Cited by 731Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

A Developmental Shift from Positive to Negative Connectivity in Human Amygdala–Prefrontal Circuitry

Open access
Gee, Dylan G., Humphreys, Kathryn L., Flannery, Jessica, Goff, Bonnie, Telzer, Eva H., Shapiro, Mor, Hare, Todd A., Bookheimer, Susan Y. +1 more·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Recent human imaging and animal studies highlight the importance of frontoamygdala circuitry in the regulation of emotional behavior and its disruption in anxiety-related disorders. Although tracing studies have suggested changes in amygdala–cortical connectivity through the adolescent period in rodents, less is known about the reciprocal connections within this circuitry across human development, when these circuits are being fine-tuned and substantial changes in emotional control are observed. The present study examined developmental changes in amygdala–prefrontal circuitry across the ages of 4–22 years using task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging. Results suggest positive amygdala–prefrontal connectivity in early childhood that switches to negative functional connectivity during the transition to adolescence. Amygdala–medial prefrontal cortex functional connectivity was significantly positive (greater than zero) among participants younger than 10 years, whereas functional connectivity was significantly negative (less than zero) among participants 10 years and older, over and above the effect of amygdala reactivity. The developmental switch in functional connectivity was paralleled by a steady decline in amygdala reactivity. Moreover, the valence switch might explain age-related improvement in task performance and a developmentally normative decline in anxiety. Initial positive connectivity followed by a valence shift to negative connectivity provides a neurobiological basis for regulatory development and may present novel insight into a more general process of developing regulatory connections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3446-12.2013

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In TD youth, amygdala reactivity to negative faces and images decreases with age, accompanied by greater structural and functional connectivity between amygdala and mPFC/rACC.

    “amygdala reactivity to negative faces and images decreases with age [21,33–36], and is accompanied by greater structural and functional connectivity between the amygdala and mPFC/rACC [25,33,34,36].”

    From Trauma, PTSD, and the Developing Brain (2017) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Results sections report that amygdala reactivity to fearful faces decreased with age and that amygdala–mPFC functional connectivity shifted from positive to more negative across development. The Discussion says the reactivity and connectivity changes were independent. The paper does not establish the broader claim about negative images, greater structural connectivity, or rACC connectivity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Amygdala-mPFC connectivity partly mediates age-related decreases in normative anxiety.

    “amygdala-mPFC connectivity appears to partly mediate age-related decreases in normative anxiety [33].”

    From Trauma, PTSD, and the Developing Brain (2017) · cites this paper as [33]

  • This change in connectivity is associated with reduced subcortical activity in response to emotional cues.

    “This shift in connectivity has been associated with decreasing subcortical activity to emotional cues (e.g., [35,41])”

    From Development of the emotional brain (2019) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Human imaging shows that functional coupling between prefrontal and limbic subcortical regions such as the amygdala changes from positive to negative between childhood and adulthood.

    “Human imaging studies show that functional coupling between prefrontal and limbic subcortical regions (e.g., amygdala) shifts from positive to negative from childhood to adulthood [35].”

    From Development of the emotional brain (2019) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Compared with subcortical changes, activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex and its connectivity change more slowly with age.

    “In contrast to subcortical changes, activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex and its connectivity, show more protracted changes with age [18,35].”

    From Development of the emotional brain (2019) · cites this paper as [35]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Amaral DG Price JL Pitkanen A Carmichael ST 1992 Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex The amygala: neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction New York, NY Wiley-Liss, Inc

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gee, D. G., Humphreys, K. L., Flannery, J., Goff, B., Telzer, E. H., Shapiro, M., Hare, T. A., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Tottenham, N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-03-06
Volume
33
Issue
10
Pages
4584-4593
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2003598308
Cited by
731
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 19
FWCI
27.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (BRAINS R01, R01MH091864)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, functional connectivity, developmental changes, adolescence, childhood, amygdala reactivity, emotion regulation, anxiety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Amygdala, Anxiety, Brain Mapping, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Emotions, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Regression Analysis, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review