The DOI matches its Crossref record; 177 of the 177 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulation of Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes
Open accessAbstract
Homologous recombination (HR) is required for accurate chromosome segregation during the first meiotic division and constitutes a key repair and tolerance pathway for complex DNA damage, including DNA double-strand breaks, interstrand crosslinks, and DNA gaps. In addition, recombination and replication are inextricably linked, as recombination recovers stalled and broken replication forks, enabling the evolution of larger genomes/replicons. Defects in recombination lead to genomic instability and elevated cancer predisposition, demonstrating a clear cellular need for recombination. However, recombination can also lead to genome rearrangements. Unrestrained recombination causes undesired endpoints (translocation, deletion, inversion) and the accumulation of toxic recombination intermediates. Evidently, HR must be carefully regulated to match specific cellular needs. Here, we review the factors and mechanistic stages of recombination that are subject to regulation and suggest that recombination achieves flexibility and robustness by proceeding through metastable, reversible intermediates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“because it is only readily available in dividing cells [110,111]”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [110]
In the citing paper
“Cell cycle phase dominates the choice between NHEJ and HDR, with HDR taking place mainly in S and G2 phases due to the availability of sister chromatids as templates.61”
From CRISPR-Cas9: a new and promising player in gene therapy (2015) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer
Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35077232 · Cited by 3,939
Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Pâques, F., & Haber, J. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999 · Cited by 2,120
Drake, J. W., Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D., & Crow, J. F. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/148.4.1667 · Cited by 1,932
Mechanism of Eukaryotic Homologous Recombination
Filippo, J. S., Sung, P., & Klein, H. L. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.125255 · Cited by 1,766
Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection
Sartori, A. A., Lukas, C., Coates, J., Mistrik, M., Fu, S., Bartek, J., Baer, R., Lukas, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06337 · Cited by 1,362
Mammalian cyclin-dependent kinases
Malumbres, M., & Barbacid, M. (2005) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2005.09.005 · Cited by 1,333
Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice
Shrivastav, M., De Haro, L. P., & Nickoloff, J. A. (2008) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2007.111 · Cited by 1,329
Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle
Branzei, D., & Foiani, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2351 · Cited by 1,228
Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance
Li, X., & Heyer, W. (2008) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2008.1 · Cited by 1,203
Self-citationSgs1 Helicase and Two Nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 Resect DNA Double-Strand Break Ends
Zhu, Z., Chung, W.-H., Shim, E. Y., Lee, S. E., & Ira, G. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.037 · Cited by 1,108
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 999
Control of gene editing by manipulation of DNA repair mechanisms
Danner, E. W., Bashir, S., Yumlu, S., Wurst, W., Wefers, B., & Kühn, R. (2017) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s00335-017-9688-5 · Cited by 73
CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein-mediated genome and epigenome editing in mammalian cells
Bloomer, H., Khirallah, J., Li, Y., & Xu, Q. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.114087 · Cited by 75
In vivo genome editing as a potential treatment strategy for inherited retinal dystrophies
Yanik, M., Müller, B., Song, F., Gáll, J., Wagner, F., Wende, W., Lorenz, B., & Stieger, K. (2016) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.09.001 · Cited by 73
Evolving AAV-delivered therapeutics towards ultimate cures
He, X., Urip, B. A., Zhang, Z., Ngan, C. C., & Feng, B. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00109-020-02034-2 · Cited by 70
Metabolic Engineering of Yarrowia lipolytica for Terpenoid Production: Tools and Strategies
Zhang, T.-L., Yu, H., & Ye, L. (2023) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.2c00569 · Cited by 66
DNA Damage and Repair in Atherosclerosis: Current Insights and Future Perspectives
Cervelli, T., Borghini, A., Galli, A., & Andreassi, M. G. (2012) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms131216929 · Cited by 66
Polynucleotide kinase-phosphatase (PNKP) mutations and neurologic disease
Dumitrache, L. C., & McKinnon, P. J. (2017) · Mechanisms of Ageing and Development · doi:10.1016/j.mad.2016.04.009 · Cited by 67
Ishida, N., Nakagawa, T., Iemura, S.-I., Yasui, A., Shima, H., Katoh, Y., Nagasawa, Y., Natsume, T., Igarashi, K., & Nakayama, K. (2016) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00347-16 · Cited by 66
Xu, W., Zhang, S., Qin, H., & Yao, K. (2024) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-024-05957-3 · Cited by 74
Smirin‐Yosef, P., Zuckerman‐Levin, N., Tzur, S., Granot, Y., Cohen, L., Sachsenweger, J., Borck, G., Lagovsky, I., Salmon‐Divon, M., Wiesmüller, L., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2016-2714 · Cited by 65
Generation of targeted mouse mutants by embryo microinjection of TALEN mRNA
Wefers, B., Panda, S. K., Ortiz, O., Brandl, C., Hensler, S., Hansen, J., Wurst, W., & Kühn, R. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.142 · Cited by 58
Dbf4‐dependent kinase and the Rtt107 scaffold promote Mus81‐Mms4 resolvase activation during mitosis
Princz, L. N., Wild, P. S., Bittmann, J., Aguado, F. J., Blanco, M. G., Matos, J., & Pfander, B. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201694831 · Cited by 61
Stok, C., Kok, Y. P., van den Tempel, N., & van Vugt, M. A. T. M. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab151 · Cited by 67
CRISPR-Cas9-Based Technology and Its Relevance to Gene Editing in Parkinson’s Disease
Rahman, M. U., Bilal, M., Shah, J. A., Kaushik, A. K., Teissèdre, P., & Kujawska, M. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14061252 · Cited by 65
Patterson-Fortin, J., Bose, A., Tsai, W.-C., Grochala, C., Nguyen, H. Q., Zhou, J., Parmar, K., Lazaro, J., Liu, J. F., McQueen, K., et al. (2022) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-1124 · Cited by 64
Self-citationUemura, T., Mori, T., Kurihara, T., Kawase, S., Koike, R., Satoga, M., Cao, X., Li, X., Yanagawa, T., Sakurai, T., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep35861 · Cited by 65
Structural Basis of Homology-Directed DNA Repair Mediated by RAD52
Saotome, M., Saito, K., Yasuda, T., Ohtomo, H., Sugiyama, S., Nishimura, Y., Kurumizaka, H., & Kagawa, W. (2018) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2018.04.005 · Cited by 64
PARP inhibitors in platinum-sensitive high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Morgan, R. D., Clamp, A. R., Evans, D. G., Edmondson, R. J., & Jayson, G. C. (2018) · Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00280-018-3532-9 · Cited by 66
Roles of XRCC2, RAD51B and RAD51D in RAD51-Independent SSA Recombination
Serra, H., Ines, O. D., Degroote, F., Gallego, M. E., & White, C. I. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003971 · Cited by 63
Nimonkar, A. V., Dombrowski, C., Siino, J. S., Stasiak, A. Z., Stasiak, A., & Kowalczykowski, S. C. (2012) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112.373290 · Cited by 68
Strand invasion by HLTF as a mechanism for template switch in fork rescue
Burkovics, P., Šebesta, M., Balogh, D., Haracska, L., & Krejčí, L. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1040 · Cited by 62
Repair of DNA Damage Induced by the Cytidine Analog Zebularine Requires ATR and ATM in Arabidopsis
Liu, C.-H., Finke, A., Díaz, M., Rozhon, W., Poppenberger, B., Baubec, T., & Pečinka, A. (2015) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.114.135467 · Cited by 59
Muñoz-Galván, S., Tous, C., Blanco, M. G., Schwartz, E. K., Ehmsen, K. T., West, S. C., Heyer, W., & Aguilera, A. (2012) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00111-12 · Cited by 62
Self-citationApplication of CRISPR/Cas9 for biomedical discoveries
Riordan, S. M., Heruth, D. P., Zhang, L. Q., & Ye, S. Q. (2015) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-015-0027-9 · Cited by 66
Histone methylation in DNA repair and clinical practice: new findings during the past 5-years
Wei, S., Li, C., Yin, Z., Wen, J., Meng, H., Xue, L., & Wang, J. (2018) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.23427 · Cited by 67
Paliwal, S., Kanagaraj, R., Sturzenegger, A., Burdová, K., & Janščák, P. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1263 · Cited by 62
Current progress of genome editing in livestock
Lee, K., Uh, K., & Farrell, K. (2020) · Theriogenology · doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.036 · Cited by 60
Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination
Reh, W. A., & Vásquez, K. M. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0005988.pub2 · Cited by 62
Presynaptic filament dynamics in homologous recombination and DNA repair
Liu, J., Ehmsen, K. T., Heyer, W., & Morrical, S. W. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409238.2011.576007 · Cited by 63
Self-citationTranscription-Associated Genome Instability
Gaillard, H., Herrera‐Moyano, E., & Aguilera, A. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400017y · Cited by 59
From yeast to mammals: Recent advances in genetic control of homologous recombination
Karpenshif, Y., & Bernstein, K. A. (2012) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.07.001 · Cited by 59
Budke, B., Lv, W., Kozikowski, A. P., & Connell, P. P. (2016) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.201600426 · Cited by 59
Multifaceted regulation and functions of 53BP1 in NHEJ‑mediated DSB repair (Review)
Lei, T., Du, S., Peng, Z., & Chen, L. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.3892/ijmm.2022.5145 · Cited by 66
CRISPR-Cas9 for medical genetic screens: applications and future perspectives
Xue, H.-Y., Ji, L.-J., Gao, A.-M., Liu, P., He, J.-D., & Lu, X. (2015) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103409 · Cited by 62
Human RAD52 interactions with replication protein A and the RAD51 presynaptic complex
Ma, C. J., Kwon, Y., Sung, P., & Greene, E. C. (2017) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m117.794545 · Cited by 62
Ensminger, M., & Löbrich, M. (2020) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20191054 · Cited by 65
Progress towards engineering gene drives for population control
Raban, R., Marshall, J. M., & Akbari, O. S. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.208181 · Cited by 60
A review on CRISPR/Cas: a versatile tool for cancer screening, diagnosis, and clinic treatment
Yang, X., & Zhang, B. (2023) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-023-01117-w · Cited by 58
Kim, H. S., Kweon, J., & Kim, Y. (2024) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-024-01212-3 · Cited by 68
Connecting genotypes, phenotypes and fitness: harnessing the power of CRISPR /Cas9 genome editing
Bono, J. M., Olesnicky, E. C., & Matzkin, L. M. (2015) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13252 · Cited by 61
Lozano, J.-C., Schatt, P., Botebol, H., Vergé, V., Lesuisse, E., Blain, S., Carré, I. A., & Bouget, F. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12530 · Cited by 58
Sofueva, S., Osman, F., Lorenz, A., Steinacher, R., Castagnetti, S., Ledesma, J., & Whitby, M. C. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr340 · Cited by 57
Chaikind, B., Bessen, J. L., Thompson, D. B., Hu, J. H., & Liu, D. R. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw707 · Cited by 57
Diakatou, M., Manès, G., Bocquet, B., Meunier, I., & Kalatzis, V. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20102542 · Cited by 59
Guidelines for DNA recombination and repair studies: Cellular assays of DNA repair pathways
Klein, H. L., Bačinskaja, G., Che, J., Cheblal, A., Elango, R., Epshtein, A., Fitzgerald, D. M., Gómez‐González, B., Khan, S. R., Kumar, S., et al. (2019) · Microbial Cell · doi:10.15698/mic2019.01.664 · Cited by 57
A genome-wide screening uncovers the role of CCAR2 as an antagonist of DNA end resection
López-Saavedra, A., Gómez-Cabello, D., Domínguez-Sánchez, M. S., Mejías-Navarro, F., Fernández-Ávila, M. J., Dinant, C., Martínez-Macías, M. I., Bártek, J., & Huertas, P. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12364 · Cited by 58
Gene editing in mouse zygotes using the CRISPR/Cas9 system
Wefers, B., Bashir, S., Rossius, J., Wurst, W., & Kühn, R. (2017) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.02.008 · Cited by 60
Batté, A., Brocas, C., Bordelet, H., Hocher, A., Ruault, M., Adjiri, A., Taddei, A., & Dubrana, K. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201796631 · Cited by 55
Nogueira, A., Fernandes, M., Catarino, R., & Medeiros, R. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11111622 · Cited by 59
CRISPR/Cas9: Implications for Modeling and Therapy of Neurodegenerative Diseases
Yang, W., Tu, Z., Sun, Q., & Li, X. (2016) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2016.00030 · Cited by 59
Application of the gene editing tool, CRISPR-Cas9, for treating neurodegenerative diseases
Kolli, N., Lü, M., Maiti, P., Rossignol, J., & Dunbar, G. L. (2017) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2017.07.007 · Cited by 59
Improving Precise CRISPR Genome Editing by Small Molecules: Is there a Magic Potion?
Bischoff, N., Wimberger, S., Maresca, M., & Brakebusch, C. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9051318 · Cited by 58
Roles of homologous recombination in response to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage
Nickoloff, J. A., Sharma, N., Allen, C., Taylor, L. E., Allen, S. J., Jaiswal, A. S., & Hromas, R. (2021) · International Journal of Radiation Biology · doi:10.1080/09553002.2021.1956001 · Cited by 61
Cell cycle- and DNA repair pathway-specific effects of apoptosis on tumor suppression
Foster, S. S., De, S., Johnson, L. K., Petrini, J. H. J., & Stracker, T. H. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1120476109 · Cited by 55
Schipler, A., Mladenova, V., Soni, A., Nikolov, V., Saha, J., Mladenov, E., & Iliakis, G. E. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw487 · Cited by 56
DNA end resection requires constitutive sumoylation of CtIP by CBX4
Soria‐Bretones, I., Cepeda-García, C., Checa-Rodríguez, C., Heyer, V., Reina‐San‐Martin, B., Soutoglou, E., & Huertas, P. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00183-6 · Cited by 61
Jimeno, S., Fernández-Ávila, M. J., Cruz-García, A., Cepeda-García, C., Gómez-Cabello, D., & Huertas, P. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1384 · Cited by 58
Kane, D. P., Shusterman, M., Rong, Y. S., & McVey, M. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002659 · Cited by 55
Gene editing and clonal isolation of human induced pluripotent stem cells using CRISPR/Cas9
Yumlu, S., Stumm, J., Bashir, S., Dreyer, A.-K., Lisowski, P., Danner, E. W., & Kühn, R. (2017) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.05.009 · Cited by 60
Spatiotemporal dynamics of homologous recombination repair at single collapsed replication forks
Whelan, D. R., Lee, W. T. C., Yin, Y., Ofri, D. M., Bermudez‐Hernandez, K., Keegan, S., Fenyö, D., & Rothenberg, E. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06435-3 · Cited by 60
Immunofluorescence-Based Methods to Monitor DNA End Resection
Mukherjee, B., Tomimatsu, N., & Burma, S. (2015) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2522-3_5 · Cited by 55
Szymonowicz, K., Krysztofiak, A., van der Linden, J., Kern, A., Deycmar, S., Oeck, S., Squire, A., Koska, B., Hlouschek, J., Vüllings, M., et al. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9040889 · Cited by 54
Crossover Localisation Is Regulated by the Neddylation Posttranslational Regulatory Pathway
Tagliaro-Jahns, M., Vezon, D., Chambon, A., Pereira, L., Falque, M., Martin, O., Chelysheva, L. A., & Grelon, M. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001930 · Cited by 57
Vu, G. T. H., Cao, H. X., Watanabe, K., Hensel, G., Blattner, F. R., Kumlehn, J., & Schubert, I. A. (2014) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.114.126607 · Cited by 53
Homology‐dependent repair is involved in 45 S rDNA loss in plant CAF ‐1 mutants
Muchová, V., Amiard, S., Mozgová, I., Dvořáčková, M., Gallego, M. E., White, C. I., & Fajkus, J. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12718 · Cited by 50
Bollen, Y., Post, J. B., Koo, B., & Snippert, H. J. G. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky571 · Cited by 53
Regulation of DNA Double Strand Breaks Processing: Focus on Barriers
Marini, F., Rawal, C. C., Liberi, G., & Pellicioli, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2019.00055 · Cited by 55
Network Rewiring of Homologous Recombination Enzymes during Mitotic Proliferation and Meiosis
Wild, P. S., Susperregui, A., Piazza, I., Dörig, C., Oke, A., Arter, M., Yamaguchi, M., Hilditch, A. T., Vuina, K., Chan, K. C., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.022 · Cited by 53
Synergistic gene editing in human iPS cells via cell cycle and DNA repair modulation
Maurissen, T. L., & Woltjen, K. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16643-5 · Cited by 54
The Ku Heterodimer and the Metabolism of Single-Ended DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Balestrini, A., Ristić, D., Dionne, I., Liu, X., Wyman, C., Wellinger, R. J., & Petrini, J. H. J. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.026 · Cited by 52
Huehls, A. M., Huntoon, C. J., Joshi, P. M., Baehr, C., Wagner, J. M., Wang, X., Lee, M. Y., & Karnitz, L. M. (2015) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.115.100164 · Cited by 52
The Problem of the Low Rates of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knock-ins in Plants: Approaches and Solutions
Розов, С. М., Permyakova, N. V., & Дейнеко, Е. В. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20133371 · Cited by 52
Whelan, D. R., & Rothenberg, E. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2021963118 · Cited by 53
A Geant4-DNA Evaluation of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage on a Human Fibroblast
Shin, W., Sakata, D., Lampe, N., Belov, O., Tran, H. N., Petrović, I., Ristic‐Fira, A., Dordevic, M., Bernal, M. A., Bordage, M., et al. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13194940 · Cited by 51
Zhang, X. C., Shan, Y., Li, J., Qin, Q., Yu, J., & Deng, H. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24098366 · Cited by 51
A cGAS-mediated mechanism in naked mole-rats potentiates DNA repair and delays aging
Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Cui, Z., Li, K.-L., Song, Z., Chen, L., Sun, X., Xu, X., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adp5056 · Cited by 53
The Role of the COP9 Signalosome and Neddylation in DNA Damage Signaling and Repair
Chung, D., & Dellaire, G. (2015) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom5042388 · Cited by 50
Efficient DNA interstrand crosslinking by 6-thioguanine and UVA radiation
Brem, R., Daehn, I., & Karran, P. (2011) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.05.010 · Cited by 48
The Mechanism of Gene Targeting in Human Somatic Cells
Kan, Y., Ruis, B. L., Lin, S. G., & Hendrickson, E. A. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004251 · Cited by 50
Meyer, D. H., Fu, B. X. H., & Heyer, W. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1507833112 · Cited by 55
Self-citationDissociation of Rad51 Presynaptic Complexes and Heteroduplex DNA Joints by Tandem Assemblies of Srs2
Kaniecki, K., Tullio, L. D., Gibb, B., Kwon, Y., Sung, P., & Greene, E. C. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.047 · Cited by 50
Edible and medicinal fungi breeding techniques, a review: Current status and future prospects
Dong, Y., Miao, R., Feng, R., Wang, T., Yan, J., Zhao, X., Han, X., Gan, Y., Lin, J., Li, Y., et al. (2022) · Current Research in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.crfs.2022.09.002 · Cited by 49
Mladenov, E., Mladenova, V., Stuschke, M., & Iliakis, G. E. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241914956 · Cited by 53
Mus81-Mms4 and Yen1 resolve a novel anaphase bridge formed by noncanonical Holliday junctions
García-Luis, J., & Machín, F. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6652 · Cited by 49
Writers, Readers, and Erasers of Histone Ubiquitylation in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair
Smeenk, G., & Mailand, N. (2016) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00122 · Cited by 52
And yet, it moves: nuclear and chromatin dynamics of a heterochromatic double-strand break
Caridi, P. C., Delabaere, L., Zapotoczny, G., & Chiolo, I. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0291 · Cited by 51
Structural basis for recognition of 53BP1 tandem Tudor domain by TIRR
Dai, Y., Zhang, A., Shan, S., Gong, Z., & Zhou, Z. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04557-2 · Cited by 50
Kumar, S., Talluri, S., Pal, J., Yuan, X., Lu, R., Nanjappa, P., Samur, M., Munshi, N. C., & Shammas, M. A. (2018) · Blood Cancer Journal · doi:10.1038/s41408-018-0129-9 · Cited by 48
The Multiple Facets of ATRX Protein
Valenzuela, M., Amato, R., Sgura, A., Antoccia, A., & Berardinelli, F. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13092211 · Cited by 53
Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Model to Study Replicative Senescence Triggered by Telomere Shortening
Teixeira, M. T. (2013) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2013.00101 · Cited by 54
Two Distinct Pathways Support Gene Correction by Single-Stranded Donors at DNA Nicks
Davis, L., & Maizels, N. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.049 · Cited by 47
Gene Editing of Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Hopes and Hurdles Toward Clinical Translation
Ferrari, S., Vavassori, V., Canarutto, D., Jacob, A., Castiello, M. C., Omer, A., & Genovese, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2021.618378 · Cited by 52
Gene therapy for cystic fibrosis: Challenges and prospects
Sui, H., Xu, X., Su, Y., Gong, Z., Yao, M., Liu, X., Zhang, T., Jiang, Z., Bai, T., Wang, J., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1015926 · Cited by 56
Targeting ubiquitination in disease and therapy
Yang, X., Lan, T., Zhang, B., Tao, X., Qi, W., Xie, K., Cai, Y., Liu, C., Han, J., & Wu, H. M. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-025-02392-8 · Cited by 55
Multiple Barriers to Nonhomologous DNA End Joining During Meiosis inDrosophila
Joyce, E. F., Paul, A., Chen, K. E., Tanneti, N. S., & McKim, K. S. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.140996 · Cited by 48
Zhang, A., Peng, B., Huang, P. C., Chen, J., & Gong, Z. (2017) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m117.777474 · Cited by 48
Targeted Genome Replacement via Homology-directed Repair in Non-dividing Cardiomyocytes
Ishizu, T., Higo, S., Masumura, Y., Kohama, Y., Shiba, M., Higo, T., Shibamoto, M., Nakagawa, A., Morimoto, S., Takashima, S., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09716-x · Cited by 50
A new class of ultrafine anaphase bridges generated by homologous recombination
Chan, Y. W., & West, S. C. (2018) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2018.1515555 · Cited by 51
Tang, X., Gao, F., Liu, M.-J., Fan, Q., Chen, D., & Ma, W. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00551 · Cited by 54
Hu, S., Du, J., Chen, N., Jia, R., Zhang, J., Liu, X., & Yang, L. (2020) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.61.4.31 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Heyer, W.-D., Ehmsen, K. T., & Liu, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2010-12-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-139
- ISSN
- 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2948
- PMC
- PMC4114321
- OpenAlex
- W2109879947
- Cited by
- 1,066
- References
- 177
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 62
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annual Review of Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (CA92776, R01CA092276, R03CA092776)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM58015, R01GM058015)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- homologous recombination, recombination regulation, DNA double-strand breaks, meiotic chromosome segregation, DNA repair, DNA damage tolerance, replication fork recovery, genomic instability, cancer susceptibility, genome rearrangement, translocation, recombination intermediates, metastable intermediates, eukaryotic cells
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA Repair, Humans, Recombination, Genetic, Yeasts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review