Cited by 37Innovative Human-Technology InteractionMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsUsability and User Interface Design

Beyond Intrinsic Motivation: The Role of Autonomous Motivation in User Experience

Open access
Bennett, Daniel, Mekler, Elisa D.·2024·ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Abstract

Motivation and autonomy are fundamental concepts in Human–Computer Interaction (HCI), yet in User Experience (UX) research they have remained surprisingly peripheral. We draw on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to analyse autonomous and non-autonomous patterns of motivation in 497 interaction experiences. Using latent profile analysis, we identify five distinct patterns of motivation in technology use—‘motivational profiles’—associated with significant differences in need satisfaction, affect, and perceived usability. Users’ descriptions of these experiences also reveal qualitative differences between profiles: from intentional, purposive engagement, to compulsive use which users themselves consider unhealthy. Our results complicate exclusively positive notions of intrinsic motivation and clarify how extrinsic motivation can contribute to positive UX. Based on these findings, we identify open questions for UX and SDT: addressing ‘hedonic amotivation’—negative experiences in activities which are intrinsically motivated but not otherwise valued—and ‘design for internalisation’—scaffolding healthy and sustainable patterns of engagement over time.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Using Self-Determination Theory’s Organismic Integration Theory and latent profile analysis on 497 interaction experiences, the paper identifies five motivational profiles in technology use that differ significantly in need satisfaction, affect, and perceived usability. It argues that autonomous extrinsic motivation can support positive UX, while intrinsic motivation can coexist with compulsive, low-intentionality use—termed “hedonic amotivation.”

Key findings

  • Five motivational profiles emerged: High Quality (165, 33.2%), Medium (146, 29.4%), External (58, 11.7%), Amotivated-Intrinsic (71, 14.3%), and Amotivated (57, 11.5%). A likelihood ratio test indicated UX variables differed significantly between profiles, χ²(24) = 1400.1, p < 0.0001; after Holm-Bonferroni correction, 48 pairwise comparisons were significant at p < 0.05, 33 at p < 0.001.
  • More autonomous profiles generally showed higher need satisfaction and affect. For example, High Quality had autonomy M = 5.47, competence M = 5.07, relatedness M = 4.09, and PANAS M = 2.35; Amotivated had autonomy M = 2.34, competence M = 2.79, relatedness M = 1.84. High Quality and Medium had similar intrinsic motivation scores, but differed substantially on integrated regulation and outcomes.
  • The Amotivated-Intrinsic profile combined relatively high intrinsic motivation (equivalent to ∼5 out of 7 on the scale) with high amotivation, very low need satisfaction, and descriptions of compulsion, bad habits, and diminished mood. The authors call this “hedonic amotivation.”
  • Extrinsic motivation was not uniformly negative: integrated and identified regulation were associated with positive affect and need satisfaction, and the External profile scored higher than amotivated profiles on relatedness, competence, and security, though still low on autonomy and affect.

Methods

  • Online survey via Prolific; 573 full responses collected, 76 excluded, leaving n = 497. Participants were randomly assigned to describe a technology they “felt good” about (n = 254) or “did not feel good” about (n = 243), focusing on frequent use over the past 2 months.
  • Measures included the User Motivation Inventory (UMI) for OIT’s six regulations, Sheldon’s need satisfaction scale, UMUX perceived usability, PANAS affect, self-attribution, and open-ended questions about why they started, continue, and what the technology means to them.
  • Analysis used confirmatory factor analysis on UMI scores, latent profile analysis on factor scores (selecting a 5-profile, equal variance, equal covariance model), BCH method with likelihood ratio and Wald tests for outcomes, and inductive thematic analysis of open-text responses.

Limitations

  • The paper states the profiles should not be treated as a definitive typology; free choice of technologies meant some technology types had few participants, and larger samples might support more profiles. It also notes the negative condition captured “not feel good” rather than actively bad experiences, interpersonal factors and age differences were not analyzed in depth, and results do not establish causal relationships.
  • Evident from the text: the study is cross-sectional and self-report, the sample is from Prolific with mostly social media technologies, and the qualitative coding was completed by the first author with periodic review by the second author; profile-to-theme percentages are described as a heuristic rather than precise quantities.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3689044

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 142 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Users' descriptions of these experiences reveal qualitative differences between profiles: from intentional, purposive engagement, to compulsive use which users themselves consider unhealthy.

    “Users' descriptions of these experiences also reveal qualitative differences between profiles: from intentional, purposive engagement, to compulsive use which users themselves consider unhealthy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The open-ended responses reflect actual experiences rather than constructed narratives.
  • Findingown data

    A pilot analysis of a prior UMI dataset containing 460 participants observed that the data best supported a 4-class structure with unequal class sizes.

    “We conducted a pilot analysis of a prior UMI dataset containing 460 participants [16], observing that the data best supported a 4-class structure with unequal class sizes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingnone given

    The paper identifies 'hedonic amotivation': intrinsically motivated, yet low-intentionality, experiences which are marked by compulsion and which users themselves consider unhealthy.

    “We identify what we call hedonic amotivation: intrinsically motivated, yet low-intentionality, experiences which are marked by compulsion and which users themselves consider unhealthy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The open-ended responses reflect actual experiences rather than constructed narratives.
  • Findingown data

    Using latent profile analysis, the study identifies five distinct patterns of motivation in technology use-'motivational profiles'-associated with significant differences in need satisfaction, affect, and perceived usability.

    “Using latent profile analysis, we identify five distinct patterns of motivation in technology use-'motivational profiles'-associated with significant differences in need satisfaction, affect, and perceived usability.”
    • Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
      “We identify five distinct 'motivational profiles' in technology use and find that they are associated with significant differences in basic need satisfaction, affect and perceived usability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Participants' self-reports of their experiences and motivations are sincere and accurate.
  • Findingown data

    Comparing adjacent profiles, the largest difference is found between the Medium and High Quality profiles.

    “Comparing adjacent profiles, the largest difference is found between the Medium and High Quality profiles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 111
  • May combine two claims. 104
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The analysis identified four high-level themes: Purpose; Qualities of the technology; Being good or bad for people; and Values, identity and emotional connection.

    “Specifically, we identified four high-level themes (Purpose; Qualities of the technology; Being good or bad for people; and Values, identity and emotional connection).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The open-ended responses reflect actual experiences rather than constructed narratives.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The pilot solution resulted in strong model fits, and when comparing outcomes across profiles, medium-to-large effect sizes were observed.

    “This solution resulted in strong model fits, and when comparing outcomes across profiles, we observed medium-to-large effect sizes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The leaning towards autonomous regulations was stronger in the positive condition, which had lower values for amotivation (M=1.73) and extrinsic motivation (M=1.76), and higher values for identified (M=5.34), integrated (M=3.8) and intrinsic (M=5.81) regulations.

    “This leaning towards autonomous regulations was stronger in the positive condition, which had lower values for amotivation (M = 1.73) and extrinsic motivation (M = 1.76), and higher values for identified (M = 5.34), integrated (M = 3.8) and intrinsic (M = 5.81) regulations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In both positive and negative conditions, the mean scores for the PANAS were positive (M=1.96 and M=0.61, respectively).

    “In both positive and negative conditions, the mean scores for the PANAS were positive (M = 1.96 and M = 0.61, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants in Amotivated-Intrinsic were by far most likely to describe engagement in terms of compulsion and empty habits (63% vs 20% in Amotivated, <10% other), or escapism (32% vs 14% Medium, <10% other).

    “Participants in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile were by far most likely to describe their engagement in terms of compulsion and empty habits (63% vs. 20% in the Amotivated profile, and <10% in other profiles), or in terms of escapism (32% vs. 14% in the Medium profile and <10% in other profiles).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    High Quality and Medium scored relatively high on usability, External was close to the midpoint, only Amotivated featured very low UMUX scores, and Amotivated-Intrinsic showed quite high UMUX scores.

    “High Quality and Medium profiles scored relatively high on usability, while the External profile was close to the midpoint of the UMUX scale.Only the Amotivated profile featured very low UMUX scores.In contrast, the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile showed quite high UMUX scores-only a little below the High Quality profile.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mentions of value disagreement were more common than agreement in all profiles except High Quality, and positive value agreement was relatively rare (about 5% of all descriptions).

    “Mentions of value disagreement were more common than agreement in all profiles except the High Quality profile, and description of positive value agreement was relatively rare in general (in about 5% of all descriptions).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Self-attribution scores were relatively undifferentiated; even Amotivated-Intrinsic was not significantly different from High-Quality; exception Amotivated featured much lower self-attribution than all other profiles.

    “In comparison to other metrics, self-attribution scores were relatively undifferentiated.Even the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile was not significantly different from the High-Quality profile.An exception to this trend was the Amotivated profile which featured much lower selfattribution scores than all other profiles (see Figure 5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Varieties of extrinsic motivation were important in differentiating outcomes and often associated with positive UX.

    “While previous work in HCI has neglected extrinsic motivation or treated it as a negative factor [36, 59, 105, 118], we found that varieties of extrinsic motivation were important in differentiating outcomes and often associated with positive UX.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All three basic needs received higher scores in the positive condition than the negative condition, with no overlap in confidence intervals.

    “As listed in Table 3, all three basic needs received higher scores in the positive condition than the negative condition, with no overlap in confidence intervals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants commented on efficiency, convenience and ease of use (~40%); ability to integrate or adapt to needs (~18%); and ways technology was exceptional (~19%).

    “Participants commented on efficiency, convenience and ease of use (∼ 40%); the ability to integrate or adapt to their needs (∼ 18%, e.g., 'ready to be customised to fit my unique needs.I started small […] but soon discovered the true power of this app'.(ID343)), and ways in which the technology was exceptional (∼ 19%), whether in outperforming alternatives or continually getting better over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Amotivated-Intrinsic profile scores substantially higher on intrinsic motivation than the External profile, yet these profiles differ little in terms of PANAS scores.

    “The Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, for example, scores substantially higher on intrinsic motivation than the External profile, yet these profiles differ little in terms of PANAS scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mentions of value disagreement were most prevalent in Amotivated-Intrinsic (38%), largely focused on poor perception of other users, sense of fakeness, and concerns with technology companies.

    “Mentions of value disagreement were most prevalent in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile (38% of responses).This largely focused on poor perception of other users, and a sense of fakeness, alongside concerns with technology companies (e.g., 'It represents the aggresive capitalism around me which goes against my values'.(ID295)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, pleasure scores are considerably higher than in the Amotivated profile and equivalent to those in the Medium profile.

    “Another notable exception is the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile where pleasure scores are considerably higher than in the Amotivated profile and equivalent to those in the more autonomously motivated Medium profile.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Users in Amotivated-Intrinsic were most likely to suggest technology was bad for people (61%), focused on bad habits and compulsion, or diminished mood and self-image.

    “Meanwhile, users in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile were most likely to suggest the technology was bad for people (61%).This focused largely on how the technology fed bad habits and compulsion, or diminished mood and self-image.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Statistical testing supported rejection of the null hypothesis for H1, indicating significant differences in UX outcomes for all pairwise comparisons between profiles.

    “Statistical testing supported the rejection of the null hypothesis for H1, indicating significant differences in UX outcomes for all pairwise comparisons between profiles”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of all profiles, the High Quality profile is most autonomous, with particularly high scores for integrated regulation.

    “Of all the profiles, the High Quality profile is most autonomous in this sense, with particularly high scores for integrated regulation, the most autonomous form of extrinsic motivation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    These profiles were associated with significant differences in how users experienced their technology use and qualitative differences in how users described their engagement.

    “These profiles were associated with significant differences in how users experienced their technology use and qualitative differences in how users described their engagement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most participants (n=201) used the technology at least 4 times per day, and only 15 used it less than once per week.

    “Most participants (n = 201) used the technology at least 4 times per day, and only 15 used the technology less than once per week.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    More autonomously motivated profiles scored consistently higher on affect, with pronounced differences even between adjacent profiles; External, Amotivated-Intrinsic and Amotivated profiles featured fairly neutral affect scores.

    “More autonomously motivated profiles scored consistently higher on affect, with pronounced differences even between adjacent profiles.External, Amotivated-Intrinsic and Amotivated profiles, in contrast, featured fairly neutral affect scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The External profile scored slightly above the more autonomous Medium profile on relatedness, competence, popularity and security, but these differences were not statistically significant.

    “The External profile represents one exception to this general pattern, scoring slightly above the more autonomous Medium profile on relatedness, competence, popularity and security (albeit these differences are not statistically significant).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Other technologies included streaming media (9%), media authoring apps (6%), voice assistants (4%) and AI Chatbots (3%).

    “Other technologies included streaming media (9%), media authoring apps (6%), voice assistants (4%) and AI Chatbots (3%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, 73% of participants reported on social media technologies, with another 17% reporting on entertainment technologies.

    “However, only one profile was strongly dominated by a particular kinds technology: in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile 73% of participants reported on social media technologies, with another 17% reporting on entertainment technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The results are consistent with prior findings: participants in the positive condition reported higher mean scores than those in the negative condition on every dimension of need satisfaction, positive affect, usability and self-attribution.

    “In these terms we find our results are consistent with prior findings: participants in the positive condition reported higher mean scores than those in the negative condition on every dimension of need satisfaction, positive affect, usability and self-attribution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the High Quality profile, mean scores for all needs are comfortably above the respective mean scores, both overall and for the positive condition.

    “For the most autonomous profile-High Quality-mean scores for all needs are comfortably above the respective mean scores, both overall and for the positive condition (see Tables 3, A4, A5 and Figure 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    From the accounts, five high-level themes with nested sub-themes were identified.

    “From these accounts we identified five high-level themes, with nested sub-themes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Amotivated-Intrinsic profile showed even higher levels of amotivation, while extrinsic regulations were low.

    “This profile showed even higher levels of amotivation, while extrinsic regulations (and especially autonomous extrinsic regulations) were low: indicating little conscious valuing of the activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The profiles observed were not technology specific; all profiles contained multiple technology types, and all technology types appeared in multiple profiles.

    “Importantly, the profiles we observed were not technology specific.Some technologies were more prominent in particular profiles, but all profiles contained multiple technology types, and all technology types appeared in multiple profiles (see Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants' written accounts contained 147 words on average (SD=67), ranging from 25 to 621 words.

    “Participants' written accounts contained 147 words on average (SD = 67), ranging from 25 to 621 words.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After Holm-Bonferroni correction, 48 comparisons gave significant results at p<0.05, and 33 of these were significant at p<0.001.

    “After adjustment 48 comparisons gave significant results at < 0.05, and 33 of these were significant at < 0.001.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Active and self-driven engagement was less common in Extrinsic and Amotivated profiles (~25%) and least common in Amotivated-Intrinsic (8%).

    “Such active and self-driven engagement was less common in the Extrinsic and Amotivated profiles (∼ 25%) and least common in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile (8%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In all profiles the most common technology category was social media (20-25%).

    “In all profiles the most common category was social media (20-25%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The High Quality and Medium profiles have very similar intrinsic motivation scores, yet display significant and sometimes large differences across all three basic needs, meaning, self-esteem and PANAS; they differ most substantially in integrated regulation.

    “The High Quality and Medium profiles, for example, have very similar intrinsic motivation scores, yet display significant and sometimes large differences across all three basic needs, meaning, self-esteem and PANAS.These profiles differ most substantially in terms of (extrinsic) integrated regulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Scores for need satisfaction and affect were often far higher in autonomous profiles than in the positive condition, and far lower in non-autonomous, amotivated profiles than in the negative condition.

    “Scores for need satisfaction and affect (PANASoften treated as a yardstick of positive UX [e.g., 37, 38, 61, 103]) were often far higher in autonomous profiles than in the positive condition, and far lower in non-autonomous, amotivated, profiles than in the negative condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Medium profile scores similarly to High Quality for intrinsic motivation, but lower on all other regulations except amotivation.

    “This profile scores similarly to the High Quality profile for intrinsic motivation, but scores lower on all other regulations except amotivation, indicating a lower quantity of motivation to engage with the technology in addition to the slightly less autonomous quality of motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The most commonly selected technology was social media (31%).

    “Overall, the most commonly selected technology was social media (31%) (see also Table 2 and Table A3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Three participants wrote less than 50 words, and 85 wrote more than 200 words.

    “Three participants wrote less than 50 words, and 85 wrote more than 200 words.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    UMUX scores showed lower variation between profiles and a less pronounced pattern overall.

    “UMUX scores showed lower variation between profiles, and a less pronounced pattern overall.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Higher intrinsic motivation was generally associated with higher PANAS scores, but this was not true in every instance.

    “While (consistent with SDT propositions [80, p. 171]) we observed that higher intrinsic motivation was generally associated with higher PANAS scores, this was not true in every instance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The Amotivated profile shows low scores on all regulations except amotivation, and very little autonomous regulation.

    “The Amotivated profile shows low scores on all regulations except amotivation, and in particular very little autonomous regulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Entertainment was most commonly mentioned in Amotivated-Intrinsic (49%), followed by Medium (34%), High Quality (28%), Amotivated (21%) and External (5%).

    “Entertainment was most commonly mentioned in the Amotivated-Intrinsic (49%), followed by the Medium (34%), High Quality (28%), Amotivated (21%) and External (5%) profiles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Such comments were less common in other profiles (13% average for whole sample) and particularly rare in High Quality (4%).

    “Such comments were less common in other profiles (13% average for the whole sample) and particularly rare in the High Quality profile (4%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The median usage frequency was 2-3 times per day.

    “The median usage frequency was 2-3 times per day.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    This was less common in Medium and Amotivated-Intrinsic (18% each) and rarest in Amotivated (7%) and External (5%).

    “This was less common in the Medium and Amotivated-Intrinsic profiles (18% each) and rarest in the Amotivated (7%) and External (5%) profiles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both the External and amotivated profiles are associated with low need satisfaction and PANAS scores.

    “While both are associated with low need satisfaction and PANAS scores, the External profile (reflecting external control) scores far more highly for competence, relatedness and security satisfactions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The Amotivated-Intrinsic profile has very low need satisfaction scores, and participants described compulsion, bad habits and diminished emotional states in relation to their chosen technologies.

    “These qualities are reflected in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile's very low need satisfaction scores and in participants' descriptions of compulsion, bad habits and diminished emotional states in relation to their chosen technologies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compared to other profiles, users in the High Quality profile reported greater meaning, need satisfaction and positive affect, and were more likely to connect the technology to their identity and values.

    “Compared to other profiles, users in this profile reported greater meaning, need satisfaction and positive affect, and were more likely to connect the technology to their identity and values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, compulsive behaviour and low affect are observed alongside relatively dense intrinsic motivation, yet sparse need satisfaction.

    “In short, in this profile, compulsive behaviour and low affect are observed alongside relatively dense intrinsic motivation, yet sparse need satisfaction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Participants in the two amotivated profiles were more likely to feel the technology was actively bad for them, and to think of quitting the technology.

    “Participants in the two amotivated profiles, in contrast, were more likely to feel the technology was actively bad for them, and to think of quitting the technology [see also similar results in 16].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants in the High Quality profile emphasised creative aspects of their technologies and connected them to their social roles.

    “Our results also suggest other strategies to support integration: participants in the High Quality profile emphasised creative aspects of their technologies and connected them to their social roles (e.g., 'as a mom', '…gamer', '…tech guy').”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile reported very low scores for need satisfaction, alongside high scores for amotivation.

    “However, while SDT associates intrinsic motivation with need satisfaction, participants in this profile in fact reported very low scores for need satisfaction, alongside high scores for amotivation-a construct associated with low need satisfaction [16] and high need frustration [80, p. 190].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [16]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, the factor score for intrinsic motivation is quite high, markedly higher than in the Amotivated and External profiles, and equivalent to about 5 out of 7 on the scale.

    “Results for the low-autonomy Amotivated-Intrinsic profile complicate this picture: the factor score for intrinsic motivation in this profile is quite high: markedly higher than the intrinsic motivation scores in the Amotivated and External profiles (see Figure 2) and equivalent to ∼ 5 out of 7 on the scale.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile commonly reported compulsive patterns of behaviour and had relatively high intrinsic motivation scores.

    “They commonly reported compulsive patterns of behaviour and had relatively high intrinsic motivation scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    When evaluating LPA models, we saw some evidence that a larger sample size may have supported a larger number of profiles.

    “Indeed, when evaluating LPA models, we saw some evidence that a larger sample size may have supported a larger number of profiles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A number of participants reported that they were introduced to technologies by friends or adopted technologies together with friends.

    “A number of participants reported that they were introduced to technologies by friends or adopted technologies together with friends.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    Social media technologies were strongly represented in each of our profiles.

    “Social media use is a strong candidate for future investigation: these technologies were strongly represented in each of our profiles, indicating that motivational profiles capture relevant differences in types of social media engagement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants were told to write in their own words without external aids (including LLMs), and copying and pasting into free text fields was disabled.

    “Through all these questions, participants were told to write in their own words without external aids (including Large Language Models (LLM)).Copying and pasting into free text fields was disabled.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Responses were screened for data quality, including checking open questions, statistical markers of careless responding, and attention checks.

    “These responses were then screened for data quality.For example, we checked responses to the open questions to ensure participants followed instructions: e.g., that they focused on direct personal experience rather than broad opinion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Participants' self-reports of their experiences and motivations are sincere and accurate.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Cronbach's for the positive scale was 0.89, and for the negative scale 0.86, indicating good reliability.

    “Cronbach's for the positive scale was 0.89, and for the negative scale 0.86, indicating good reliability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The results complicate exclusively positive notions of intrinsic motivation and clarify how extrinsic motivation can contribute to positive UX.

    “Our results complicate exclusively positive notions of intrinsic motivation and clarify how extrinsic motivation can contribute to positive UX.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The study combines confirmatory testing with theory-informed exploratory analysis, consistent with recent recommendations concerning good research practice.

    “Our study combines confirmatory testing with theory-informed exploratory analysis, consistent with recent recommendations concerning good research practice [84,107].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [84]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [107]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Cronbach's scores indicated satisfactory levels of reliability for all need sub-scales except Security-control, which fell slightly below the typical benchmark of 0.7.

    “Cronbach's scores indicated satisfactory levels of reliability for all need sub-scales except Security-control, which fell slightly below the typical benchmark of 0.7 (i.e., = 0.798, = 0.88, = 0.89, --= 0.86, = 0.77, = 0.66, -= 0.83, = 0.85).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study aimed for a sample size of approximately 500 participants.

    “As such we aimed for a sample size of approx.500 participants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    At the end of the survey, participants were asked to honestly report whether they answered the questions in a 'sincere, conscious and engaged' way and whether they used ChatGPT or other LLMs.

    “At the end of the survey, we asked participants to honestly report whether they answered the questions in a 'sincere, conscious and engaged' way and whether they used ChatGPT or other LLMs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Participants' self-reports of their experiences and motivations are sincere and accurate.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Data, analysis code and preregistration are provided at https://osf.io/eny6v/.

    “Data, analysis code and preregistration (as time-stamped wiki) are provided at https://osf.io/eny6v/.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The first and second authors met periodically at each stage of the coding process to review sample codes and themes, as well as check their sense and consistency.

    “The first and second authors met periodically at each stage of the coding process to review sample codes and themes, as well as check their sense and consistency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions, describing a digital technology they either 'felt good' about (positive condition) (n=254) or 'did not feel good' about (negative condition) (n=243).

    “Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions, describing a digital technology they either 'felt good' about (positive condition) ( = 254) or 'did not feel good' about (negative condition) ( = 243).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    After exclusions (n=76), 497 participants remained for analysis.

    “After exclusions ( = 76), = 497 participants remained for analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    To confirm that participants understood the criteria, they answered a multiple choice question demonstrating understanding of the criteria and were directed back to the instructions until they answered correctly.

    “To confirm that participants understood these criteria, they answered a multiple choice question demonstrating understanding of the criteria and were directed back to the instructions until they answered correctly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The survey included three attention check questions to check for careless responding.

    “To check for careless responding, the survey also included three attention check questions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Only responses to the open questions were exported to NVIVO, to avoid potential biases from knowing which experimental condition or profile participants were assigned to.

    “Only responses to the open questions were exported to NVIVO, to avoid potential biases from knowing which experimental condition or profile participants were assigned to.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The analysis of open questions took a bottom-up, inductive approach, avoiding a priori assumptions, guided by Braun and Clarke's Thematic Analysis.

    “Instead, we took a bottom-up, or 'inductive' approach, avoiding a priori assumptions.This was guided by descriptions of good practice in Thematic Analysis (TA) as described by Braun and Clarke [12,14].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [12]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [14]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Motivation has been considered a central issue in HCI research.

    “Perhaps naturally, then, motivation has been considered a central issue in HCI research [4]:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The results clarify the conditions under which extrinsic forms of motivation are autonomous and contribute positively to UX, dispelling the idea that extrinsic motivation in technology use can be reduced to a singular, negative phenomenon.

    “Our results clarify the conditions under which extrinsic forms of motivation are autonomous and contribute positively to UX, dispelling the idea that extrinsic motivation in technology use can be reduced to a singular, negative phenomenon.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The UMI measures the degree to which participants' technology use is characterised by six distinct motivational regulations.

    “The UMI measures the degree to which participants' technology use is characterised by six distinct motivational regulations [16].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    There remain gaps in understanding of motivation in technology use; it is unclear how motivation influences UX, and how technologies and contexts influence motivation.

    “However, despite this acknowledged importance, there remain gaps in our understanding of motivation in technology use.It is unclear how motivation influences user experience (UX), and how technologies and contexts in turn influence motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Autonomy in motivational regulation concerns the degree to which users make an activity their own: how they internalise values and patterns of behaviour associated with an activity, alongside personal values, beliefs and patterns of behaviour.

    “In contrast, autonomy in motivational regulation concerns the degree to which users make an activity their own: how they internalise the values and patterns of behaviour associated with an activity, alongside their personal values, beliefs and patterns of behaviour [80].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Means for self-attribution were slightly higher in the positive condition (M=5.66 vs M=5.13), though both were comfortably above the midpoint, indicating users in both conditions tended to feel a sense of responsibility for outcomes.

    “Finally, means for self-attribution were slightly higher in the positive condition (M = 5.66 vs. M = 5.13), though both were comfortably above the midpoint, indicating that users in both conditions tended to feel a sense of responsibility for the outcomes experienced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    SDT posits that three basic psychological needs-autonomy, competence and relatedness-are expected to promote intrinsic motivation.

    “In particular, SDT posits that three 'basic psychological needs'-autonomy, competence and relatedness-are expected to promote intrinsic motivation: spontaneous enjoyment, interest and continued engagement with the activity [80, pp. 123-178].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80, pp. 123-178]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Conducting LPA on factor scores rather than raw measure scores is arguably optimal.

    “Previous work has argued that it is 'arguably optimal' [5, p. 10] to conduct LPA on factor scores (e.g., resulting from a CFA), rather than raw measure scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The BCH method avoids normality assumptions and is insensitive to heteroscedasticity.

    “It also avoids normality assumptions and is insensitive to heteroscedasticity [2].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Mean scores for identified and intrinsic regulations in the negative condition are just above scale midpoint, indicating participants still felt their use was at least somewhat worthwhile and inherently satisfying.

    “Mean scores for identified and intrinsic regulations in the negative condition are just above scale midpoint, indicating that these participants still felt their use of the selected technology was at least somewhat worthwhile and inherently satisfying.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Conducting LPA on factor scores ensures that indicators are truly continuous and that measurement error has been corrected for.

    “This ensures that the indicators used are truly continuous (as required by LPA) and that measurement error has been corrected for [5].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The profiles distinguished identity-grounded and often highly meaningful engagement from empty habit, and empty habit from external pressure.

    “They distinguished identity-grounded and often highly meaningful engagement from empty habit, and empty habit from external pressure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    OIT identifies six distinct forms of motivation, associated with different relationships to the self, qualities of experience, degrees of autonomy and patterns of behaviour.

    “OIT identifies six distinct forms of motivation, associated with different relationships to the self, qualities of experience, degrees of autonomy and patterns of behaviour [79].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [79]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Motivation is implicated in many of HCI's grand challenges.

    “and is implicated in many of the field's 'grand challenges' [93,96].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [93]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [96]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SDT considers intrinsic motivation inherently autonomous, due to its basis in spontaneous interest, and associates it with learning and growth.

    “SDT considers intrinsic motivation inherently autonomous, due to its basis in spontaneous interest [80, p. 14], and also associates it with learning and growth [82, p. 222].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [80, p. 14]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [82, p. 222]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Extrinsic motivation has commonly been neglected in HCI and UX research or else reduced to its less healthy and autonomous forms and exclusively associated with poor quality outcomes.

    “Despite all this, extrinsic motivation has commonly been neglected in HCI and UX research [e.g., 1,94] or else reduced to its less healthy and autonomous forms (such as reward and punishment) and exclusively associated with poor quality outcomes [36,105].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [1]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [94]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [36]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [105]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LPA is well established in psychology and particularly in SDT research.

    “While LPA is a relatively novel technique in UX research, it is well established in psychology [5,66], and particularly in SDT research [e.g., 15,33,76,114].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [66]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [e.g., 15,33,76,114]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Differences in outcomes seem weakly related to intrinsic motivation and more strongly associated with extrinsic motivation.

    “Elsewhere, differences in outcomes seem weakly related to intrinsic motivation and more strongly associated with extrinsic motivation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Motivation plays an important theoretical role in UX and design work.

    “It plays an important theoretical role in UX and design work [e.g., 29,68,70]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [29]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [68]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [70]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    When a technology frames an activity in a way that fits with the user's self-image, then it is experienced as autonomous and more likely to be accepted; when the framing challenges the user's self-image, then the activity is experienced as non-autonomous and more likely to be rejected.

    “To give examples, when a technology frames an activity in a way that fits with the user's self-image (e.g., as 'a fun person', 'motivated', 'reliable') then it is experienced as autonomous and more likely to be accepted.When the framing challenges the user's self-image, then the activity is experienced as non-autonomous and more likely to be rejected [29, p. 735].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29, p. 735]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Internalisation will often demand engagement and effort from the user, and as such seems likely to demand some existing level of motivation.

    “Internalisation will often demand engagement and effort from the user, and as such seems likely to demand some existing level of motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Existing motivation is a pre-requisite for further internalisation.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Counter to these assumptions, OIT holds that multiple motivational regulations will commonly be operative for a single activity, simultaneously.

    “Counter to these assumptions, OIT holds that multiple motivational regulations will commonly be operative for a single activity, simultaneously [80, p. 184].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Rigby and Ryan articulate a seemingly related phenomenon, subsequently named the 'need density hypothesis'.

    “While these tensions have not, to our knowledge, been addressed directly in core SDT research, Rigby and Ryan [74, p. 99] articulate a seemingly related phenomenon, subsequently named the 'need density hypothesis' [78].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [74]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [78]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It may mean a shift away from externally controlled motivation-based on reward, social pressure or guilt-and towards more autonomous regulation.

    “Equally it may mean a shift away from externally controlled motivation-based on reward, social pressure or guilt-and towards more autonomous regulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gerstenberg et al. recently argued that OIT provides an ecological perspective that integrates activity into the broader context of a person's life, which designers can draw upon to support healthy sustainable motivation.

    “Gerstenberg et al. recently argued that OIT provides 'an ecological perspective that integrates […] activity into the broader context of a person's life' [29, p. 727], which designers can draw upon to support healthy sustainable motivation [29].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    We should not expect an amotivated user to engage in the 'confrontation with personally held values' required for integration.

    “We should not, for example, expect an amotivated user to engage in the 'confrontation with personally held values' [29, p. 5] required for integration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Intrinsic motivation is widely considered an uncomplicated good, grounded in the satisfaction of three basic psychological needs which are essential to human flourishing.

    “Intrinsic motivation is widely considered an uncomplicated good, grounded in the satisfaction of three basic psychological needs which are essential to human flourishing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such intermediate strategies for internalisation may entail clarifying the value of an activity's outcomes and connecting these outcomes to the user's goals (identified regulation).

    “Such intermediate strategies for internalisation may entail clarifying the value of an activity's outcomes and connecting these outcome to the user's goals (identified regulation as in Figure 7, middle).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Integrated regulation is considered the most autonomous and well-being supportive form of extrinsic motivation.

    “While integrated regulation is considered the most autonomous and well-being supportive form of extrinsic motivation [79], it is inherently difficult to support this through design.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [79]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The hypothesis that intrinsic motivation has other sources beyond the three basic needs contradicts current accounts in SDT, but is consistent with the results observed in the Amotivated-Intrinsic group.

    “This contradicts current accounts in SDT, but is consistent with the results observed in our Amotivated-Intrinsic group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Digital technologies allow stimulation to be precisely calibrated, highly responsive to the user, and somewhat detached from wider consequences, and entertainment design is known to leverage such possibilities.

    “Digital technologies allow stimulation to be precisely calibrated, highly responsive to the user, and somewhat detached from wider consequences, and entertainment design in particular is known to leverage such possibilities [48].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Within SDT, intrinsic motivation is described as a prototype of human proactivity experienced as highly autonomous, and an evolved growth-oriented potential characterizing bases for learning and developing.

    “Within SDT it is described as 'a prototype of human proactivity that is experienced as highly autonomous', and an evolved 'growth-oriented potential, which… characterizes our bases for learning and developing' [82, p. 222].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    SDT proposes that need satisfaction can support both intrinsic and autonomous extrinsic motivations.

    “SDT proposes that need satisfaction can support both intrinsic and autonomous extrinsic motivations [80, p. 123, 202]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The paper's account goes beyond previous accounts in explicitly articulating a mechanism for scale dependency in terms of internalisation and the temporal properties of motivational constructs.

    “Our account goes beyond these previous accounts in explicitly articulating a mechanism for this scale dependency in terms of internalisation, and the temporal properties of motivational constructs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The paper's results support the idea that designers should not limit themselves to integrated regulation, but address the full spectrum of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations.

    “Our results also support the idea that designers should not limit themselves to integrated regulation, but address the full spectrum of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Ryan and Deci emphasise that truly autonomous extrinsic motivation involves bringing the future into the present-connecting immediate activity to the fulfilment of values and goals which are not directly present.

    “Ryan and Deci emphasise that truly autonomous extrinsic motivation involves 'bring[ing] the future into the present' [80, p. 198]-connecting our immediate activity to the fulfilment of values and goals which are not directly present.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Extrinsic forms of motivation should be seen as temporally extended and situated in the wider circumstances of a person's life.

    “As such, extrinsic forms of motivation should be seen as temporally extended and situated in the wider circumstances of a person's life.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Gerstenberg et al. developed an OIT-grounded approach to design for behaviour change which they call 'technology-mediated regulatory transformation'.

    “They developed an OIT-grounded approach to design for behaviour change which they call 'technology-mediated regulatory transformation'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The separation of basic needs from hedonic satisfactions seems likely to be more common in technology use than in other contexts.

    “Finally, we note that the separation of basic needs from hedonic satisfactions seems likely to be more common in technology use than in other contexts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    OIT is vague about what happens when motivational regulation changes.

    “OIT is vague about what happens when motivational regulation changes [29], and there has been a surprising lack of research on the dynamics of motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Amotivation is associated with low need satisfaction and high need frustration.

    “However, while SDT associates intrinsic motivation with need satisfaction, participants in this profile in fact reported very low scores for need satisfaction, alongside high scores for amotivation-a construct associated with low need satisfaction [16] and high need frustration [80, p. 190].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [16]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The self-confrontations associated with integration may be risky, requiring contextual, interpersonal or therapeutic support, to avoid backfiring and undermining motivation or self-image.

    “Furthermore, the self-confrontations associated with integration may be risky, requiring contextual, interpersonal or therapeutic support, to avoid backfiring and undermining motivation or self-image.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Gerstenberg et al.'s approach assumes that these changes in regulation will provoke an experience of 'friction' between the two adjacent regulations, which the user must overcome.

    “(3) These changes in regulation will provoke an experience of 'friction' between the two adjacent regulations, which the user must overcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Generally, self-report of intrinsic motivation is operationalised via adjectives like 'enjoyable', 'interesting', and 'fun', which seem unlikely to distinguish between basic need satisfaction and hedonic aspects of the experience such as stimulation and novelty.

    “Generally, self-report of intrinsic motivation is operationalised via adjectives like 'enjoyable', 'interesting', and 'fun' [e.g., 16,17], which seem unlikely to distinguish between basic need satisfaction and hedonic aspects of the experience such as stimulation and novelty.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [16]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [17]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While SDT generally expects basic need satisfaction to support positive experience, Rigby and Ryan suggest that in some cases games and other digital technologies may have properties which interfere with this.

    “While SDT generally expects basic need satisfaction to support positive experience, Rigby and Ryan suggest that in some cases, games (and other digital technologies) may have properties which interfere with this.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [74]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Lindenberg argues this risks creating gaps in the treatment of unhealthy engagement.

    “He argues this risks creating gaps in the treatment of unhealthy engagement: 'the very distinction between the inherently noble connotations of intrinsic motivation and obsessive and addictive behaviour has been left unexamined' [53, p. 318].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The need density account primarily addresses problematic gaming behaviour, but its principles transfer readily to problematic behaviour with other forms of technology, such as social media.

    “The account primarily addresses problematic gaming behaviour, but its principles transfer readily to problematic behaviour with other forms technology, such as social media.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Intrinsic motivation is considered by definition autonomous, experienced as being volitional and emanating from one's self.

    “Intrinsic motivation is considered 'by definition, autonomous; […] experienced as being volitional and emanating from one's self' [80, p. 14].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While it may be reasonable to expect high levels of investment from the user in matters of health and high personal significance, this cannot be relied upon in other circumstances.

    “While it may be reasonable to expect such high levels of investment from the user in matters of health and high personal significance, this cannot be relied upon in other circumstances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The paper's results support the idea of grounding design in OIT, as well as supporting certain details of the approach Gerstenberg et al. describe.

    “Our results support the idea of grounding design in OIT, as well as supporting certain details of the approach Gerstenberg et al. describe.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Amotivation is a construct associated with the absence of need satisfaction and the lack of conscious volition.

    “At the same time, the profile has a very high score for amotivation, a construct associated with the absence of need satisfaction [80, p. 190], and the lack of conscious volition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Gerstenberg et al.'s work focuses in particular on guiding users to more autonomous forms of regulation in rehabilitation exercises, to support more sustainable engagement.

    “Their work focuses in particular on guiding users to more autonomous forms of regulation in rehabilitation exercises, to support more sustainable engagement [29].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Gerstenberg et al.'s approach is grounded in assumptions which are in tension with OIT propositions and which currently lack an evidential basis.

    “However, their approach is grounded in some assumptions which are in tension with OIT propositions, and which currently lack an evidential basis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Lindenberg suggests this framing fails to account for factors such as stimulation that are intrinsic to the activity, motivating and enjoyable, yet unconnected to basic need satisfaction and lacking its positive, healthy associations.

    “He suggests this framing fails to account for many factors, such as stimulation, which are intrinsic to the activity, motivating and enjoyable, yet are unconnected to basic need satisfaction and lack its positive, healthy, associations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In developing such strategies, the paper's results and OIT more broadly suggest that users' responses to such interventions may be affected by the context, by their existing motivational profile for the activity and by nuances in design.

    “In developing such strategies for motivational design, our results (and OIT more broadly) suggest that users' responses to such interventions may be affected by the context, by their existing motivational profile for the activity and by nuances in design [e.g., in the kind of reward and the way it is delivered, 80, p. 148].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    On a broader understanding of what it means for a person to be autonomous, neither integrated nor identified regulation should be seen as inherently more autonomous than the other.

    “on a broader understanding of what it means for a person to be autonomous [see, e.g., 21, 50, 67, 72], we suggest that neither of these regulations should be seen as inherently more autonomous than the other.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [50]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [67]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Amotivation is expected to arise either from users' indifference to the activity or from conditions which undermine their sense that they are able to perform adequately or their expectation that the activity will lead to valued outcomes.

    “This is expected to arise either from users' indifference to the activity, or from conditions which undermine either their sense that they are able to perform adequately or their expectation that the activity will lead to valued outcomes [80, p. 191].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The work of Gerstenberg et al. is among the few works to investigate the factors which facilitate internalisation.

    “The work of Gerstenberg et al. [30], discussed above, is among the few works to investigate the factors which facilitate internalisation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Wan and Chiou found that more 'addictive' behaviour could be associated with higher intrinsic motivation.

    “Elsewhere, Wan and Chiou found that more 'addictive' behaviour could be associated with higher intrinsic motivation [112]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [112]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The results for the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile paint a picture of immediate but shallow pleasure and weak self-determination, rather than the growth-oriented potential SDT associates with intrinsic motivation.

    “Rather than the 'growth-oriented potential' [82, p. 222] SDT associates with intrinsic motivation, these results paint a picture of immediate but shallow pleasure, and weak self-determination.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The results for the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile fit some aspects of the need density account while raising challenges for other aspects.

    “The results for our Amotivated-Intrinsic profile fit some aspects of the account while raising challenges for other aspects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Gerstenberg et al.'s approach assumes that a user's motivation for an activity will be dominated by one motivational regulation.

    “Specifically, the approach assumes: (1) A user's motivation for an activity will be dominated by one motivational regulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Reflection and awareness play an important role in integrated regulation.

    “More broadly, since both reflection and awareness play an important role in integrated regulation, it seems likely that there is value in design strategies which promote these mindsets, such as seamfulness [47], friction in interaction [22,60] and varieties of positive breakdown [8,10].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a study of online gamers, around a third of participants shared a motivational profile similar to the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile and likewise reported negative UX outcomes and low need satisfaction.

    “In a study of online gamers [15], for example, around a third of participants shared a motivational profile similar to our Amotivated-Intrinsic profile, and likewise reported negative UX outcomes and low need satisfaction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Intrinsic motivation is concerned with immediate, spontaneous experience.

    “By contrast, intrinsic motivation is concerned with immediate, spontaneous, experience [80, p. 198]: 'the freely chosen continuation of an activity in”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [53]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Previous research in motivational psychology has proposed sub-types within intrinsic motivation, including stimulation, and posited a role for more hedonic needs such as arousal and novelty, in addition to the basic needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness.

    “Previous research in motivational psychology has proposed sub-types within intrinsic motivation, including stimulation [106], and posited a role for more 'hedonic' needs, such as arousal [99,100] and novelty [31], in addition to the 'basic' needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [106]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [99]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [100]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This may mean a shift away from amotivation, by increasing either intrinsic or extrinsic motivation.

    “This may, for example, mean a shift away from amotivation, by increasing either intrinsic or extrinsic motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The degree of congruence between the intrinsic and extrinsic constructs can help clarify when intrinsic motivation scores are or are not grounded in basic need satisfaction.

    “The degree of congruence between the intrinsic and extrinsic constructs can help clarify when intrinsic motivation scores are or are not grounded in basic need satisfaction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Not all psychologists concur with SDT's view of intrinsic motivation.

    “In interpreting these results, it is important to note that not all psychologists concur with SDT's view of intrinsic motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The need bubble account would be consistent with existing SDT propositions that intrinsic motivation follows from basic need satisfaction and that need satisfaction can be somewhat restricted to particular spheres of life.

    “It would also be consistent with existing SDT propositions, namely that intrinsic motivation follows from basic need satisfaction [80, pp. 123-178] and that need satisfaction can be somewhat restricted to particular spheres of life [70].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [70]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Evidence for the need density hypothesis remains inconclusive at present.

    “Evidence for the need density hypothesis remains inconclusive at present [104, pp. 13-14].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [104]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    There has been a surprising lack of research on the dynamics of motivation.

    “OIT is vague about what happens when motivational regulation changes [29], and there has been a surprising lack of research on the dynamics of motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rigby and Ryan propose that need-dense activities may provide a strong draw to people who lack need satisfaction in their wider lives, and may thereby lead to problematic over-reliance.

    “The authors propose that such 'need-dense' activities may provide a strong draw to people who lack need satisfaction in their wider lives, and may thereby lead to problematic over-reliance [63,110].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [63]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [110]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Integration relies on developing congruence between the activity and the user's self-image, and can require significant investment from the user, sometimes even emotional investment in the form of a confrontation with personally held values.

    “Integration relies on developing congruence between the activity and the user's self-image, and as such can require significant investment from the user; sometimes even emotional investment in the form of 'a confrontation with personally held values' [29, p. 5].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Designers can rarely ensure such support.

    “Designers can rarely ensure such support.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Integrated and identified regulation reflect different ways of being autonomous-mindful, conscious and self-governing-in an activity.

    “Rather, we suggest they reflect different ways of being autonomous-mindful, conscious and self-governing-in an activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Integrated and identified regulation illustrate two qualitatively different kinds of autonomous regulation; two different ways of relating an activity to one's goals and values.

    “Integrated and identified regulation thus illustrate two qualitatively different kinds of autonomous regulation; two different ways of relating an activity to one's goals and values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Lindenberg has argued against SDT's maxim that all intrinsic motivation is grounded in basic need satisfaction.

    “Lindenberg, for example, has argued against SDT's maxim that all intrinsic motivation is grounded in basic need satisfaction [53].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Gerstenberg et al.'s approach assumes that users will move step-wise between adjacent motivational regulations.

    “(2) Users will move step-wise, between adjacent motivational regulations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    In SDT's account, internalised extrinsic motivation relies on satisfactions which do not pay off during the activity itself, but in the outcomes of the activity, and via personal investment over time.

    “In SDT's account, internalised extrinsic motivation (see Figure 1) relies on satisfactions which do not pay off during the activity itself, but in the outcomes of the activity, and via personal investment over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Users with very low identified regulation will fail to see how an activity leads to outcomes they value, something which may be difficult to overcome even if the activity itself is quite fun.

    “For example, users with very low identified regulation will fail to see how an activity leads to outcomes they value, something which may be difficult to overcome even if the activity itself is quite fun.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Many experiences in HCI may show complexity of this kind.

    “Recent work has argued that many experiences in HCI may show complexity of this kind [7,11,83] and has turned to complexity methods to disentangle the directionality and relative strength of causal relationships between experiential constructs [11,40,83].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [11]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [83]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    In our negative condition, participants described technologies they did 'not feel good' about, which is not necessarily the same as feeling bad.

    “In our negative condition, participants described technologies they did 'not feel good' about, which is not necessarily the same as feeling bad.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    These aspects of our analysis were exploratory, and in reporting them we have been careful to avoid final or confirmatory claims.

    “These aspects of our analysis were exploratory, and in reporting them we have been careful to avoid final or confirmatory claims.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    We did not form or test hypotheses about the specific motivational profile that would be observed, nor about relationships between specific profiles and specific outcomes.

    “We did not form or test hypotheses about the specific motivational profile that would be observed, nor about relationships between specific profiles and specific outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SDT holds that early childhood motivation is dominated by intrinsic motivation but that even by late childhood people are able to access all regulations.

    “SDT holds that early childhood motivation is dominated by intrinsic motivation [80, p. 214] but that even by late childhood people are able to access all regulations [80, p. 197].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites 80, p. 214

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites 80, p. 197

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There is potential for an 'upward spiral' of motivation.

    “Sheldon and Houser-Marko point to the potential for an 'upward spiral' of motivation [89], yet there is evidence that such reciprocal relationships between constructs can also result in more complex, and not necessarily positive, trajectories [40].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This account is somewhat in line with the developmental approach of Gerstenberg et al., but differs in its basic assumptions in ways which have consequences for design.

    “This account is somewhat in line with the developmental approach of Gerstenberg et al. [30], but differs in its basic assumptions in ways which have consequences for design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Internalised, autonomous regulations are expected to support need satisfaction and other positive affect.

    “For example, internalised, autonomous regulations are expected to support need satisfaction and other positive affect [80, pp.202-207], while at the same time need satisfaction and affect can act as support factors for internalisation [80, pp. 208-212].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 80, pp.202-207

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In some cases, less autonomous regulations do not seem to prevent the development of more autonomous motivations: there is evidence that controlled and autonomous regulations coexist, and that controlled regulations remain in place as autonomous regulations develop.

    “However, in some cases, less autonomous regulations do not seem to prevent the development of more autonomous motivations: there is evidence that controlled and autonomous regulations coexist, and that controlled regulations remain in place as autonomous regulations develop [115].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [115]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    SDT indicates the kind of reward and the manner of its delivery may be critical.

    “It is important to note that SDT indicates the kind of reward and the manner of its delivery may be critical.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 80, p. 148

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Our dataset did not permit the analysis of differences in motivational profile over age groups.

    “Similarly, our dataset did not permit the analysis of differences in motivational profile over age groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    Some of our results challenge previous expectations in HCI and SDT.

    “Some of our results challenge previous expectations in HCI and SDT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Previous work in HCI and UX has addressed motivation in a limited fashion, largely focusing on the immediate satisfaction inherent in moment to moment engagement with technologies.
    • Rests on an assumption: Very little attention has been paid to motivational factors related to outcomes of the activity and how these relate to the values and goals the users bring to the interaction.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Recent work has turned to complexity methods to disentangle the directionality and relative strength of causal relationships between experiential constructs.

    “Recent work has argued that many experiences in HCI may show complexity of this kind [7,11,83] and has turned to complexity methods to disentangle the directionality and relative strength of causal relationships between experiential constructs [11,40,83].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [40]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [83]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    Motivational profiles capture relevant differences in types of social media engagement.

    “Social media use is a strong candidate for future investigation: these technologies were strongly represented in each of our profiles, indicating that motivational profiles capture relevant differences in types of social media engagement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The profiles we identify should not be treated as a definitive typology of motivation in technology use.

    “First, the profiles we identify should not be treated as a definitive typology of motivation in technology use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Need satisfaction and affect can act as support factors for internalisation.

    “For example, internalised, autonomous regulations are expected to support need satisfaction and other positive affect [80, pp.202-207], while at the same time need satisfaction and affect can act as support factors for internalisation [80, pp. 208-212].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 80, pp. 208-212

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Our approach allows the identification of user sub-groups marked by particular patterns of motivation, who should show qualitatively distinct patterns of experience, and who may be receptive to different design interventions.

    “Our approach allows the identification of user sub-groups marked by particular patterns of motivation, who should show qualitatively distinct patterns of experience, and who may be receptive to different design interventions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Interpersonal factors are expected to be important in motivation and internalisation.

    “While interpersonal factors are expected to be important in motivation and internalisation [80, pp. 158-216], the results of our survey did not support in-depth analysis of this.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 80, pp. 158-216

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The motivational regulations in OIT are not developmental: people are not expected to move through them stage by stage, and in principle should be able to directly develop any of the regulations.

    “The motivational regulations in OIT are not developmental: people are not expected to move through them stage by stage [80, p. 199], and in principle should be able to directly develop any of the regulations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    HCI researchers have argued that controlled motivations, such as reward, can undermine integration and intrinsic motivation, leading to poor quality motivation.

    “HCI researchers have argued that controlled motivations, such as reward, can undermine integration and intrinsic motivation, leading to poor quality motivation [e.g., 29,36,105].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [29]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [36]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [105]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Studies of short duration might only observe changes in the faster-changing regulations and miss slower but still significant changes, risking bias in future findings.

    “Studies of short duration might otherwise only observe changes in the faster-changing regulations, and miss slower but still significant changes, something which risks biasing future findings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    SDT suggests that motivational processes, needs and identity factors may be related by reciprocal relationships rather than by single clear directions of causality.

    “SDT suggests that motivational processes, needs and identity factors may be related by reciprocal relationships rather than by single clear directions of causality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some extrinsic regulations could increase quickly, while change in intrinsic motivation was slower-i.e., it took longer before participants began to find the activity inherently interesting and enjoyable.

    “Wasserkampf and Kleinert found that some of the extrinsic regulations could increase quickly, while change in intrinsic motivation was slower-i.e., it took longer before participants began to find the activity inherently interesting and enjoyable [115].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [115]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    saBIC is found to perform better than BIC in evaluating mixture models.

    “saBIC is found to perform better than BIC in evaluating mixture models[85].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [85]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The full decision process and all data is recorded in the OSF repository.

    “The full decision process and all data is recorded in the OSF repository.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is a concept of 'hedonic amotivation': low-intentionality, compulsive, technology use, which is nevertheless marked by intrinsic motivation.

    “In particular, we articulate the concept of 'hedonic amotivation': low-intentionality, compulsive, technology use, which is nevertheless marked by intrinsic motivation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    We could not address in great depth the influence of interpersonal factors on motivational profiles.

    “Another issue we could not address in great depth was influence of interpersonal factors on motivational profiles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Subsequent to our analysis, more precise guidelines have been published which confirm the adequacy of this sample size for our observed group sizes and feature count.

    “Subsequent to our analysis more precise guidelines have been published[23], which confirm the adequacy of this sample size for our observed group sizes and feature count.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

181 of 181
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants' self-reports of their experiences and motivations are sincere and accurate.

    “At the end of the survey, we asked participants to honestly report whether they answered the questions in a 'sincere, conscious and engaged' way and whether they used ChatGPT or other LLMs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The open-ended responses reflect actual experiences rather than constructed narratives.

    “Participants were asked to describe their experience with the technology in their own words.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Existing motivation is a pre-requisite for further internalisation.

    “We only assume that existing motivation is a pre-requisite for further internalisation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Previous work in UX has not distinguished between these kinds of low-autonomy engagement.

    “While previous work in UX has not distinguished between these kinds of low-autonomy engagement, they have distinct experiential outcomes in our results.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At present there are very little data to answer whether controlled motivations inhibit users from continuing to internalise behaviours and activities.

    “At present.there are very little data to answer this.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Previous work in HCI and UX has addressed motivation in a limited fashion, largely focusing on the immediate satisfaction inherent in moment to moment engagement with technologies.

    “Despite this, previous work in HCI and UX has addressed motivation in a limited fashion, largely focusing on the immediate satisfaction inherent in moment to moment engagement with technologies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Very little attention has been paid to motivational factors related to outcomes of the activity and how these relate to the values and goals the users bring to the interaction.

    “Very little attention has been paid to motivational factors related to outcomes of the activity and how these relate to the values and goals the users bring to the interaction.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some 'extrinsic' motivations can be highly supportive of autonomous engagement and can connect activities to experiences of personal meaning and value.

    “Yet psychological research suggests that some 'extrinsic' motivations can be highly supportive of autonomous engagement and can connect activities to experiences of personal meaning and value.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Previous HCI research has ignored or devalued extrinsic motivation.

    “Where previous HCI research has ignored or devalued extrinsic motivation, our results indicate that extrinsic motivation can be strongly associated with positive outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Previous research has treated intrinsic motivation as an uncomplicated good.

    “Where previous research has treated intrinsic motivation as an uncomplicated good, our results indicate that it may in some circumstances be associated with negative outcomes, even potentially compulsive behaviour.”
10 of 10

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The number of high-level themes changes from four to five

    Minor

    The methods identify four high-level themes, but the results say the same analysis identified five.

  • Social media prevalence exceeds the stated range for all profiles

    Minor

    The claim that social media accounts for 20-25% in every profile conflicts with the reported 73% in the Amotivated-Intrinsic profile.

  • Two tables give different confidence intervals for the same need scores

    Minor

    Table 3 gives the positive-condition autonomy mean of 4.75 a confidence interval of [4.59, 4.91], whereas Table A4 gives [4.67, 4.83] for that same group, measure and mean. The discrepancy also occurs for other positive- and negative-condition basic-need intervals.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.5555/3532758.3532762 · DOI
  2. Kai Lukoff Ulrik Lyngs and Lize Alberts. 2022. Designing to Support Autonomy and Reduce Psychological Reactance in Digital Self-Control Tools. In Workshop on Self-Determination Theory in HCI (CHI ’22). ACM. Retrieved from https://www.positivecomputing.org/blog/chi-2022-workshop
  3. 10.1002/2013wr014338_eprint · DOI
  4. 10.1521/978.14625/28806 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1521/978.14625/28806 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, D., & Mekler, E. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Published
2024-10-31
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
1-41
ISSN
  • 1073-0516 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7325
OpenAlex
W4401636212
Cited by
37
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 11
FWCI
10.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101043198)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
autonomous motivation, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, self-determination theory, user experience, motivational profiles, need satisfaction, affect, perceived usability, compulsive use, technology use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-02.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-02.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review