Cited by 1,066DNA Repair MechanismsFungal and yeast genetics researchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 177 of the 177 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regulation of Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes

Open access

Heyer, Wolf-Dietrich, Ehmsen, Kirk T., Liu, Jie·2010·Annual Review of Genetics

DOI 10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955PMC PMC4114321

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Homologous recombination (HR) is required for accurate chromosome segregation during the first meiotic division and constitutes a key repair and tolerance pathway for complex DNA damage, including DNA double-strand breaks, interstrand crosslinks, and DNA gaps. In addition, recombination and replication are inextricably linked, as recombination recovers stalled and broken replication forks, enabling the evolution of larger genomes/replicons. Defects in recombination lead to genomic instability and elevated cancer predisposition, demonstrating a clear cellular need for recombination. However, recombination can also lead to genome rearrangements. Unrestrained recombination causes undesired endpoints (translocation, deletion, inversion) and the accumulation of toxic recombination intermediates. Evidently, HR must be carefully regulated to match specific cellular needs. Here, we review the factors and mechanistic stages of recombination that are subject to regulation and suggest that recombination achieves flexibility and robustness by proceeding through metastable, reversible intermediates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955

Cites

177 of 177 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer
Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35077232 · Cited by 3,939
Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Pâques, F., & Haber, J. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999 · Cited by 2,120
Rates of spontaneous mutation
Drake, J. W., Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D., & Crow, J. F. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/148.4.1667 · Cited by 1,932
Mechanism of Eukaryotic Homologous Recombination
Filippo, J. S., Sung, P., & Klein, H. L. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.125255 · Cited by 1,766
Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection
Sartori, A. A., Lukas, C., Coates, J., Mistrik, M., Fu, S., Bartek, J., Baer, R., Lukas, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06337 · Cited by 1,362
Mammalian cyclin-dependent kinases
Malumbres, M., & Barbacid, M. (2005) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2005.09.005 · Cited by 1,333
Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice
Shrivastav, M., De Haro, L. P., & Nickoloff, J. A. (2008) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2007.111 · Cited by 1,329
Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle
Branzei, D., & Foiani, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2351 · Cited by 1,228
Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance
Li, X., & Heyer, W. (2008) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2008.1 · Cited by 1,203
Self-citation
Sgs1 Helicase and Two Nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 Resect DNA Double-Strand Break Ends
Zhu, Z., Chung, W.-H., Shim, E. Y., Lee, S. E., & Ira, G. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.037 · Cited by 1,108

Show all 177 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

10.1128/MCB.12.7.3224 · DOI
10.1007/4735_2006_0209 · DOI

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 999

CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool
Loureiro, A., & da Silva, G. J. (2019) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics8010018 · Cited by 129
Rad52 Inverse Strand Exchange Drives RNA-Templated DNA Double-Strand Break Repair
Mazina, O. M., Keskin, H., Hanamshet, K., Storici, F., & Mazin, A. V. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.019 · Cited by 135
Eukaryotic DNA damage checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks
Finn, K., Lowndes, N. F., & Grenon, M. (2012) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0875-3 · Cited by 127
Human genome-edited hematopoietic stem cells phenotypically correct Mucopolysaccharidosis type I
Gomez‐Ospina, N., Scharenberg, S. G., Mostrel, N., Bak, R. O., Mantri, S., Quadros, R. M., Gurumurthy, C. B., Lee, C. M., Bao, G., Suarez, C. J., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11962-8 · Cited by 124
Human RECQ helicases: Roles in DNA metabolism, mutagenesis and cancer biology
Monnat, R. J. (2010) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.10.002 · Cited by 127
Novel insights into RAD51 activity and regulation during homologous recombination and DNA replication
Godin, S. K., Sullivan, M. R., & Bernstein, K. A. (2016) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/bcb-2016-0012 · Cited by 128
Checkpoint mechanisms: the puppet masters of meiotic prophase
MacQueen, A. J., & Hochwagen, A. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011.03.004 · Cited by 125
Structure of Mre11–Nbs1 complex yields insights into ataxia-telangiectasia–like disease mutations and DNA damage signaling
Schiller, C., Lammens, K., Guerini, I., Coordes, B., Feldmann, H. M., Schlauderer, F., Möckel, C., Schele, A., Sträßer, K., Jackson, S. P., et al. (2012) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2323 · Cited by 118
CRISPRi repression of nonhomologous end‐joining for enhanced genome engineering via homologous recombination in Yarrowia lipolytica
Schwartz, C., Frogue, K., Ramesh, A., Misa, J., & Wheeldon, I. R. (2017) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.26404 · Cited by 116
Chromodomain Helicase DNA-binding Protein 4 (CHD4) Regulates Homologous Recombination DNA Repair, and Its Deficiency Sensitizes Cells to Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor Treatment
Pan, M., Hsieh, H.-J., Dai, H., Hung, W.-C., Li, K., Peng, G., & Lin, S. (2012) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.287037 · Cited by 118
FIGL1 and its novel partner FLIP form a conserved complex that regulates homologous recombination
Fernandes, J. B., Duhamel, M., Seguéla-Arnaud, M., Froger, N., Girard, C., Choinard, S., Solier, V., De Winne, N., De Jaeger, G., Gevaert, K., et al. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007317 · Cited by 116
“Homologous recombination (HR) is critical for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in both mitotic and meiotic cells [1].”
Background
Top3-Rmi1 Dissolve Rad51-Mediated D Loops by a Topoisomerase-Based Mechanism
Fasching, C. L., Ćejka, P., Kowalczykowski, S. C., & Heyer, W. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.022 · Cited by 115
Self-citation
Common Chemical Inductors of Replication Stress: Focus on Cell‐Based Studies
Veselá, E., Chromá, K., Turi, Z., & Mistrík, M. (2017) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom7010019 · Cited by 128
Microhomology Directs Diverse DNA Break Repair Pathways and Chromosomal Translocations
Villarreal, D. D., Lee, K., Deem, A. K., Shim, E. Y., Malkova, A., & Lee, S. E. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003026 · Cited by 124
BRCA Mutations in Ovarian and Prostate Cancer: Bench to Bedside
Boussios, S., Rassy, E., Moschetta, M., Ghose, A., Adeleke, S. M., Sanchez, E., Sheriff, M., Chargari, C., & Pavlidis, N. A. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14163888 · Cited by 117
Programmable gene insertion in human cells with a laboratory-evolved CRISPR-associated transposase
Witte, I. P., Lampe, G. D., Eitzinger, S., Miller, S. M., Berríos, K. N., McElroy, A. N., King, R. T., Stringham, O. G., Gelsinger, D. R., Vo, P. L. H., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adt5199 · Cited by 121
CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics: a cure for cancer and other genetic diseases
Khan, F. A., Pandupuspitasari, N. S., Huang, C., Ao, Z., Jamal, M., Zohaib, A., Khan, F. A., Hakim, M. R., & ShuJun, Z. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.9646 · Cited by 115
Chromatin Dynamics in Genome Stability: Roles in Suppressing Endogenous DNA Damage and Facilitating DNA Repair
Nair, N., Shoaib, M., & Sørensen, C. S. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18071486 · Cited by 117
H3K36me3, message from chromatin to DNA damage repair
Sun, Z., Zhang, Y., Jia, J., Fang, Y., Tang, Y., Wu, H., & Fang, D. (2020) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-020-0374-z · Cited by 109
Top3-Rmi1 DNA Single-Strand Decatenase Is Integral to the Formation and Resolution of Meiotic Recombination Intermediates
Kaur, H., Muyt, A. D., & Lichten, M. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.020 · Cited by 121
Genome Editing in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Approaches, Pitfalls, and Solutions
Hendriks, W. T., Warren, C. R., & Cowan, C. A. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.12.002 · Cited by 110
Spatial control of the GEN1 Holliday junction resolvase ensures genome stability
Chan, Y. W., & West, S. C. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5844 · Cited by 107
Life or Death after a Break: What Determines the Choice?
Krenning, L., van den Berg, J., & Medema, R. H. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.08.023 · Cited by 113
The Arabidopsis SWR1 Chromatin-Remodeling Complex Is Important for DNA Repair, Somatic Recombination, and Meiosis
Rosa, M., Harder, M. V., Cigliano, R. A., Schlögelhofer, P., & Scheid, O. M. (2013) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.112.104067 · Cited by 109
ATM Deficiency Is Associated with Sensitivity to PARP1- and ATR Inhibitors in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Schmitt, A., Knittel, G., Welcker, D., Yang, T.-P., George, J., Nowak, M., Leeser, U., Büttner, R., Perner, S., Peifer, M., et al. (2017) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-3398 · Cited by 109
ATP driven structural changes of the bacterial Mre11:Rad50 catalytic head complex
Möckel, C., Lammens, K., Schele, A., & Hopfner, K. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr749 · Cited by 116
Resources for the design of CRISPR gene editing experiments
Graham, D. B., & Root, D. E. (2015) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0823-x · Cited by 108
Cohesin and the nucleolus constrain the mobility of spontaneous repair foci
Dion, V., Kalck, V., Seeber, A., Schleker, T., & Gasser, S. M. (2013) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2013.142 · Cited by 103
Necessities in the Processing of DNA Double Strand Breaks and Their Effects on Genomic Instability and Cancer
Iliakis, G. E., Mladenov, E., & Mladenova, V. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11111671 · Cited by 101
Efficient single-copy HDR by 5’ modified long dsDNA donors
Gutierrez-Triana, J. A., Tavhelidse, T., Thumberger, T., Thomas, I., Wittbrodt, B., Kellner, T., Anlaş, K., Tsingos, E., & Wittbrodt, J. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.39468 · Cited by 103
Rad54 Drives ATP Hydrolysis-Dependent DNA Sequence Alignment during Homologous Recombination
Crickard, J. B., Moevus, C. J., Kwon, Y., Sung, P., & Greene, E. C. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.056 · Cited by 102
Plug-and-Play Protein Modification Using Homology-Independent Universal Genome Engineering
Gao, Y., Hisey, E. E., Bradshaw, T. W., Erata, E., Brown, W. E., Courtland, J. L., Uezu, A., Xiang, Y., Diao, Y., & Soderling, S. H. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.047 · Cited by 108
INDEL detection, the ‘Achilles heel’ of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels
Bennett, E., Petersen, B. L., Johansen, I. E., Niu, Y., Yang, Z., Chamberlain, C. A., Met, Ö., Wandall, H. H., & Frödin, M. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa975 · Cited by 108
Controlling DNA-end resection: a new task for CDKs
Ferretti, L. P., Lafranchi, L., & Sartori, A. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2013.00099 · Cited by 112
A STING to inflammation and autoimmunity
Kumar, V. (2019) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1002/jlb.4mir1018-397rr · Cited by 100
Targeted gene knock-in by homology-directed genome editing using Cas9 ribonucleoprotein and AAV donor delivery
Gaj, T., Staahl, B. T., Rodrigues, G. M. C., Limsirichai, P., Ekman, F. K., Doudna, J. A., & Schaffer, D. V. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx154 · Cited by 89
FBH1 Helicase Disrupts RAD51 Filaments in Vitro and Modulates Homologous Recombination in Mammalian Cells
Šimandlová, J., Zagelbaum, J., Payne, M., Chu, W. K., Shevelev, I., Hanada, K., Chatterjee, S., Reid, D. A., Liu, Y., Janščák, P., et al. (2013) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m113.484493 · Cited by 103
Precision Targeted Mutagenesis via Cas9 Paired Nickases in Rice
Mikami, M., Toki, S., & Endo, M. (2016) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcw049 · Cited by 97
Functional Genomics via CRISPR–Cas
Ford, K. M., McDonald, D., & Mali, P. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2018.06.034 · Cited by 103
Monitoring Homology Search during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair In Vivo
Renkawitz, J., Lademann, C. A., Kalocsay, M., & Jentsch, S. (2013) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.020 · Cited by 98
Prolyl Isomerase PIN1 Regulates DNA Double-Strand Break Repair by Counteracting DNA End Resection
Steger, M., Murina, O., Hühn, D., Ferretti, L. P., Walser, R., Hänggi, K., Lafranchi, L., Neugebauer, C., Paliwal, S., Janščák, P., et al. (2013) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.023 · Cited by 100
Biological Adaptations of Tumor Cells to Radiation Therapy
Carlos‐Reyes, Á., Muñiz-Lino, M. A., Romero‐Garcia, S., López‐Camarillo, C., & la Cruz, O. N. H.-D. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.718636 · Cited by 106
Genetic screens and functional genomics using CRISPR /Cas9 technology
Hartenian, E., & Doench, J. G. (2015) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.13248 · Cited by 100
Programmed genome editing of the omega-1 ribonuclease of the blood fluke, Schistosoma mansoni
Ittiprasert, W., Mann, V. H., Karinshak, S. E., Coghlan, A., Rinaldi, G., Sankaranarayanan, G., Chaidee, A., Tanno, T., Kumkhaek, C., Prangtaworn, P., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.41337 · Cited by 96
Pronuclear Microinjection during S-Phase Increases the Efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9-Assisted Knockin of Large DNA Donors in Mouse Zygotes
Abe, T., Inoue, K., Furuta, Y., & Kiyonari, H. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107653 · Cited by 95
Regulation of Recombination and Genomic MaintenancePreprint
Heyer, W. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016501 · Cited by 105
Self-citation
Improving Gene Editing Outcomes in Human Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells by Temporal Control of DNA Repair
Lomova, A., Clark, D. N., Campo-Fernández, B., Flores, C., Kaufman, M. L., Fitz‐Gibbon, S. T., Wang, X., Miyahira, E., Brown, D., DeWitt, M. A., et al. (2018) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.2935 · Cited by 97
Mechanisms of precise genome editing using oligonucleotide donorsPreprint
Kan, Y., Ruis, B. L., Takasugi, T., & Hendrickson, E. A. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.214775.116 · Cited by 92
Biochemical DSB-repair model for mammalian cells in G1 and early S phases of the cell cycle
Taleei, R., & Nikjoo, H. (2013) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.06.004 · Cited by 94
Coping with DNA double strand breaks
Hiom, K. J. (2010) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.018 · Cited by 99
CRISPR/Cas9-based genetic correction for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa
Webber, B. R., Osborn, M. J., McElroy, A. N., Twaroski, K., Lonetree, C.-L., DeFeo, A. P., Xia, L., Eide, C. R., Lees, C. J., McElmurry, R. T., et al. (2016) · npj Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1038/npjregenmed.2016.14 · Cited by 98
Systematic Screen Identifies miRNAs That Target RAD51 and RAD51D to Enhance Chemosensitivity
Huang, J., Wang, Y., Dhillon, K. K., Calses, P. C., Villegas, E., Mitchell, P. S., Tewari, M., Kemp, C. J., & Taniguchi, T. (2013) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-13-0292 · Cited by 95
CRISPR/Cas systems: Delivery and application in gene therapy
Huang, J., Zhou, Y., Li, J., Lü, A., & Liang, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.942325 · Cited by 102
Noncanonical Role of the 9-1-1 Clamp in the Error-Free DNA Damage Tolerance Pathway
Karras, G. I., Fumasoni, M., Sienski, G., Vanoli, F., Branzei, D., & Jentsch, S. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.016 · Cited by 94
High-Resolution Genome-Wide Analysis of Irradiated (UV and γ-Rays) Diploid Yeast Cells Reveals a High Frequency of Genomic Loss of Heterozygosity (LOH) Events
Charles, J. S., Hazkani‐Covo, E., Yin, Y. A., Andersen, S. L., Dietrich, F. S., Greenwell, P. W., Malc, E. P., Mieczkowski, P. A., & Petes, T. D. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.137927 · Cited by 92
Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage tolerance
González‐Prieto, R., Muñoz-Cabello, A. M., Cabello-Lobato, M. J., & Prado, F. (2013) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.73 · Cited by 89
Direct Involvement of Retinoblastoma Family Proteins in DNA Repair by Non-homologous End-Joining
Cook, R., Zoumpoulidou, G., Luczynski, M. T., Rieger, S., Moquet, J., Spanswick, V. J., Hartley, J. A., Rothkamm, K., Huang, P. H., & Mittnacht, S. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.059 · Cited by 86
Exploiting the Microhomology-Mediated End-Joining Pathway in Cancer Therapy
Patterson-Fortin, J., & D’Andrea, A. D. (2020) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-1672 · Cited by 98
DNA Damage Clustering after Ionizing Radiation and Consequences in the Processing of Chromatin Breaks
Mladenova, V., Mladenov, E., Stuschke, M., & Iliakis, G. E. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27051540 · Cited by 90
Precise genome-wide base editing by the CRISPR Nickase system in yeast
Satomura, A., Nishioka, R., Mori, H., Sato, K., Kuroda, K., & Ueda, M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02013-7 · Cited by 89
Polyphenols: Major regulators of key components of DNA damage response in cancer
Majidinia, M., Bishayee, A., & Yousefi, B. (2019) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102679 · Cited by 87
A non-canonical, interferon-independent signaling activity of cGAMP triggers DNA damage response signaling
Banerjee, D., Langberg, K. A., Abbas, S., Odermatt, E., Yerramothu, P., Volaric, M. P., Reidenbach, M. A., Krentz, K. J., Rubinstein, C. D., Brautigan, D. L., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26240-9 · Cited by 88
Protein dynamics during presynaptic-complex assembly on individual single-stranded DNA molecules
Gibb, B., Ye, L. F., Kwon, Y., Niu, H., Sung, P., & Greene, E. C. (2014) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2886 · Cited by 89
NAP1 Family Histone Chaperones Are Required for Somatic Homologous Recombination in Arabidopsis
Gao, J., Zhu, Y., Zhou, W., Molinier, J., Dong, A., & Shen, W. (2012) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.112.096792 · Cited by 84
Challenges and Perspectives in Homology-Directed Gene Targeting in Monocot Plants
Vu, T. V., Sung, Y. W., Kim, J., Tran, M. T., Tran, M. T., & Kim, J. (2019) · Rice · doi:10.1186/s12284-019-0355-1 · Cited by 83
Progress and challenges in sorghum biotechnology, a multipurpose feedstock for the bioeconomy
Silva, T. N., Thomas, J. B., Dahlberg, J., Rhee, S. Y., & Mortimer, J. C. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erab450 · Cited by 85
Ubiquitin family modifications and template switching
Branzei, D. (2011) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.053 · Cited by 88
G9a coordinates with the RPA complex to promote DNA damage repair and cell survival
Yang, Q., Zhu, Q., Lu, X., Du, Y., Cao, L., Shen, C., Hou, T., Li, M., Li, Z., Liu, C., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1700694114 · Cited by 85
Evolution of Protein Domain Architectures
Forslund, S. K., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2012) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-585-5_8 · Cited by 83
Histone H3K56 Acetylation, CAF1, and Rtt106 Coordinate Nucleosome Assembly and Stability of Advancing Replication Forks
Clemente‐Ruiz, M., González‐Prieto, R., & Prado, F. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002376 · Cited by 86
Human DNA2 possesses a cryptic DNA unwinding activity that functionally integrates with BLM or WRN helicases
Pinto, C., Kasaciunaite, K., Seidel, R., & Ćejka, P. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.18574 · Cited by 82
DNA-damage-induced degradation of EXO1 exonuclease limits DNA end resection to ensure accurate DNA repair
Tomimatsu, N., Mukherjee, B., Harris, J. L., Boffo, F. L., Hardebeck, M. C., Potts, P. R., Khanna, K. K., & Burma, S. (2017) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m116.772475 · Cited by 85
Enhancing CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair in mammalian cells by expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad52
Shao, S., Ren, C., Liu, Z., Bai, Y., Chen, Z., Wei, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, Z., & Xu, K. (2017) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2017.09.012 · Cited by 80
Alternative Non-Homologous End-Joining: Error-Prone DNA Repair as Cancer’s Achilles’ Heel
Caracciolo, D., Riillo, C., Martino, M. T. D., Tagliaferri, P., & Tassone, P. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13061392 · Cited by 87
Meiotic Crossover Patterning
Pazhayam, N. M., Turcotte, C. A., & Sekelsky, J. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.681123 · Cited by 81
Programmable DNA repair with CRISPRa/i enhanced homology-directed repair efficiency with a single Cas9
Ye, L., Wang, C., Hong, L., Sun, N., Chen, D., Chen, S., & Han, F. (2018) · Cell Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41421-018-0049-7 · Cited by 83
Histone methyltransferase SETD2: a potential tumor suppressor in solid cancers
Chen, R., Zhao, W., Fang, C., Yang, X., & Ji, M. (2020) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.38391 · Cited by 85
Recombination machinery engineering for precise genome editing in methylotrophic yeast Ogataea polymorpha
Gao, J., Gao, N., Zhai, X., & Zhou, Y. J. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102168 · Cited by 79
Heteroduplex DNA Position Defines the Roles of the Sgs1, Srs2, and Mph1 Helicases in Promoting Distinct Recombination Outcomes
Mitchel, K., Lehner, K. R., & Jinks-Robertson, S. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003340 · Cited by 80
Genomic hallmarks of homologous recombination deficiency in invasive breast carcinomas
Manié, É., Popova, T. G., Battistella, A., Tarabeux, J., Caux‐Moncoutier, V., Golmard, L., Smith, N. K., Mueller, C. R., Mariani, O., Sigal‐Zafrani, B., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.29829 · Cited by 80
H3K36 trimethylation-mediated biological functions in cancer
Xiao, C., Fan, T., Tian, H., Zheng, Y., Zhou, Z., Li, S., Li, C., & He, J. (2021) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-021-01187-2 · Cited by 63
RAD51 as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer
Nagathihalli, N. S., & Nagaraju, G. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2011.07.004 · Cited by 79
Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of chromosome fragile sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Song, W., Dominska, M., Greenwell, P., & Petes, T. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.1406847111 · Cited by 88
Poly-ADP ribosylation in DNA damage response and cancer therapy
Hou, W., Chen, S.-H., & Yu, X. (2017) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2017.09.004 · Cited by 82
Genome-Wide High-Resolution Mapping of UV-Induced Mitotic Recombination Events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Yin, Y. A., & Petes, T. D. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003894 · Cited by 76
Synthetic lethality in DNA repair network: A novel avenue in targeted cancer therapy and combination therapeutics
Bhattacharjee, S., & Nandi, S. (2017) · IUBMB Life · doi:10.1002/iub.1696 · Cited by 76
Transcription and Recombination: When RNA Meets DNAPreprint
Aguilera, A., & Gaillard, H. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016543 · Cited by 82
DNA damage, chromatin, and transcription: the trinity of aging
Burgess, R. C., Misteli, T., & Oberdoerffer, P. (2012) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2012.07.005 · Cited by 72
Suppression of Ku70/80 or Lig4 leads to decreased stable transformation and enhanced homologous recombination in rice
Nishizawa‐Yokoi, A., Nonaka, S., Saika, H., Kwon, Y., Osakabe, K., & Toki, S. (2012) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04350.x · Cited by 73
Augmented HR Repair Mediates Acquired Temozolomide Resistance in Glioblastoma
del Alcazar, C. R. G., Todorova, P. K., Habib, A. A., Mukherjee, B., & Burma, S. (2016) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-16-0125 · Cited by 73
The coordination of nuclear envelope assembly and chromosome segregation in metazoans
Liu, S., & Pellman, D. S. (2020) · Nucleus · doi:10.1080/19491034.2020.1742064 · Cited by 68
Gene cassette knock-in in mammalian cells and zygotes by enhanced MMEJ
Aida, T., Nakade, S., Sakuma, T., Izu, Y., Oishi, A., Mochida, K., Ishikubo, H., Usami, T., Aizawa, H., Yamamoto, T., et al. (2016) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3331-9 · Cited by 74
A change of view: homologous recombination at single-molecule resolution
Kaniecki, K., Tullio, L. D., & Greene, E. C. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.92 · Cited by 75
Mating-type Gene Switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Lee, C., & Haber, J. E. (2015) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.mdna3-0013-2014 · Cited by 71
Joint Molecule Resolution Requires the Redundant Activities of MUS-81 and XPF-1 during Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis
O'Neil, N. J., Martin, J., Youds, J. L., Ward, J. D., Petalcorin, M. I. R., Rose, A., & Boulton, S. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003582 · Cited by 80
Srs2 promotes synthesis-dependent strand annealing by disrupting DNA polymerase δ-extending D-loops
Liu, J., Ede, C., Wright, W. D., Gore, S. K., Jenkins, S. S., Freudenthal, B., Washington, M. T., Veaute, X., & Heyer, W. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.22195 · Cited by 80
Self-citation
The Shu complex interacts with Rad51 through the Rad51 paralogues Rad55–Rad57 to mediate error-free recombination
Godin, S. K., Wier, A. D., Kabbinavar, F. F., Bratton-Palmer, D. S., Ghodke, H. B., Houten, B. V., VanDemark, A. P., & Bernstein, K. A. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt138 · Cited by 74
BRCA2 diffuses as oligomeric clusters with RAD51 and changes mobility after DNA damage in live cells
Reuter, M., Zelensky, A. N., Smal, I., Meijering, E. H. W., van Cappellen, W. A., de Gruiter, H. M., van Belle, G. J., van Royen, M. E., Houtsmuller, A. B., Essers, J., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201405014 · Cited by 70
Inhibiting homologous recombination for cancer therapy
Chernikova, S. B., Game, J. C., & Brown, J. M. (2012) · Cancer Biology & Therapy · doi:10.4161/cbt.13.2.18872 · Cited by 71
DNA repair by RNA: Templated, or not templated, that is the question
Meers, C., Keskin, H., & Storici, F. (2016) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.05.002 · Cited by 70

Authors: Heyer, W.-D., Ehmsen, K. T., & Liu, J.
Affiliations: University of California, Davis (US)
ORCID: Heyer, Wolf-Dietrich
Ehmsen, Kirk T.
Liu, Jie
Venue: Annual Review of Genetics
Publisher: Annual Reviews
Published: 2010-12-01
Volume: 44
Issue: 1
Pages: 113-139
ISSN: 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
1545-2948
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955
PMC: PMC4114321
OpenAlex: W2109879947
Cited by: 1,066
References: 177
Citations by year: 2026: 26 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 62
FWCI: 4.67
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Locations: Annual Review of Genetics (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders: Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program
National Institutes of Health
National Cancer Institute (CA92776, R01CA092276, R03CA092776)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM58015, R01GM058015)
Topics: Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords: homologous recombination, recombination regulation, DNA double-strand breaks, meiotic chromosome segregation, DNA repair, DNA damage tolerance, replication fork recovery, genomic instability, cancer susceptibility, genome rearrangement, translocation, recombination intermediates, metastable intermediates, eukaryotic cells
MeSH terms: Animals, DNA Repair, Humans, Recombination, Genetic, Yeasts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Regulation of Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks