Cited by 121EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeural dynamics and brain function

Sensors and Decoding for Intracortical Brain Computer Interfaces

Open access
Homer, Mark L., Nurmikko, Arto V., Donoghue, John P., Hochberg, Leigh R.·2013·Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Intracortical brain computer interfaces (iBCIs) are being developed to enable people to drive an output device, such as a computer cursor, directly from their neural activity. One goal of the technology is to help people with severe paralysis or limb loss. Key elements of an iBCI are the implanted sensor that records the neural signals and the software that decodes the user's intended movement from those signals. Here, we focus on recent advances in these two areas, placing special attention on contributions that are or may soon be adopted by the iBCI research community. We discuss how these innovations increase the technology's capability, accuracy, and longevity, all important steps that are expanding the range of possible future clinical applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124640

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 121 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Burrow MDJ Humphrey D Cortical control of a robot using a time-delay neural network 1997 Presented at International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Homer, M. L., Nurmikko, A. V., Donoghue, J. P., & Hochberg, L. R.
Affiliations
  • Biomedical Engineering,
  • School of Engineering,
  • Brown University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering
Published
2013-07-11
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
383-405
ISSN
  • 1523-9829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4274
OpenAlex
W2165100436
Cited by
121
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC009899)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS025074)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB007401)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
intracortical brain-computer interfaces, neural decoding, motor intention decoding, paralysis, neuroprosthetics, clinical translation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amputation, Surgical, Brain, Calibration, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Humans, Paralysis, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review