Cited by 813Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthTryptophan and brain disorders

The gut-brain axis

Open access
Mayer, Emeran A., Nance, Karina, Chen, Shelley·2022·Annual Review of Medicine

Abstract

Preclinical evidence has firmly established bidirectional interactions among the brain, the gut, and the gut microbiome. Candidate signaling molecules and at least three communication channels have been identified. Communication within this system is nonlinear, is bidirectional with multiple feedback loops, and likely involves interactions between different channels. Alterations in gut–brain–microbiome interactions have been identified in rodent models of several digestive, psychiatric, and neurological disorders. While alterations in gut–brain interactions have clearly been established in irritable bowel syndrome, a causative role of the microbiome in irritable bowel syndrome remains to be determined. In the absence of specific microbial targets for more effective therapies, current approaches are limited to dietary interventions and centrally targeted pharmacological and behavioral approaches. A more comprehensive understanding of causative influences within the gut–brain–microbiome system and well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to translate these exciting preclinical findings into effective therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-med-042320-014032

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dapeng Li, Gregory D. Sempowski, Kevin O. Saunders, Priyamvada Acharya, and Barton F. Haynes p p p p p p p p p p p p p p
  2. Kevin and Gregory A. Schmidt p p p p p p81 COVID-19 : A Data-Driven Review

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayer, E. A., Nance, K., & Chen, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Mayer, Emeran A.
Venue
Annual Review of Medicine
Published
2022-01-27
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
439-453
ISSN
  • 0066-4219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-326X
OpenAlex
W3205708972
Cited by
813
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 191 · 2025: 248 · 2024: 241 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 27
FWCI
17.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK048351, P30DK041301)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
gut-brain axis, gut microbiota, two-way communication, signaling molecules, irritable bowel syndrome, mental illness, neurological disorders, dietary intervention, microbiome-targeted therapy, rodent models
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Brain-Gut Axis, Brain, Humans, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review