The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 148 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation
Open accessAbstract
Social isolation has been recognized as a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in humans for more than a quarter of a century. Although the focus of research has been on objective social roles and health behavior, the brain is the key organ for forming, monitoring, maintaining, repairing, and replacing salutary connections with others. Accordingly, population-based longitudinal research indicates that perceived social isolation (loneliness) is a risk factor for morbidity and mortality independent of objective social isolation and health behavior. Human and animal investigations of neuroendocrine stress mechanisms that may be involved suggest that (a) chronic social isolation increases the activation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenocortical axis, and (b) these effects are more dependent on the disruption of a social bond between a significant pair than objective isolation per se. The relational factors and neuroendocrine, neurobiological, and genetic mechanisms that may contribute to the association between perceived isolation and mortality are reviewed.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that perceived social isolation (loneliness), more than objective isolation, is linked to morbidity and mortality through neuroendocrine stress mechanisms, especially increased HPA-axis activity. It synthesizes human and animal evidence indicating that chronic isolation from a meaningful social bond elevates glucocorticoids and may promote glucocorticoid resistance and inflammation, whereas SAM catecholamine findings are less consistent.
Key findings
- Human studies generally link loneliness to higher HPA activity: chronic loneliness was positively correlated with salivary cortisol, and loneliness predicted a larger cortisol awakening response the following day independent of demographic factors, nervousness, or perceived stress, whereas the cortisol awakening response did not predict later loneliness; this was replicated in high school students. The paper notes the cortisol awakening response typically increases 50% to 60% in the first 30 to 45 minutes after awakening.
- Loneliness has been associated with glucocorticoid resistance and proinflammatory gene expression: in a nationally representative sample of adults ages 54 and older from Taiwan, loneliness was associated with smaller neutrophil:lymphocyte and neutrophil:monocyte ratios, consistent with leukocyte glucocorticoid resistance; genome-wide microarray analyses showed reduced expression of glucocorticoid receptor–response genes, upregulated proinflammatory transcripts, and downregulated anti-inflammatory markers in middle- and older-age lonely adults.
- Animal experiments suggest chronic social isolation increases HPA activity more when it disrupts a significant pair bond than from isolation per se: titi monkeys isolated from a pair mate showed a significant increase in plasma cortisol, whereas polygynous squirrel monkeys did not; prairie voles chronically isolated from a pair-bonded partner showed increased corticosterone, but those isolated from a same-sex sibling did not.
- Across human and animal work, chronic social isolation is associated with relatively consistent increases in HPA-axis activity but little alteration in SAM catecholamine activity, and effects appear more dependent on disruption of a social bond between a significant pair than on objective isolation alone.
Methods
- Narrative review of human and animal literature on the SAM and HPA neuroendocrine stress axes and social isolation/loneliness, focusing on adult mammals and adults.
- Human evidence includes population-based longitudinal, cross-sectional, experience-sampling, fMRI, eye-tracking, immune, and gene-expression studies; animal evidence includes experimental assignment to normal versus socially isolated housing, acute and chronic isolation, and pair-bond disruption.
- Main analysis is qualitative synthesis; no new data or formal meta-analysis are reported.
Limitations
- Stated: the causal role of loneliness on neural and neuroendocrine mechanisms is difficult to test conclusively in humans; animal studies often use small sample sizes due to cost and animal-welfare concerns, reducing statistical power and producing inconsistent results; SAM findings are less numerous and consistent and may reflect perceived stress rather than perceived isolation per se; the oxytocinergic system is beyond the article’s scope.
- Evident: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search, quality appraisal, or meta-analysis; heterogeneity in species, sex, isolation duration, relationship type, assayed tissue, measurement timing, and HPA parameters limits comparability across studies.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
90 Not checked yet · 36 Own interpretation · 5 No basis given · 1 Own method
In the paper
“Functional magnetic resonance imaging research also indicates that loneliness is associated with greater activation of the visual cortex in response to negative social images in contrast to negative nonsocial images (Cacioppo et al. 2009)”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > SOCIAL ISOLATION: A SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE PERSPECTIVE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo et al. 2009
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“population-based longitudinal research indicates that perceived social isolation (loneliness) is a risk factor for morbidity and mortality independent of objective social isolation and health behavior.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Luo et al. 2012
- Not checked yetcites Luo & Waite 2014
- Not checked yetcites Hawkley et al. 2009
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“whether measured in a hospital laboratory (Cacioppo et al. 2002b) or over the course of a normal day using ambulatory procedures (Hawkley et al. 2003), loneliness is associated with elevated tonic vascular resistance—a marker of threat surveillance (Mendes et al. 2002).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > SOCIAL ISOLATION: A SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE PERSPECTIVE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo et al. 2002b
- Not checked yetcites Hawkley et al. 2003
- Not checked yetcites Mendes et al. 2002
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“growing evidence indicates that loneliness increases attention to negative social stimuli (e.g., social threats, rejection, exclusion).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > SOCIAL ISOLATION: A SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE PERSPECTIVE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo & Hawkley 2009
- Not checked yetcites Jones et al. 1981
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo et al. 2006
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Accordingly, the association between indices of perceived and objective social isolation is mediated by the perceived quality of social relationships”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > SOCIAL ISOLATION: A SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE PERSPECTIVE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The effects of loneliness on attention to potential social threats appear to be largely implicit.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > SOCIAL ISOLATION: A SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE PERSPECTIVE
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Human and animal investigations of neuroendocrine stress mechanisms that may be involved suggest that (a) chronic social isolation increases the activation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenocortical axis”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Social isolation has been recognized as a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in humans for more than a quarter of a century.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“Chronic social isolation has long been recognized as a risk factor for broad-based morbidity and mortality.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites House et al. 1988
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these effects are more dependent on the disruption of a social bond between a significant pair than objective isolation per se.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These behavioral results suggest a more general principle, specifically, that perceived social isolation activates neural, neuroendocrine, and behavioral responses that promote short-term self-preservation.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > SOCIAL ISOLATION: A SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE PERSPECTIVE
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: In many contexts across human history, a chief threat to a person’s reproductive success and survival has come from other humans.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 49
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
In the paper
“the brain is the key organ for forming, monitoring, maintaining, repairing, and replacing salutary connections with others”
- Also stated in: § SOCIAL ISOLATION: A SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE PERSPECTIVE · plain
“the brain is the key organ for forming, monitoring, maintaining, repairing, and replacing salutary connections with others as well as regulating physiological processes relevant to morbidity and mortality (Cacioppo & Berntson 1992).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo & Berntson 1992
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § SOCIAL ISOLATION: A SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE PERSPECTIVE · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The HPA axis is sensitive to the interpretation by the brain of threats and stressors, and it influences a wide range of physiological, behavioral, and health outcomes (e.g., Charmandari et al. 2005, Hostinar et al. 2014, McEwen & Gianaros 2011, Sapolsky et al. 2000).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > THE NEUROENDOCRINE STRESS AXES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Charmandari et al. 2005
- Not checked yetcites Hostinar et al. 2014
- Not checked yetcites McEwen & Gianaros 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The prefrontal cortex modulates attention, working memory, conflicting inputs, and emotion regulation as well as integrates information from plans (e.g., goals) and prior knowledge, information from peripheral afferents, and information from the environment—including the social environment—to coordinate neural, hormonal, and behavioral responses (Hostinar et al. 2014, McEwen & Gianaros 2011).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > THE NEUROENDOCRINE STRESS AXES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hostinar et al. 2014
- Not checked yetcites McEwen & Gianaros 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Using a similar methodology at four points in time across the day, Pressman et al. (2005) similarly found loneliness to be related to salivary cortisol levels, although this association reached statistical significance only for salivary cortisol levels measured an hour after awakening and at night.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pressman et al. 2005
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The amygdala appears to be especially important for rapid-onset, short-duration behaviors that occur in response to specific threats, whereas the BNST appears to mediate slower-onset, longer-lasting responses that frequently accompany sustained threats (or the surveillance for threats) and that may persist even after threat termination (Walker et al. 2003).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > THE NEUROENDOCRINE STRESS AXES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Walker et al. 2003
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subsequent investigations suggest that loneliness is typically associated with higher levels of HPA activation, although the strength of the association may vary depending on the chronicity of loneliness, the specific tissue assayed, the parameter used to gauge HPA activity, the time of day of the measurements, and the reliability (e.g., number) of the measurements.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“trait loneliness was associated with a flattening of the diurnal cortisol rhythm”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Doane & Adam 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Genome-wide microarray analyses revealed a reduction in the expression of genes bearing glucocorticoid receptor response elements, an upregulation of proinflammatory gene transcripts”
- Also stated in: § NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS) · plain
“in middle- and older-age adults who are high in loneliness compared with those low in loneliness (Cole et al. 2007, 2011).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cole et al. 2007
- Not checked yetcites Cole et al. 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS) · plain
In the paper
“Results indicated that loneliness was positively correlated with salivary cortisol levels, but this association reached statistical significance only for chronic loneliness.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo et al. 2000
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some data also suggest an association between perceived social isolation and increased circulating levels of catecholamines, although the SAM findings are less numerous and consistent (e.g., Edwards et al. 2010, Hawkley et al. 2006) and may be attributable at least in part to differences in perceived stress rather than perceived isolation per se (Hawkley et al. 2006).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Edwards et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Hawkley et al. 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Several studies now suggest that social threat in general, and loneliness in particular, is associated with glucocorticoid resistance and a complementary increase in proinflammatory gene expression that may contribute to some of the adverse health outcomes associated with perceived social isolation.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > THE NEUROENDOCRINE STRESS AXES
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Glucocorticoids (e.g., cortisol) influence a wide range of physiological functions that include glucose regulation, metabolism, inflammatory control, cardiovascular activity (e.g., endothelial function, atherosclerosis), cellular and humoral immunity, reproductive processes, and neurodegeneration and apoptosis.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Borski 2000
- Not checked yetcites Chrousos 2009
- Not checked yetcites Hawkley et al. 2012
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“most are mediated by slower-acting genomic effects, where up to 20% of the expressed genome in a tissue is susceptible to the direct and indirect influences of glucocorticoids, estrogens, and androgens (Chrousos 2009, Hawkley et al. 2012).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chrousos 2009
- Not checked yetcites Hawkley et al. 2012
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Analyses indicated that inpatients in the high lonely group had significantly higher levels of urinary cortisol than inpatients in the low lonely group, whereas the inpatients grouped in terms of high or low levels of recent stressful life events did not differ in urinary cortisol levels.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kiecolt-Glaser et al. 1984b
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“animal models of social disruption suggest that social factors can lead to glucocorticoid resistance in which the glucocorticoid receptor becomes less efficient in transducing endogenous glucocorticoid signals (e.g., Cole et al. 2009, Hanke et al. 2012, Pace et al. 2007, Powell et al. 2013), thereby increasing an inflammatory biology that can contribute to the development of diseases ranging from”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cole et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Hanke et al. 2012
- Not checked yetcites Pace et al. 2007
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Experimentally imposed social isolation thus can have different effects in various animal models; this may be due to species- and sex-related differences in the natural social conditions of the animal populations studied and resulting differences in the contrast condition created by experimental social isolation”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“chronic social isolation from same-sex peers in rats elevates nuclear glucocorticoid protein in prefrontal cortex (Djordjevic et al. 2010), downregulates glucocorticoid receptor expression in the prefrontal cortex (Djordjevic et al. 2010), and decreases cytosolic glucocorticoid receptors in the hippocampus (Dronjak et al. 2004).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Djordjevic et al. 2010 source
- Not checked yetcites Dronjak et al. 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Studies in monogamous prairie voles, for instance, show that a single acute (e.g., one hour) or repeated acute (e.g., one hour per day for four weeks) social isolation from a group or from a same-sex sibling increases corticosterone levels (e.g., Pournajafi-Nazarloo & Partoo 2011).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pournajafi-Nazarloo & Partoo 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Following one hour of social isolation from their pair mates, the normally monogamous titi monkeys (for whom partner preference is high) showed a significant increase in plasma cortisol, whereas the normally polygynous squirrel monkeys (for whom partner preference is relatively low) did not (Mendoza & Mason 1986a).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mendoza & Mason 1986a
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In contrast, the HPA axis in the squirrel monkeys is unresponsive to isolation from polygamous partners or adult peers (Hennessy 1986, Mendoza et al. 1992), but the separation of squirrel monkey mothers from their infant produces significant increases in plasma cortisol levels in both the mother and the infant (Coe et al. 1978, Mendoza et al. 1978, Vogt & Levine 1980).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hennessy 1986
- Not checked yetcites Mendoza et al. 1992 source
- Not checked yetcites Coe et al. 1978
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The isolated males showed elevated plasma cortisol levels but similar levels of epinephrine and testosterone (and lower levels of norepinephrine) compared to pair-housed males.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Castro & Matt 1997
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies in rats similarly suggest that chronic social isolation increases corticosterone levels when experimental animals are socially isolated from a group of same-sex rats (Djordjevic et al. 2010; Dronjak et al. 2004; Garrido et al. 2012; Zlatković & Filipović 2012, 2013), but inconsistencies have also been observed (cf. Pournajafi-Nazarloo & Partoo 2011).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Djordjevic et al. 2010 source
- Not checked yetcites Dronjak et al. 2004
- Not checked yetcites Garrido et al. 2012
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The titi monkeys show elevated HPA activity when isolated from their monogamous partner, but they do not show HPA activation when separated from their infant (Mendoza & Mason 1986b).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mendoza & Mason 1986b
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As Button et al. (2013) detail, a small sample size reduces the likelihood of detecting a true effect (due to low statistical power), increases the likelihood that the effect size of a true effect is overestimated”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Button et al. 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the nature of the relationship that is disrupted by isolating an animal and the duration of isolation are important influences on the neuroendocrine response to social isolation.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A major advantage of using animal models is the ability to experimentally manipulate social isolation from conspecifics, controlling for other aspects of the environment (e.g., amount of space available, complexity of the environment, thermoregulation), to investigate its effects on the SAM and HPA axes.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Chronic social isolation increased basal levels of ACTH and corticosterone, whereas no effect of social isolation (or social crowding) was found for basal catecholamine levels.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dronjak et al. 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“studies in monogamous prairie voles show that animals that are chronically isolated from their pair-bonded partner show increased corticosterone levels (e.g., Bosch et al. 2009, McNeal et al. 2014) and higher corticosterone levels after a resident-intruder test (Grippo et al. 2007a), whereas prairie voles that are chronically isolated from a conspecific for whom partner preference is low (e.g.,”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bosch et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites McNeal et al. 2014
- Not checked yetcites Grippo et al. 2007a
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study of neuroendocrine responses to acute isolation in adult female dairy goats also documented increased norepinephrine levels but no change in epinephrine or cortisol levels (Carbonaro et al. 1992).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carbonaro et al. 1992
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Studies in Wistar rats provide information about the temporal dynamics of the effect of repeated acute social isolation on levels of corticosterone: Levels peak at the 5- and 15-minute intervals, then plateau through the 30-minute interval, and finally return to baseline after 90 minutes of social isolation (Ferland & Schrader 2011).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL STUDIES OF NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ferland & Schrader 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is not an animal literature on loneliness per se, but there is a large literature in which social animals are randomly assigned either to normal social living conditions or to socially isolated living conditions.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > NEUROENDOCRINE ACTIVITY AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL ISOLATION (LONELINESS)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a functional magnetic resonance imaging study found that perceived isolation was associated with (a) stronger activity in the visual cortex in response to unpleasant social relative to unpleasant nonsocial visual stimuli and (b) weaker activity in the ventral striatal area in response to pleasant social compared to pleasant nonsocial visual stimuli (Cacioppo et al. 2009).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo et al. 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Once reintroduced into social settings, isolated male rodents often display a greater propensity for dominant/aggressive behavior (Blanchard et al. 2001), which has parallels in the increased negativity/hostility profile observed in lonely individuals but possibly less so in the socially withdrawn/anxious/depressed profile observed in lonely humans (Cacioppo et al. 2006).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL AND HUMAN STUDIES IN RETROSPECT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Blanchard et al. 2001
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo et al. 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The animal research, for instance, suggests that chronic social isolation between meaningful pairs not only elevates basal levels of glucocorticoids (see Table 1) but also tends to enhance the neuroendocrine response to an acute stressor (i.e., stress reactivity)—an effect not typically observed in the human literature.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL AND HUMAN STUDIES IN RETROSPECT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Table 1
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the presence of others did not differentially affect the ratings of the severity of stressors for individuals who did and did not feel socially isolated; instead, social interactions, which themselves are a potential uplift and a source of pleasure for most individuals, were experienced less positively by individuals who felt socially isolated.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hawkley et al. 2003
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“CRH is produced not only by neurons in the medial parvocellular region of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus but also by cells in the lateral central amygdala that release CRH into the lateral BNST (Walker & Davis 2008).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Walker & Davis 2008
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This pattern is similar to the immunologic effects observed in lonely humans (Cole et al. 2007, 2011), but it is not observed in rodents subject to objective social isolation.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL AND HUMAN STUDIES IN RETROSPECT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cole et al. 2007
- Not checked yetcites Cole et al. 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies in rhesus macaques have shown that unstable social conditions (experimentally preventing the development of a stable social hierarchy) confer risk for greater mortality due to viral infection (Capitanio et al. 1998, Capitanio & Lerche 1998) and induce both socially anxious behavior and immunoregulatory alterations that resemble those observed in lonely humans (Sloan et al. 2007).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL AND HUMAN STUDIES IN RETROSPECT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Capitanio et al. 1998
- Not checked yetcites Capitanio & Lerche 1998
- Not checked yetcites Sloan et al. 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Analyses revealed two main effects—higher vascular resistance in lonely than nonlonely participants and higher vascular resistance during the stressors than during the baseline—whereas the interaction did not approach significance (Cacioppo et al. 2002b).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo et al. 2002b
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is now a sizable literature in humans and animals for social buffering, including an attenuation of the sympathetic and HPA response to a stressor (Cacioppo et al. 1998, Hostinar et al. 2014).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo et al. 1998
- Not checked yetcites Hostinar et al. 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These differences raise the possibility that the BNST plays a key role in the effects of perceived social isolation from a significant conspecific on basal HPA functioning.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The distinction between the effects of the amygdala versus the BNST on HPA activity may also be relevant to understanding how social isolation affects neuroendocrine activity and mortality in contemporary society.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“perceived social isolation has typically been associated with changes in tonic functioning such as basal differences in sympathetic vascular tonus (as gauged by vascular resistance), cortisol awakening responses, elevated evening cortisol levels, circulating glucocorticoid levels, and decreased glucocorticoid receptor sensitivity (e.g., Cacioppo et al. 2003, Hawkley et al. 2012).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo et al. 2003
- Not checked yetcites Hawkley et al. 2012
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These behavioral findings suggest that perceived social isolation may both increase surveillance for social threats and decrease the rewards that one derives from interpersonal relationships.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In an experience sampling study, undergraduate students were just as likely to interact with other people whether or not they felt socially isolated. For those who felt isolated, the interactions were rated as being of poorer quality and as providing less support and comfort (Hawkley et al. 2003).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hawkley et al. 2003
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The animal model for repeated social threat activates neuroendocrine responses in both the HPA and SAM axes, and it also induces proinflammatory/glucocorticoid-resistant immune dynamics (Hanke et al. 2012, Powell et al. 2013) analogous to those observed in lonely humans (Cole 2008; Cole et al. 2007, 2011).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL AND HUMAN STUDIES IN RETROSPECT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hanke et al. 2012
- Not checked yetcites Powell et al. 2013
- Not checked yetcites Cole 2008
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The HPA axis is also under the influence of oxytocin and vasopressin, and these hormones exert opposite effects on the HPA axis, with oxytocin decreasing and vasopressin increasing HPA axis activity (De Boer et al. 2012).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites De Boer et al. 2012
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a similar study, Steptoe et al. (2004) reported the interaction to be significant, but it held only for women and only for diastolic blood pressure, not systolic blood pressure or heart rate.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Steptoe et al. 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the acute stressors used commonly in human studies are relatively mild (e.g., public speaking, serial subtraction) models of the stressors encountered in modern societies. In contrast, the acute stressors used in animal studies are relatively severe (e.g., two hours of immobilization simulating the collapse of a burrow, two hours in a 4°C chamber).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL AND HUMAN STUDIES IN RETROSPECT
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The amygdala is especially important for rapid-onset, short-duration behaviors that occur in response to specific threats, whereas the BNST appears to mediate slower-onset, longer-lasting responses that frequently accompany sustained threats and that may persist even after threat termination (Walker & Davis 2008).”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > PUTATIVE UNDERLYING NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Walker & Davis 2008
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“social isolation of male adult rodents is generally associated with a substantial reduction in physical activity (and attending decreases in activity-related SNS activity) and a notable decrease in fighting and other overtly aggressive behavior.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL AND HUMAN STUDIES IN RETROSPECT
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Experimentally imposed social instability also induces SNS innervation of the lymph node tissues in which immune cells coordinate responses to tissue injury and infection (Sloan et al. 2007, 2008) even though social instability does not appear to alter circulating SAM catecholamine levels.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL AND HUMAN STUDIES IN RETROSPECT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sloan et al. 2007
- Not checked yetcites Sloan et al. 2008
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such observations suggest that nonhuman primate models may provide an ethologically valid context for analyzing the effects of perceived social isolation and may play an important role in identifying the most appropriate small rodent models for mechanistic investigations.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > ANIMAL AND HUMAN STUDIES IN RETROSPECT
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date it is clear that a full understanding of the core psychological and biological features of human loneliness requires a consideration of the brain’s interpretation of the social environment.”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > CONCLUDING REMARKS
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The brain is the key organ of social connections and processes.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(a) chronic social isolation is associated with relatively consistent increases in HPA axis activity but little alteration in SAM catecholamine activity”
§ The Neuroendocrinology of Social Isolation > CONCLUDING REMARKS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
In many contexts across human history, a chief threat to a person’s reproductive success and survival has come from other humans.
“In many contexts across human history, a chief threat to a person’s reproductive success and survival has come from other humans.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The human brain categorizes, abstracts, interprets, and evaluates incoming stimuli in light of current states and goals as well as prior knowledge and predispositions.
“The human brain does not simply respond to stimuli (including people) in an invariant fashion, but rather it categorizes, abstracts, interprets, and evaluates incoming stimuli in light of current states and goals as well as prior knowledge and predispositions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The HPA axis includes a negative feedback mechanism to limit its circulating hormonal outputs.
“Unlike the adrenal medulla of the SAM axis, the adrenal cortex of the HPA axis is necessary for survival, and the HPA axis includes a negative feedback mechanism to limit its circulating hormonal outputs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The brain is the key organ of social connections and processes, and this should be true for other species for which sociality has been a central feature of life for millions of years.
“The idea that the brain is the key organ of social connections and processes should be true for other species for which sociality has been a central feature of life for millions of years.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The extent to which glucocorticoid receptors become insensitive to glucocorticoid signals is reflected in an attenuation of the established positive correlation between cortisol levels and the circulating neutrophil:lymphocyte and neutrophil:monocyte ratios.
“The rationale is that the extent to which the glucocorticoid receptors become insensitive (resistant) to glucocorticoid signals should be reflected in an attenuation of the established positive correlation between cortisol levels and the circulating neutrophil:lymphocyte and neutrophil:monocyte ratios.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cortisol acts on glucocorticoid receptors in leukocytes, leading to a suppression of proinflammatory gene networks.
“cortisol acts on the glucocorticoid receptors in leukocytes, leading to a suppression of proinflammatory gene networks”
The paper relies on this without support.
The brain is the key organ of social connections and processes.
“The brain is the key organ of social connections and processes”
The paper relies on this without support.
The same objective social relationship can be experienced as caring and protective or as exploitive and isolating.
“the same objective social relationship can be experienced as caring and protective or as exploitive and isolating”
The paper relies on this without support.
Social isolation has been a recognized major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in humans for more than a quarter of a century.
“Social isolation has been recognized as a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in humans for more than a quarter of a century.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Loneliness predicts increased morbidity and mortality even after adjusting for health behaviours (ibidem).”
From Exposed to events that never happen: generalized unsafety, the default stress response, and prolonged autonomic activity (2017) · cites this paper as Cacioppo et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“Evidence is growing for chronic autonomic (including low HRV) and endocrine stress responses in lonely animals and humans which likely mediates their health risk (ibidem; Hawkley et al., 2003).”
From Exposed to events that never happen: generalized unsafety, the default stress response, and prolonged autonomic activity (2017) · cites this paper as Cacioppo et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“Specifically, belonging to a cohesive and supporting social network or simply perceiving sufficient friendly people around appears vital (Cacioppo et al., 2015)”
From Exposed to events that never happen: generalized unsafety, the default stress response, and prolonged autonomic activity (2017) · cites this paper as Cacioppo et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“It is becoming particularly important to understand this given the emerging body of work demonstrating the detrimental effects of loneliness and social disconnection on physical and mental health (3, 64, 206).”
From A transdiagnostic perspective on social anhedonia (2019) · cites this paper as [206]
Citations
Cites
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641 · cited 1×
“As Button et al. (2013) detail, a small sample size reduces the likelihood of detecting a true effect (due to low statistical power), increases the likelihood that the effect size of a true effect is overestimated (due to the use of p < 0.05 to identify when an effect has been “detected” and the…”
BackgroundInfluentialSapolsky, R. M., Romero, L. M., & Munck, A. U. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389 · Cited by 7,541
Sapolsky, R. M. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.21.1.55 · Cited by 7,533
Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 · Cited by 7,272 · cited 1×
“…and perceived social isolation (i.e., loneliness) has been found to predict increased morbidity and mortality (e.g., Caspi et al. 2006, Holt-Lunstad et al. 2010, Patterson & Veenstra 2010, Penninx et al. 1997, Seeman 2000) even after adjusting for objective social isolation and health…”
BackgroundSocial Relationships and Health
House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3399889 · Cited by 7,073
Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.355 · Cited by 5,881
Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses
Ulrich-Lai, Y. M., & Herman, J. P. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2647 · Cited by 3,318
Stress and disorders of the stress system
Chrousos, G. P. (2009) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2009.106 · Cited by 3,215
Loneliness: the experience of emotional and social isolation
Weiss, R. S. (1974) · Cited by 2,513
Perceived social isolation and cognition
Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.005 · Cited by 2,144
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614568352 · Cited by 6,043
Guzik, T. J., MOHIDDIN, S. A., Dimarco, A. D., Patel, V., Savvatis, K., Marelli‐Berg, F. M., Madhur, M. S., Tomaszewski, M., Maffia, P., D’Acquisto, F., et al. (2020) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvaa106 · Cited by 1,484
Loneliness: clinical import and interventions
Cacioppo, S., Grippo, A. J., London, S., Goossens, L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615570616 · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationMore than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science
Epel, E. S., Crosswell, A. D., Mayer, S. E., Prather, A. A., Slavich, G. M., Puterman, E., & Mendes, W. B. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001 · Cited by 1,077
“For example, loneliness predicts earlier mortality (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015), and is associated with less salutary profiles of cortisol and inflammatory responses to acute stress (Cacioppo et al., 2015; Eisenberger et al., 2017; Hawkley and Cacioppo, 2010).”
BackgroundThe growing problem of loneliness
Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30142-9 · Cited by 897
Self-citationThe Neurobiology of Human Attachments
Feldman, R. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.007 · Cited by 839
Donovan, N. J., & Blazer, D. (2020) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2020.08.005 · Cited by 739
Holt‐Lunstad, J. (2022) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-110732 · Cited by 642
Mattioli, A. V., Sciomer, S., Cocchi, C., Maffei, S., & Gallina, S. (2020) · Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2020.05.020 · Cited by 540
Loss and Resilience in the Time of COVID‐19: Meaning Making, Hope, and Transcendence
Walsh, F. W. (2020) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12588 · Cited by 524
Schrempft, S., Jackowska, M., Hamer, M., & Steptoe, A. (2019) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-019-6424-y · Cited by 557
Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Cardiovascular Health
Xia, N., & Li, H. (2017) · Antioxidants and Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2017.7312 · Cited by 538
Loneliness in the Modern Age: An Evolutionary Theory of Loneliness (ETL)
Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2018) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.03.003 · Cited by 481
Self-citationThe effects of social isolation stress and discrimination on mental health
Brandt, L., Liu, S., Heim, C. C., & Heinz, A. (2022) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-022-02178-4 · Cited by 549
Lim, M. H., Eres, R., & Vasan, S. (2020) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7 · Cited by 438
Psychological Consequences of Social Isolation During COVID-19 Outbreak
Pietrabissa, G., & Simpson, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02201 · Cited by 475
Are loneliness and social isolation associated with cognitive decline?
Lara, E., Caballero, F. F., Rico‐Uribe, L. A., Olaya, B., Haro, J. M., Ayuso‐Mateos, J. L., & Miret, M. (2019) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.5174 · Cited by 423
The Stability and Change of Loneliness Across the Life Span: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies
Mund, M., Freuding, M. M., Möbius, K., Horn, N., & Neyer, F. J. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868319850738 · Cited by 417
Neurobiology and consequences of social isolation stress in animal model—A comprehensive review
Mumtaz, F., Khan, M. I., Zubair, M., & Dehpour, A. R. (2018) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.086 · Cited by 369
Hakulinen, C., Pulkki-Råback, L., Virtanen, M., Jokela, M., Kivimäki, M., & Elovainio, M. (2018) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312663 · Cited by 355
Lara, E., Martín-María, N., De la Torre-Luque, A., Koyanagi, A., Vancampfort, D., Izquierdo, A., & Miret, M. (2019) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2019.03.002 · Cited by 351
Stress and cancer: mechanisms, significance and future directions
Eckerling, A., Ricon-Becker, I., Sorski, L., Sandbank, E., & Ben-Eliyahu, S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00395-5 · Cited by 348
Lindsay, E. K., Young, S., Brown, K. W., Smyth, J. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1813588116 · Cited by 344
Smith, K. J., Gavey, S., Riddell, N. E., Kontari, P., & Victor, C. R. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.002 · Cited by 364
Dhabhar, F. S. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.004 · Cited by 377
Loneliness and risk of dementia
Sutin, A. R., Stephan, Y., Luchetti, M., & Terracciano, A. (2020) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gby112 · Cited by 331
(2018) · Acta bio-medica dell'Ateneo parmense/Acta biomedica · doi:10.23750/abm.v89i2.7404 · Cited by 329
Cole, S. W., Capitanio, J. P., Chun, K., Arevalo, J. M. G., Ma, J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1514249112 · Cited by 310
Self-citationDu Preez, A., Onorato, D., Eiben, I., Musaelyan, K., Egeland, M., Zunszain, P. A., Fernandes, C., Thuret, S., & Pariante, C. M. (2021) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.07.015 · Cited by 285
The Neuropeptide Tac2 Controls a Distributed Brain State Induced by Chronic Social Isolation Stress
Zelikowsky, M., Hui, M., Karigo, T., Choe, A., Yang, B., Blanco, M. R., Beadle, K., Gradinaru, V., Deverman, B. E., & Anderson, D. J. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.037 · Cited by 290
The major health implications of social connection
Holt-Lunstad, J. (2021) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721421999630 · Cited by 273
BROSSCHOT, J. F., Verkuil, B., & Thayer, J. F. (2016) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.04.012 · Cited by 299
Rafnsson, S. B., Orrell, M., d’Orsi, E., Hogervorst, E., & Steptoe, A. (2020) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx087 · Cited by 262
Maternal prenatal stress phenotypes associate with fetal neurodevelopment and birth outcomes
Walsh, K., McCormack, C. A., Webster, R., Pinto, A., Lee, S., Feng, T., Krakovsky, H. S., O’Grady, S. M., Tycko, B., Champagne, F. A., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1905890116 · Cited by 273
Towards a second-person neuropsychiatry
Schilbach, L. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0081 · Cited by 251
The gender gap in mental well-being at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from the UK
Etheridge, B., & Spantig, L. (2022) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104114 · Cited by 258
Brosschot, J., Verkuil, B., & Thayer, J. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15030464 · Cited by 244
Loneliness Across Phylogeny and a Call for Comparative Studies and Animal Models
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Cole, S. W., Capitanio, J. P., Goossens, L., & Boomsma, D. I. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614564876 · Cited by 241
Self-citationLoneliness, eudaimonia, and the human conserved transcriptional response to adversity
Cole, S. W., Levine, M. E., Arevalo, J. M. G., Ma, J., Weir, D. R., & Crimmins, E. M. (2015) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.07.001 · Cited by 238
Self-citationLiving Alone in Later Life: A Global Perspective
Reher, D., & Requena, M. (2018) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12149 · Cited by 234
Loneliness, social isolation, their synergistic interaction, and mortality.
Beller, J., & Wagner, A. (2018) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000605 · Cited by 217
Bower, J. E. (2019) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.31790 · Cited by 219
Social participation and risk of developing dementia
Sommerlad, A., Kivimäki, M., Larson, E. B., Röhr, S., Shirai, K., Singh-Manoux, A., & Livingston, G. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00387-0 · Cited by 207
Mund, M., Maes, M., Drewke, P. M., Gutzeit, A., Jaki, I., & Qualter, P. (2023) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911221077227 · Cited by 192
Brosschot, J. F., Verkuil, B., & Thayer, J. F. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.019 · Cited by 178
Wang, Y., Liu, M., Yang, F., Chen, H., Wang, Y., & Liu, J. (2024) · The Lancet Healthy Longevity · doi:10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.001 · Cited by 177
Malcolm, M., Frost, H., & Cowie, J. (2019) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-019-0968-x · Cited by 194
Loneliness and implicit attention to social threat: A high-performance electrical neuroimaging study
Cacioppo, S., Bangee, M., Balogh, S., Cardenas‐Iniguez, C., Qualter, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2015) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2015.1070136 · Cited by 173
Self-citationA transdiagnostic perspective on social anhedonia
Barkus, E., & Badcock, J. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00216 · Cited by 165
What is good grief support? Exploring the actors and actions in social support after traumatic grief
Cacciatore, J., Thieleman, K., Fretts, R. C., & Jackson, L. B. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252324 · Cited by 195
The role of oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease caused by social isolation and loneliness
Li, H., & Xia, N. (2020) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2020.101585 · Cited by 162
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on community-dwelling caregivers and persons with dementia.
Greenberg, N. E., Wallick, A., & Brown, L. M. (2020) · Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy · doi:10.1037/tra0000793 · Cited by 157
Liu, H., Zhang, M., Yang, Q., & Yu, B. (2020) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-019-01726-6 · Cited by 150
Digital Addiction: Increased Loneliness, Anxiety, and Depression
Peper, E., & Harvey, R. (2018) · NeuroRegulation · doi:10.15540/nr.5.1.3 · Cited by 151
Comparative studies of social buffering: A consideration of approaches, terminology, and pitfalls
Kiyokawa, Y., & Hennessy, M. B. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.12.005 · Cited by 136
Fulford, D., Campellone, T. R., & Gard, D. E. (2018) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.007 · Cited by 143
Philip, K. E. J., Polkey, M. I., Hopkinson, N. S., Steptoe, A., & Fancourt, D. E. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70483-3 · Cited by 142
Hakulinen, C. A., Pulkki-Råbäck, L., Jokela, M. M., Ferrie, J. E., Aalto, A., Virtanen, M., Mika Kivimaki, B., Vahtera, J., & Elovainio, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2015-206165 · Cited by 130
Trust in Social Media: Enhancing Social Relationships
Hatamleh, I. H. M., Safori, A. O., Habes, M., Tahat, O. M., Ahmad, A. K., Abdallah, R. A.-Q., & Aissani, R. A. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12070416 · Cited by 147
Social isolation and the brain: effects and mechanisms
Xiong, Y., Hong, H., Liu, C., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01835-w · Cited by 137
Cacioppo, S., Balogh, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.032 · Cited by 140
Self-citationSimpson, S., Simionato, G., Smout, M., van Vreeswijk, M., Hayes, C., Sougleris, C., & Reid, C. L. (2018) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2328 · Cited by 154
Arslantaş, H., Adana, F., Ergın, F., Kayar, D., & Acar, G. (2015) · PubMed Central · Cited by 121
Post-finasteride syndrome: a surmountable challenge for clinicians
Traish, A. M. (2020) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.030 · Cited by 129
The role of stress in drug addiction. An integrative review
Ruisoto, P., & Contador, I. (2019) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.01.022 · Cited by 132
Subramanian, I., Farahnik, J., & Mischley, L. K. (2020) · npj Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.1038/s41531-020-00128-9 · Cited by 126
Future Directions in Peer Relations Research
Prinstein, M. J., & Giletta, M. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2020.1756299 · Cited by 122
Rosenkranz, M. A., Antoine Lutz, A., Perlman, D., Bachhuber, D. R. W., Schuyler, B. S., MacCoon, D. G., & Davidson, R. J. (2016) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.02.013 · Cited by 120
Resilience training that can change the brain.
Tabibnia, G., & Radecki, D. (2018) · Consulting psychology journal · doi:10.1037/cpb0000110 · Cited by 124
Layden, E. A., Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Cappa, S. F., Dodich, A., Falini, A., & Canessa, N. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.050 · Cited by 118
Self-citationLiang, Y. Y., Chen, Y., Feng, H., Liu, X., Ai, Q. Y. H., Xue, H., Shu, X., Weng, F., He, Z., Ma, J., et al. (2023) · JACC Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2022.11.028 · Cited by 113
Abdellaoui, A., Chen, H., Willemsen, G. A. H. M., Ehli, E. A., Davies, G. E., Verweij, K. J. H., Nivard, M. G., de Geus, E. J. C., Boomsma, D. I., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2018) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12397 · Cited by 129
Self-citationNeurobiology of Loneliness, Isolation, and Loss: Integrating Human and Animal Perspectives
Vitale, E. M., & Smith, A. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2022.846315 · Cited by 127
Murínová, J., Hlaváčová, N., Chmelová, M., & Riečanský, I. (2017) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00101 · Cited by 110
Cacioppo, J. T., Chen, H. Y., & Cacioppo, S. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217705120 · Cited by 120
Self-citationYu, B., Steptoe, A., Chen, L.-J., Chen, Y.-H., Lin, C.-H., & Ku, P.-W. (2020) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000777 · Cited by 108
Nexhmedin Morina, B., Kip, A., Hoppen, T. H., Priebe, S., & Meyer, T. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042335 · Cited by 113
Loneliness in adolescence: Insights from Cacioppo's evolutionary model
Goossens, L. (2018) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12291 · Cited by 106
Schwaiger, M., Grinberg, M., Moser, D., Zang, J. C. S., Heinrichs, M., Hengstler, J. G., Rahnenführer, J., Cole, S. W., & Kumsta, R. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2016.57 · Cited by 107
Self-citationWalker, E., Ploubidis, G., & Fancourt, D. (2019) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2019.08.189 · Cited by 104
The Effect of Gender and Culture on Loneliness: A Mini Review
Rokach, A. (2018) · Emerging Science Journal · doi:10.28991/esj-2018-01128 · Cited by 109
The Pathophysiology of Perceived Social Isolation: Effects on Health and Mortality
Bhatti, A. B., & Haq, A. U. (2017) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.994 · Cited by 103
Phenome-wide investigation of health outcomes associated with genetic predisposition to loneliness
Abdellaoui, A., Sanchez‐Roige, S., Sealock, J., Treur, J. L., Dennis, J. K., Fontanillas, P., Elson, S. L., Nivard, M. G., Ip, H. F., van der Zee, M. D., et al. (2019) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddz219 · Cited by 106
Self-citationDaily cortisol activity, loneliness, and coping efficacy in late adolescence
Drake, E. C., Sladek, M. R., & Doane, L. D. (2015) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/0165025415581914 · Cited by 119
Genome-Wide Association Study of Loneliness Demonstrates a Role for Common Variation
Gao, J., Davis, L. K., Hart, A. B., Sanchez‐Roige, S., Han, L., Cacioppo, J. T., & Palmer, A. A. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2016.197 · Cited by 111
Self-citationNuyen, J., Tuithof, M., de Graaf, R., van Dorsselaer, S., Kleinjan, M., & ten Have, M. (2019) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-019-01778-8 · Cited by 116
Bushell, W. C., Castle, R. D., Williams, M. A., Brouwer, K., Tanzi, R., Chopra, D., & Mills, P. (2020) · Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2020.0177 · Cited by 78
Elovainio, M. J., Komulainen, K., Sipilä, P. N., Pulkki-Råbäck, L., Cachón-Alonso, L., Pentti, J., Nyberg, S. T., Suominen, S., Vahtera, J., Lipsanen, J. O., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(22)00253-5 · Cited by 94
Loneliness in schizophrenia and its possible correlates. An exploratory study
Trémeau, F., Antonius, D., Malaspina, D., GOFF, D. C., & Javitt, D. C. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.09.043 · Cited by 99
Parenteau, A. M., Boyer, C. J., Campos, L., Carranza, A. F., Deer, L. K., Hartman, D. T., Bidwell, J. T., & Hostinar, C. E. (2022) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579422000499 · Cited by 100
Genetic Contributions to Loneliness and Their Relevance to the Evolutionary Theory of Loneliness
Spithoven, A. W. M., Cacioppo, S., Goossens, L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618812684 · Cited by 106
Self-citationConnectome-based individualized prediction of loneliness
Feng, C., Wang, L., Li, T., & Xu, P. (2019) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsz020 · Cited by 90
The impact of workplace loneliness on employee outcomes: what role does psychological capital play?
Firoz, M., & Chaudhary, R. (2021) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-03-2020-0200 · Cited by 86
Lennartsson, C., Rehnberg, J., & Dahlberg, L. (2021) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2021.1976723 · Cited by 98
Donovan, M., Mackey, C. S., Platt, G. N., Rounds, J., Brown, A. N., Trickey, D. J., Liu, Y., Jones, K. M., & Wang, Z. (2020) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100278 · Cited by 85
Social neuroscience: undoing the schism between neurology and psychiatry
Ibáñez, A. M., García, A. M., Esteves, S., Yoris, A., Muñoz, É., Reynaldo, L., Pietto, M. L., Adolfi, F., & Manes, F. F. (2016) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2016.1245214 · Cited by 86
Nenov-Matt, T., Barton, B. B., Dewald‐Kaufmann, J., Goerigk, S. A., Rek, S. V., Zentz, K., Musil, R., Jobst, A., Padberg, F., & Reinhard, M. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.608476 · Cited by 92
How Does COVID-19 Affect the Neurobiology of Suicide?
Conejero, I., Nobile, B., Olié, É., & Courtet, P. (2021) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-021-01227-x · Cited by 86
A hypothalamic circuit underlying the dynamic control of social homeostasis
Liu, D., Rahman, M., Johnson, A., Amo, R., Tsutsui‐Kimura, I., Sullivan, Z. A., Pena, N., Talay, M., Logeman, B. L., Finkbeiner, S., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08617-8 · Cited by 89
Chirico, A., Lucidi, F., Galli, F., Giancamilli, F., Vitale, J. A., Borghi, S., Torre, A. L., & Codella, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02100 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Capitanio, J. P., & Cole, S. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095;
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2015-01-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 733-767
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- PMC
- PMC5130104
- OpenAlex
- W2133556218
- Cited by
- 977
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 103 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 19
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P51OD011107)
- National Institute on Aging (R37AG033590)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- social isolation, loneliness, neuroendocrinology, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, chronic stress, mortality risk, social bonds, perceived social isolation, genetic mechanisms, neurobiological mechanisms
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Humans, Loneliness, Social Isolation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review