Cited by 634Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorChild and Animal Learning Development

Developmental neurobiology of cognitive control and motivational systems.

Open access
Somerville, Leah H, Casey, BJ·2010·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

One form of cognitive control is the ability to resist temptation in favor of long-term goal-oriented behavior. Historically, the development of cognitive control capacity has been described by a linear function from infancy to adulthood. However, the context in which control is required impacts behavioral regulation abilities, such that emotionally charged or rewarding contexts can diminish control. More recently, studies have begun to examine the development of cognitive control in contexts that vary in motivation. These studies suggest specific windows of development in which cognitive control capacity is more vulnerable to incentive-based modulation. In this review we highlight the most recent work on neurobiological changes supporting motivational and cognitive development, underscoring the importance of functional organization and development of the underlying circuitry implicated in these processes, and provide a theoretical perspective that moves away from discussing singular functional regions toward considering functional circuitry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2010.01.006

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Somerville, L. H., & Casey, B.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Somerville, Leah H
  • Casey, BJ
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
236-241
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966241122
Cited by
634
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 30
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH62196, P50MH062196)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA018879, R01DA018879, DA007274, T32DA007274)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
cognitive control, developmental neuroscience, motivation, delay discounting, behavioral regulation, emotional context, reward context, goal-directed behavior, cognitive development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Aging, Animals, Brain, Child, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Motivation, Neural Pathways, Reward, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review