The DOI matches its Crossref record; 177 of the 177 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulation of Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes
Open accessAbstract
Homologous recombination (HR) is required for accurate chromosome segregation during the first meiotic division and constitutes a key repair and tolerance pathway for complex DNA damage, including DNA double-strand breaks, interstrand crosslinks, and DNA gaps. In addition, recombination and replication are inextricably linked, as recombination recovers stalled and broken replication forks, enabling the evolution of larger genomes/replicons. Defects in recombination lead to genomic instability and elevated cancer predisposition, demonstrating a clear cellular need for recombination. However, recombination can also lead to genome rearrangements. Unrestrained recombination causes undesired endpoints (translocation, deletion, inversion) and the accumulation of toxic recombination intermediates. Evidently, HR must be carefully regulated to match specific cellular needs. Here, we review the factors and mechanistic stages of recombination that are subject to regulation and suggest that recombination achieves flexibility and robustness by proceeding through metastable, reversible intermediates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“because it is only readily available in dividing cells [110,111]”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [110]
In the citing paper
“Cell cycle phase dominates the choice between NHEJ and HDR, with HDR taking place mainly in S and G2 phases due to the availability of sister chromatids as templates.61”
From CRISPR-Cas9: a new and promising player in gene therapy (2015) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer
Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35077232 · Cited by 3,939
Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Pâques, F., & Haber, J. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999 · Cited by 2,120
Drake, J. W., Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D., & Crow, J. F. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/148.4.1667 · Cited by 1,932
Mechanism of Eukaryotic Homologous Recombination
Filippo, J. S., Sung, P., & Klein, H. L. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.125255 · Cited by 1,766
Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection
Sartori, A. A., Lukas, C., Coates, J., Mistrik, M., Fu, S., Bartek, J., Baer, R., Lukas, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06337 · Cited by 1,362
Mammalian cyclin-dependent kinases
Malumbres, M., & Barbacid, M. (2005) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2005.09.005 · Cited by 1,333
Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice
Shrivastav, M., De Haro, L. P., & Nickoloff, J. A. (2008) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2007.111 · Cited by 1,329
Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle
Branzei, D., & Foiani, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2351 · Cited by 1,228
Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance
Li, X., & Heyer, W. (2008) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2008.1 · Cited by 1,203
Self-citationSgs1 Helicase and Two Nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 Resect DNA Double-Strand Break Ends
Zhu, Z., Chung, W.-H., Shim, E. Y., Lee, S. E., & Ira, G. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.037 · Cited by 1,108
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 999
Site-specific, TALENs-mediated transformation of Bombyx mori
Wang, Y., Tan, A., Xu, J. Q., Li, Z., Zeng, B., Lin, L., You, L., Chen, Y., James, A. A., & Huang, Y. (2014) · Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2014.10.003 · Cited by 34
Slavny, P., Hegde, M., Doerner, A., Parthiban, K., McCafferty, J., Zielonka, S., & Hoet, R. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1469329 · Cited by 33
Taleei, R., Girard, P. M., & Nikjoo, H. (2015) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.01.007 · Cited by 31
Nguyen, H. P., Labella, S., Silva, N., Jantsch, V., & Zetka, M. (2018) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007776 · Cited by 33
Increased antitumor efficacy of PD-1-deficient melanoma-specific human lymphocytes
Marotte, L., Simon, S., Vignard, V., Dupre, E., Gantier, M., Cruard, J., Alberge, J.-B., Hussong, M., Deleine, C., Heslan, J., et al. (2020) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1136/jitc-2019-000311 · Cited by 32
Zhong, H., Ceballos, C. C., Massengill, C. I., Muniak, M. A., Ma, L., Qin, M., Kaech, S., & Mao, T. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.64911 · Cited by 33
Melatonin: A smart molecule in the DNA repair system
Mir, S. M., Aliarab, A., Goodarzi, G., Shirzad, M., Jafari, S. M., Qujeq, D., Tehrani, S. S., & Asadi, J. (2021) · Cell Biochemistry and Function · doi:10.1002/cbf.3672 · Cited by 35
Dietlein, F., & Reinhardt, H. C. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1165 · Cited by 34
Mizutani, K. (2015) · Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1080/09168451.2014.952614 · Cited by 32
Zhou, W., Gao, J., Ma, J., Cao, L., Zhang, C., Zhu, Y., Dong, A., & Shen, W. (2016) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13256 · Cited by 32
de Morais, C. R., Carvalho, S. M., Naves, M. P. C., Araujo, G. R., de Rezende, A. A. A., Bonetti, A. M., & Spanó, M. A. (2017) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.108 · Cited by 33
DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice: the fork in the road
Han, J., & Huang, J. (2019) · Genome Instability & Disease · doi:10.1007/s42764-019-00002-w · Cited by 33
CRISPR and Target-Specific DNA Endonucleases for Efficient DNA Knock-in in Eukaryotic Genomes.
Lee, S. H., Kim, S., & Hur, J. K. (2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.14348/molcells.2018.0408 · Cited by 32
Meyer, F., Becker, S., Classen, S., Parplys, A. C., Mansour, W. Y., Riepen, B., Timm, S., Ruebe, C., Jasin, M., Wikman, H., et al. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9010238 · Cited by 31
Shibata, A., & Jeggo, P. A. (2020) · Journal of Radiation Research · doi:10.1093/jrr/rraa053 · Cited by 34
Non-Recombinogenic Role for Rad52, Rad51 and Rad57 in Translesion Synthesis
Cano-Linares, M. I., Yáñez‐Vilches, A., García‐Rodríguez, N., Barrientos‐Moreno, M., González‐Prieto, R., San-Segundo, P. A., Ulrich, H. D., & Prado, F. (2019) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202050410 · Cited by 31
The Off-Targets of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats Gene Editing
Vicente, M. M., Chaves‐Ferreira, M., Jorge, J. M. P., Proença, J. T., & Barreto, V. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.718466 · Cited by 31
Zinovyev, A. Y., Kuperstein, I., Barillot, E., & Heyer, W. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003016 · Cited by 32
Self-citationRecA-SSB Interaction Modulates RecA Nucleoprotein Filament Formation on SSB-Wrapped DNA
Wu, H., Lu, C., & Li, H. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12213-w · Cited by 32
Carneiro, S. P., Greco, A., Chiesa, E., Genta, I., & Merkel, O. M. (2023) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2023.2185220 · Cited by 33
Tullio, L. D., Kaniecki, K., & Greene, E. C. (2018) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2017.12.004 · Cited by 32
Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice: a new focus on 53BP1
Zhang, F., & Gong, Z. (2021) · Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B · doi:10.1631/jzus.b2000306 · Cited by 32
Prime Editing for Inherited Retinal Diseases
da Costa, B. L., Levi, S. R., Eulau, E., Tsai, Y.-T., & Quinn, P. M. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2021.775330 · Cited by 34
Mechanism and Disease Association With a Ubiquitin Conjugating E2 Enzyme: UBE2L3
Zhang, X., Huo, C., Liu, Y., Su, R., Zhao, Y., & Li, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.793610 · Cited by 35
Genome editing in induced pluripotent stem cells
Cheng, L.-T., Sun, L., & Tada, T. (2012) · Genes to Cells · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2012.01599.x · Cited by 30
Lee, Y., Kim, K., Kang, K., Lee, J.-S., Yang, S. S., & Chung, W. (2014) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2014.07.029 · Cited by 29
Węsierska‐Gądek, J., Zulehner, N., Ferk, F., Składanowski, A., Komina, O., & Maurer‐Granofszky, M. (2012) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2012.07.024 · Cited by 30
MHF1–2/CENP-S-X performs distinct roles in centromere metabolism and genetic recombination
Bhattacharjee, S., Osman, F., Feeney, L., Lorenz, A., Bryer, C., & Whitby, M. C. (2013) · Open Biology · doi:10.1098/rsob.130102 · Cited by 30
RetractedThe Rise of CRISPR/Cas for Genome Editing in Stem Cells
Shui, B., Hernández-Matías, L., Guo, Y., & Peng, Y. (2016) · Stem Cells International · doi:10.1155/2016/8140168 · Cited by 33
Bakr, A., Köcher, S., Volquardsen, J., Petersen, C., Borgmann, K., Dikomey, E., Rothkamm, K., & Mansour, W. Y. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.11023 · Cited by 35
Biochemical attributes of mitotic and meiotic presynaptic complexes
Crickard, J. B., & Greene, E. C. (2018) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.018 · Cited by 35
Characterization of DNA Repair Foci in Root Cells of Arabidopsis in Response to DNA Damage
Hirakawa, T., & Matsunaga, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00990 · Cited by 29
Rad9/53BP1 promotes DNA repair via crossover recombination by limiting the Sgs1 and Mph1 helicases
Ferrari, M., Rawal, C. C., Lodovichi, S., Vietri, M. Y., & Pellicioli, A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16997-w · Cited by 34
DNA double-strand break repair in cancer: A path to achieving precision medicine
Gillyard, T. R., & Davis, J. S. (2021) · International review of cytology · doi:10.1016/bs.ircmb.2021.06.003 · Cited by 32
Origins of cancer: ain’t it just mature cells misbehaving?
Cho, C. J., Brown, J. W., & Mills, J. C. (2024) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/s44318-024-00099-0 · Cited by 31
Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: From mechanisms to treatment strategies
Li, H., Sheng, J.-J., Zheng, S. L., Liu, P.-W., Wu, N., Zeng, W., Li, Y., & Wang, J. (2025) · Genes & Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101801 · Cited by 31
Andersen, S. L., Sloan, R. S., Petes, T. D., & Jinks-Robertson, S. (2015) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005098 · Cited by 29
Estep, K. N., & Brosh, R. M. (2017) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20170044 · Cited by 30
Kar, A., Jones, N. D., Arat, N. Ö., Fishel, R. A., & Griffith, J. D. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.002158 · Cited by 28
The Nup84 complex coordinates the DNA damage response to warrant genome integrity
Gaillard, H., Santos-Pereira, J. M., & Aguilera, A. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz066 · Cited by 30
Xue, C., Molnárová, L., Steinfeld, J. B., Zhao, W., Ma, C., Špı́rek, M., Kaniecki, K., Kwon, Y., Beláň, O., Krejčı́, K., et al. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1184 · Cited by 29
Human DNA polymerase η promotes RNA-templated error-free repair of DNA double-strand breaks
Chakraborty, A., Tapryal, N., Islam, A., Sarker, A. H., Kodavati, M. M., Mitra, J., Hegde, M. L., & Hazra, T. K. (2023) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2023.102991 · Cited by 31
Generation of a mouse model for studying the role of upregulated RTEL1 activity in tumorigenesis
Wu, X., Sandhu, S., Nabi, Z., & Ding, H. (2012) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-011-9586-7 · Cited by 28
Say, A. F., Ledford, L. L., Sharma, D., Singh, A. K., Leung, W., Sehorn, H. A., Tsubouchi, H., Sung, P., & Sehorn, M. G. (2011) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.03.006 · Cited by 29
McKinney, J. S., Sethi, S., Tripp, J. D., Nguyen, T. N., Sanderson, B. A., Westmoreland, J. W., Resnick, M. A., & Lewis, L. K. (2013) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-251 · Cited by 29
Chen, J., Morrical, M. D., Donigan, K. A., Weidhaas, J. B., Sweasy, J. B., Averill, A. M., Tomczak, J. A., & Morrical, S. W. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1337 · Cited by 28
And-1 is required for homologous recombination repair by regulating DNA end resection
Li, Y., Li, Z., Wu, R., Han, Z., & Zhu, W. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1241 · Cited by 29
The differentiated and conserved roles of Swi5‐Sfr1 in homologous recombination
Argunhan, B., Murayama, Y., & Iwasaki, H. (2017) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.12656 · Cited by 28
Genetic interaction between DNA repair factors PAXX, XLF, XRCC4 and DNA‐PKcs in human cells
Xing, M., & Oksenych, V. (2019) · FEBS Open Bio · doi:10.1002/2211-5463.12681 · Cited by 29
DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice - from basic biology to clinical exploitation
Jachimowicz, R. D., Goergens, J., & Reinhardt, H. C. (2019) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2019.1618542 · Cited by 35
Jimeno, S., Prados‐Carvajal, R., & Huertas, P. (2019) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102662 · Cited by 29
Gol, T. M., Rodemann, H. P., & Dittmann, K. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20246316 · Cited by 27
A plant-specific module for homologous recombination repair
Wang, X., Wang, L., Huang, Y., Deng, Z., Li, C., Zhang, J., Zheng, M., & Yan, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2202970119 · Cited by 26
Efficient Knock-in of a Point Mutation in Porcine Fibroblasts Using the CRISPR/Cas9-GMNN Fusion Gene
Gerlach, M., Kraft, T., Brenner, B., Petersen, B., Niemann, H., & Montag, J. (2018) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes9060296 · Cited by 27
Dai, Y., Zhang, F., Wang, L., Shan, S., Gong, Z., & Zhou, Z. (2019) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra119.011464 · Cited by 28
Chauvin, S. D., Ando, S., Holley, J. A., Sugie, A., Zhao, F. R., Poddar, S., Kato, R., Miner, C. A., Nitta, Y., Krishnamurthy, S. R., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49066-7 · Cited by 28
Trenaman, A., Hartley, C. L., Prorocic, M. M., Passos-Silva, D. G., van den Hoek, M., Nechyporuk‐Zloy, V., Machado, C. R., & McCulloch, R. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1192 · Cited by 27
Evolution of CRISPR towards accurate and efficient mammal genome engineering
Ryu, S.-M., Hur, J. W., & Kim, K. (2019) · BMB Reports · doi:10.5483/bmbrep.2019.52.8.149 · Cited by 28
Understanding the DNA double-strand break repair and its therapeutic implications
Ray, U., & Raghavan, S. C. (2021) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103177 · Cited by 27
Role of BRCA2 DNA-binding and C-terminal domain in its mobility and conformation in DNA repair
Paul, M. W., Sidhu, A., Liang, Y., van Rossum-Fikkert, S. E., Odijk, H., Zelensky, A. N., Kanaar, R., & Wyman, C. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.67926 · Cited by 28
DNA Double-Strand Break Repairs and Their Application in Plant DNA Integration
Shen, H., & Li, Z. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes13020322 · Cited by 30
The recombination mediator RAD51D promotes geminiviral infection
Richter, K. S., Serra, H., White, C. I., & Jeske, H. (2016) · Virology · doi:10.1016/j.virol.2016.03.014 · Cited by 27
Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Chang, T., Huang, H., & Yee, J.-K. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1057 · Cited by 26
Sayadi, A., Jeyakani, J., Seet, S. H., Wei, C.-L., Bourque, G., Bard, F., Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G., & Bard-Chapeau, E. A. (2015) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2015.286 · Cited by 26
Lu, C., Liu, X., Liu, C., Wang, J., Li, C., Liu, Q., Li, Y., Li, S., Sun, S. W., Yan, J., et al. (2015) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfv153 · Cited by 26
New routes for transgenesis of the mouse
Belizário, J. E., Akamine, P. S., Wolf, P., Strauss, B. E., & Xavier‐Neto, J. (2012) · Journal of Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s13353-012-0096-y · Cited by 26
Krueger, C., King, M., Krueger, F., Branco, M., Osborne, C. S., Niakan, K. K., Higgins, M., & Reik, W. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038983 · Cited by 26
Tang, J., Wang, N., Wu, J., Ren, P., Li, J., Yang, L., Shi, X., Chen, Y., Fu, S., & Lin, S. (2019) · Investigational New Drugs · doi:10.1007/s10637-019-00740-4 · Cited by 26
RAD51 Is Implicated in DNA Damage, Chemoresistance and Immune Dysregulation in Solid Tumors
Liao, C., Talluri, S., Zhao, J., Mu, S., Kumar, S., Shi, J., Buon, L., Munshi, N. C., & Shammas, M. A. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14225697 · Cited by 31
The recombinase Rad51 plays a key role in events of genetic exchange in Trypanosoma cruzi
Alves, C. L., Repolês, B. M., da Silva, M. S., Mendes, I. C., Marín, P. M., de Aguiar, P. H. N., Santos, S. D. S., Franco, G. R., Macedo, A. M., Pena, S. D. J., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31541-z · Cited by 28
Application of CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing for the Treatment of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1
Marsh, S., Hanson, B., Wood, M. J. A., Varela, M. A., & Roberts, T. C. (2020) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.10.005 · Cited by 29
Gene Editing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Application and Future Perspective
Wang, H., Fang, J., Wang, Y., Li, S., Wang, Z., He, W., Wang, N., Luo, S., Zou, H., & Zhang, F. (2022) · ONCOLOGIE · doi:10.32604/oncologie.2022.021863 · Cited by 25
Matsumoto, D., Matsugi, E., Kishi, K., Inoue, Y., Nigorikawa, K., & Nomura, W. (2024) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102124 · Cited by 28
Kohama, Y., Higo, S., Masumura, Y., Shiba, M., Kondo, T., Ishizu, T., Higo, T., Nakamura, S., Kameda, S., Tabata, T., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72216-y · Cited by 25
Super-resolution visualization of distinct stalled and broken replication fork structures
Whelan, D. R., Lee, W. T. C., Marks, F., Kong, Y. T., Yin, Y., & Rothenberg, E. (2020) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009256 · Cited by 30
Gene Therapy for Neurodegenerative Disease: Clinical Potential and Directions
Zhu, X., Zhang, Y., Yang, X., Hao, C., & Duan, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2021.618171 · Cited by 25
Rahman, F., Mishra, A., Gupta, A., & Sharma, R. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.870108 · Cited by 25
Recent advances in therapeutic CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing: mechanisms and applications
Zhou, L., & Yao, S. (2023) · Molecular Biomedicine · doi:10.1186/s43556-023-00115-5 · Cited by 29
Dong, F., Wang, P., Qian, W., Tang, X. Y., Zhu, X., Wang, Z., Cai, Z., & Wang, J. (2019) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113850 · Cited by 25
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing for Huntington’s Disease
Vachey, G., & Déglon, N. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7825-0_21 · Cited by 24
A Meiotic Checkpoint Alters Repair Partner Bias to Permit Inter-sister Repair of Persistent DSBs
García‐Muse, T., Galindo-Diaz, U., García-Rubio, M. L., Martin, J. S., Polanowska, J., O’Reilly, N., Aguilera, A., & Boulton, S. J. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.074 · Cited by 24
RECQ5: A Mysterious Helicase at the Interface of DNA Replication and Transcription
Andrš, M., Hašanová, Z., Oravetzova, A., Dobrovolná, J., & Janščák, P. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11020232 · Cited by 24
Murmann-Konda, T., Soni, A., Stuschke, M., & Iliakis, G. E. (2021) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503372 · Cited by 24
Genome Editing Strategies to Protect Livestock from Viral Infections
Söllner, J.-H., Mettenleiter, T. C., & Petersen, B. (2021) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v13101996 · Cited by 24
Genome edited B cells: a new frontier in immune cell therapies
Rogers, G. L., & Cannon, P. M. (2021) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.09.019 · Cited by 27
The HsRAD51B–HsRAD51C stabilizes the HsRAD51 nucleoprotein filament
Amunugama, R., Groden, J. L., & Fishel, R. A. (2013) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.05.005 · Cited by 24
The homologous recombination protein RAD51D protects the genome from large deletions
Reh, W. A., Nairn, R. S., Lowery, M. P., & Vásquez, K. M. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1204 · Cited by 26
53BP1 loss elicits cGAS-STING-dependent antitumor immunity in ovarian and pancreatic cancer
Sun, Y., Patterson-Fortin, J., Han, S., Li, Z., Nowicka, Z., Hirohashi, Y., Kilgas, S., Yi, J. K., Spektor, A., Fendler, W. M., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50999-2 · Cited by 25
Signaling of double strand breaks and deprotected telomeres in Arabidopsis
Amiard, S., Gallego, M. E., & White, C. I. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00405 · Cited by 26
Dynamics of RIF1 SUMOylation is regulated by PIAS4 in the maintenance of Genomic Stability
Kumar, R., & Cheok, C. F. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16934-w · Cited by 23
Mladenov, E., Saha, J., & Iliakis, G. E. (2018) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-0593-1_10 · Cited by 23
Therapeutic application of the CRISPR system: current issues and new prospects
Lee, M., & Kim, S. (2019) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-019-02028-2 · Cited by 23
Soni, A., Murmann-Konda, T., Siemann, M., Pantelias, G. E., & Iliakis, G. E. (2020) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102828 · Cited by 23
Cabello-Lobato, M. J., González‐Garrido, C., Cano-Linares, M. I., Wong, R. P. C., Yáñez‐Vilches, A., Morillo‐Huesca, M., Roldán‐Romero, J. M., Vicioso‐Mantis, M., González‐Prieto, R., Ulrich, H. D., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109440 · Cited by 25
From DNA break repair pathways to CRISPR/Cas-mediated gene knock-in methods
Bazaz, M. R., & Dehghani, H. (2022) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120409 · Cited by 23
Mechanistic Links Between ATM and Histone Methylation Codes During DNA Repair
Xu, Y., Xu, C., & Price, B. D. (2012) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-387665-2.00010-9 · Cited by 23
Development of a Reporter System to Explore MMEJ in the Context of Replacing Large Genomic Fragments
Yanik, M., Ponnam, S. P. G., Wimmer, T., Trimborn, L., Müller, C., Gambert, I., Ginsberg, J., Janise, A., Domicke, J., Wende, W., et al. (2018) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2018.03.010 · Cited by 23
Harnessing CRISPR/Cas9 technology in cardiovascular disease
Rezaei, H., Khadempar, S., Farahani, N., Hosseingholi, E. Z., Hayat, S. M. G., Sathyapalan, T., & Sahebkar, A. H. (2019) · Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2019.03.005 · Cited by 24
Yu, E. Y., Kojić, M., Holloman, W. K., & Lue, N. F. (2013) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.04.027 · Cited by 23
Dunlop, M. H., Dray, E. V., Zhao, W., Tsai, M.-S., Wiese, C., Schild, D., & Sung, P. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.290015 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Heyer, W.-D., Ehmsen, K. T., & Liu, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2010-12-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-139
- ISSN
- 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2948
- PMC
- PMC4114321
- OpenAlex
- W2109879947
- Cited by
- 1,066
- References
- 177
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 62
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annual Review of Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (CA92776, R01CA092276, R03CA092776)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM58015, R01GM058015)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- homologous recombination, recombination regulation, DNA double-strand breaks, meiotic chromosome segregation, DNA repair, DNA damage tolerance, replication fork recovery, genomic instability, cancer susceptibility, genome rearrangement, translocation, recombination intermediates, metastable intermediates, eukaryotic cells
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA Repair, Humans, Recombination, Genetic, Yeasts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review