Cited by 114Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Neural representation of expected value in the adolescent brain

Open access
Barkley-Levenson, Emily, Galván, Adriana·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: The brain undergoes significant maturation during adolescence that influences reward sensitivity and risk-taking behavior. However, it is unknown if the adolescent brain truly values rewards in a way that is unique from the mature brain or if confounding factors contribute to this developmental difference. Here we show that adolescents place greater value on rewards than do adults through exaggerated activation of the ventral striatum and that this valuation increases gambling behavior. This developmental effect remains even when controlling for income and task performance. We also find that heightened reward sensitivity leads to more advantageous risk-taking in adolescents versus adults. These data provide behavioral and neural evidence for ontogenetic differences in how value computation is used to bias reward-related behavior during adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1319762111

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies using a task design in which the reward cue signals not only the opportunity for reward, but also an increased likelihood of earning that reward, tend to find increased adolescent activity in the striatum during anticipation.

    “Studies using a task design in which the reward cue signals not only the opportunity for reward, but also an increased likelihood of earning that reward, tend to find increased adolescent activity in the striatum during anticipation (e.g., Barkley-Levenson and Galvan, 2014, Van Leijenhorst et al., 2010b).”

    From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Barkley-Levenson and Galvan, 2014

    The paper reports greater adolescent ventral-striatal activation as the expected value of a presented gamble increased (p. 2). But Materials and Methods (p. 6) say the mixed gambles had a fixed 50% chance of gaining and 50% chance of losing; the task varied monetary amounts, not the likelihood of earning a reward. It therefore supports the neural-activity finding, but not the cited description of the task design. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Despite occasional inconsistencies in the literature, self-reported sensation seeking, behavioral measures of reward sensitivity, and neuroimaging studies of reward processing support the contention that reward sensitivity reaches its apex during adolescence.

    “In summary, despite occasional inconsistencies in the literature, self-reported sensation seeking, behavioral measures of reward sensitivity, and neuroimaging studies of reward processing support the contention that reward sensitivity reaches its apex during adolescence (e.g., Barkley-Levenson and Galvan, 2014, Christakou et al., 2011, Collado et al., 2014, Galvan and McGlennen, 2013, MacPherson”

    From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Barkley-Levenson and Galvan, 2014

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The handful of studies that include a behavioral measure or control for behavioral differences in reward sensitivity across development all report both greater recruitment of the striatum during anticipation of reward and higher reward sensitivity among adolescents compared to adults, reflected in the behavioral outcomes.

    “While most reward processing tasks used in neuroimaging studies do not include a behavioral measure or control for behavioral differences in reward sensitivity across development, the handful of studies that do (Barkley-Levenson and Galvan, 2014, Christakou et al., 2011, Geier et al., 2010, Padmanabhan et al., 2011, Somerville et al., 2011) all report both greater recruitment of the striatum”

    From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Barkley-Levenson and Galvan, 2014

  • Early development of the valuation system is indicated by increases in striatal dopamine levels, dopamine receptor availability, and BOLD activity to rewarding stimuli in early adolescence.

    “Indications of the early development of the valuation system include increases in striatal dopamine levels, dopamine receptor availability, and blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) activity related to rewarding stimuli in early adolescence (34, 35)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barkley-Levenson, E., & Galván, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563; and
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-01-13
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
1646-1651
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2081265660
Cited by
114
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
expected value, adolescent brain, ventral striatum, decision-making, subjective value
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Age Factors, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review