basic needs and other outcome measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Reciprocal relationships between constructs can result in more complex, and not necessarily positive, trajectories.
“Sheldon and Houser-Marko point to the potential for an 'upward spiral' of motivation [89], yet there is evidence that such reciprocal relationships between constructs can also result in more complex, and not necessarily positive, trajectories [40].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Our results may not include very negative experiences with technologies.
“It is worth noting that our results may not include very negative experiences with technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Intrinsic motivation may in some circumstances be associated with negative outcomes, even potentially compulsive behaviour.
“Where previous research has treated intrinsic motivation as an uncomplicated good, our results indicate that it may in some circumstances be associated with negative outcomes, even potentially compulsive behaviour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Previous research has treated intrinsic motivation as an uncomplicated good.
- Interpretationreasoning
While previous work has often treated external reward as straightforwardly negative, the paper suggests that this may depend on the user's existing motivational profile.
“While previous work has often treated external reward as straightforwardly negative [e.g., 35, 59, 118], we suggest that this may depend on the user's existing motivational profile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [118]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Users who identify strongly with an activity (e.g., high integration) may perceive the introduction of reward as 'cheapening' the experience, undermining the congruence of the activity with their values.
“For example, users who identify strongly with an activity (e.g., high integration) may perceive the introduction of reward as 'cheapening' the experience, undermining the congruence of the activity with their values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Internalisation of motivation can sometimes occur quite quickly, where 'quickly' means weeks rather than hours.
“While recent work has observed that internalisation of motivation can sometimes occur quite quickly, 'quickly' here means weeks rather than hours [115].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Extrinsic motivation can be strongly associated with positive outcomes.
“Where previous HCI research has ignored or devalued extrinsic motivation, our results indicate that extrinsic motivation can be strongly associated with positive outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Previous HCI research has ignored or devalued extrinsic motivation.
- Study design and conductown data
The results of our survey did not support in-depth analysis of interpersonal factors.
“While interpersonal factors are expected to be important in motivation and internalisation [80, pp. 158-216], the results of our survey did not support in-depth analysis of this.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For users with different motivational profiles, rewards may be counterproductive.
“Meanwhile, for users with different motivational profiles, rewards may be counterproductive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Free choice of technologies resulted in some technologies being addressed by relatively few participants, potentially limiting our ability to resolve representative distributions of motivations for every technology type.
“However, this also resulted in some technologies being addressed by relatively few participants, potentially limiting our ability to resolve representative distributions of motivations for every technology type.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Motivational profiles are unlikely to change on the short timescales characteristic of many HCI studies.
“Motivational profiles are unlikely to change on the short timescales characteristic of many HCI studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Tentatively, controlled motivations may not always inhibit the development of autonomous motivation.
“Tentatively, we can say that controlled motivations may not always inhibit the development of autonomous motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The six regulations may change over different timescales.
“Furthermore, the six regulations may change over different timescales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The rate at which regulations change seems likely to be activity dependent.
“The rate at which regulations change seems likely to be activity dependent; work by Wasserkampf and Kleinert pertains to exercise motivation, where increase in physical fitness may be required to find the activity enjoyable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 111
- May combine two claims. 104
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe analysis identified four high-level themes: Purpose; Qualities of the technology; Being good or bad for people; and Values, identity and emotional connection.
“Specifically, we identified four high-level themes (Purpose; Qualities of the technology; Being good or bad for people; and Values, identity and emotional connection).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The open-ended responses reflect actual experiences rather than constructed narratives.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe pilot solution resulted in strong model fits, and when comparing outcomes across profiles, medium-to-large effect sizes were observed.
“This solution resulted in strong model fits, and when comparing outcomes across profiles, we observed medium-to-large effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe leaning towards autonomous regulations was stronger in the positive condition, which had lower values for amotivation (M=1.73) and extrinsic motivation (M=1.76), and higher values for identified (M=5.34), integrated (M=3.8) and intrinsic (M=5.81) regulations.
“This leaning towards autonomous regulations was stronger in the positive condition, which had lower values for amotivation (M = 1.73) and extrinsic motivation (M = 1.76), and higher values for identified (M = 5.34), integrated (M = 3.8) and intrinsic (M = 5.81) regulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn both positive and negative conditions, the mean scores for the PANAS were positive (M=1.96 and M=0.61, respectively).
“In both positive and negative conditions, the mean scores for the PANAS were positive (M = 1.96 and M = 0.61, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants in Amotivated-Intrinsic were by far most likely to describe engagement in terms of compulsion and empty habits (63% vs 20% in Amotivated, <10% other), or escapism (32% vs 14% Medium, <10% other).
“Participants in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile were by far most likely to describe their engagement in terms of compulsion and empty habits (63% vs. 20% in the Amotivated profile, and <10% in other profiles), or in terms of escapism (32% vs. 14% in the Medium profile and <10% in other profiles).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHigh Quality and Medium scored relatively high on usability, External was close to the midpoint, only Amotivated featured very low UMUX scores, and Amotivated-Intrinsic showed quite high UMUX scores.
“High Quality and Medium profiles scored relatively high on usability, while the External profile was close to the midpoint of the UMUX scale.Only the Amotivated profile featured very low UMUX scores.In contrast, the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile showed quite high UMUX scores-only a little below the High Quality profile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMentions of value disagreement were more common than agreement in all profiles except High Quality, and positive value agreement was relatively rare (about 5% of all descriptions).
“Mentions of value disagreement were more common than agreement in all profiles except the High Quality profile, and description of positive value agreement was relatively rare in general (in about 5% of all descriptions).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSelf-attribution scores were relatively undifferentiated; even Amotivated-Intrinsic was not significantly different from High-Quality; exception Amotivated featured much lower self-attribution than all other profiles.
“In comparison to other metrics, self-attribution scores were relatively undifferentiated.Even the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile was not significantly different from the High-Quality profile.An exception to this trend was the Amotivated profile which featured much lower selfattribution scores than all other profiles (see Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVarieties of extrinsic motivation were important in differentiating outcomes and often associated with positive UX.
“While previous work in HCI has neglected extrinsic motivation or treated it as a negative factor [36, 59, 105, 118], we found that varieties of extrinsic motivation were important in differentiating outcomes and often associated with positive UX.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll three basic needs received higher scores in the positive condition than the negative condition, with no overlap in confidence intervals.
“As listed in Table 3, all three basic needs received higher scores in the positive condition than the negative condition, with no overlap in confidence intervals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants commented on efficiency, convenience and ease of use (~40%); ability to integrate or adapt to needs (~18%); and ways technology was exceptional (~19%).
“Participants commented on efficiency, convenience and ease of use (∼ 40%); the ability to integrate or adapt to their needs (∼ 18%, e.g., 'ready to be customised to fit my unique needs.I started small […] but soon discovered the true power of this app'.(ID343)), and ways in which the technology was exceptional (∼ 19%), whether in outperforming alternatives or continually getting better over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Amotivated-Intrinsic profile scores substantially higher on intrinsic motivation than the External profile, yet these profiles differ little in terms of PANAS scores.
“The Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, for example, scores substantially higher on intrinsic motivation than the External profile, yet these profiles differ little in terms of PANAS scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMentions of value disagreement were most prevalent in Amotivated-Intrinsic (38%), largely focused on poor perception of other users, sense of fakeness, and concerns with technology companies.
“Mentions of value disagreement were most prevalent in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile (38% of responses).This largely focused on poor perception of other users, and a sense of fakeness, alongside concerns with technology companies (e.g., 'It represents the aggresive capitalism around me which goes against my values'.(ID295)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, pleasure scores are considerably higher than in the Amotivated profile and equivalent to those in the Medium profile.
“Another notable exception is the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile where pleasure scores are considerably higher than in the Amotivated profile and equivalent to those in the more autonomously motivated Medium profile.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsers in Amotivated-Intrinsic were most likely to suggest technology was bad for people (61%), focused on bad habits and compulsion, or diminished mood and self-image.
“Meanwhile, users in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile were most likely to suggest the technology was bad for people (61%).This focused largely on how the technology fed bad habits and compulsion, or diminished mood and self-image.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStatistical testing supported rejection of the null hypothesis for H1, indicating significant differences in UX outcomes for all pairwise comparisons between profiles.
“Statistical testing supported the rejection of the null hypothesis for H1, indicating significant differences in UX outcomes for all pairwise comparisons between profiles”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf all profiles, the High Quality profile is most autonomous, with particularly high scores for integrated regulation.
“Of all the profiles, the High Quality profile is most autonomous in this sense, with particularly high scores for integrated regulation, the most autonomous form of extrinsic motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese profiles were associated with significant differences in how users experienced their technology use and qualitative differences in how users described their engagement.
“These profiles were associated with significant differences in how users experienced their technology use and qualitative differences in how users described their engagement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost participants (n=201) used the technology at least 4 times per day, and only 15 used it less than once per week.
“Most participants (n = 201) used the technology at least 4 times per day, and only 15 used the technology less than once per week.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMore autonomously motivated profiles scored consistently higher on affect, with pronounced differences even between adjacent profiles; External, Amotivated-Intrinsic and Amotivated profiles featured fairly neutral affect scores.
“More autonomously motivated profiles scored consistently higher on affect, with pronounced differences even between adjacent profiles.External, Amotivated-Intrinsic and Amotivated profiles, in contrast, featured fairly neutral affect scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe External profile scored slightly above the more autonomous Medium profile on relatedness, competence, popularity and security, but these differences were not statistically significant.
“The External profile represents one exception to this general pattern, scoring slightly above the more autonomous Medium profile on relatedness, competence, popularity and security (albeit these differences are not statistically significant).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOther technologies included streaming media (9%), media authoring apps (6%), voice assistants (4%) and AI Chatbots (3%).
“Other technologies included streaming media (9%), media authoring apps (6%), voice assistants (4%) and AI Chatbots (3%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, 73% of participants reported on social media technologies, with another 17% reporting on entertainment technologies.
“However, only one profile was strongly dominated by a particular kinds technology: in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile 73% of participants reported on social media technologies, with another 17% reporting on entertainment technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe results are consistent with prior findings: participants in the positive condition reported higher mean scores than those in the negative condition on every dimension of need satisfaction, positive affect, usability and self-attribution.
“In these terms we find our results are consistent with prior findings: participants in the positive condition reported higher mean scores than those in the negative condition on every dimension of need satisfaction, positive affect, usability and self-attribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the High Quality profile, mean scores for all needs are comfortably above the respective mean scores, both overall and for the positive condition.
“For the most autonomous profile-High Quality-mean scores for all needs are comfortably above the respective mean scores, both overall and for the positive condition (see Tables 3, A4, A5 and Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFrom the accounts, five high-level themes with nested sub-themes were identified.
“From these accounts we identified five high-level themes, with nested sub-themes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Amotivated-Intrinsic profile showed even higher levels of amotivation, while extrinsic regulations were low.
“This profile showed even higher levels of amotivation, while extrinsic regulations (and especially autonomous extrinsic regulations) were low: indicating little conscious valuing of the activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe profiles observed were not technology specific; all profiles contained multiple technology types, and all technology types appeared in multiple profiles.
“Importantly, the profiles we observed were not technology specific.Some technologies were more prominent in particular profiles, but all profiles contained multiple technology types, and all technology types appeared in multiple profiles (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants' written accounts contained 147 words on average (SD=67), ranging from 25 to 621 words.
“Participants' written accounts contained 147 words on average (SD = 67), ranging from 25 to 621 words.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter Holm-Bonferroni correction, 48 comparisons gave significant results at p<0.05, and 33 of these were significant at p<0.001.
“After adjustment 48 comparisons gave significant results at < 0.05, and 33 of these were significant at < 0.001.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataActive and self-driven engagement was less common in Extrinsic and Amotivated profiles (~25%) and least common in Amotivated-Intrinsic (8%).
“Such active and self-driven engagement was less common in the Extrinsic and Amotivated profiles (∼ 25%) and least common in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile (8%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn all profiles the most common technology category was social media (20-25%).
“In all profiles the most common category was social media (20-25%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe High Quality and Medium profiles have very similar intrinsic motivation scores, yet display significant and sometimes large differences across all three basic needs, meaning, self-esteem and PANAS; they differ most substantially in integrated regulation.
“The High Quality and Medium profiles, for example, have very similar intrinsic motivation scores, yet display significant and sometimes large differences across all three basic needs, meaning, self-esteem and PANAS.These profiles differ most substantially in terms of (extrinsic) integrated regulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataScores for need satisfaction and affect were often far higher in autonomous profiles than in the positive condition, and far lower in non-autonomous, amotivated profiles than in the negative condition.
“Scores for need satisfaction and affect (PANASoften treated as a yardstick of positive UX [e.g., 37, 38, 61, 103]) were often far higher in autonomous profiles than in the positive condition, and far lower in non-autonomous, amotivated, profiles than in the negative condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Medium profile scores similarly to High Quality for intrinsic motivation, but lower on all other regulations except amotivation.
“This profile scores similarly to the High Quality profile for intrinsic motivation, but scores lower on all other regulations except amotivation, indicating a lower quantity of motivation to engage with the technology in addition to the slightly less autonomous quality of motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe most commonly selected technology was social media (31%).
“Overall, the most commonly selected technology was social media (31%) (see also Table 2 and Table A3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThree participants wrote less than 50 words, and 85 wrote more than 200 words.
“Three participants wrote less than 50 words, and 85 wrote more than 200 words.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUMUX scores showed lower variation between profiles and a less pronounced pattern overall.
“UMUX scores showed lower variation between profiles, and a less pronounced pattern overall.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHigher intrinsic motivation was generally associated with higher PANAS scores, but this was not true in every instance.
“While (consistent with SDT propositions [80, p. 171]) we observed that higher intrinsic motivation was generally associated with higher PANAS scores, this was not true in every instance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe Amotivated profile shows low scores on all regulations except amotivation, and very little autonomous regulation.
“The Amotivated profile shows low scores on all regulations except amotivation, and in particular very little autonomous regulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEntertainment was most commonly mentioned in Amotivated-Intrinsic (49%), followed by Medium (34%), High Quality (28%), Amotivated (21%) and External (5%).
“Entertainment was most commonly mentioned in the Amotivated-Intrinsic (49%), followed by the Medium (34%), High Quality (28%), Amotivated (21%) and External (5%) profiles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSuch comments were less common in other profiles (13% average for whole sample) and particularly rare in High Quality (4%).
“Such comments were less common in other profiles (13% average for the whole sample) and particularly rare in the High Quality profile (4%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe median usage frequency was 2-3 times per day.
“The median usage frequency was 2-3 times per day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis was less common in Medium and Amotivated-Intrinsic (18% each) and rarest in Amotivated (7%) and External (5%).
“This was less common in the Medium and Amotivated-Intrinsic profiles (18% each) and rarest in the Amotivated (7%) and External (5%) profiles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth the External and amotivated profiles are associated with low need satisfaction and PANAS scores.
“While both are associated with low need satisfaction and PANAS scores, the External profile (reflecting external control) scores far more highly for competence, relatedness and security satisfactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe Amotivated-Intrinsic profile has very low need satisfaction scores, and participants described compulsion, bad habits and diminished emotional states in relation to their chosen technologies.
“These qualities are reflected in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile's very low need satisfaction scores and in participants' descriptions of compulsion, bad habits and diminished emotional states in relation to their chosen technologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared to other profiles, users in the High Quality profile reported greater meaning, need satisfaction and positive affect, and were more likely to connect the technology to their identity and values.
“Compared to other profiles, users in this profile reported greater meaning, need satisfaction and positive affect, and were more likely to connect the technology to their identity and values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, compulsive behaviour and low affect are observed alongside relatively dense intrinsic motivation, yet sparse need satisfaction.
“In short, in this profile, compulsive behaviour and low affect are observed alongside relatively dense intrinsic motivation, yet sparse need satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationParticipants in the two amotivated profiles were more likely to feel the technology was actively bad for them, and to think of quitting the technology.
“Participants in the two amotivated profiles, in contrast, were more likely to feel the technology was actively bad for them, and to think of quitting the technology [see also similar results in 16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants in the High Quality profile emphasised creative aspects of their technologies and connected them to their social roles.
“Our results also suggest other strategies to support integration: participants in the High Quality profile emphasised creative aspects of their technologies and connected them to their social roles (e.g., 'as a mom', '…gamer', '…tech guy').”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile reported very low scores for need satisfaction, alongside high scores for amotivation.
“However, while SDT associates intrinsic motivation with need satisfaction, participants in this profile in fact reported very low scores for need satisfaction, alongside high scores for amotivation-a construct associated with low need satisfaction [16] and high need frustration [80, p. 190].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, the factor score for intrinsic motivation is quite high, markedly higher than in the Amotivated and External profiles, and equivalent to about 5 out of 7 on the scale.
“Results for the low-autonomy Amotivated-Intrinsic profile complicate this picture: the factor score for intrinsic motivation in this profile is quite high: markedly higher than the intrinsic motivation scores in the Amotivated and External profiles (see Figure 2) and equivalent to ∼ 5 out of 7 on the scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile commonly reported compulsive patterns of behaviour and had relatively high intrinsic motivation scores.
“They commonly reported compulsive patterns of behaviour and had relatively high intrinsic motivation scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataWhen evaluating LPA models, we saw some evidence that a larger sample size may have supported a larger number of profiles.
“Indeed, when evaluating LPA models, we saw some evidence that a larger sample size may have supported a larger number of profiles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA number of participants reported that they were introduced to technologies by friends or adopted technologies together with friends.
“A number of participants reported that they were introduced to technologies by friends or adopted technologies together with friends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataSocial media technologies were strongly represented in each of our profiles.
“Social media use is a strong candidate for future investigation: these technologies were strongly represented in each of our profiles, indicating that motivational profiles capture relevant differences in types of social media engagement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenParticipants were told to write in their own words without external aids (including LLMs), and copying and pasting into free text fields was disabled.
“Through all these questions, participants were told to write in their own words without external aids (including Large Language Models (LLM)).Copying and pasting into free text fields was disabled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataResponses were screened for data quality, including checking open questions, statistical markers of careless responding, and attention checks.
“These responses were then screened for data quality.For example, we checked responses to the open questions to ensure participants followed instructions: e.g., that they focused on direct personal experience rather than broad opinion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Participants' self-reports of their experiences and motivations are sincere and accurate.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataCronbach's for the positive scale was 0.89, and for the negative scale 0.86, indicating good reliability.
“Cronbach's for the positive scale was 0.89, and for the negative scale 0.86, indicating good reliability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results complicate exclusively positive notions of intrinsic motivation and clarify how extrinsic motivation can contribute to positive UX.
“Our results complicate exclusively positive notions of intrinsic motivation and clarify how extrinsic motivation can contribute to positive UX.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe study combines confirmatory testing with theory-informed exploratory analysis, consistent with recent recommendations concerning good research practice.
“Our study combines confirmatory testing with theory-informed exploratory analysis, consistent with recent recommendations concerning good research practice [84,107].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [84]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [107]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataCronbach's scores indicated satisfactory levels of reliability for all need sub-scales except Security-control, which fell slightly below the typical benchmark of 0.7.
“Cronbach's scores indicated satisfactory levels of reliability for all need sub-scales except Security-control, which fell slightly below the typical benchmark of 0.7 (i.e., = 0.798, = 0.88, = 0.89, --= 0.86, = 0.77, = 0.66, -= 0.83, = 0.85).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study aimed for a sample size of approximately 500 participants.
“As such we aimed for a sample size of approx.500 participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAt the end of the survey, participants were asked to honestly report whether they answered the questions in a 'sincere, conscious and engaged' way and whether they used ChatGPT or other LLMs.
“At the end of the survey, we asked participants to honestly report whether they answered the questions in a 'sincere, conscious and engaged' way and whether they used ChatGPT or other LLMs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Participants' self-reports of their experiences and motivations are sincere and accurate.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData, analysis code and preregistration are provided at https://osf.io/eny6v/.
“Data, analysis code and preregistration (as time-stamped wiki) are provided at https://osf.io/eny6v/.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe first and second authors met periodically at each stage of the coding process to review sample codes and themes, as well as check their sense and consistency.
“The first and second authors met periodically at each stage of the coding process to review sample codes and themes, as well as check their sense and consistency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenParticipants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions, describing a digital technology they either 'felt good' about (positive condition) (n=254) or 'did not feel good' about (negative condition) (n=243).
“Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions, describing a digital technology they either 'felt good' about (positive condition) ( = 254) or 'did not feel good' about (negative condition) ( = 243).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAfter exclusions (n=76), 497 participants remained for analysis.
“After exclusions ( = 76), = 497 participants remained for analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenTo confirm that participants understood the criteria, they answered a multiple choice question demonstrating understanding of the criteria and were directed back to the instructions until they answered correctly.
“To confirm that participants understood these criteria, they answered a multiple choice question demonstrating understanding of the criteria and were directed back to the instructions until they answered correctly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe survey included three attention check questions to check for careless responding.
“To check for careless responding, the survey also included three attention check questions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningOnly responses to the open questions were exported to NVIVO, to avoid potential biases from knowing which experimental condition or profile participants were assigned to.
“Only responses to the open questions were exported to NVIVO, to avoid potential biases from knowing which experimental condition or profile participants were assigned to.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe analysis of open questions took a bottom-up, inductive approach, avoiding a priori assumptions, guided by Braun and Clarke's Thematic Analysis.
“Instead, we took a bottom-up, or 'inductive' approach, avoiding a priori assumptions.This was guided by descriptions of good practice in Thematic Analysis (TA) as described by Braun and Clarke [12,14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [12]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMotivation has been considered a central issue in HCI research.
“Perhaps naturally, then, motivation has been considered a central issue in HCI research [4]:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results clarify the conditions under which extrinsic forms of motivation are autonomous and contribute positively to UX, dispelling the idea that extrinsic motivation in technology use can be reduced to a singular, negative phenomenon.
“Our results clarify the conditions under which extrinsic forms of motivation are autonomous and contribute positively to UX, dispelling the idea that extrinsic motivation in technology use can be reduced to a singular, negative phenomenon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe UMI measures the degree to which participants' technology use is characterised by six distinct motivational regulations.
“The UMI measures the degree to which participants' technology use is characterised by six distinct motivational regulations [16].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThere remain gaps in understanding of motivation in technology use; it is unclear how motivation influences UX, and how technologies and contexts influence motivation.
“However, despite this acknowledged importance, there remain gaps in our understanding of motivation in technology use.It is unclear how motivation influences user experience (UX), and how technologies and contexts in turn influence motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAutonomy in motivational regulation concerns the degree to which users make an activity their own: how they internalise values and patterns of behaviour associated with an activity, alongside personal values, beliefs and patterns of behaviour.
“In contrast, autonomy in motivational regulation concerns the degree to which users make an activity their own: how they internalise the values and patterns of behaviour associated with an activity, alongside their personal values, beliefs and patterns of behaviour [80].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMeans for self-attribution were slightly higher in the positive condition (M=5.66 vs M=5.13), though both were comfortably above the midpoint, indicating users in both conditions tended to feel a sense of responsibility for outcomes.
“Finally, means for self-attribution were slightly higher in the positive condition (M = 5.66 vs. M = 5.13), though both were comfortably above the midpoint, indicating that users in both conditions tended to feel a sense of responsibility for the outcomes experienced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSDT posits that three basic psychological needs-autonomy, competence and relatedness-are expected to promote intrinsic motivation.
“In particular, SDT posits that three 'basic psychological needs'-autonomy, competence and relatedness-are expected to promote intrinsic motivation: spontaneous enjoyment, interest and continued engagement with the activity [80, pp. 123-178].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80, pp. 123-178]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationConducting LPA on factor scores rather than raw measure scores is arguably optimal.
“Previous work has argued that it is 'arguably optimal' [5, p. 10] to conduct LPA on factor scores (e.g., resulting from a CFA), rather than raw measure scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe BCH method avoids normality assumptions and is insensitive to heteroscedasticity.
“It also avoids normality assumptions and is insensitive to heteroscedasticity [2].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMean scores for identified and intrinsic regulations in the negative condition are just above scale midpoint, indicating participants still felt their use was at least somewhat worthwhile and inherently satisfying.
“Mean scores for identified and intrinsic regulations in the negative condition are just above scale midpoint, indicating that these participants still felt their use of the selected technology was at least somewhat worthwhile and inherently satisfying.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationConducting LPA on factor scores ensures that indicators are truly continuous and that measurement error has been corrected for.
“This ensures that the indicators used are truly continuous (as required by LPA) and that measurement error has been corrected for [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe profiles distinguished identity-grounded and often highly meaningful engagement from empty habit, and empty habit from external pressure.
“They distinguished identity-grounded and often highly meaningful engagement from empty habit, and empty habit from external pressure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationOIT identifies six distinct forms of motivation, associated with different relationships to the self, qualities of experience, degrees of autonomy and patterns of behaviour.
“OIT identifies six distinct forms of motivation, associated with different relationships to the self, qualities of experience, degrees of autonomy and patterns of behaviour [79].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMotivation is implicated in many of HCI's grand challenges.
“and is implicated in many of the field's 'grand challenges' [93,96].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [93]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [96]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSDT considers intrinsic motivation inherently autonomous, due to its basis in spontaneous interest, and associates it with learning and growth.
“SDT considers intrinsic motivation inherently autonomous, due to its basis in spontaneous interest [80, p. 14], and also associates it with learning and growth [82, p. 222].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [80, p. 14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [82, p. 222]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExtrinsic motivation has commonly been neglected in HCI and UX research or else reduced to its less healthy and autonomous forms and exclusively associated with poor quality outcomes.
“Despite all this, extrinsic motivation has commonly been neglected in HCI and UX research [e.g., 1,94] or else reduced to its less healthy and autonomous forms (such as reward and punishment) and exclusively associated with poor quality outcomes [36,105].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [94]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [105]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLPA is well established in psychology and particularly in SDT research.
“While LPA is a relatively novel technique in UX research, it is well established in psychology [5,66], and particularly in SDT research [e.g., 15,33,76,114].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [66]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [e.g., 15,33,76,114]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDifferences in outcomes seem weakly related to intrinsic motivation and more strongly associated with extrinsic motivation.
“Elsewhere, differences in outcomes seem weakly related to intrinsic motivation and more strongly associated with extrinsic motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMotivation plays an important theoretical role in UX and design work.
“It plays an important theoretical role in UX and design work [e.g., 29,68,70]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [68]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [70]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhen a technology frames an activity in a way that fits with the user's self-image, then it is experienced as autonomous and more likely to be accepted; when the framing challenges the user's self-image, then the activity is experienced as non-autonomous and more likely to be rejected.
“To give examples, when a technology frames an activity in a way that fits with the user's self-image (e.g., as 'a fun person', 'motivated', 'reliable') then it is experienced as autonomous and more likely to be accepted.When the framing challenges the user's self-image, then the activity is experienced as non-autonomous and more likely to be rejected [29, p. 735].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29, p. 735]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInternalisation will often demand engagement and effort from the user, and as such seems likely to demand some existing level of motivation.
“Internalisation will often demand engagement and effort from the user, and as such seems likely to demand some existing level of motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Existing motivation is a pre-requisite for further internalisation.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCounter to these assumptions, OIT holds that multiple motivational regulations will commonly be operative for a single activity, simultaneously.
“Counter to these assumptions, OIT holds that multiple motivational regulations will commonly be operative for a single activity, simultaneously [80, p. 184].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRigby and Ryan articulate a seemingly related phenomenon, subsequently named the 'need density hypothesis'.
“While these tensions have not, to our knowledge, been addressed directly in core SDT research, Rigby and Ryan [74, p. 99] articulate a seemingly related phenomenon, subsequently named the 'need density hypothesis' [78].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [74]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [78]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIt may mean a shift away from externally controlled motivation-based on reward, social pressure or guilt-and towards more autonomous regulation.
“Equally it may mean a shift away from externally controlled motivation-based on reward, social pressure or guilt-and towards more autonomous regulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGerstenberg et al. recently argued that OIT provides an ecological perspective that integrates activity into the broader context of a person's life, which designers can draw upon to support healthy sustainable motivation.
“Gerstenberg et al. recently argued that OIT provides 'an ecological perspective that integrates […] activity into the broader context of a person's life' [29, p. 727], which designers can draw upon to support healthy sustainable motivation [29].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningWe should not expect an amotivated user to engage in the 'confrontation with personally held values' required for integration.
“We should not, for example, expect an amotivated user to engage in the 'confrontation with personally held values' [29, p. 5] required for integration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIntrinsic motivation is widely considered an uncomplicated good, grounded in the satisfaction of three basic psychological needs which are essential to human flourishing.
“Intrinsic motivation is widely considered an uncomplicated good, grounded in the satisfaction of three basic psychological needs which are essential to human flourishing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSuch intermediate strategies for internalisation may entail clarifying the value of an activity's outcomes and connecting these outcomes to the user's goals (identified regulation).
“Such intermediate strategies for internalisation may entail clarifying the value of an activity's outcomes and connecting these outcome to the user's goals (identified regulation as in Figure 7, middle).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIntegrated regulation is considered the most autonomous and well-being supportive form of extrinsic motivation.
“While integrated regulation is considered the most autonomous and well-being supportive form of extrinsic motivation [79], it is inherently difficult to support this through design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe hypothesis that intrinsic motivation has other sources beyond the three basic needs contradicts current accounts in SDT, but is consistent with the results observed in the Amotivated-Intrinsic group.
“This contradicts current accounts in SDT, but is consistent with the results observed in our Amotivated-Intrinsic group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDigital technologies allow stimulation to be precisely calibrated, highly responsive to the user, and somewhat detached from wider consequences, and entertainment design is known to leverage such possibilities.
“Digital technologies allow stimulation to be precisely calibrated, highly responsive to the user, and somewhat detached from wider consequences, and entertainment design in particular is known to leverage such possibilities [48].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWithin SDT, intrinsic motivation is described as a prototype of human proactivity experienced as highly autonomous, and an evolved growth-oriented potential characterizing bases for learning and developing.
“Within SDT it is described as 'a prototype of human proactivity that is experienced as highly autonomous', and an evolved 'growth-oriented potential, which… characterizes our bases for learning and developing' [82, p. 222].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSDT proposes that need satisfaction can support both intrinsic and autonomous extrinsic motivations.
“SDT proposes that need satisfaction can support both intrinsic and autonomous extrinsic motivations [80, p. 123, 202]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe paper's account goes beyond previous accounts in explicitly articulating a mechanism for scale dependency in terms of internalisation and the temporal properties of motivational constructs.
“Our account goes beyond these previous accounts in explicitly articulating a mechanism for this scale dependency in terms of internalisation, and the temporal properties of motivational constructs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe paper's results support the idea that designers should not limit themselves to integrated regulation, but address the full spectrum of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations.
“Our results also support the idea that designers should not limit themselves to integrated regulation, but address the full spectrum of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRyan and Deci emphasise that truly autonomous extrinsic motivation involves bringing the future into the present-connecting immediate activity to the fulfilment of values and goals which are not directly present.
“Ryan and Deci emphasise that truly autonomous extrinsic motivation involves 'bring[ing] the future into the present' [80, p. 198]-connecting our immediate activity to the fulfilment of values and goals which are not directly present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningExtrinsic forms of motivation should be seen as temporally extended and situated in the wider circumstances of a person's life.
“As such, extrinsic forms of motivation should be seen as temporally extended and situated in the wider circumstances of a person's life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGerstenberg et al. developed an OIT-grounded approach to design for behaviour change which they call 'technology-mediated regulatory transformation'.
“They developed an OIT-grounded approach to design for behaviour change which they call 'technology-mediated regulatory transformation'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe separation of basic needs from hedonic satisfactions seems likely to be more common in technology use than in other contexts.
“Finally, we note that the separation of basic needs from hedonic satisfactions seems likely to be more common in technology use than in other contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOIT is vague about what happens when motivational regulation changes.
“OIT is vague about what happens when motivational regulation changes [29], and there has been a surprising lack of research on the dynamics of motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmotivation is associated with low need satisfaction and high need frustration.
“However, while SDT associates intrinsic motivation with need satisfaction, participants in this profile in fact reported very low scores for need satisfaction, alongside high scores for amotivation-a construct associated with low need satisfaction [16] and high need frustration [80, p. 190].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe self-confrontations associated with integration may be risky, requiring contextual, interpersonal or therapeutic support, to avoid backfiring and undermining motivation or self-image.
“Furthermore, the self-confrontations associated with integration may be risky, requiring contextual, interpersonal or therapeutic support, to avoid backfiring and undermining motivation or self-image.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGerstenberg et al.'s approach assumes that these changes in regulation will provoke an experience of 'friction' between the two adjacent regulations, which the user must overcome.
“(3) These changes in regulation will provoke an experience of 'friction' between the two adjacent regulations, which the user must overcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGenerally, self-report of intrinsic motivation is operationalised via adjectives like 'enjoyable', 'interesting', and 'fun', which seem unlikely to distinguish between basic need satisfaction and hedonic aspects of the experience such as stimulation and novelty.
“Generally, self-report of intrinsic motivation is operationalised via adjectives like 'enjoyable', 'interesting', and 'fun' [e.g., 16,17], which seem unlikely to distinguish between basic need satisfaction and hedonic aspects of the experience such as stimulation and novelty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile SDT generally expects basic need satisfaction to support positive experience, Rigby and Ryan suggest that in some cases games and other digital technologies may have properties which interfere with this.
“While SDT generally expects basic need satisfaction to support positive experience, Rigby and Ryan suggest that in some cases, games (and other digital technologies) may have properties which interfere with this.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLindenberg argues this risks creating gaps in the treatment of unhealthy engagement.
“He argues this risks creating gaps in the treatment of unhealthy engagement: 'the very distinction between the inherently noble connotations of intrinsic motivation and obsessive and addictive behaviour has been left unexamined' [53, p. 318].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe need density account primarily addresses problematic gaming behaviour, but its principles transfer readily to problematic behaviour with other forms of technology, such as social media.
“The account primarily addresses problematic gaming behaviour, but its principles transfer readily to problematic behaviour with other forms technology, such as social media.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIntrinsic motivation is considered by definition autonomous, experienced as being volitional and emanating from one's self.
“Intrinsic motivation is considered 'by definition, autonomous; […] experienced as being volitional and emanating from one's self' [80, p. 14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile it may be reasonable to expect high levels of investment from the user in matters of health and high personal significance, this cannot be relied upon in other circumstances.
“While it may be reasonable to expect such high levels of investment from the user in matters of health and high personal significance, this cannot be relied upon in other circumstances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe paper's results support the idea of grounding design in OIT, as well as supporting certain details of the approach Gerstenberg et al. describe.
“Our results support the idea of grounding design in OIT, as well as supporting certain details of the approach Gerstenberg et al. describe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmotivation is a construct associated with the absence of need satisfaction and the lack of conscious volition.
“At the same time, the profile has a very high score for amotivation, a construct associated with the absence of need satisfaction [80, p. 190], and the lack of conscious volition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGerstenberg et al.'s work focuses in particular on guiding users to more autonomous forms of regulation in rehabilitation exercises, to support more sustainable engagement.
“Their work focuses in particular on guiding users to more autonomous forms of regulation in rehabilitation exercises, to support more sustainable engagement [29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGerstenberg et al.'s approach is grounded in assumptions which are in tension with OIT propositions and which currently lack an evidential basis.
“However, their approach is grounded in some assumptions which are in tension with OIT propositions, and which currently lack an evidential basis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLindenberg suggests this framing fails to account for factors such as stimulation that are intrinsic to the activity, motivating and enjoyable, yet unconnected to basic need satisfaction and lacking its positive, healthy associations.
“He suggests this framing fails to account for many factors, such as stimulation, which are intrinsic to the activity, motivating and enjoyable, yet are unconnected to basic need satisfaction and lack its positive, healthy, associations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIn developing such strategies, the paper's results and OIT more broadly suggest that users' responses to such interventions may be affected by the context, by their existing motivational profile for the activity and by nuances in design.
“In developing such strategies for motivational design, our results (and OIT more broadly) suggest that users' responses to such interventions may be affected by the context, by their existing motivational profile for the activity and by nuances in design [e.g., in the kind of reward and the way it is delivered, 80, p. 148].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationOn a broader understanding of what it means for a person to be autonomous, neither integrated nor identified regulation should be seen as inherently more autonomous than the other.
“on a broader understanding of what it means for a person to be autonomous [see, e.g., 21, 50, 67, 72], we suggest that neither of these regulations should be seen as inherently more autonomous than the other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [67]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmotivation is expected to arise either from users' indifference to the activity or from conditions which undermine their sense that they are able to perform adequately or their expectation that the activity will lead to valued outcomes.
“This is expected to arise either from users' indifference to the activity, or from conditions which undermine either their sense that they are able to perform adequately or their expectation that the activity will lead to valued outcomes [80, p. 191].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe work of Gerstenberg et al. is among the few works to investigate the factors which facilitate internalisation.
“The work of Gerstenberg et al. [30], discussed above, is among the few works to investigate the factors which facilitate internalisation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWan and Chiou found that more 'addictive' behaviour could be associated with higher intrinsic motivation.
“Elsewhere, Wan and Chiou found that more 'addictive' behaviour could be associated with higher intrinsic motivation [112]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results for the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile paint a picture of immediate but shallow pleasure and weak self-determination, rather than the growth-oriented potential SDT associates with intrinsic motivation.
“Rather than the 'growth-oriented potential' [82, p. 222] SDT associates with intrinsic motivation, these results paint a picture of immediate but shallow pleasure, and weak self-determination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results for the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile fit some aspects of the need density account while raising challenges for other aspects.
“The results for our Amotivated-Intrinsic profile fit some aspects of the account while raising challenges for other aspects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGerstenberg et al.'s approach assumes that a user's motivation for an activity will be dominated by one motivational regulation.
“Specifically, the approach assumes: (1) A user's motivation for an activity will be dominated by one motivational regulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenReflection and awareness play an important role in integrated regulation.
“More broadly, since both reflection and awareness play an important role in integrated regulation, it seems likely that there is value in design strategies which promote these mindsets, such as seamfulness [47], friction in interaction [22,60] and varieties of positive breakdown [8,10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a study of online gamers, around a third of participants shared a motivational profile similar to the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile and likewise reported negative UX outcomes and low need satisfaction.
“In a study of online gamers [15], for example, around a third of participants shared a motivational profile similar to our Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, and likewise reported negative UX outcomes and low need satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIntrinsic motivation is concerned with immediate, spontaneous experience.
“By contrast, intrinsic motivation is concerned with immediate, spontaneous, experience [80, p. 198]: 'the freely chosen continuation of an activity in”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [53]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious research in motivational psychology has proposed sub-types within intrinsic motivation, including stimulation, and posited a role for more hedonic needs such as arousal and novelty, in addition to the basic needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness.
“Previous research in motivational psychology has proposed sub-types within intrinsic motivation, including stimulation [106], and posited a role for more 'hedonic' needs, such as arousal [99,100] and novelty [31], in addition to the 'basic' needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [106]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [99]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [100]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis may mean a shift away from amotivation, by increasing either intrinsic or extrinsic motivation.
“This may, for example, mean a shift away from amotivation, by increasing either intrinsic or extrinsic motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThe degree of congruence between the intrinsic and extrinsic constructs can help clarify when intrinsic motivation scores are or are not grounded in basic need satisfaction.
“The degree of congruence between the intrinsic and extrinsic constructs can help clarify when intrinsic motivation scores are or are not grounded in basic need satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNot all psychologists concur with SDT's view of intrinsic motivation.
“In interpreting these results, it is important to note that not all psychologists concur with SDT's view of intrinsic motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe need bubble account would be consistent with existing SDT propositions that intrinsic motivation follows from basic need satisfaction and that need satisfaction can be somewhat restricted to particular spheres of life.
“It would also be consistent with existing SDT propositions, namely that intrinsic motivation follows from basic need satisfaction [80, pp. 123-178] and that need satisfaction can be somewhat restricted to particular spheres of life [70].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [70]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEvidence for the need density hypothesis remains inconclusive at present.
“Evidence for the need density hypothesis remains inconclusive at present [104, pp. 13-14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [104]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThere has been a surprising lack of research on the dynamics of motivation.
“OIT is vague about what happens when motivational regulation changes [29], and there has been a surprising lack of research on the dynamics of motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRigby and Ryan propose that need-dense activities may provide a strong draw to people who lack need satisfaction in their wider lives, and may thereby lead to problematic over-reliance.
“The authors propose that such 'need-dense' activities may provide a strong draw to people who lack need satisfaction in their wider lives, and may thereby lead to problematic over-reliance [63,110].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [63]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [110]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIntegration relies on developing congruence between the activity and the user's self-image, and can require significant investment from the user, sometimes even emotional investment in the form of a confrontation with personally held values.
“Integration relies on developing congruence between the activity and the user's self-image, and as such can require significant investment from the user; sometimes even emotional investment in the form of 'a confrontation with personally held values' [29, p. 5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningDesigners can rarely ensure such support.
“Designers can rarely ensure such support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIntegrated and identified regulation reflect different ways of being autonomous-mindful, conscious and self-governing-in an activity.
“Rather, we suggest they reflect different ways of being autonomous-mindful, conscious and self-governing-in an activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIntegrated and identified regulation illustrate two qualitatively different kinds of autonomous regulation; two different ways of relating an activity to one's goals and values.
“Integrated and identified regulation thus illustrate two qualitatively different kinds of autonomous regulation; two different ways of relating an activity to one's goals and values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLindenberg has argued against SDT's maxim that all intrinsic motivation is grounded in basic need satisfaction.
“Lindenberg, for example, has argued against SDT's maxim that all intrinsic motivation is grounded in basic need satisfaction [53].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGerstenberg et al.'s approach assumes that users will move step-wise between adjacent motivational regulations.
“(2) Users will move step-wise, between adjacent motivational regulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenIn SDT's account, internalised extrinsic motivation relies on satisfactions which do not pay off during the activity itself, but in the outcomes of the activity, and via personal investment over time.
“In SDT's account, internalised extrinsic motivation (see Figure 1) relies on satisfactions which do not pay off during the activity itself, but in the outcomes of the activity, and via personal investment over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenUsers with very low identified regulation will fail to see how an activity leads to outcomes they value, something which may be difficult to overcome even if the activity itself is quite fun.
“For example, users with very low identified regulation will fail to see how an activity leads to outcomes they value, something which may be difficult to overcome even if the activity itself is quite fun.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMany experiences in HCI may show complexity of this kind.
“Recent work has argued that many experiences in HCI may show complexity of this kind [7,11,83] and has turned to complexity methods to disentangle the directionality and relative strength of causal relationships between experiential constructs [11,40,83].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [83]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenIn our negative condition, participants described technologies they did 'not feel good' about, which is not necessarily the same as feeling bad.
“In our negative condition, participants described technologies they did 'not feel good' about, which is not necessarily the same as feeling bad.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThese aspects of our analysis were exploratory, and in reporting them we have been careful to avoid final or confirmatory claims.
“These aspects of our analysis were exploratory, and in reporting them we have been careful to avoid final or confirmatory claims.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenWe did not form or test hypotheses about the specific motivational profile that would be observed, nor about relationships between specific profiles and specific outcomes.
“We did not form or test hypotheses about the specific motivational profile that would be observed, nor about relationships between specific profiles and specific outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSDT holds that early childhood motivation is dominated by intrinsic motivation but that even by late childhood people are able to access all regulations.
“SDT holds that early childhood motivation is dominated by intrinsic motivation [80, p. 214] but that even by late childhood people are able to access all regulations [80, p. 197].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites 80, p. 214
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites 80, p. 197
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere is potential for an 'upward spiral' of motivation.
“Sheldon and Houser-Marko point to the potential for an 'upward spiral' of motivation [89], yet there is evidence that such reciprocal relationships between constructs can also result in more complex, and not necessarily positive, trajectories [40].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis account is somewhat in line with the developmental approach of Gerstenberg et al., but differs in its basic assumptions in ways which have consequences for design.
“This account is somewhat in line with the developmental approach of Gerstenberg et al. [30], but differs in its basic assumptions in ways which have consequences for design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInternalised, autonomous regulations are expected to support need satisfaction and other positive affect.
“For example, internalised, autonomous regulations are expected to support need satisfaction and other positive affect [80, pp.202-207], while at the same time need satisfaction and affect can act as support factors for internalisation [80, pp. 208-212].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 80, pp.202-207
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn some cases, less autonomous regulations do not seem to prevent the development of more autonomous motivations: there is evidence that controlled and autonomous regulations coexist, and that controlled regulations remain in place as autonomous regulations develop.
“However, in some cases, less autonomous regulations do not seem to prevent the development of more autonomous motivations: there is evidence that controlled and autonomous regulations coexist, and that controlled regulations remain in place as autonomous regulations develop [115].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSDT indicates the kind of reward and the manner of its delivery may be critical.
“It is important to note that SDT indicates the kind of reward and the manner of its delivery may be critical.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 80, p. 148
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataOur dataset did not permit the analysis of differences in motivational profile over age groups.
“Similarly, our dataset did not permit the analysis of differences in motivational profile over age groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataSome of our results challenge previous expectations in HCI and SDT.
“Some of our results challenge previous expectations in HCI and SDT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Previous work in HCI and UX has addressed motivation in a limited fashion, largely focusing on the immediate satisfaction inherent in moment to moment engagement with technologies.
- Rests on an assumption: Very little attention has been paid to motivational factors related to outcomes of the activity and how these relate to the values and goals the users bring to the interaction.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent work has turned to complexity methods to disentangle the directionality and relative strength of causal relationships between experiential constructs.
“Recent work has argued that many experiences in HCI may show complexity of this kind [7,11,83] and has turned to complexity methods to disentangle the directionality and relative strength of causal relationships between experiential constructs [11,40,83].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [83]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataMotivational profiles capture relevant differences in types of social media engagement.
“Social media use is a strong candidate for future investigation: these technologies were strongly represented in each of our profiles, indicating that motivational profiles capture relevant differences in types of social media engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe profiles we identify should not be treated as a definitive typology of motivation in technology use.
“First, the profiles we identify should not be treated as a definitive typology of motivation in technology use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNeed satisfaction and affect can act as support factors for internalisation.
“For example, internalised, autonomous regulations are expected to support need satisfaction and other positive affect [80, pp.202-207], while at the same time need satisfaction and affect can act as support factors for internalisation [80, pp. 208-212].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 80, pp. 208-212
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOur approach allows the identification of user sub-groups marked by particular patterns of motivation, who should show qualitatively distinct patterns of experience, and who may be receptive to different design interventions.
“Our approach allows the identification of user sub-groups marked by particular patterns of motivation, who should show qualitatively distinct patterns of experience, and who may be receptive to different design interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInterpersonal factors are expected to be important in motivation and internalisation.
“While interpersonal factors are expected to be important in motivation and internalisation [80, pp. 158-216], the results of our survey did not support in-depth analysis of this.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 80, pp. 158-216
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe motivational regulations in OIT are not developmental: people are not expected to move through them stage by stage, and in principle should be able to directly develop any of the regulations.
“The motivational regulations in OIT are not developmental: people are not expected to move through them stage by stage [80, p. 199], and in principle should be able to directly develop any of the regulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHCI researchers have argued that controlled motivations, such as reward, can undermine integration and intrinsic motivation, leading to poor quality motivation.
“HCI researchers have argued that controlled motivations, such as reward, can undermine integration and intrinsic motivation, leading to poor quality motivation [e.g., 29,36,105].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [105]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStudies of short duration might only observe changes in the faster-changing regulations and miss slower but still significant changes, risking bias in future findings.
“Studies of short duration might otherwise only observe changes in the faster-changing regulations, and miss slower but still significant changes, something which risks biasing future findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSDT suggests that motivational processes, needs and identity factors may be related by reciprocal relationships rather than by single clear directions of causality.
“SDT suggests that motivational processes, needs and identity factors may be related by reciprocal relationships rather than by single clear directions of causality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome extrinsic regulations could increase quickly, while change in intrinsic motivation was slower-i.e., it took longer before participants began to find the activity inherently interesting and enjoyable.
“Wasserkampf and Kleinert found that some of the extrinsic regulations could increase quickly, while change in intrinsic motivation was slower-i.e., it took longer before participants began to find the activity inherently interesting and enjoyable [115].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationsaBIC is found to perform better than BIC in evaluating mixture models.
“saBIC is found to perform better than BIC in evaluating mixture models[85].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe full decision process and all data is recorded in the OSF repository.
“The full decision process and all data is recorded in the OSF repository.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThere is a concept of 'hedonic amotivation': low-intentionality, compulsive, technology use, which is nevertheless marked by intrinsic motivation.
“In particular, we articulate the concept of 'hedonic amotivation': low-intentionality, compulsive, technology use, which is nevertheless marked by intrinsic motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataWe could not address in great depth the influence of interpersonal factors on motivational profiles.
“Another issue we could not address in great depth was influence of interpersonal factors on motivational profiles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationSubsequent to our analysis, more precise guidelines have been published which confirm the adequacy of this sample size for our observed group sizes and feature count.
“Subsequent to our analysis more precise guidelines have been published[23], which confirm the adequacy of this sample size for our observed group sizes and feature count.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
Participants' self-reports of their experiences and motivations are sincere and accurate.
“At the end of the survey, we asked participants to honestly report whether they answered the questions in a 'sincere, conscious and engaged' way and whether they used ChatGPT or other LLMs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The open-ended responses reflect actual experiences rather than constructed narratives.
“Participants were asked to describe their experience with the technology in their own words.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Existing motivation is a pre-requisite for further internalisation.
“We only assume that existing motivation is a pre-requisite for further internalisation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Previous work in UX has not distinguished between these kinds of low-autonomy engagement.
“While previous work in UX has not distinguished between these kinds of low-autonomy engagement, they have distinct experiential outcomes in our results.”
The paper relies on this without support.
At present there are very little data to answer whether controlled motivations inhibit users from continuing to internalise behaviours and activities.
“At present.there are very little data to answer this.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Previous work in HCI and UX has addressed motivation in a limited fashion, largely focusing on the immediate satisfaction inherent in moment to moment engagement with technologies.
“Despite this, previous work in HCI and UX has addressed motivation in a limited fashion, largely focusing on the immediate satisfaction inherent in moment to moment engagement with technologies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Very little attention has been paid to motivational factors related to outcomes of the activity and how these relate to the values and goals the users bring to the interaction.
“Very little attention has been paid to motivational factors related to outcomes of the activity and how these relate to the values and goals the users bring to the interaction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some 'extrinsic' motivations can be highly supportive of autonomous engagement and can connect activities to experiences of personal meaning and value.
“Yet psychological research suggests that some 'extrinsic' motivations can be highly supportive of autonomous engagement and can connect activities to experiences of personal meaning and value.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Previous HCI research has ignored or devalued extrinsic motivation.
“Where previous HCI research has ignored or devalued extrinsic motivation, our results indicate that extrinsic motivation can be strongly associated with positive outcomes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Previous research has treated intrinsic motivation as an uncomplicated good.
“Where previous research has treated intrinsic motivation as an uncomplicated good, our results indicate that it may in some circumstances be associated with negative outcomes, even potentially compulsive behaviour.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The number of high-level themes changes from four to five
MinorThe methods identify four high-level themes, but the results say the same analysis identified five.
“Specifically, we identified four high-level themes (Purpose; Qualities of the technology; Being good or bad for people; and Values, identity and emotional connection).”
“From these accounts we identified five high-level themes, with nested sub-themes.”
Social media prevalence exceeds the stated range for all profiles
MinorThe claim that social media accounts for 20-25% in every profile conflicts with the reported 73% in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile.
“In all profiles the most common category was social media (20-25%).”
“in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile 73% of participants reported on social media technologies”
Two tables give different confidence intervals for the same need scores
MinorTable 3 gives the positive-condition autonomy mean of 4.75 a confidence interval of [4.59, 4.91], whereas Table A4 gives [4.67, 4.83] for that same group, measure and mean. The discrepancy also occurs for other positive- and negative-condition basic-need intervals.
“Mean Positive 254 (51%) 100.0 4.75 [4.59, 4.91] 1.32”
“Mean Positive 254 (51%) 100.0 4.75 [4.67, 4.83] 1.32”
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
<b>lavaan</b> : An <i>R</i> Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Rosseel, Y. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02 · Cited by 27,955 · see citing works
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617 · see citing works
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Both the quality and quantity of motivation influence its capacity to energise and direct behaviour [77].”
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701575396 · Cited by 11,415 · see citing works
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 · Cited by 9,727 · see citing works
Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners
Jamieson, J., Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2014.1.18.39 · Cited by 6,672 · see citing works
The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N., Senécal, C. B., & Vallières, É. F. (1992) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164492052004025 · Cited by 2,890 · see citing works
Facilitating Internalization: The Self‐Determination Theory Perspective
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x · Cited by 2,627 · see citing works
Thompson, E. R. (2007) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022106297301 · Cited by 2,399 · see citing works
Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013) · Journal of Psychotherapy Integration · doi:10.1037/a0032359 · Cited by 2,170 · see citing works
Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445 · Cited by 2,119 · see citing works
Parent styles associated with children's self-regulation and competence in school.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.143 · Cited by 1,777 · see citing works
What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs.
Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.325 · Cited by 1,694 · see citing works
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016984 · Cited by 1,484 · see citing works
What Makes for a Good Day? Competence and Autonomy in the Day and in the Person
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., & Reis, H. T. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672962212007 · Cited by 917 · see citing works
Needs, affect, and interactive products – Facets of user experience
Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., & Göritz, A. (2010) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.002 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience
Peters, D., Calvo, R. A., & Ryan, R. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Self-concordance, goal attainment, and the pursuit of happiness: Can there be an upward spiral?
Sheldon, K. M., & Houser-Marko, L. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.152 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs.
Tamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Organ, A. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01513.x · Cited by 611 · see citing works
The Usability Metric for User Experience
Finstad, K. (2010) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.004 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Mixture Models: Latent Profile and Latent Class Analysis
Oberski, D. L. (2016) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26633-6_12 · Cited by 596 · see citing works
A Non-arbitrary Method of Identifying and Scaling Latent Variables in SEM and MACS Models
Little, T. D., Slegers, D. W., & Card, N. A. (2006) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1301_3 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Antona, M., Chen, J. Y. C., Dong, J., Duffy, V. G., Fang, X., Fidopiastis, C., Fragomeni, G., Fu, L. P., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach
Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J. S., & den Broeck, A. V. (2016) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Intrinsic Motivation in a New Light
Lindenberg, S. M. (2001) · Kyklos · doi:10.1111/1467-6435.00156 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Burton, K. D., Lydon, J. E., D’Alessandro, D. U., & Koestner, R. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.750 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Why Hypothesis Testers Should Spend Less Time Testing Hypotheses
Scheel, A. M., Tiokhin, L., Isager, P. M., & Lakens, D. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620966795 · Cited by 382 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Our study combines confirmatory testing with theory-informed exploratory analysis, consistent with recent recommendations concerning good research practice [84, 107].”
Ryan, R. M., Duineveld, J. J., Di Domenico, S. I., Ryan, W. S., Steward, B. A., & Bradshaw, E. L. (2022) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000385 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
A categorized list of motivation definitions, with a suggestion for a consensual definition
Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf00993889 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Glued to Games: How Video Games Draw Us In and Hold Us Spellbound
Rigby, S., & Ryan, R. M. (2011) · doi:10.5040/9798400658105 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Modeling Unobserved Heterogeneity Using Latent Profile Analysis: A Monte Carlo Simulation
Peugh, J., & Fan, X. (2013) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.824780 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Hertzum (2017) · doi:10.1145/3127358 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory.
Koestner, R., Losier, G. F., Vallerand, R. J., & Carducci, D. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.1025 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Theories of motivation: Integration and ways forward
Hattie, J., Hodis, F. A., & Kang, S. H. K. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101865 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., De Muynck, G.-J., Haerens, L., Patall, E., & Reeve, J. (2018) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1381067 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J. S., & Forest, J. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316645653 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Sheldon, K. M. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314538549 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
How feedback boosts motivation and play in a brain-training game
Burgers, C., Eden, A., van Engelenburg, M. D., & Buningh, S. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.038 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
A Primer to Latent Profile and Latent Class Analysis
Bauer, J. (2022) · Professional and practice-based learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_11 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Media enjoyment as need satisfaction: the contribution of hedonic and nonhedonic needs
Tamborini, R., Grizzard, M., David Bowman, N., Reinecke, L., Lewis, R. J., & Eden, A. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01593.x · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Design Frictions for Mindful Interactions: The Case for Microboundaries
Cox, A. L., Gould, S. J. J., Cecchinato, M. E., Iacovides, I., & Renfree, I. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2851581.2892410 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Wanting, having, and needing: Integrating motive disposition theory and self-determination theory.
Sheldon, K. M., & Schüler, J. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024952 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Self-Determination Theory in the Clinic: Motivating Physical and Mental Health
Sheldon, K. M., Williams, G. C., & Joiner, T. E. (2003) · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-determination theory, internet gaming disorder, and the mediating role of self-control
Mills, D. J., & Allen, J. J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.106209 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Using crowdsourcing to support pro-environmental community activism
Massung, E., Coyle, D., Cater, K. F., Jay, M., & Preist, C. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2470708 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Hassenzahl, M., Wiklund-Engblom, A., Bengs, A., Hägglund, S., & Diefenbach, S. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1064664 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Relating latent class membership to external variables: An overview
Bakk, Z., & Kuha, J. (2020) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12227 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory.
Koestner, R., Losier, G. F., Vallerand, R. J., et al. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1025 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Partala, T., & Kallinen, A. (2011) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2011.10.001 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Digital game elements, user experience and learning: A conceptual framework
Alexiou, A., & Schippers, M. C. (2018) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-018-9730-6 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Studying Behaviour Change Mechanisms under Complexity
Heino, M. T. J., Knittle, K. P., Noone, C., Hasselman, F., & Hankonen, N. E. (2021) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs11050077 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Momentary Pleasure or Lasting Meaning?
Mekler, E. D., & Hornbæk, K. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858225 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationThe effects of competition and competitiveness upon intrinsic motivation in exergames
Song, H., Kim, J., Tenzek, K. E., & Lee, K. M. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.042 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Partala, T., & Saari, T. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.012 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Sheehan, R. B., Herring, M. P., & Campbell, M. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00707 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Testing the need for novelty as a candidate need in basic psychological needs theory
González-Cutre, D., Romero-Elías, M., Jiménez-Loaisa, A., Beltrán-Carrillo, V. J., & Hagger, M. S. (2020) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-019-09812-7 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., den Broeck, A. V., Guay, F., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Ntoumanis, N., & Pelletier, L. G. (2020) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-020-09831-9 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Recommended Practices in Latent Class Analysis Using the Open-Source R-Package tidySEM
Lissa, C. J. V., Garnier‐Villarreal, M., & Anadria, D. (2023) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2023.2250920 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
How does HCI Understand Human Agency and Autonomy?
Bennett, D., Metatla, O., Roudaut, A., & Mekler, E. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580651 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationThe motivations of adolescents who are addicted to online games: a cognitive perspective.
Wan, C., & Chiou, W. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 110 · see citing works
careless: Procedures for Computing Indices of Careless Responding
Yentes, R. D., & Wilhelm, F. (2018) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.careless · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Analyzing users' narratives to understand experience with interactive products
Tuch, A., Trusell, R., & Hornbæk, K. (2013) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2481285 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Encouraging intrinsic motivation in management training: The use of business simulation games
Buil, I., Catalán, S., & Martínez, E. P. (2019) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2019.02.002 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Rheinberg, F., & Engeser, S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4_14 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
"Beautiful Seams": Strategic Revelations and Concealments
Inman, S., & Ribes, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300508 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Rouse, P. C., Turner, P. J. F., Siddall, A. G., Schmid, J., Standage, M., & Bilzon, J. L. J. (2020) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-019-09816-3 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Motivational profiles and burnout in elite athletes: A person-centered approach
Gustafsson, H., Carlin, M., Podlog, L. W., Stenling, A., & Lindwall, M. (2017) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.11.009 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Exploring the pull and push underlying problem video game use: A Self-Determination Theory approach
Mills, D. J., Milyavskaya, M., Mettler, J., & Heath, N. L. (2018) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.007 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Contextual Autonomy Support in Video Game Play
Deterding, S. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858395 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Measuring the “Why” of Interaction
Brühlmann, F., Vollenwyder, B., Opwis, K., & Mekler, E. D. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173680 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman autonomy in the age of artificial intelligence
Prunkl, C. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00449-9 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Oshana, M. A. L. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315247076 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Grand challenges for HCI researchers
Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M. S., et al. (2016) · interactions · doi:10.1145/2977645 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Does Smartphone Use Drive our Emotions or vice versa? A Causal Analysis
Sarsenbayeva, Z., Marini, G., van Berkel, N., Luo, C., Jiang, W., Yang, K., Wadley, G., Dingler, T., Kostakos, V., & Gonçalves, J. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376163 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Liu, M., & Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q. (2022) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2022.102762 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Motivational Profiling of League of Legends Players
Brühlmann, F., Baumgartner, P., Wallner, G., Kriglstein, S., & Mekler, E. D. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01307 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-Determination Theory and HCI Games Research: Unfulfilled Promises and Unquestioned Paradigms
Tyack, A., & Mekler, E. D. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3673230 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-Determination Theory in HCI: Shaping a Research Agenda
Ballou, N., Deterding, S., Tyack, A., Mekler, E. D., Calvo, R. A., Peters, D., Villalobos-Zúñiga, G., & Türkay, S. (2022) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3491101.3503702 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, J., Liu, W. C., Nie, Y., Chye, Y. L. S., Lim, B. S. C., Liem, G. A. D., Tay, E. G., Hong, Y., & Chiu, C. (2017) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00308 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Mejtoft, T., Hale, S., & Söderström, U. (2019) · Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1145/3335082.3335106 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
The Effects of Badges and Avatar Identification on Play and Making in Educational Games
Kao, D., & Harrell, D. F. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174174 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Ballou, N., Denisova, A., Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Deterding, S. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103289 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Lissa, C. J. V. (2022) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.2370 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Ryan, R. M., Legate, N., Niemiec, C. P., & Deci, E. (2012) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/13748-012 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Comparison of Relative Fit Indices for Diagnostic Model Selection
Şen, S., & Bradshaw, L. P. (2017) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621617695521 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
A longitudinal analysis of motivation profiles at work
Howard, J. L., Morin, A. J. S., & Gagné, M. (2020) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-020-09852-4 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Fryer, L. K., den Broeck, A. V., Ginns, P., & Nakao, K. (2016) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb.265 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Leisure and Work, Good and Bad
Tuch, A. N., van Schaik, P., & Hornbæk, K. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2994147 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Quality-of-user-experience: a position paper
Hammer, F., Egger-Lampl, S., & Möller, S. (2018) · Quality and User Experience · doi:10.1007/s41233-018-0022-0 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Burnell, R., Peters, D., Ryan, R. M., & Calvo, R. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092288 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Türkay, S., Lin, A., Johnson, D. M., & Formosa, J. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2094832 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Modeling interaction as a complex system
van Berkel, N., Dennis, S. J., Zyphur, M. J., Li, J., Heathcote, A., & Kostakos, V. (2020) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2020.1715221 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-determination trajectories at work: A growth mixture analysis
Fernet, C., Morin, A. J. S., Austin, S., Gagné, M., Litalien, D., Lavoie‐Tremblay, M., & Forest, J. (2020) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103473 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Güldenpfennig, F., Mayer, P. B., Panek, P. E., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300357 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Examining Practical, Everyday Theory Use in Design Research
Beck, J., & Stolterman, E. (2016) · She ji · doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.010 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Taking the Measure of Autonomy
Killmister, S. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315204932 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Wasserkampf, A., & Kleinert, J. (2015) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2015.1119873 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Exploring the Use of Gesture in Collaborative Tasks
Wang, I., Narayana, P., Patil, D., Mulay, G., Bangar, R., Draper, B. A., Beveridge, R., & Ruiz, J. (2017) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3027063.3053239 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
A primer to latent profile and latent class analysisPreprint
Bauer, J. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/97uab · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Stiegemeier, D., Kraus, J., Bringeland, S., & Baumann, M. R. K. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2088658 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
How does Juicy Game Feedback Motivate? Testing Curiosity, Competence, and Effectance
Kao, D., Ballou, N., Gerling, K., Breitsohl, H., & Deterding, S. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642656 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
A Market in Your Social Network
Zhu, H., Das, S., Cao, Y., Yu, S., Kittur, A., & Kraut, R. E. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858396 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Stiegemeier, D., Bringeland, S., Kraus, J., & Baumann, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications · doi:10.1145/3543174.3546847 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Murray, J., French, D., Kee, F., Gough, A., Tang, J., & Hunter, R. F. (2020) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000849 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Emergent Interaction: Complexity, Dynamics, and Enaction in HCI
Bennett, D., Dix, A. J., Eslambolchilar, P., Feng, F., Froese, T., Kostakos, V., Lerique, S., & van Berkel, N. (2021) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3411763.3441321 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationMultifractal Mice: Operationalising Dimensions of Readiness-to-hand via a Feature of Hand Movement
Bennett, D., Roudaut, A., & Metatla, O. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517601 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationDesigning for Integration: Promoting Self-Congruence to Sustain Behavior Change
Gerstenberg, R., Albers, R., & Hassenzahl, M. (2023) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3563657.3596050 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Mankad, A., & Greenhill, M. (2013) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2013wr014338 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Vornhagen, J. B., Bennett, D., Murphy, D., & Mekler, E. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3611071 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationDesigning for Autonomy: A Process-Oriented Approach Based on Organismic Integration Theory
Gerstenberg, R., Hassenzahl, M., & Laschke, M. (2024) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwae022 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Position paper: Quality-of-experience of cyber-physical system applications
Hammer, F., Egger-Lampl, S., & Möller, S. (2017) · International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) · doi:10.1109/qomex.2017.7965666 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Lushnikova, A., Morse, C., Doublet, S., Koenig, V., & Bongard-Blanchy, K. (2023) · European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1145/3605655.3605658 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Dalmaijer, E. S. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.00866 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Jank Accounts: We Should Study `Broken' Games
Bennett, D., & Mekler, E. D. (2023) · Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play · doi:10.1145/3573382.3616045 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationAutonomy and the Metaphysics of Agency
Buss, S. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429290411-13 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ryan, R. M., Duineveld, J., Domenico, S. D., Ryan, W., Steward, B. A., & Bradshaw, E. L. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gk5cy
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.5555/3532758.3532762 · DOI
- Kai Lukoff Ulrik Lyngs and Lize Alberts. 2022. Designing to Support Autonomy and Reduce Psychological Reactance in Digital Self-Control Tools. In Workshop on Self-Determination Theory in HCI (CHI ’22). ACM. Retrieved from https://www.positivecomputing.org/blog/chi-2022-workshop
- 10.1002/2013wr014338_eprint · DOI
- 10.1521/978.14625/28806 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1521/978.14625/28806 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yeh, H., Chang, T., & Li, Y. (2025) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-08-2024-0423 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Gerstenberg, R., Høeg, E. R., van der Kaap‐Deeder, J., & Hassenzahl, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1634267 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Chen, X., Schöni, L., Distler, V., & Zimmermann, V. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713122 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Autonomous Regulation of Social Media Use: Implications for Self-control, Well-Being, and UX
Bennett, D., Feng, F., & Mekler, E. D. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713094 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationApplication of distinct motivational types in shaping generative AI (GenAI) adoption behaviour
Dias, S., Davidson, B. G. J., Chully, A. A., & Sharma, T. R. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-00844-w · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Hao, X., Xu, J., & An, G. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-45243-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Latent motivations in educational technology: projective techniques for AI-driven learning tools
Karimova, G. Z., Kim, Y. D., & Goby, V. P. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2478438 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Syamala, S., Shrivastava, A., & Karmakar, S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3624267 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Faas, C., Kerstan, S., Uth, R., Langer, M., & Feit, A. M. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3742413.3789100 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ghaith, A., Alshirbini, M. H., & Ma, H. (2026) · Journal of Robotic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11701-025-03116-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Leveling up Learning: Serious Games for Computing Education - Long-Term Opportunities and Risks
Wuensche, B. C., Hooper, S., Whalley, J. L., Straand, I. J., Denny, P. C., Crow, T. V. H., Lange-Nawka, D. C., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Thompson, S. E. R. (2025) · Australasian Computing Education Conference · doi:10.1145/3716640.3716655 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Living Well with Diabetes: Rethinking Digital Diabetes Management Systems
Gerstenberg, R., Neuhaus, R., Vitt, M., & Hassenzahl, M. (2025) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3715336.3735726 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Selvamani, L., Azam, M. S., Shalini, R., & Lakshmi, J. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106402 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Heinisch, M. J., Wolf, S., Maas, F., & Huber, S. L. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719918 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Prybutok, G. T., Liu, X., Ta, A., & Prybutok, V. R. (2025) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2025.2564933 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Chen, C., & Wang, B. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1665652 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-determination theory in HCI: advancing the field
Ballou, N., Peters, D., Villalobos-Zúñiga, G., Mekler, E. D., Calvo, R. A., & Deterding, S. (2026) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwag019 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationCzech, E., Bennett, D., Stangroome, G. J., Hanschke, V. A., Ingold, A., Marshall, P., & Metatla, O. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790423 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationThe experiential trade-offs of low-tech systems: Evidence from a large-scale citizen experiment
Duhamel, R., Bousquet-Pasturel, E., Hefti, M., Vuille, S., Legardeur, J., & Lallemand, C. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101254 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Sakib, M. N., Rayasam, N. M., & Dey, S. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3816931 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Paengchai, T., Sukbanjong, P., Santongkum, A., Putjorn, P., & Chaichombhoo, T. (2026) · Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT & NCON) · doi:10.1109/ectidamtncon67592.2026.11460101
Tarmissi, K., & Marref, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2026.1773479
Liu, X., Seo, J., Yang, Z., Zhang, X., & Chen, Z. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2656448
Zahrai, K., Prayag, G., & Veer, E. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2663130
Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2674839
Creative Reading: Scaffolding Reading for Transformation
Liu, S., Abowitz, S., Liu, Y., Sterman, S., Almeda, S. G., & Kreminski, M. (2026) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/3800935.3830891
Gaming motivations and sustained user engagement among highly engaged players
Forjan, J., Buljubašić, I., & Šebo, D. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103045
Can media multitasking enhance creative performance? Insights from self-determination theory
Zhang, J.-J., Bai, B.-R., Zhou, X., & Zhang, H. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102290
Sousa, D., Gama, S. P., & Pires, A. C. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/3773077.3812128
Sauer, J., Baumgartner, J., & Sonderegger, A. (2026) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000586
Lowe, S., & Fischer, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30781-1_38
Challenges and Ethical Considerations in Gamified and Cognitive Learning in Cybersecurity Education
Sindiramutty, S. R., & Jhanjhi, N. Z. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6581-7.ch003
Boß, M., Schadow, F., Reussner, R., & Gerling, K. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS) · doi:10.1145/3837062.3838682
Mapping motivation profiles and perceived role value appreciation in research project management
Santos, J. M. R. C. A., & Vare, D. (2026) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/ijmpb-03-2026-0143
PersuaBridge: Real-Time Coaching for Negotiating with Value-Embedded AI Agents
Chang, R.-C., & Wang, H. (2026) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3785651.3831563
Zhu, C., Huang, Q., & Liu, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1967142
- Authors
- Bennett, D., & Mekler, E. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
- Published
- 2024-10-31
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1-41
- ISSN
- 1073-0516 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7325
- OpenAlex
- W4401636212
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 11
- FWCI
- 10.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Commission
- HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101043198)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- autonomous motivation, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, self-determination theory, user experience, motivational profiles, need satisfaction, affect, perceived usability, compulsive use, technology use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-02.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-02.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review