Cited by 685Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative, High-Resolution Proteomics for Data-Driven Systems Biology

Open access
Cox, Jürgen, Mann, Matthias·2011·Annual Review of Biochemistry

Abstract

Systems biology requires comprehensive data at all molecular levels. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics has emerged as a powerful and universal method for the global measurement of proteins. In the most widespread format, it uses liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to identify and quantify peptides at a large scale. This peptide intensity information is the basic quantitative proteomic data type. It is used to quantify proteins between different proteome states, including the temporal variation of the proteome, to determine the complete primary structure of proteins including posttranslational modifications, to localize proteins to organelles, and to determine protein interactions. Here, we describe the principles of analysis and the areas of biology where proteomics can make unique contributions. The large-scale nature of proteomics data and its high accuracy pose special opportunities as well as challenges in systems biology that have been largely untapped so far.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061308-093216

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 161 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cox, J., & Mann, M.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (DE)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Annual Review of Biochemistry
Published
2011-07-07
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
273-299
ISSN
  • 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4509
OpenAlex
W2106074866
Cited by
685
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 85
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Annual Review of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
quantitative proteomics, high-resolution mass spectrometry, systems biology, peptide identification, protein quantification, post-translational modification, proteome dynamics, protein localization, protein-protein interaction, proteomics data analysis
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Liquid, Humans, Peptides, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Proteins, Proteome, Proteomics, Systems Biology, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review